Jump to content

Talk:Dani Evans

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Cewbot (talk | contribs) at 03:32, 14 February 2024 (Maintain {{WPBS}}: 5 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 5 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biography}}, {{WikiProject Fashion}}, {{WikiProject United States}}, {{WikiProject Television}}, {{WikiProject Women}}. Remove 1 deprecated parameter: importance.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Untitled

[edit]

She is so my role model i want yo be her!

SKS2K6 07:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I'm curious too? I'm confused. Peanutbuttercups 10:14, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its definately Evans.

Where's a source for this, if it is certain? -- ArkansasTraveler 21:04, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All the news articles as of late say "Danielle Evans has won ANTM".... SKS2K6 06:55, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Well I think that Danielle really didn't deserve to win

I thought Danielle totally deserved to win.

Inappropriate Tone Tag

[edit]

The current version of this page reads like a press kit biography. I am not going to get into a revert war, so I have instead tagged Evans' article. Elcda0 17:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE, Stop making this article brief!

[edit]

Why does someone keep changing the article to make it smaller? Danielle deserves to have a great article, to match her great achievments, so stop trying to make her sound really unimportant and minor, because she isn't. This article needs to say and note her experiences and achievments in TopModel and after, and someone keeps on making it really brief. What is really mean, is that she won ANTM, and Joanie's is somewhat bigger and goes into greater detail, so why isn't anyone changing hers. Or is someone just changing Danielle's to make Joanie look more successful and notable? I don't mean to sound mean, rude and intruding, but Danielle just deserves more, so can you please just stop making it brief, I spent alot of time creating her article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.100.217.253 (talkcontribs)

I know it sucks when you spend a lot of time creating an article only to have it changed, but that's the whole point of Wikipedia; it's an encyclopedia anyone can edit. Also, it's important to make a biographical article on a living person sound as neutral and encyclopedic as possible - this current version just isn't. Frankly, it's a mess - in addition to the unsourced, POV information, there are grammatical errors as well. Elcda0 17:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dani Evans is a new face for METROSTYLE catalog.

Photo?

[edit]

I'm surprised there's no photo of her here, she won quite some time ago.

  • Highlighting this again because the current image is set to be deleted due to lack of copyright information. Can someone come up with a fair use image for her? Rebochan 15:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:DanielleEvans.jpg

[edit]

Image:DanielleEvans.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:28, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]