User talk:Yairchaim

November 2014

Hello, I'm Ogress. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Treatment of bipolar disorder because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ogress _smash! 03:12, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to United States Military Academy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: United States Military Academy was changed by Yairchaim (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952307 on 2014-12-21T11:25:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Supreme Operations for Common Issues and Extraordinary Tasks Including Extreme Situations, the Global Intelligence Agency

Hello, Yairchaim. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Supreme Operations for Common Issues and Extraordinary Tasks Including Extreme Situations, the Global Intelligence Agency, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SOCIETIES-GIA can be an NGO, Company, or IGO or even a new religion.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yehuda ben guiga (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

There is no content here to review.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Yairchaim/Yehuda ben guiga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Schizotypal autism, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 05:14, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paradoxysm

The article Paradoxysm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NEO and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk 17:44, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Samsoncity (talk) 13:42, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Matrixism. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ... discospinster _talk 14:09, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yairchaim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am just trying to clear up the mystery of my leaving the U.S.M.A. while I was 19. it is mostly a medical mystery and spiritual mystery. you say i am not trying to build an online interactive encyclopdia but that is actually what i am doing. i am also a financial supporter of wikipedia in the hebrew language

Decline reason:

We do not care why you left the U.S.M.A. , and your donations to Wikipedia are wholly irrelevant.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:47, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unless newspapers and reliable sources that aren't associated with you have written about you leaving the USMA, it isn't notable enough for an article. And donators are treated no differently from non-donators (all Wikipedias are maintained by the same charity organisation). —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:44, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yairchaim (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was taking medication that had as the adverse effect cloudy thinking and impared thought patterns.now i am no longer taking this bad medicine but am taking natural meds instead. thanks and i apologize for the past behaviour on wikipedia

Decline reason:

That's great to know, but it's irrelevant to Wikipedia. See also WP:NOTTHERAPY. Talk page access revoked. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed}} is only for administrator use. Using it yourself isn't going to help you get unblocked. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]