User talk:Ssgapu22

Welcome

Hello, Ssgapu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rijin (talk) 11:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gapu

Hello Ssgapu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gapu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rijin (talk) 11:34, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gapu

Hello Ssgapu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gapu for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rijin (talk) 12:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Rijin (talk) 12:45, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gapu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gapu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bentogoa (talk) 13:15, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Gapu. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Bentogoa (talk) 13:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gapu, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 13:31, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not social media

Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a place like Facebook where anyone can have a page. If you pass WP:BIO, and this can be proved with reliable independent sources WP:RS, you mey be eligible for an article - but very few students have that sort of notability. In fact, few people of any age have it. Peridon (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ssgapu, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ssgapu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Vedhika

Your addition to Vedhika has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I had used that pic from commons Wikimedia. And I didn't have any idea about that picture. And I had not upload that picture to the commons. -Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 12:12, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benchmark (October 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no independent references.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benchmark and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Benchmark concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Benchmark, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Benchmark

Hello, Ssgapu22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benchmark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pupul Bhuyan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pupul Bhuyan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 09:05, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @GSS:, can you please check this article again. I had created the article in Odia some months before and due to lack of references in English media, I hadn't created this in English. But she won one title, that's why I got some more references and did this here. There are lots of references in Odia newspapers, but here English is required that's why we are using Englsih news references only.Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There are no such restrictions and you can cite sources in any language but those sources must be reliable, please see WP:RS to know how you can identify reliable sources and can support your draft. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS:, sources are use to varify an article, that's why we use English references, so ope person could get the proof. And the references I've added are from some reliable sources like Orissa Post and My city links. And others I use from internet. Hope this would make this article reliable. -Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No the sources are not reliable so I have declined the submission. GSS (talk) 11:16, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pupul Bhuyan (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pupul Bhuyan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Pupul Bhuyan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk) 11:14, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[SVG Translation Campaign 2019 India] Feedback survey

Greetings,

Many thanks for participating in the SVG Translation Campaign 2019 in India. It had been quite a successful campaign—194 users from 19 Indic languages took part in the campaign for 38 days, and have created more than 2,500 SVG files, all of them having labels in native Indian languages. You may read the complete report of the campaign at https://w.wiki/3yn.

We would like to thank you again for translating SVG files as a part of this campaign, your contributions have given thousands of people the knowledge that they need the most. Now we would like to have your feedback about the overall campaign, how effective were the training sessions, the resources provided, the support etc.

Please fill the feedback survey at https://forms.gle/4TCicfYzjAGVvKTy6

Your responses are extremely valuable to us, and will be of immense help to understand further training needs or plan future activities in this area. Let us know if you have any questions.

Please note that 4 August 2019 is the last date to complete the survey. Regards, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:08, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pupul Bhuyan

Hello, Ssgapu22. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pupul Bhuyan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 03:30, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looking for help

Hi,

I was looking for some small help. I created an article en:Kithaab (Bengali bn:কিতাব (নাটক)/Hindi hi:किताब (नाटक)) -a play about women rights issues- which has been copy edited and is ready for translation in various languages. Looking for your possible help in translating the article en:Kithaab to your ଓଡ଼ିଆ language Wikipedia. If you are unable to spare time yourself then may be you like to refer the same to some other translator.

Thanking you , with warm regards

Bookku (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional edits?

Hi. The edit at [1] and several other places appear to be promoting a website with which you have some involvement. Please note that this is contrary to the policies of Wikipedia and can result in your being blocked and other undesirable effects on your website. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:14, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hi Ssgapu22! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 15:15, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Hi Gappu. I have created the article Draft:Utkal Sahitya Samaj, the oldest literary institute in Odisha. There are very less details available about this institute. Can you find out some details and and into article ? I am not so good at searching sources.Pratikbhansali123 (talk) 11:08, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Sharma (singer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gaurav Sharma (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Notability is not justified by available references. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 11:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav Sharma (singer) has been accepted

Gaurav Sharma (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--VersaceSpace 🌃 02:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gaurav Sharma (singer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gaurav Sharma (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Only Tribune India's source has reliable and indepth coverage about the subject. Remaining sources are either interviews or trivial mention of the subject. Dial911 (talk) 16:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pupul Bhuyan moved to draftspace

It appears that you may have a conflict of interest with the subject of Pupul Bhuyan, and as such you should submit this article to be published through the Articles for Creation process. Before editing the article further, please first disclose on your user page and on the article's Talk page whether you have received money to write this or other articles on Wikipedia, or if you have any other kind of conflict of interest concerning the subject. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Before submitting, you should make sure that the article is fully compliant with Wikipedia’s neutrality and verifiability policies, as well as our notability guidelines. When you’re ready, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. This process is encouraged, but optional. If you choose not to participate in it, you can remove the AfC template and move the article back to mainspace. You should also consider reaching out to the Teahouse for additional feedback and aid from experienced editors. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:44, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rosguill, I don't know how you come to this point that I've taken money from them to create articles. Though, I'm not creating or editing articles on English Wikipedia, but there is an Odia Wikipedia, where I usually create articles everyday and this girl is from the Odia film Industry. So after 4 years again I though to create the article in English. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 10:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have claimed File:Pupul Bhuyan after winning Opera Mrs India Global.jpg as your own work, which would suggest that you have at a minimum met in person with the subject. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because, I use to attend different programs and all those photographs I've uploaded are taken from different places. By the way, this photo was taken at some news studio, where I went for some work. I usually click photographs of different actors, writers, politicians from different places like stage shows, music studios, news room, etc. Rosguill, you can check my contribution on Commons also. And since I'm a regular contributor on Odia Wikipedia, I use to write articles and also click photographs if I get a chance to click them. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 05:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid this does not clarify whether or not you have a COI. Did you take the photo and/or write the article as part of your work? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rosguill, I don't know how to clarify this. I had written the same article in Odia language in 2018 and that too during an edit-a-thon. And yes, I have not uploaded those photographs before, but while writing it here again, I have uploaded some photographs to commons. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 18:35, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like you to clarify this statement: By the way, this photo was taken at some news studio, where I went for some work. Was taking the photos or writing the articles part of a paid job? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:53, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not my job. I went there to meet a friend of mine who works there. During that time, she was there. So clicked this one. Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 03:16, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm satisfied with these responses, feel free to move the article back to mainspace. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gaurav Sharma (singer) has been accepted

Gaurav Sharma (singer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 21:58, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Pichemist. I don't know why they are moving it to draft space again and again. I really appreciate your work. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 03:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dayanidhi Das

The article Dayanidhi Das has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage on them to show they pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Onel5969, this person is one of the notable Odissi dance teacher who created the 1st syllabus in 1952-53. And there is a dance form he initiated that. Even, the references (books, journals) describing that. And yes, he died in 1979, so there are not much media coverage right now. In Odia language, there are not much books available on Internet till now. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 11:51, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As it stands, there is not enough in-depth coverage to show they pass notability. Do you think you will be able to include any further sourcing? Do you want me to move it to draft so you can work on it? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I asked a few of my friends to find some books on him. Give me some time, otherwise it's okay to move it to draft space. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 11:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Odia films of 2023 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Odia films of 2023. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

MPGuy2824, this article is the list of movies released in 2023 in Odia-language. Yes, during the creation, I had not added any sources. But now, added a few sources and it would be updated regularly till the end of 2023. If possible, then move this to main-space, because the review takes long time. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 05:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think that you should be able to move the page to mainspace yourself. Please clean up the invalid template/s before you do and add the article to the relevant wikiprojects after the move. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to the mainspace. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dayanidhi Das moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dayanidhi Das, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dayanidhi Das for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dayanidhi Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dayanidhi Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:26, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Phalguna Chaitra moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Phalguna Chaitra, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:13, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article

I would like to say thank you for creating Partha Sarathi Ray (my draft had been rejected). Can you help with Draft:Suna Panjuri? DareshMohan (talk) 21:59, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the character names of Hakim Babu and poster? DareshMohan (talk) 07:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phalguna Chaitra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phalguna Chaitra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phalguna Chaitra until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 05:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Awwww... - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 06:37, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Subodh Patnaik (disambiguation)

Hello, Ssgapu22, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Karnataka, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Subodh Patnaik (disambiguation), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subodh Patnaik (disambiguation).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Karnataka}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Karnataka ^talk 20:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karnataka. Actually I had created this disambiguation page on Odia Wikipedia, as there are three people till now with the same name. Two are there on Wiki and there is one actor which is not written here. So, I had created the same on English Wikipedia. If it is not necessary now, I don't have any issues to delete this one. -Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 07:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ssgapu22 no problem. Disambiguation pages are usually created when there is no primary topic, however Subodh Patnaik the screenwriter has been allocated as the primary topic, with the other person being mentioned at the top of the article.

I cannot delete pages, and any page that doesn't meet speedy deletion criteria has to be discussed - which is what I have done now.

If you feel the third person is notable enough, feel free to create that article here and there would be no issues with the disambiguation page. See Wikipedia:Disambiguation for more information, thank you so much! — Karnataka ^talk 10:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about S3 Movies

Hello, Ssgapu22, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username DreamRimmer, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, S3 Movies, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S3 Movies.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 14:29, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to mail

As per WP:NFO, a film is considered notable if it has received full-length reviews by atleast two nationally known critics or if it meets any other criterias listed under the guideline. I cannot find any credible reviews for the film Pushkara. Thilsebatti (talk) 04:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thilsebatti, this movie is in Odia-language. And for Odia movies, nobody from the national level media covers the news, there is no chance for a critics review. - Sangram Keshari Senapati (talk) 06:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I can only stick with the policies. I'm pinging DreamRimmer, who is more of an expert in movie related articles. Thilsebatti (talk) 06:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Phalguna Chaitra

Hello, Ssgapu22. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Phalguna Chaitra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]