User talk:Zigismon

Welcome!

Hi Zigismon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! CNMall41 (talk) 04:04, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:USGS modified from pierce, WG., and Rich, E.I. 1962.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:USGS modified from pierce, WG., and Rich, E.I. 1962.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:30, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Salina Group

Hello Zigismon. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Salina Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not valid speedy criteria listed. Use other deletion methods instead. Thank you. BangJan1999 18:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tioga Bentonites has been accepted

Tioga Bentonites, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moving to draft

Please read WP:ATD-I before moving articles to draft. The last line there says "Older articles should not be draftified without an AfD consensus, with 90 days a rule of thumb." Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More information can be found at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Proposal to ban draftifying articles more than 90 days old without consensus. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 08:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syracuse Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Lockport Group

Hello Zigismon. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Lockport Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. BangJan1999 00:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I politely disagree. This is a cookie cutter template that basically says the same thing 3 times for the same geologic unit. Only altering the location and the name slightly "Lockport Formation" "Lockport Group" and "Lockport Dolomite" I could copy and paste the body of this and change the name to cover almost any clastic unit in the world. Zigismon (talk) 00:56, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guelph Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolomite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Allegany Group

You moved Allegheny Formation to Allegheny Group, which is fine, but you did not rewrite the article to present it as a group. If you do not intend to do that, it should probably be reverted to Formation. There are plenty of sources that list it as such. Jstuby (talk) 22:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black River Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolomite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eramosa Member, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolomite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harrell Shale

You have changed the article on the Harrell Shale from a Formation to a Group. All the references in the article state it is a Formation. Please add a reference that states that it is now a Group, or it may get reverted. Jstuby (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Monongahela Group

I reverted your edit to Monongahela Group because the subject is not notable. We need significant coverage in multiple, independent reliable sources. You could read WP:SPINOUT regarding developing this content in the larger article before attempting a standalone article. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Monongahela Formation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennsylvanian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

bare urls

Please don't add bare url template to the pages where there is none. Egeymi (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genesee Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Zigismon. Thank you for your work on St Clair Limestone (geologic formation). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 13:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo Wallow Group

Hi there - could I ask you to provide the complete citation for "Malott (1925)" in that article? Currently this reference is all but useless because the reader has next to no chance of finding the text based on the information given. Cheers! --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Muscatatuck Group

Hello, I thought as much to inquire why the redirect of North Vernon Limestone and Sellersburg Limestone to Muscatatuck Group. There was no page move/ redirect discussion and hence, I have reverted your edits till further notice as the article you merged them to doesn't provide credible sources for verification. Please note that you should not merge such articles except with seeking request for move or redirect. Such can be edit war and may cause block. Happy editing! Otuọcha (talk) 07:14, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to clean up and consolidate articles that contain little or no information. There are many articles that should have never made it out of draft since the information is incomplete and frankly inaccurate. I am working on filling out the information for the groups. Often there are formations that are not really noteworthy outside of their geologic group. Zigismon (talk) 23:43, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Hello. I enjoyed reading your created page on the Knox Supergroup, and I appreciate the effort you put in to make the page aesthetically pleasing as well! Keep up the great work. Cheers! Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. This really means a lot to me! Zigismon (talk) 01:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muscatatuck Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dolomite.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chronostratigraphy templates

Template:Chronostratigraphy of Arkansas Template:Chronostratigraphy of Oklahoma Template:Chronostratigraphy of Kansas Template:Chronostratigraphy of Missouri

What are these templates meant to be for? ★Trekker (talk) 20:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to fill them out in a bit. There are ones for several other States, so I just got them started to begin filling out. Zigismon (talk) 13:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Zigismon. Thank you for your work on the Munising Group. Ingratis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi, Zigismon. Thanks for creating this article. I have marked it as reviewed. Best wishes, Ingratis (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ingratis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Ingratis (talk) 05:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Boyle Group

Hello Zigismon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Boyle Group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Grahaml35 (talk) 02:43, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the speedy deletion tag. Thanks for this article! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 05:20, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]