Talk:Ken Paxton
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ken Paxton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ken Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140109062336/http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe to http://elections.sos.state.tx.us/elchist.exe
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://team1.sos.state.tx.us/enr/results/mar04_169_state.htm?x=0&y=3948&id=969
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Removed false and defamatory material in violation of Wikipedia policies.
Removed entire introductory section making false, partisan claims about alleged acts of "insurrection." This false and defamatory material violates Wikipedia NPOV and Biographies of Living Persons policies.
172.56.42.108 (talk) 10:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Removed false and defamatory partisan claims related to alleged acts of "bribery." This false and defamatory material violates Wikipedia NPOV and Biographies of Living Persons policies.
Preserved mention in introduction of 2015 indictment related to alleged securities fraud charges. This is the only actual case of alleged criminal charges filed. All unsubstantiated, false, and defamatory claims against Paxton involving hearsay and speculation violate Wikipedia policy.
172.56.42.108 (talk) 10:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Repeated defamatory reverts by user violating Living Persons policy have been reported on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard.
172.56.42.108 (talk) 11:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- (talk), (talk), IP Users have been regularly scrubbing well-sourced text from this article, sometimes briefly, i.e., removing the word "false" from "false claims of election fraud," and disguising their edits by claiming in an edit summary, i.e., that they had just corrected a typo. I'm not sure how one gets an administrator to restrict edits at this (or any) article to autoconfirmed Users. Could either of you help? Thanks. Activist (talk) 18:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is where you go for that. Semi-protection is the usual block for IP editor vandalism, you can read Wikipedia:Rough guide to semi-protection. Semi-protection is usually pretty temporary, when first applied. And it is possible that the administrator will decide the vandalism problem is infrequent enough that it need not be applied. Anyway, that's the first level, and that's where you start. Also check out Wikipedia:Protection policy, to see what the different levels and varieties are. -- M.boli (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
How to declare his current job?
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
My understanding is that despite the impeachment, Paxton is still attorney general. He is just suspended pending the outcome of the trial in the Texas senate. I'm not sure it is best to list his time as attorney general as "until May 2023." I'm open to differing opinions. Esolo5002 (talk) 22:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
- I feel like we should mention that he has been suspended in the main article too. Death Editor 2 (talk) 22:24, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
impeachment paragraph in lead
I prefer the previous version because it showed the stunning speed with which this unfolded that surprised nearly everyone. They really wanted him gone right now. soibangla (talk) 03:57, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- So is he no longer Attorney General, unless the Senate acquits and he is restored? 331dot (talk) 08:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Soibangla: - hope your concerns will be assauged with this. [1] 331dot - he is still AG but suspended. For what's next, read [2]. starship.paint (exalt) 14:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Starship.paint, I don't see how 331dot's response, or yours, addresses my comment. The committee vote was a bolt from the blue, hours later on the same day articles were presented, a day later Paxton is impeached. That breathtaking speed alone is lead-notable to my thinking. The current lead doesn't even hint at how sudden and stunning this was. soibangla (talk) 14:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Soibangla: - Tuesday the investigation is revealed, Thursday the articles were presented, Saturday he is impeached. But if that is what you want to stress, then how about this? [3] starship.paint (exalt) 14:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- no one thought the investigation would lead to impeachment, the vote was Thurs dinnertime, articles came later that evening, they skip a day and impeach the next day. Wow! soibangla (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- My only question here was about his status, as the article suggests he is no longer AG, which is different from being suspended(though I know little about the Texas impeachment process). 331dot (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @331dot: - I've tried to fix the lede accordingly. [4] starship.paint (exalt) 15:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- well, I still prefer how the previous version laid it out chronologically, with the rapid pace shown, but oh well, that's all I got here. soibangla (talk) 15:29, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @331dot: - I've tried to fix the lede accordingly. [4] starship.paint (exalt) 15:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- My only question here was about his status, as the article suggests he is no longer AG, which is different from being suspended(though I know little about the Texas impeachment process). 331dot (talk) 15:11, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- no one thought the investigation would lead to impeachment, the vote was Thurs dinnertime, articles came later that evening, they skip a day and impeach the next day. Wow! soibangla (talk) 14:48, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Soibangla: - Tuesday the investigation is revealed, Thursday the articles were presented, Saturday he is impeached. But if that is what you want to stress, then how about this? [3] starship.paint (exalt) 14:33, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Starship.paint, I don't see how 331dot's response, or yours, addresses my comment. The committee vote was a bolt from the blue, hours later on the same day articles were presented, a day later Paxton is impeached. That breathtaking speed alone is lead-notable to my thinking. The current lead doesn't even hint at how sudden and stunning this was. soibangla (talk) 14:21, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Soibangla: - hope your concerns will be assauged with this. [1] 331dot - he is still AG but suspended. For what's next, read [2]. starship.paint (exalt) 14:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
- Should there be a seperate article about the impeachment trial itself, given the signficance it has in the political landscape beyond the biography of Paxton personally? AddInfinty (talk) 01:04, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe that can wait until there is a trial in August. Anon a mouse Lee (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's a great idea to start this now, something like, The impeachment of Ken Paxton which would be about the lead-up to the trial, as well as then the trial. Novellasyes (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Did the page exist for the Trump Impeachment prior to the Trial? If so then the same should apply to Paxton IMO. AddInfinty (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- There are multiple articles (7) about the Impeachment of Donald Trump, including one called the Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump which was started in September 2019, which was about four months before the first Trump impeachment trial, which took place in January 2020. The impeachment trial article was started in December 2019, a month before the trial started. Novellasyes (talk) 14:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, and with the Date set for September 5th, that means the article should be up in early August for a similar timeline. AddInfinty (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
- There are multiple articles (7) about the Impeachment of Donald Trump, including one called the Impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump which was started in September 2019, which was about four months before the first Trump impeachment trial, which took place in January 2020. The impeachment trial article was started in December 2019, a month before the trial started. Novellasyes (talk) 14:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
- Did the page exist for the Trump Impeachment prior to the Trial? If so then the same should apply to Paxton IMO. AddInfinty (talk) 22:29, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's WP:TOOSOON to consider splitting the article. I'd prefer to wait for the trial to start. Carguychris (talk) 23:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- I think it's a great idea to start this now, something like, The impeachment of Ken Paxton which would be about the lead-up to the trial, as well as then the trial. Novellasyes (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe that can wait until there is a trial in August. Anon a mouse Lee (talk) 16:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/20 November 2010
- Accepted AfC submissions
- C-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- C-Class American politics articles
- Unknown-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Texas articles
- Low-importance Texas articles
- WikiProject Texas articles
- C-Class US State Legislatures articles
- Unknown-importance US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject US State Legislatures articles
- WikiProject United States articles