Talk:Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered. |
![]() | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
![]() | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Israeli bombing of the Gaza Strip at the Reference desk. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by reviewer, closed by Narutolovehinata5 talk 11:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- ... that Israel's bombing of Gaza has been compared to history's most destructive bombing campaigns, including the bombings of Dresden and Cologne? Source: Financial Times
- ALT1: ... that the Israeli military is using an artificial intelligence system dubbed "the Gospel" to select targets for its Bombing of Gaza? Source: The Guardian
- Reviewed: [[]]
Created by CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk). Self-nominated at 07:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Bombing of Gaza; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- General eligibility:
- New enough:
- Long enough:
- Not met, per WP:DYKSPLIT
- Other problems:
-
Splits from non-new articles are ineligible, but if the copied text does not exceed one-fifth of the total prose size, the article can be considered eligible as a fivefold expansion of the copied text.
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- There is a lot of imprecise language: "Experts stated", "Experts warned", "Public health experts", unqualified uses of "large" etc. Needs a thorough copyedit.
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
- Other problems:
- Combined with the above imprecise language throughout, the article needs a thorough copy edit.
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Unfortunately, this article is currently ineligible for DYK as the majority of its content has been sourced from other Wikipedia articles, and as far as I can tell the 5x expansion requirement for this kind of DYK has not been met. My recommendation is to nominate the article at GA as this would mean the article would meet the third newness clause:
promoted to good article status;
Seddon talk 22:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Damage in Gaza Strip during the October 2023 - 29.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 16, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-03-16. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 8.8% of all FPs. 14:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
The bombing of Gaza is an ongoing aerial bombardment campaign on the Gaza Strip by the Israeli Air Force during the Israel–Hamas war. During the bombing, which began on 7 October 2023 after a Hamas-led attack on Israel, airstrikes have damaged Palestinian mosques, schools, hospitals, refugee camps, and civilian infrastructure. The campaign has been compared to other major historical bombing campaigns, including the bombings of Dresden and Tokyo during World War II. This photograph shows damage following an Israeli airstrike on the neighborhood of Rimal in Gaza City on 9 October 2023. Photograph credit: Wafa / APAimages
Recently featured:
|
Hamas run casualties
There is an ongoing disagreement between editors about whether "Per Hamas:" should be included on the casualty count for this article.
- Yes – As the editor who added it. In similar-style of articles where one side directly involved in the conflict states the casualties, that said is also mentioned. Examples of this include Siege of Mariupol ("Per Russia" / "Per Ukraine"), Battle of Kherson ("Per Russia"), and even for this conflict with the Siege of Khan Yunis having "Per Israel" & "Per Hamas". This was removed by CarmenEsparzaAmoux with the reasoning, "discussed extensively on related talks". That is not a valid reason for removal as each article and topic must be discussed individually unless a Wikipedia-wide consensus for the conflict for it takes place. A large discussion has not taken place as far as I am aware, and other articles in this conflict have notes when one side of the conflict states the casualties. I !vote to restore this until a community consensus decides not to specifically either in relation to the Israel-Hamas war (affecting all articles under it) or it is removed from all war infoboxes (very unlikely). Do to CTOPS nature, I am not restoring it for at least 24 hours if no responses are given here. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 18:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- TL;DR – Support !vote for the Infobox format and layout as of this edit with an oppose !vote to the layout as of this edit, the current layout. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- No – I don't have any issue with a note similar to the one used on the Israel–Hamas war infobox: "Per Gaza Health Ministry, the total number of deaths are 31,553" with a breakdown listed below. Just searching that page's talk archive for the term "Hamas-run" comes up with multiple discussions about using the phrase "Hamas-run" prior to the GHM: Updating language: The term "Hamas-run", RFC on infobox casualties, Why are we using Hamas casualty figures for civilians?, infobox attribution inline. This is all to say that although there is no Wiki-wide consensus, this exact topic has been discussed at length by many more editors on the main war page than are likely to contribute here. Neither the term "per Hamas" nor "per Hamas-run GHM" are included in the infobox there in regards to the GHM or total civilian casualty counts, so I would be strongly disinclined to introduce that language here. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CarmenEsparzaAmoux: — In that case, would you restore that part of the addition then? I do not want to as that is a reversion, but we both seem to be in agreement a “Per GHM” is acceptable. Note, I still believe “Per Hamas” is better and I will let others comment on that, but “Per GHM” should be added/restored. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @WeatherWriter I actually never removed that part of the addition! Per GHM is included now as a footnote, similar to how the Israel-Hamas war infobox currently displays the information. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok then we still don't fully agree on the format then. The footnote is not actually the standard method. The Template:Israel–Hamas war infobox even shows that, where it says "Per Israel" or "Per Hamas" format outside of a footnote. As I stated in my "Yes" !vote earlier, that is used on tons of other articles like the Battle of Kherson or even Siege of Khan Yunis. The format which you removed should be like this:
- Per the Gaza Health Ministry:
- That is the standard format for casualty articles, which is also used in the Israel-Hamas war infobox. Basically, what I'm asking you to restore is the bolded "Per" format, removing the enf note, which is not the standard format. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think where there might be a little oversight here is that there's a slight but important distinction made in the format used based on casualty type. I'm not sure when the decision was made, but the bolding "Per" format is used for Palestinian militant casualty totals as provided by Hamas (you will see that in the article and template you posted above), while the footnote format is standard when discussing GHM casualty counts within the Gaza Strip. Since we're discussing GHM numbers from within Gaza in this article, I think using the latter format makes more sense. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 22:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess we shall have to agree to disagree on that then. I will be keeping an eye on this discussion to see if and/or when other editors comment or !vote about this. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds good. Overall, I think you're absolutely right that a consensus on standardization across articles is a great idea (even if we disagree on what that standardization should be!) CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 22:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I guess we shall have to agree to disagree on that then. I will be keeping an eye on this discussion to see if and/or when other editors comment or !vote about this. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 22:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think where there might be a little oversight here is that there's a slight but important distinction made in the format used based on casualty type. I'm not sure when the decision was made, but the bolding "Per" format is used for Palestinian militant casualty totals as provided by Hamas (you will see that in the article and template you posted above), while the footnote format is standard when discussing GHM casualty counts within the Gaza Strip. Since we're discussing GHM numbers from within Gaza in this article, I think using the latter format makes more sense. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 22:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok then we still don't fully agree on the format then. The footnote is not actually the standard method. The Template:Israel–Hamas war infobox even shows that, where it says "Per Israel" or "Per Hamas" format outside of a footnote. As I stated in my "Yes" !vote earlier, that is used on tons of other articles like the Battle of Kherson or even Siege of Khan Yunis. The format which you removed should be like this:
- @WeatherWriter I actually never removed that part of the addition! Per GHM is included now as a footnote, similar to how the Israel-Hamas war infobox currently displays the information. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 20:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CarmenEsparzaAmoux: — In that case, would you restore that part of the addition then? I do not want to as that is a reversion, but we both seem to be in agreement a “Per GHM” is acceptable. Note, I still believe “Per Hamas” is better and I will let others comment on that, but “Per GHM” should be added/restored. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 20:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Health Ministry In Hamas-run Gaza Says War Death Toll At 30,717". Barron's. Agence France Presse. Retrieved 9 March 2024.
- ^ Choukeir, Jana. "30,717 Palestinians killed in Israeli offensive, Gaza health ministry says". Reuters. Retrieved 9 March 2024.
- ^ Bland, Archie (8 January 2024). "The numbers that reveal the extent of the destruction in Gaza". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 20 February 2024. Retrieved 20 February 2024.
Oregon University?
The introduction mentions an article published by the Guardian and conducted by researchers at CUNY and Oregon State University. Can someone with admin privileges please change the hyperlink text from "Oregon University" to "Oregon State University"? Thank you! Wschreyer (talk) 04:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Implemented CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 15:06, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Casualties only from the bombing
To date I have not come across any list of casualties that are only from the bombing and not from other Israeli operations. The exception here is this report considers casualties only from "explosive weapon use". Its conclusion is that there have been 15,797 civilian casualties. It doesn't have the complete demographic breakdown, but the partial demographic breakdown it has suggests the civilian casualties are: 25% men, 25% women and 50% children. VR (Please ping on reply) 08:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Strela etc
I'm not sure why Strela, Igla etc are mentioned in the infobox. MANPADs are incapable of shooting down high flying aircraft, certainly not F-35s. I don't recall any such incident either. I'm removing this.VR (Please ping on reply) 08:28, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
70,000 tons?
That number is sourced from a report from “Euro Med Monitor”, and then another article from a Turkish news outlet which is also quoting that report. I don’t know who Euro Med Monitor is, but their report does not read like a neutral, objective, or rigorous finding. The only part in the report addressing this figure is this sentence:
“It is estimated that Israel has dropped more than 70,000 tons of explosives on the Gaza Strip"
There is no methodology and it’s not even clear who is doing this estimation.
I’m not familiar with this Turkish news outlet, but I could not RS quoting this figure from this NGO. It seems rather unlikely, and not a number Wikipedia should be suggesting is a fact. Telecart (talk) 17:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
- Exact my thoughts. This should be changed in the article immediately. Half volley dropshot (talk) 22:09, 20 June 2024 (UTC)
- Third citation is from a Robert Pape article in Foreign Affairs. Relevant quote is "Israel has... dropped at least 70,000 tons of bombs on the territory (surpassing the combined weight of bombs dropped on London, Dresden, and Hamburg in all of World War II)". CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 21:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding a third source but I don’t think it helps; the reference to Dresden etc. suggests to me he’s referencing this article in Wikipedia rather than having any independently validated RS for this reference. Certainly there’s nothing in the article to suggest any methodology that Pape researched this figure himself. Telecart (talk) 12:43, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 June 2024
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected redirect at Bombing of the Gaza Strip. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
Change Israel's bombing campaign of the Gaza Strip began within hours of Hamas militants and their allies entering into Israel. The citation (10) does not match/support the statement.
It should read: Oct. 7, 2023: Air raid sirens begin sounding in Jerusalem around 6:30 a.m. local time, warning citizens of the attack in progress and to immediately take cover. An estimated 2,200 rockets were fired toward southern and central Israel, including Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, by the Hamas militants. Armed Hamas terrorists and citizens of Gaza, many on motorcycles, storm blockaded areas, shooting at and slaughtering people in kibbutzim and small towns. Video footage surfaces of Hamas militants taking people -- including mothers, small children, and the elderly -- hostage and carrying them across the Gaza border.[1] Over 1,200 people were murdered in Israel, citizens and non-citizens alike, and over 200 people were taken hostage [1]
Israel's air raid response began on Oct. 17. [2] Ewereallythinkthat (talk) 09:23, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done Citation does support statement. Relevant quotation from the 7 October 2023 New York Times article reads: "Hamas fired thousands of rockets toward Israeli cities, and Palestinian militants crossed into southern Israel, killing civilians and holding Israelis hostage.
Israel retaliated with major strikes across the blockaded Gaza Strip, leveling multistory buildings, including a residential building with approximately 100 units."[1] CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)- It seems like a fair point that
within hours
doesn't appear to be backed up by the NYT article, though, no? — xDanielx T/C\R 22:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)- That's actually a really good point. The Times didn't give a timeline of the day. I'll edit that. CarmenEsparzaAmoux (talk) 23:56, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- It seems like a fair point that
References
- ^ a b https://abcnews.go.com/International/timeline-surprise-rocket-attack-hamas-israel/story?id=103816006. Retrieved 18 June 2024.
{{cite web}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help) Cite error: The named reference "CNN" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page). - ^ "CNN". Retrieved 18 June 2024.
IDF figures
@W. C. Minor: By a non-independent source, I was not referring to Ynet news, but to the IDF as an involved party. Clearly, the IDF figures belong to an alternative reality, which independent sources disagree with. Including IDF figures without their refutation would be misleading to say the least. Makeandtoss (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 June 2024
![]() | It is requested that an edit be made to the extended-confirmed-protected redirect at Bombing of the Gaza Strip. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any extended confirmed user. Remember to change the |
Remove the sentence about 70,000 tons dropped; it is not reliably sourced. See discussion above in talk page. Telecart (talk) 12:46, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
secondary sources
i could not find any secondary reliable source for the claim "In its defense, Israel has claimed only 16% of Gaza buildings were destroyed" does anyone have it? @Kentucky Rain24 i added [better source needed] which was reverted. also TOI is not in reliable sources list https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources Gsgdd (talk) 00:34, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Many sources that are reliable do not appear in Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources which, as its name says, is only a list of sources that come up repeatedly, and includes many sources that are categorically NOT reliable. ToI is a mainstream online news source. You can take your concerns about it to WP:RSN. But since your search skills leave much to be desired, here are addiotnal RSes saying the same thing: [2],[3] Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- according to UN, in march it is 35% building damaged https://www.unitar.org/about/news-stories/press/35-buildings-affected-gaza-strip
- why are we quoting researchers at Oregon State University and the City University of New York instead? Gsgdd (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- According to the UN is X, and Israel says it is Y, and that's what we write, based on reliable sources. Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 02:26, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
Article title
Does anyone besides me think that the title "Bombing of the Gaza Strip" implies that this is the first or only time Gaza Strip was bombed? Should it be something more specific, like "Bombing of the Gaza Strip (2023-present)"? Or should the scope of the article (under the current title) be expanded to include all bombings of the Gaza Strip? In which case the lead should say that the current bombing is the worst but not the first. Or is it fine the way it is? Levivich (talk) 04:02, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think this entire article is redundant- the bombing is part of the current war, for which there is already more than one article - Israel–Hamas war, Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip (2023–present) Kentucky Rain24 (talk) 11:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, a time context should be added. Completely disagree on the claim that this article is redundant since it has received significant coverage in RS and fulfills the WP:Notability guideline. Makeandtoss (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia controversial topics
- Start-Class Human rights articles
- Unknown-importance Human rights articles
- WikiProject Human rights articles
- Start-Class International relations articles
- Unknown-importance International relations articles
- Start-Class International law articles
- Unknown-importance International law articles
- WikiProject International law articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- Start-Class Israel-related articles
- Unknown-importance Israel-related articles
- WikiProject Israel articles
- WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration articles
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- Start-Class Middle Eastern military history articles
- Middle Eastern military history task force articles
- Start-Class Post-Cold War articles
- Post-Cold War task force articles
- Start-Class Palestine-related articles
- Unknown-importance Palestine-related articles
- WikiProject Palestine articles
- Start-Class Disaster management articles
- Unknown-importance Disaster management articles
- Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests