Jump to content

User talk:Persian Poet Gal/Rev Dump

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Persian Poet Gal

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Khampalak (talk | contribs) at 19:45, 14 August 2007 (A dog is a dog.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Click here to leave a new message!

Be wary that she sits on my desk quite often and queries on this talk page may not always be answered by me...
Archives

Archive I move archive my talk page every so often. If you have recently left a message for me and do not see it on my talk page anymore, feel free to look through the archives below to see my response.

2010

2009

2008

Old Archives


User:Persian Poet Gal/busybox User:Persian Poet Gal/Talk other stuff


Smile

Lights has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Cheers, Lights 00:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(from Kskk2)

merci keh baneh mano var dashdeeh. Shomah adameh khoobi hasteen. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kskk2 (talk • contribs)

  • Oh my Farsi is very terrible! I'll try to answer you as best I can. I am assuming you are thanking me for the unautoblock, khahesh mikonam! And you referred to something about "hand" (dashdeeh or daste is hand correct?) and my parents always say the expression "do not hurt your hands" in Persian, which I say moshkeli nist. And to answer your final question, man khoobam haily mamnoon.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 04:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

lol, I was not talking about your hand. I said thank you for the unautoblock, you are a good person! Btw the persian expression is "I hope your hands don't hurt" translated literally which means thank you very much. So you live in Cali, huh? I didn't know there were any Iranians in California!! jk they're tons. Anyway, nice talking to you and I'll let you know if I get blocked again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kskk2 (talk • contribs)

Anti me

OK...so I feel I just broke into a new realm of existence! Wow! Thanks for pointing it out, PPG! --Kukini hablame aqui 05:09, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I just saw you were back! One of the AIV bots said your name! Good to see you again! I've been kind of scarce myself (I'm out of country right now), but I still keep an eye on my watchlist. Anyway, hope all is well for you! Heimstern Läufer (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lopez4life

Good move on Lopez4life Ryan4314 06:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

Welcome back! Glad to see you've returned.--Chaser - T 06:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages

Or at least a bunch of flowers.  :) NawlinWiki 19:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSD

Responded on my talk page. Acalamari 20:21, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that was it? There's been nothing for a few minutes. Acalamari 20:28, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I was late though; I only deleted four pages. I would have responded sooner and would probably have got more pages deleted, but unfortunately, I was caught up with something in real life. :) I've never cleaned up a bot's work before (not with the administrator tools anyway), so that was my first time with that. Acalamari 20:33, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
At any rate, however, it is so nice to see you back. It's great to see a friendly smile and a green "online" where you "status" indicator is. :) Acalamari 20:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Paris Hilton

Oh, Persian Poet Girl, I've been editing Wikipedia for over a year, and I have 1000s of edits, and 3 barnstars to my credit. But whats an online encyclopedia for if you can't have a little fun now and then? Havn't you ever done anything wild like redirect Paris Hilton's link or steal a cupcake from your commanding officer in Vietnam? I promise I won't do it anymore. For now.--Dudeman5685 21:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

But wikipedia IS real life!--Dudeman5685 16:17, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank a lot today for helping me deal with the raging psycho de jour. I'm waiting with rapt anticipation for sockpuppet number three. :) Trusilver 22:18, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm still learning the mechanics of how blocks affect the unintended. Is it correct that an established username will be able to edit from an IP that has been blocked for an anon vandal's actions? Trusilver 22:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fortunately the kind of block I instated does allow established users to edit. However, the IP will be unable to create a new account or edit anonymously. It creates some hassle if the school or library have not created Wikipedia accounts yet.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:36, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks for fixing the aspersion regarding my numeracy, Jimfbleak 06:17, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.

Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 31 30 July 2007 About the Signpost
From the editor: Another experiment and Wikimania
Report on Citizendium Response: News from Citizendium
User resigns admin status amid allegations of sock puppetry WikiWorld comic: "Mr. Bean"
Wikipedia in the news Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:22, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


What was it I vandalised? I removed something I have removed many times because it was OR and the person who added it has been blocked many times and banned, then changed IP more than once since to continue adding this OR. Once again on the Human Height article the skin whiteners affecting growth has been added as it has on whiteners affecting intelliegence on race and IQ. Also I am confused to what was reverted and undid in this discussion.Gooogen 15:23, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Babel box?

I suggest you to create a Babel box for yourself, so that we know what language do you speak. Oh yeah, since you're half Persian, do you speak Persian? --Edmund the King of the Woods! 17:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia?

Since you're half Persian, do you have an account in the Persian Wikipedia? --Edmund the King of the Woods! 17:19, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I am still hesitant to create an account on the Persian Wikipedia because my Farsi is not only very minimal but I don't even have one character of the Farsi alphabet down. Also as far as boxes, I think that it would be a bit redundant if I only place one box due to the only language I can speak confidently enough is English :P...¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:44, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your efforts on Jak 3

Thank you for your work to combat vandalism on the Jak 3 article. I notice that a similar IP address responsible for those two edits has done this on this same article, even the same act of vandalism. Is this an issue that demands a block yet?

By the way, I notice that you are one of the gods of Wikipedia. If you ever have a wish, let me know and I will obey if I can. Larrythefunkyferret 06:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Psycho Samurai

Hi there; this user, whom you just blocked for a week, decided to post threatening and offensive messages, aimed at you, on his userpage. I have accordingly protected this userpage for the duration of your block, with a warning suggesting that future good behaviour would be a smart idea. Hope I am not treading on your toes here. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:43, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • My he's steamed at the moment! No worries, you're not treading on my toes at all! I tend to ignore or revert that venting. For now its better off letting him calm down and just avoid the tantrum he's throwing.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • That same user was posting on my talk page and Natalie Erin's yesterday for my semi-protection of the Wal-Mart article. Psysco Samurai and their IP implied that I had abused my abilities by locking the page from IP editing due to a content dispite, when in fact all I had done was semi-protect the page due to IP vandalism (a semi-protection that Natalie Erin reviewed). Acalamari 21:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seemed to me that making the point that we can prevent him even from editing his own userpage just might be an educational experience for him. Or it might not, of course. But we always try to convert vandals into useful editors, do we not? --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I instated a week long block rather than an indef. Seems he's just emotional at the moment. But if he continues the way he's going, then he's going to find himself facing a pretty ice cold indef block.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I have learned since acquiring the tools that there is a certain amount of variety of opinion as to how long blocks are applied. My policy with this guy would, I think to do a 3 month block on next offence, and indeblock thereafter. You would go straight to indefblock, would you? I ask only for educational purposes. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 21:59, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That proposal does not hurt either but the severity of the threats he makes are not to be taken lightly (such as saying you better run). If he repeats a threat like that I usually would indef block. Threats that imply bodily harm are never good.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair comment. As I said, I was asking for personal educational purposes, not for argumentative ones. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(Sorry to butt in) A 3-month block is usually equivalent to an indef. They're going to sock in either case. —Wknight94 (talk) 22:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Then we'll just have to keep our eyes peeled for a sock-friend or two. Hopefully he will decide against that and not take it that far. Optimism never hurts.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:11, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey... looks like you're out... but for when you get back, looking at the conversation you guys had, do you think this diff, along with the other things he's done over the past two days, would constitute a re-block? I'm not sure, to be honest. Gscshoyru 02:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. It's been taken care of. Gscshoyru 02:33, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: IP Stalker

User:Potterator Lara♥Love 18:02, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out with the problem - is it on a time limit? Chaza 93 18:54, 6 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

OK well thanks for your help on the matter Chaza 93 18:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK so now the IP's are sorted - but i forgot that some users are adding the unhelpful content to the page - should i put {{Chaza93/Vandal}} to their talk page or ask for a Full Protect (don't do this yet i want to still be able to edit the article) Chaza 93 20:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest placing the warning, going for a full protect is a bit much at the moment.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:06, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK thanks once again for your feedback on the situation Chaza 93 20:10, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Potterator

...is asking for unblock at WP:RFU. I presume that he is the same user as the IP whose edits you redacted from LaraLove's talk page, which is why he was blocked? ELIMINATORJR 19:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your talk page.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 19:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't work. He's back on another IP that's almost exactly the same as the previous one to the registered account. He's being antagonizing on my talk page. Lara♥Love 03:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 3, Issue 32 6 August 2007 About the Signpost
Committee makes statement on U.S. chapter About: The Wikipedia Plays
Review: The Wikipedia Plays WikiWorld comic: "Terry Gross"
News and notes: Similpedia, milestones Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reverts

I tend to let things be, and figure people know I appreciate the assistance, but today's vandalism at my talk page got to be a bit above and beyond the norm. ;) Thanks for helping out! – Luna Santin (talk) 01:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for indef blocking my doppelganger account. NHRHS2010 Talk 01:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!!!

For my befitting mortification, I hereby apologize for not having noticed any sooner that you were back. I must be getting rusty. Still, welcome back PPG!! We all missed you deeply. :-) Best regards, Húsönd 03:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Doughboy C-1 30s String.jpg

Here's some firecrackers for you! Firecrackers somehow promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving something friendly to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Make your own message to spread WikiLove to others! Happy editing! Húsönd 03:07, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fdfdfdfdfd

Whose sock is he? Noticed in your block summary that you described him as a sock of an already-banned editor. Blueboy96 20:40, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • I remember seeing the edits of a blocked editor who posted the same rant about "YOU SHALL NOT HOLD DOWN THE RIGHTS OF THE VANDALIZERS!!!!" on every page he vandalized...I can't seem to locate those edits again but this guy has been around before.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded. I remember this guy... from somewhere. Gscshoyru 20:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You found it how? rofl Gscshoyru 21:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I had a feeling a vandal like that might be attracted to a active vandal fighter's page. When you said he seems familiar I scanned the reverts you made. I then randomly opened the history of your userpage and spotted a diff with that familiar rallying cry.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:29, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't a question... more of an incredulous statement, trying to convey the fact that I found that pretty funny... but thanks anyways. :) Gscshoyru 21:31, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Block Log of 63.164.145.198

Hey PPG. I had noticed the log and the obviously recurring vandalism (had even been blocked indef). I had decided to block just 48 hours nonetheless because some of this IP's edits today had been valid contributions. Anyway, on second thought, I've followed your advice and extended the block to 6 months. Any users from this IP willing to contribute productively are always welcome to register. Best regards, Húsönd 23:35, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up, I did forget. :-) Keep up your always excellent work. Best regards, Húsönd 23:41, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adani

Good call on blocking this one. I had just seen the AIV entry and was going to add my two cents, but you beat me to it. GlassCobra 23:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

Thank you for your words. I think it has been rammed home to me this past week that the majority of the human race simply does not make judgements on considered analysis of the evidence, trusting instead their first impression of the situation and the malicious or equally hasty judgement of others. I hasten to add that I am not just thinking of my RfA - I've been reading and watching Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens all week. I find an interesting parellel between people who refuse pointblank to believe evolution even when the facts are right there and the people who refuse to believe that I am not incivil, even when I pointed out that the diffs they dug up constituted 0.0004% of my contributing history. I think it said more about them that they would choose to ignore that statistic and the glowing testimonies from people who have worked with me than it did about my civility or possible lack thereof. But hey, what can you do? When people decide on a narrative, you're stuck with it. Look at poor Profumo. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 23:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Parallels are eerie things are they not? I hardly thought any of the people in that debate to be incivil, more like brutally straightforward and passionate about their stances. I'm glad that at least debates/times like that won't come by again for a long time (hopefully).¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of abeldent

You really do not leave much time for improvement. I have created open dental wiki article and thought that having other dental Practice Management Software represented in wiki would be good. So I started abeldent first draft was deleted before I could even get started getting the details. Then I created it again with just a little more info and now that has been deleted. I understand advertisements on wiki are bad but if no time is allowed for improvements then how is anything going to get better. I have never used this product so it is going to take a little more time to get all the information. I was hoping that I could get some help from others that know the software to improve the article. The only reason I started it was it happens to be on the top of the list from the ada website for PMS

I started Fluoride therapy the first draft was rough but over time and with others help it was improved a lot. I was hoping this would happen with abeldent I guess not.

You might as well delete Comparison of Dental Practice Management Software, it is not filled out very much I personally do not know all that information, yet. That way no one can contribute to it.


As far as being blatant advertisement you might as well delete all the dental Practice Management Software articles I have created. They must be ads right. open dental Dentrix, PracticeWorks, SoftDent, Eaglesoft. I chose these because they are software produces that I have heard of, again never used them knowledge on them is limited. If nothing else please place ad warning on then. I would do it but you may delete my account.

I would think a week of time should be given to improve an article before deletion. Not just an hour or less. Thanks for reading my rant.


User :Gdbanks

i still think a reasonable working time for creating an article is not too much to ask for. i "created" the article twice. both times while i was still working on it. during the article creation i like to see how it is looking and hit the show preview button but sometimes may hit the save button. between the save and collecting info to place in the article, it is deleted. you wrote 

"please do not ... or recreate an article when you have been notified numerous times not to do so."

i have not been told, not to recreate an article tell now. a reasonable creation would be nice, say instead of deleting it before improvements can be made place in a quarantine for a limited time. in writing this message i have had to leave, do other things for work. a reasonable working time is all i ask

User:Gdbanks

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scipio

I also replied on ANI! Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 20:44, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I made a short summary of the personal attacks, deletions, falsifications and other violations commited by him during the last few days at ANI. PS, your user page is the nicest I've seen this far :) Cheers! JdeJ 21:19, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion

Just a quick word to say that I'm more than glad to see your signature and your contributions starting to creep back all over this place - you (unknowingly) inspired me to keep plugging away here. Keep fighting the "fight", you should know that you have dozens of real allies here. Once more, welcome back. The Rambling Man 22:56, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hdayejr

Oh, I'm quite aware of it. He's been gloating about how he's going to get me banned for the last half hour or so. Thank you for the alert anyway, though. -TPIRFanSteve 00:11, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning

With the legendary PPG knowing about it, I'm not worried about these bizarre charges. I'm a pretty public figure on the Web, so I'm a poor choice to impersonate. (Or is this Steve supposed to be the sockpuppet I've been secretly running for years?) It would be more amusing if the accuser wasn't so nasty about it. --Orange Mike 00:54, 11 August 2007 (UTC) (orangemike@livejournal, etc.)[reply]

Now he's invoking the 3RR because I undid his deletion of a posting to his talk page; according to his summary, this constitutes "vandalism"! I anticipate a request for block at any moment. --Orange Mike 02:13, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked my e-mail, only to find this billet-doux from you-know-who: look dipcrap....vandalize my page again and you'll have some serious hell to pay!

I'll wipe you up with the floor, keep it up BOY!!!!!!!

How could people possibly want to leave Wikipedia? --Orange Mike 02:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As long as we're posting e-mails, lemme describe how this whole thing started.
Last summer, I was being harrassed on here by someone who was eventually blocked when his account was discovered to be a sockpuppet. It wasn't Hdayejr, but at the time, I obviously didn't know that. Actually, I didn't know if he even used Wikipedia, but given that I've been his least favorite person in the world since about November of 2000 and he as such seemed like a likely culprit, I asked an admin if a Checkuser could be run to find out if it was one of the IPs he's known for using. Obviously, the request was declined, but Hdayejr's real name remained posted, because I had no reason to think it would be a problem.
Two months ago, on June 7, I received the following e-mail from Hdayejr:
You continue to harass me, and I haven't even said a word about you in years. But your immaturity hasn't stopped...you had the balls to mention me on Wikipedia about vandalizing? Hell I don't even go on that site much anyhow...but you have a lot of nerve telling people to trace it back to the library.
Dolt, I use my own computer, not theirs. Next time you talk another word(AND I MEAN ONE WORD ABOUT ME)..I'll post all your flaming from Invision, Golden Road, and ATGS online everywhere for all to see.
DON'T FUCK WITH ME!
Three weeks later, this edit was made in the discussion about last summer's harrassment, and it's just been downhill ever since. -TPIRFanSteve 17:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brevard County Environment

Please undelete my article forked from Brevard County as per discussion at User talk:Student7#August 2007. Thanks. Student7 01:22, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Difference of opinion

When working AIV you wrote that there was no cause to block User:Majin Xezeveir at this time. You might want to know that I indefblocked him! In reviewing his contributions I found nothing but vandalism and nonsense, including creation of an obvious WP:HOAX article, with no constructive edits that I could see. Please let me know if you think I've gone too far. Cheers - Raymond Arritt 19:10, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:149.4.106.130 ban heads up

Good day! I noted you banned User:149.4.106.130, who is marked as a suspected sockpuppet of User:Ron liebman. Also noted as suspected sockpuppets are User:Baseball Gurus and User:Alex cheung.

Alex cheung, Baseball Gurus, and the IP users were attempting to make the same revisions on Hideki Matsui (sample diff:[1]), Eddie Cicotte (sample diff:[2]), and Major League Baseball titles leaders (sample diff:[3]).

So, it seems pretty obvious that all three accounts were trying to push incorrect facts on the same articles. You blocked the IP, all edits stopped... pretty suspicious, huh? :)

I wasn't sure if you noticed the edits from all three accounts together, and as the blocking admin of the IP, I just wanted to give you a heads up in case you didn't notice. Thanks for the vandal block! -- Irixman (t) (m) 20:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

User:King Lopez has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

This is for you Persian Poet Gal. It seems like you have been sleeping for quite a while. We are glad you are back. Do you like Poetry? King Lopez Contribs 09:35, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by 60.49.35.144 - good job!

I caught the one you missed because the affected page was on my watchlist.  ;) BrokenSphereMsg me 17:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This edit

Thank you for reverting my userpage. I really appreciate it. Bushcarrot Talk Please Sign! 17:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC) [reply]

A dog is a dog.

If you want to block me from editing, then do so. It seems that those who use wikipedia as a propaganda tool are more welcome than those who would rather use it for legitimate purposes. I will offer no apologies for my behavior as the individuals in question do not deserve it. --Khampalak 19:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Persian_Poet_Gal/Rev_Dump&oldid=151234865"