Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 18
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) at 14:52, 27 February 2023 (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 14:52, 27 February 2023 by MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) (Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12))
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
July 18
[edit]Given the exact copyright, it is still candidate for deletion as it is a duplicate of PTCL-subtypes.jpg
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tinchy+Stryder+Tinchy+and+Amelle.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mikepepsi (notify | contribs).
- Image is being used on a musical single article but doesn't seem to be the cover of the single. Polly (Parrot) 02:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is being used on a musical single article and is a PROMOTIONAL PICTURE supporting the single release, which has no single cover as of yet. Mikepepsi (User talk:Mikepepsi) 03:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: The image is not a single cover, yet a promotional photo. Therefore being, it is unnecessary for this image to longer exist. • вяαdcяochat 06:21, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete bad fur, unencyclopedic, orphaned. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Carly-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leslie Roak (notify | contribs).
- Decorative image — TAnthonyTalk 03:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The picture does nothing to increase our understanding of the article's subject. AniMatedraw 00:45, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Docks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theboywhohasnolegs (notify | contribs).
- Delete: Uploader cannot be the copyright holder of this copyright image found all over the internet by tineye. ww2censor (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bearsbeataggies.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aboxorocks (notify | contribs).
- Uploader has extensive history of blatantly claiming copyrighted images as PD-self. No evidence that this is not a copyrighted image. Mosmof (talk) 04:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As much as I love this picture, it should be deleted due to the copyvios. Corpx (talk) 04:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete LOL. no evidence of permission, unencyclopedic, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Donnie22.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Forevergonzo618 (notify | contribs).
- Delete: orphaned image with copyright watermark which does not concur with the licence and is dependent on deleted article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Witt. ww2censor (talk) 04:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possible copyvio, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Donnie22smaller.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Forevergonzo618 (notify | contribs).
- Delete: orphaned image with copyright watermark which does not concur with the licence and is dependent on deleted article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Witt. ww2censor (talk) 04:41, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possible copyvio, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Donniewitt3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Forevergonzo618 (notify | contribs).
- Delete: orphaned image with copyright watermark which does not concur with the licence and is dependent on deleted article per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donnie Witt. ww2censor (talk) 04:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete possible copyvio, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 05:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, unencyclopedic B (talk) 05:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 04:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Womanizer Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Superpop (notify | contribs).
- Image fails WP:NFCC#3a as multiple covers are being used when one would suffice. This image does not convey significant information that would improve the readers' understanding of the subject. — Σxplicit 06:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Manchester Titans Roster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Barnett89 (notify | contribs).
- A team roster table in image form that is now redundant as I have replaced it with a Wikitext table here, attributing the author in the edit summary. Sherool (talk) 13:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The pigs 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Skinny Pigs (notify | contribs).
- Delete: orphaned image associated with previously deleted page [1]. ww2censor (talk) 17:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Commonsd to File:London Bus 236 at its terminus at Finsbury Park Station.jpg, all instances replaced - Peripitus (Talk) 06:40, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:London Bus 236 at its terminus at Finsbury Park Station.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Crest of London (notify | contribs).
- Delete: badly out of focus image of a London bus which is easily replaceable. ww2censor (talk) 18:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep True but we don't have a replacement. And I think having this version in the article is better than not having one. As a bonus, someone might think the same as you do and make a replacement, thus solving the problem the image has at the moment. Come to think of it, you simply could have asked the uploader to make a new image... Regards SoWhy 18:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Although it is out of focus, the image is still enough to identify the bus. When a clearer image is created, it can replace the current one. — Σxplicit 18:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm sure there are Wikipedians living in London who would be able to take a picture themselves. Mnmazur (talk) 19:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; as the image is free there is no policy that requires its deletion before a replacement is found. Stifle (talk) 22:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:CSD#F8.--Rockfang (talk) 20:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thisara Samarasinghe.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cossde (notify | contribs).
- Was at CSD as an replacable FU image but the explanation for why a free image cannot be taken is sufficiently interesting to be worthy of further debate Spartaz Humbug! 19:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- the reason provided was: The reason given is: Due to high level of security around senior military & government personal due to terrorist activity, only authorized people are allowed to take pictures. These would be either military or media personal. Hence a copy rights free image can not be found.
- Delete - the same argument could be used about thousands of living people and basically boils down to it being difficult to get an image. I can see no evidence that anyone has contacted his office asking for such an image, or considered any of the myriad of other ways to get a free image. I can also find no support online that the image is harder to obtain than, say, an image of a Indonesian, Indian or Pakistani military person with the same security concerns. That a free image does not exist NOW is not a reason to host one, the man is alive and a free image could be taken—though it may require significant effort. - Peripitus (Talk) 23:23, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Interesting explanation of why a Free image cannot be provided to make it worth discussing. was nominated at CSD as replaceable FU but the uploader asserts The status of Hezbollah as a terrorist organization in much of the world, combined with the fact that access to Hassan Nasrallah is understandably restricted by Hezbollah, makes creating a new picture of Hassan Nasrallah to license under a free liecense virtually impossible. Furthermore, a Google Image search for Hassan Nasrallah indicates, after searching through images on the first several pages, that no free-use images of Nasrallah exist. More information in the documented Free Use Rationale below. Mnmazur (talk) Spartaz Humbug! 19:15, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure what the protocol is, but as the uploader, I of course feel that my rationale is justified, and therefore would say to keep this file, assuming the uploader is allowed to put his two cents in in this situation :) - Also, links to Google Search and NFU Rationale mentioned. Mnmazur (talk) 19:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The man holds press conferences and speaks at what appear to be public rallys. He is well photographed at both and a free image could be created - Peripitus (Talk) 23:29, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Twisted Metal Head On Extra Twisted Edition PS2 Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Project FMF (notify | contribs).
- Identical to File:Twisted Metal Head On.jpg except for the platform banner. Mika1h (talk) 19:48, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Mika1h (talk) 19:50, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Flickr
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:45, 27 July 2009 (UTC) File:Walnutree Hospital Former Workhouse.jpg File:Southwell workhouse.jpg[reply]
I uploaded these flickr images but apparently they have the wrong creative commons licences. Could you please delete them. I'm not sure how to get rid of them Francium12 (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rain Pic Disc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Madonna92 (notify | contribs).
- The alternate cover is not discussed and is not of any importance. The use of a non-free image is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 23:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FifaCoversInOtherCountries.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Devoindahouse (notify | contribs).
- Delete - This is a composite of several copyrighted images. Since the images can be adequately described in the article text and there is already an image of the cover of the English version of the game, it is unlikely that this image would pass the Fair Use criteria. – PeeJay 23:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I think this one should be kept in favor of the English cover version, as this gives a better international perspective than ust the English one does. Mnmazur (talk)
- This is the English Wikipedia; there is no need for "international perspective". Furthermore, you are yet to address the issue of Fair Use for this image. – PeeJay 08:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While there is definitely a need for an international perspective (we're the English language encyclopedia, not the encyclopedia from an English/American point of view) this is clearly overuse. The international covers are not discussed, and, even if they were, this many would not need to be shown. The original cover is already used in the infobox, this file should clearly be deleted. J Milburn (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.