Jump to content

Talk:Chanakya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Rasnaboy (talk | contribs) at 17:35, 19 June 2024 (Undid revision 1229671416 by Mohit atulkar (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Change Title or Name of page

[edit]

It is submitted that the title of the page may henceforth be edited to Rishi Chanakya.

"Rishi" is a title from ancient Vedic Culture era. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TejeshwarTaneja (talk • contribs) 22:39, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Chanakya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:27, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Chanakya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:16, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jurist?

[edit]

Cannot find credible source which lists him as being a jurist. For this reason I am removing the term jurist being applied to him. Lets keep this article factual please, thanks.Andiar.rohnds (talk) 22:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read Chanakya written arthashasthra and chanakya neeti you will understand 21aryan (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Professor Chanayka?

[edit]

Professor Chanakya?

That jokers are writing into the article pages of Wikipedia is a known thing.

However, calling a Chanakya professor would be the height of irresponsible writing. Very few academicians do have the originality to create anything like Arthashastra. Generally academicians are apt is parroting other peoples ideas.

It is a terrible act to define great thinkers with the definition meant for rank mediocre individuals. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.214.29.163 (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While agree that western writers are blind to things outside of their culture. Perhaps, giving them the benefit of the doubt we could consider that since Chankaya did teach at Takshasila and was an "Acharya" then that could be translated as "professor." Just a thought.24.139.24.163 (talk) 16:15, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chanakya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2018

[edit]

1. Change the last sentence of the first paragraph from, "His works were lost near the end of the Gupta Empire and not rediscovered until the early twentieth century.[4]", to, "His works were lost near the end of the Gupta Empire until rediscovered in 1905 by a librarian R. Shamasastry, who translated Chanakya's Arthashstra into English.[4][5]"

2. Insert a new reference [5] for R. Shamasastry's work referred to above, as follows: "5. R. Shamasastry's translation of Arthashastra: https://ia802703.us.archive.org/13/items/Arthasastra_English_Translation/Arthashastra_of_Chanakya_-_English.pdf" Comp ounding (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The source for these claims cannot be the work itself. They must come from a third party. Spintendo      22:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate the attention to my suggested edits. Taking into account the objection raised to the original edit, I suggest the following changes to improve the specificity of the information in the sentence. With the suggested change, the specificity of the original sentence is improved by replacing the vague date of "not rediscovered until the early twentieth century" by the precise year when they were discovered (1905) and by whom (R. Shamasastry). In addition, the change also allows linking R. Shamasastry's name to the existing Wikipedia page on him. Thus,

1. Change the last sentence of the first paragraph from, "His works were lost near the end of the Gupta Empire and not rediscovered until the early twentieth century.[4]", to, "His works were lost near the end of the Gupta Empire until rediscovered in 1905 by the librarian R. Shamasastry [4]"

2. Hyperlink R. Shamasastry's name to the wikipedia page: 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R._Shamasastry#The_discovery'

Thanks! Comp ounding (talk) 11:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Comp ounding:, the message Spintendo left wasn't about the reason for your edit or its usefulness, it was about sourcing. Claims in Wikipedia articles should be supported by reliable, third-party sources and linking to Shamasastry's translation of Chanakya as evidence that Shamasastry found Chanakya's writing is not useful. I was able to find a source and have added the information to the Literary works section. According to the manual of Style, the lead only summarizes claims made in the body text. Claims requiring support should be in the body text with their sources. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong birthplace

[edit]

The birthplace shows as Taxila, Pakistan. Pakistan as a country only came into existence in 1947. It should rightfully be Takshashila (Taxila), Ancient India. Prashan.as (talk) 06:31, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 23 March 2021

[edit]

Chanakya was Born in Patliputra. And he moved Takshila to study and then became a teacher in Takshila Dharmo rakshoti (talk) 17:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is correct. He was born in Patliputra, the capitol of Maghadha and went to Takshasila to study, before going back to Pataliutra.24.139.24.163 (talk) 16:18, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please provide sourcing for anything you'd like added to the article. Thanks. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Kutayuddha into Chanakya

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The Result was Oppose. In 24 days, only one comment on this proposal. Closure is indicated. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Under the section titled "Chanakyan vocabulary", kutayuddha will be provided with more context. The sources currently in the article for Kutayuddha such as Kaushik Roy's 2015 book (Cambridge University Press) have a chapter titled "Kautilya's Kutayuddha" and Giri Deshingkar has titled his piece "Strategic Thinking of Kautilya and Sun Zi", again pointing to Kautilya. DTM (talk) 06:24, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why just philospher

[edit]

Acharya Chanakya Is All side of thinker Wether its political science or war feild or either creating akhand bharta Acharya Chanakya Skillful in evry feild 21aryan (talk) 18:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chankya didn’t create Akhanda Bharat. He only helped Chandragupta Mauryan empire. Mauryan empire didn’t even reach its peak during his time. It reached peak during Ashoka. ChandlerMinh (talk) 07:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Info

[edit]

Please don't put wrong information 21aryan (talk) 05:27, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kehna kyaa chaahte ho… ChandlerMinh (talk) 07:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 July 2022

[edit]

Please Sumit Halzed (talk) 07:35, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done It's not clear what your request is. Please use "Change X to Y" format. Adakiko (talk) 08:26, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Social

[edit]

Chanakya 103.24.22.34 (talk) 16:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2023

[edit]

Plays--Adityatejwani (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Indian television actor Manoj Joshi has been doing the role of Chanakya in the play that goes by the same name since 1990 . Initially starting in Gujarati language , it was enacted in Hindi since 1993-94 and since then it has been enacted more than a thousand times till 2018 across various Indian cities and platforms in theatres and colleges . Today Joshi who is now a padmashree still plays the lead role in the play inspiring millions across India.[reply]

Source https://m.rediff.com/amp/movies/special/he-has-played-chanakya-1039-times/20180310.htm

https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/television/manoj-joshi-has-grand-plans-for-silver-jubilee-of-play-chanakya/lite/

https://m.timesofindia.com/tv/news/hindi/manoj-joshi-has-been-playing-chanakya-since-24-years/articleshow/45660396.cms

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chankay_Play_Manoj_Joshi.JPG[[1]] Adityatejwani (talk) 19:54, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IP edit request

[edit]

This is an edit request that an IP left on my user-talk page. But I'm not clear (at all) on what the IP is asking for. Can anyone help? – S. Rich (talk) 22:30, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"== Chanakya == Please! correct an information about chanakya he belongs to "Bhumihar Brahmin" not "Brahmin" caste. [[Special:Contributions/2409:408A:2B85:BFB4:0:0:3B88:3009|2409:408A:2B85:BFB4:0:0:3B88:3009]] ([[User talk:2409:408A:2B85:BFB4:0:0:3B88:3009|talk]]) 14:10, 16 June 2023 (UTC)"

Dates of birth and death

[edit]

Hello dear Wikipedia, After consulting the cited sources I couldn’t find any proof for the given dates of birth and death. The dates itself lack any citation. Where did the dates come from and is there a source? Many publications give random dates somewhere around the time given in the article. But I couldn’t find a source yet to illustrate how these dates came to be. Flaverius (talk) 10:28, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chanakya&oldid=1229954031"