Omaha Beach
Omaha Beach | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of World War II | |||||||
Troops from the First Division landing on Omaha Beach. | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
United States | Germany | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Omar Bradley, Norman Cota, Clarence R. Huebner | Dietrich Kraiss | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
43,250 | Unknown | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
3,000 | 1,200 |
Omaha Beach was the codename for one of the principal landing points of the Allied invasion of German-occupied France in the Normandy landings on June 6 1944, during World War II. The beach was located on the northern coast of France, facing the English Channel, and was 5 miles (8 km) long, from east of Sainte-Honorine-des-Pertes to west of Vierville-sur-Mer. Landings here were necessary in order to link up the British landings to the east with the American landing to the west, thus providing a continuous lodgement on the Normandy coast. Taking Omaha was to be the responsibility of United States Army troops, with sea transport provided courtesy of the U.S. Navy and elements of the Royal Navy.
On D-Day, the untested 29th Infantry Division, joined by eight companies of U.S. Rangers redirected from Pointe du Hoc, were to assault the western half of the beach. The battle-hardened 1st Infantry Division was given the eastern half. The initial assault waves, consisting of tanks, infantry and combat engineer forces, were carefully planned to reduce the coastal defences and allow the larger ships of the follow-up waves to land. The primary objective at Omaha was to secure a beachhead of some five miles (eight kilometers) depth, between Port-en-Bessin and the Vire River, linking up with the British landings at Gold Beach to the east and reaching the area of Isigny ready to link up with VII Corps landing at Utah Beach to the west. Opposing the landings was the experienced 352nd Infantry Division. Largely deployed in strongpoints at the coast, the German strategy was based on defeating any seaborne assault at the water line.
Very little went as planned at Omaha on D-Day. Difficulties in navigation caused the majority of landing craft to miss their targets throughout the day. The defenses were unexpectedly strong and inflicted heavy casualties on US troops as they landed. Under heavy fire the engineers struggled to clear the beach obstacles, causing later landings to bunch around the few channels that had been cleared. Weakened by the casualties taken just to land, the surviving assault troops could not clear the heavily defended exits off the beach, causing further problems and consequent delays for later landings. Small penetrations were eventually achieved by groups of survivors making improvised assaults, scaling the bluffs between the most heavily defended points. By the end of the day two small isolated footholds had been won and which, against weaker defenses further inland, were subsequently exploited to achieve the original D-Day objectives over the following days.
"Bloody Omaha"
Terrain and defenses
Bound at either end by rocky cliffs, the Omaha Beach crescent presented a gently sloping tidal area averaging 300 yards (275 m) between low and highwater marks. Above the tide line was a bank of shingle 8 feet (2.4 m) high and up to 15 yards (14 m) wide in some places. At the western end the shingle bank rested against a stone (further east becoming wood) constructed sea wall which ranged from 4-12 feet (1.5-4 m) in height. For the remaining two thirds of the beach after the seawall ended the shingle lay against a low sand embankment. Behind the sand embankment and sea wall lay a level shelf of sand, narrow at either end and extending up to 200 yards (180 m) inland in the center. Steep escarpments or bluffs then rose 100-170 feet (30-50 m), dominating the whole beach and cut into by small wooded valleys or draws at five points along the beach, codenamed west to east D-1, D-3, E-1, E-3 and F-1.[1]
The German defensive preparations and the lack of any defense in depth indicated that their plan was to stop the invasion at the beaches.[2] Four lines of obstacles were constructed in the water. The first, a non-contiguous line with a small gap in the middle of Dog White sector and a larger gap across the whole of Easy Red sector, was 270 yards (250 m) out from the highwater line and consisted of 200 Belgian Gates with mines lashed to the uprights. Some 32 yards (30 m) behind these was a continuous line of logs driven into the sand pointing seaward, every third one capped with an anti-tank mine. Another 32 yards (30 m) shoreward of this line was a continuous line of 450 ramps sloping towards the shore, also with mines attached and designed to force flat-bottomed landing craft to ride up and either flip or detonate the mine. The final line of obstacles was a continuous line of hedgehogs 165 yards (150 m) from the shoreline.[3] The area between the shingle bank and the bluffs was both wired and mined with the latter also scattered on the bluff slopes.
Coastal troop deployments, comprising five companies of infantry, were concentrated mostly at 15 strongpoints called Widerstandsnester ("resistance nests"), numbered WN-60 in the east to WN-74 near Vierville in the west, located primarily around the entrances to the draws and protected by minefields and wire.[4] Positions within each strongpoint were interconnected by trenches and tunnels. As well as the basic weaponry of rifles and machine guns a total of over 60 light artillery pieces were deployed at these strongpoints. The heaviest pieces were located in eight gun casemates and four open positions whilst the lighter guns were housed in 35 pillboxes. A further 18 anti-tank guns completed the disposition of artillery targeting the beach. Areas between the strongpoints were less lightly manned with occasional trenches, rifle pits and a further 85 machine gun emplacements.[5][6] No area of the beach was left uncovered, and the disposition of weapons meant that flanking fire could be brought to bear anywhere along the beach.
Allied intelligence identified the coastal defenses as being manned by a reinforced battalion (800 – 1000 men) of the 716th Infantry Division.[7] This was a static defensive division estimated to comprise up to 50% of non-Germanic troops, mostly Russian volunteers and German Volksdeutsche. The more experienced and offensively capable 352nd Infantry Division was identified as being located 20 miles (30 km) inland at St. Lo and was regarded as the most likely force to be committed to a counter attack. However, as part of Rommel's strategy to concentrate defenses at the water's edge the 352nd was ordered forward in March,[8] taking over responsibility for the defense of the Normandy coast in which Omaha Beach was located. As part of this reorganization the 352nd also took under command the two battalions of the 726th Grenadier Regiment as well as the 439th Ost battalion that had been attached to the 726th.[9] Omaha beach fell mostly within 'Coast Defense Sector 2', stretching westwards from Coleville and allocated to the 916th Grenadier Regiment with the third battalion 726th Grenadier Regiment attached. Two companies of the 726th manned strongpoints in the Vierville area whilst two companies of the 916th occupied the St. Laurent area strongpoints in the center of Omaha. These positions were supported by the artillery of the first and fourth battalions of the 352nd Artillery Regiment (twelve 105 mm and four 150 mm howitzers respectively). The two remaining companies of the 916th formed a reserve at Formigny two miles (4 km) inland. East of Coleville 'Coast Defense Sector 3' was the responsibility of the remainder of the 726th Grenadier Regiment. Two companies were deployed at the coast, one in the most easterly series of strongpoints, with artillery support provided by the third battalion of the 352nd Artillery Regiment. The area reserve, comprising the two battalions of the 915th Grenadier Regiment and known as 'Kampfgruppe Meyer', was located south east of Bayeux outside of the immediate Omaha area.[10]
The failure to identify the reorganization of the defenses was a rare intelligence failure for the allies. Even post action reports still documented the original estimate and assume that the 352nd had been deployed to the coastal defences by chance only a few days previously as part of an anti-invasion exercise.[11][10]
Plan of attack
Omaha was divided into ten sectors, codenamed from west to east: Able, Baker, Charlie, Dog Green, Dog White, Dog Red, Easy Green, Easy Red, Fox Green, and Fox Red. The initial assault was to be made by two Regimental Combat Teams (RCT), supported by two tank battalions and with two battalions of Rangers attached. The infantry regiments were organized into three battalions each of around 1,000 men. These battalions were organized as three rifle companies each of up to 240 men and a support company up to 190 men.[12] Infantry companies A through D belonged to the 1st battalion of a regiment, E through H to the 2nd, I through M (the letter ‘J’ was not used) to the 3rd. (Individual companies will be referred to in this article by company and regiment, e.g. Company A of the 116th RCT will be A/116). In addition each battalion had a headquarters company of up to 180 men. The tank battalions consisted of three companies, A through C, each of 16 tanks whilst the Ranger battalions were organized into six companies, A through F, of around 65 men per company.
The 116th RCT of the 29th Infantry Division was to land two battalions in the western four sectors, to be followed 30 minutes later by the third battalion. Their landings were to be supported by the tanks of the 743rd tank battalion; two companies swimming ashore in amphibious DD tanks and the remaining company landing directly onto the beach from assault craft. To the left of the 116th RCT the 16th RCT of the 1st Infantry Division was also to land two battalions with the third following 30 minutes after, on Easy Red and Fox Green at the eastern end of Omaha. Their tank support was to be provided by the 741st tank battalion, again two companies swimming ashore and the third landed conventionally. Three companies of the 2nd Ranger Battalion were to take a fortified battery at Pointe du Hoc, three miles (5 km) to the west of Omaha. Meanwhile C company 2nd Rangers was to land on the right of the 116th RCT and take the positions at Pointe de la Percée. The remaining companies of 2nd Rangers and the 5th Ranger Battalion were to follow up at Pointe du Hoc if that action proved to be successful, otherwise they were to follow the 116th into Dog Green and proceed to Pointe du Hoc overland.[13]
The landings were scheduled to start at 06:30, "H-Hour", on a flooding tide, preceded by a 40-minute naval and 30-minute aerial bombardment of the beach defenses, with the DD tanks arriving five minutes before H-Hour. The infantry were organized into specially equipped assault sections, 32 men strong, one section to a landing craft, with each section assigned specific objectives in reducing the beach defenses. Immediately behind the first landings the Special Engineer Task Force was to land with the mission of clearing and marking lanes through the beach obstacles. This would allow the larger ships of the follow up landings to get through safely at high tide. The landing of artillery support was scheduled to start at H+90 minutes whilst the main build up of vehicles was to start at H+180 minutes. At H+195 minutes two further Regimental Combat Teams, the 115th RCT of the 29th Infantry Division and the 18th RCT of the 1st Infantry Division were to land, with the 26th RCT of the 1st Infantry Division to be landed on the orders of the V Corps commander.[14]
The objective was for the beach defenses to be cleared by H+2 hours whereupon the assault sections were to reorganize into and continue the battle as battalion formations. The draws were to be opened to allow traffic to exit the beach by H+3 hours. By the end of the day the forces at Omaha were to have established a bridgehead five miles (8 km) deep, linked up with the British XXX Corps landed at Gold beach to the east and be in position to move on Isigny the next day and link up with the American VII Corps landed at Utah beach to the west.[15]
To execute this plan the Omaha assault force totaled 34,000 men and 3,300 vehicles with naval support provided by two battleships, three cruisers, 12 destroyers and 105 other ships provided predominantly by the US Navy but also including Free French and British warships.[16] The 16th RCT (swollen by 3,502 men and 295 vehicles attached only for landing at the beach) numbered 9,828 personnel, 919 vehicles and 48 tanks. To move this force required 2 transport ships, 6 Landing Ship, Tank (LST), 53 LCT's, 5 Landing Craft Infantry (Large) LCI(L), 81 LCVP's, 18 LCA's, 13 other landing craft, and about 64 DUKW’s.[17] Assault craft were manned by US Navy, US Coastguard and British Royal Navy crews.[18]
Initial assault
Very little went according to plan throughout the landings. Ten landing craft were lost before they even reached the beach, swamped by the rough seas. Seasickness was also prevalent amongst the troops offshore. On the 16th RCT front, the boats passed men struggling in life preservers and on rafts, survivors of the DD tanks which had sunk.[19] For the assault craft, navigation was made difficult by smoke and mist obscuring the landmarks they were using to guide themselves in, whilst a heavy current served to push them to the east.[20]
As the boats came to within a few hundred yards of the shore, the ineffectiveness of the pre-landing bombardments became clear when the landing craft came under increasingly heavy fire from automatic weapons and artillery. Forced by the weather to delay the dropping of bombs in order to avoid hitting the landing craft as they ran in, the aerial bombardment fell too far inland to have any real effect on the coastal defenses.[21]
Tank landings
Concluding that the sea conditions were too rough, the DD tanks of the 743rd battalion on the 116th RCT front were carried all the way to the beach. Coming in opposite the heavily defended Vierville draw, company B of the 743rd tank battalion (B/743) lost all but one of its officers and half of its tanks. The other two companies landed to the left of B/743 without initial loss. On the 16th RCT front, the two DD tanks that survived the swim ashore were joined by three others that had to be landed directly onto the beach when their LCT suffered damage to its ramp. The remaining tank company managed to land 14 of its 16 tanks, although three of these were quickly knocked out.[22][23]
Infantry landings
I was the first one out. The seventh man was the next one to get across the beach without being hit. All the ones in-between were hit. Two were killed; three were injured. That’s how lucky you had to be.
Captain Richard Merrill, 2nd Ranger Battalion.][24]
Of the nine companies landing in the first wave only Company A of the 116th RCT (A/116) at Dog Green and the Rangers to their right landed where they were supposed to. E/116, aiming for Easy Green, ended up scattered across the two sectors of the 16th RCT beach.[25] G/116, aiming for Dog White, opened up a 1,000 yard (900 m) gap between themselves and A/116 to their right when they landed at Easy Green. I/16 drifted so far east it did not land for another hour and a half.[26]
As infantry disembarked from the landing craft, they found themselves almost everywhere on sandbars 50 to 100 yards (45 to 90 m) out. Before they could even reach the beach they had to wade through water sometimes neck deep, and they still had a 200 yard (180 m) or more journey to go when they did reach the shore. Those that made it to the shingle did so at a walk, so heavily laden were they. Most sections had to brave the full weight of fire from small arms, mortars, artillery and the heavy interlocking fields of machine gun fire.[27] Where the naval bombardment had set grass fires burning, as it had at Dog Red opposite the Les Moulins strongpoint, the resulting smoke obscured the landing troops and prevented effective fire from being laid down on them.[25] Some sections of G/116 and F/116 were able to reach the shingle bank relatively unscathed, though the latter became disorganized after the loss of their officers. G/116 was able to retain some cohesion, but this was soon lost as it made its way westwards under fire along the shingle in an attempt to reach its assigned objectives.[28] The scattering of the boats was most evident on the 16th RCT front where some sections of E/16, F/16 and E/116 became intermingled. This made it difficult for sections to come together to improvise company assaults that might have retrieved the situation caused by the mis-landings. Those scattered sections of E/116 landing at Easy Red were also able to escape heavy casualties, though having encountered a deep runnel after being landed on a sandbank they were forced to discard most of their weapons in order to be able to swim ashore.[29]
Casualties were heaviest amongst the troops landing at either end of Omaha. In the east at Fox Green and the adjacent stretch of Easy Red scattered elements of three companies were reduced to half strength by the time they gained the relative safety of the shingle, many of them having crawled the 300 yards (270 m) of beach just ahead of the incoming tide. Within 15 minutes of landing at Dog Green on the western end of the beach, A/116 had been cut to pieces, the leaders amongst the 120 or so casualties,[28][30][31][32] the survivors reduced to seeking cover at the water's edge or behind obstacles. The smaller Ranger company to their right fared a little better, having made the shelter of the bluffs, but already down to half strength.
L/16 eventually landed 30 minutes late to the left of Fox Green, taking casualties as the boats ran in and more as they crossed the 200 yards (180 m) of beach. The terrain at the very eastern end of Omaha however gave them enough protection to allow the 125 survivors to organize and begin an assault of the bluffs, the only company in the first wave able to operate as a unit.[33] All the other companies were at best disorganized, mostly leaderless and pinned down behind the shingle with no hope of carrying out their assault missions. At worst they simply ceased to exist as a fighting unit. Nearly all had landed at least a few hundred yards off target, and in an intricately planned operation where each boat section had been assigned a specific task this was enough to throw the whole plan out.
Engineer landings
Pushed off their targets just as the infantry were, only five of the 16 engineer teams arrived at their assigned locations. Three teams came in where there were no infantry or armor to cover them. Working under heavy fire the engineers set about their task of clearing gaps through the beach obstacles, their work made more difficult by loss of equipment and infantry passing through or taking cover behind the obstacles they were trying to blow. They suffered heavy casualties when enemy fire set off the explosives they were working with. Eight men of one team were dragging their pre-loaded rubber boat off the LCM when it was hit by artillery fire. The explosives on their boat were detonated; one man survived. Another team had just finished laying their explosives when the area was struck by mortar fire. The premature explosion of their charges killed or wounded 19 engineers as well as some infantry nearby. The engineers nevertheless succeeded in clearing six gaps; one each at Dog White and Easy Green on the 116th RCT front, the other four at Easy Red on the 16th RCT front. It cost them over 40% casualties.[34]
Second assault wave
With the initial assault missions unaccomplished the second and larger wave of assault landings, designed to bring in reinforcements, support weapons and headquarter elements, started coming ashore at 07:00 to similar conditions experienced by the first. Some relief against the largely unsuppressed defensive fire was gained simply by virtue of the fact that with more troops landing the concentration of fire was spread more about the many targets available. The survivors amongst the initial forces were not however able to give much covering fire, and the landing troops still suffered in places the same high casualty rates as those in the first wave. The failure to clear sufficient paths through the beach obstacles added to the difficulties of the second wave now that the tide was beginning to cover those obstacles. The loss of landing craft as they hit these defenses before they reached the shore began to feature in the rate of attrition. As in the initial landings, difficulties in navigation and the consequent mis-landings proved most disruptive, serving to scatter the infantry and to separate headquarters elements from their units.[35]
On the 116th RCT front the remainder of the 1st battalion; B/116, C/116 and D/116, were due to land in support of A/116 at Dog Green. Three boats carrying the battalion’s headquarters elements and Dog Green beach master group landed too far west, under the cliffs. There are no exact details of the casualties they took getting across the beach, but the one-third to one-half that did make it spent the rest of day pinned down by snipers. Dog Green remained a lethal sector. Not all sections of the badly scattered B/116 landed there, but those that did quickly joined the survivors of A/116 in their fight for survival at the water’s edge.[36] Two companies of 2nd Rangers coming in later on the edge of Dog Green did manage to reach the sea wall, but it cost them half their strength to do so.[37]
To the left of Dog Green the Dog White sector sitting between the Vierville and Les Moulins strongpoints (defending the draws codenamed D-1 and D-3 respectively) was a different story. As a result of earlier mis-landings and now because of their own mis-landing, the troops of C/116 found themselves alone there, only a handful of tanks from the first wave in sight. The smoke from the grass fires covered their advance up the beach, and they gained the sea wall with few casualties and in better shape than any unit on the 116th RCT front so far.[38] Whilst the 1st battalion was effectively disarmed of its heavy weapons when D/116 suffered a disastrous landing, the build up at Dog White continued when C/116 was joined by the 5th Ranger battalion pretty much in its entirety. The Ranger commander, recognizing the situation at Dog Green on the run in, ordered the assault craft to divert into Dog White (the 2nd Rangers still got caught out on the right flank of the Ranger landing). This was also the sector where the 116th RCT regimental command group, including the 29th Division assistant commander Brigadier General Norman Cota was able to land relatively unscathed.[37]
Further east a similar picture of the effectiveness of the strongpoint defenses emerges. On the Dog Red/Easy Green boundary the defenses around the Les Moulins strongpoint took a heavy toll as the remainder of the 2nd battalion; H/116 and headquarters elements, struggled ashore there. The survivors joined the remnants of F/116 behind the shingle where the battalion commander was able to organize 50 men in an improvised advance across the shingle. A further advance up the bluffs just east of Les Moulins was too weak to have any effect and was forced back down.[39] To their left, mainly between the draws on the Easy Green/Easy Red boundary, the 116th RCT support battalion landed without too much loss, though in the process becoming scattered and too disorganized to play any immediate part in an assault against the bluffs.[40]
On the 16th RCT front, the eastern end of Easy Red was another area between strongpoints that allowed G/16 and the support battalion to escape destruction in the advance up the beach. Nevertheless, most of G/16’s 63 casualties for the day were suffered before this company reached the shingle. The other 2nd battalion company landing in the second wave; H/16 came in a few hundred yards to the left opposite the E-3 draw and suffered for it, being put out of action for the next few hours.[41]
The situation on the eastern most beach (Fox Green) where elements of five different companies had become mixed up was little improved by the equally disorganized landings of the second wave. Two more companies of the third battalion joined the melee, and I/16, part of the first wave that had drifted east, finally made a traumatic landing there at 08:00. A captain from this company found himself senior officer in charge of the badly out of shape 3rd battalion.[42]
American situation
Infantry were not the only troops to be landed in the second wave. Supporting arms began to arrive and experienced the same chaos and destruction as the rifle companies. Combat engineers tasked with clearing the exits and marking beaches landed without their equipment and off target. The half tracks, jeeps and trucks that did not founder in deep water became jammed up on the narrowing beach, easy targets for German defenders. The loss of the majority of radios made the task of organizing the scattered and dispirited troops even more difficult, and those command groups that did make the shore were limited in their effect to their immediate locality. With the exception of a few surviving tanks or a heavy weapons squad here or there, the assault troops had only their personal weapons, and these invariably required cleaning first after having been dragged through surf and sand.[43]
The survivors at the shingle, their first time in combat for many, were relatively well-protected from small arms fire, but were still exposed to artillery and mortars. To their front lay exposed and mined flats, and the bluffs above were still active with enemy fire. Morale was a problem.[44] Many groups were without leaders and were able to witness the fate of neighboring troops and the landings coming in behind them. Wounded men out on the beach were drowning as the tide came in, and out to sea landing craft were being pounded and set ablaze.
German situation
As late as 13:35 the German 352nd division was reporting that the assault had been hurled back into the sea.[45] From their vantage point at Pointe de la Percée overlooking the whole of the beach from the western end the German perception was that the assault had been stopped at the beach. An officer there noted that troops were seeking cover behind obstacles and counted ten tanks burning.[46] However, as early as 07:35 the third battalion 726th Grenadier Regiment, defending Draw F-1 on Fox Green beach, was reporting that 100-200 American troops had penetrated its front, with enemy inside the wire at WN-62 and WN-61 under attack from the rear.[47] Casualties amongst the defenders were mounting and at the same time that the 916th regiment, defending the centre of the 352nd zone, was reporting that the landings had been frustrated, it was also requesting reinforcement. The request could not be met because the situation elsewhere in Normandy was becoming more urgent for the defenders. The reserve regiment, the 915th of the 352nd division, which had earlier been ordered against the American airborne landings to the west of Omaha, was diverted to the Gold beach zone east of Omaha when the defenses there crumbled.[48]
Breakthrough
"Are you going to lay there and get killed, or get up and do something about it?"
Unnamed lieutenant, Easy Red sector.[44]
One key feature of the landings was to influence the next phase of the battle. The draws, as natural conduits off the beaches, were the main targets in the initial assault plan. The strong defenses concentrated around these however meant that the troops landing near them quickly ended up in no shape to carry the assault against them. It was only in the intervals between the draws, at the bluffs, where units were able to land in greater strength and defenses were weaker, that advances could be made.[49]
The other key aspect of the next few hours was leadership. The original plan was in tatters, units were mis-landed, disorganized and scattered, commanders had mostly fallen or were absent, and there were few means of communication more than the shouted command available to those that were left. In places small groups of men sometimes scratched together from different companies, in some cases from different divisions, were "…inspired, encouraged or bullied…"[44] from the relative safety of the shingle to start the task of reducing the defenses at the top of the bluffs.
Assaulting the bluffs
As early as 07:30 survivors of C company 2nd Rangers, who had landed 45 minutes earlier on the right flank of Omaha in the first wave, had scaled the cliffs near Dog White and the Vierville draw. Joined later by a mis-landed section from B/116 this group spent the better part of the day tying up and eventually taking WN-73 defending draw D-1 at Vierville.[50][51]
At 07:50 C/116 led the way off Dog White between WN-68 and WN-70, forcing gaps in the wire with a Bangalore torpedo and wire cutters. More gaps were blown by 5th Rangers when they joined the advance 20 minutes later. The command party established themselves at the top of the bluff where elements of G/116 and H/116 joined them following their lateral move along the beach earlier, and the narrow front was widened to the east before 09:00 when small parties from F/116 and B/116 crested just east of Dog White.[52][51] The right flank of this penetration was covered by the survivors of the 2nd Rangers’ A and B companies who had fought their way to the top independently between 08:00 and 08:30, taking WN-70 that had already been heavily damaged by naval shellfire before joining the 5th Rangers for the move inland. By 09:00 more than 600 American troops in groups ranging from a few men to company sized had reached the top of the bluff opposite Dog White and were moving inland.[53][54]
The 3rd battalion 116th RCT forced its way across the flats and up the bluff between WN-66 defending the D-3 draw at Les Moulins and WN-65 defending the E-1 draw. The advance was made in small groups, supported by the heavy weapons of M/116 who were held at the base of the bluff. Progress was slowed by mines on the bluff slopes but elements of all three rifle companies, as well as a stray section of G/116, gained the top by 09:00, causing the defenders in WN-62 to mistakenly report that WN-65 and WN-66 had been taken.[55][56]
Between 07:30 and 08:30 elements of G/16, E/16, and E/116 came together and climbed the bluffs at Easy Red between WN-64 defending the E-1 draw and WN-62 defending the E-3 draw. At 09:05 German observers reported the loss of WN-61 and that only one machine gun was still firing from WN-62. Having reached the top hampered more by minefields than enemy fire 150 men, mostly from G/16, continued south to attack the WN-63 command post on the edge of Coleville. Meanwhile E/16, led by Lieutenant Spalding turned westward along the top of the bluffs and engaged in a two hour battle against WN-64. His small group of just three men effectively neutralized this point by mid morning, taking 21 prisoners and just in time to prevent it from engaging fresh landings below.[57] On the beach below, the 16th RCT commander, Colonel George Taylor had landed at 08:15. With the words "Two kinds of people are staying on this beach, the dead and those who are going to die-now let's get the hell out of here."[58] he started to organize groups of men regardless of their unit, putting them under the command of the nearest non-commissioned officer and sending them through the area opened up by G/16. By 09:30 the regimental command post was set up just below the bluff crest, and the 1st and 2nd battalions of the 16th RCT reaching the crest were being sent inland.[59]
On Fox Green, at the eastern end of Omaha, four sections of L/16 had survived their landing intact and they now led elements of I/16, K/16 and E/116 up the slopes. With supporting fire from the heavy weapons of M/16, tanks and destroyers, this force eliminated WN-60 defending the draw at F-1 by 09:00, and the 3rd battalion 16th RCT commenced its move inland.[60][51]
Naval support
The only artillery support available to the troops in making these tentative advances came from the navy. With no naval shore parties in action, targets difficult to spot, and because of the fear of hitting their own troops, the big guns of the battleships and cruisers concentrated on targets at each flank of the Omaha beaches. The destroyers, however, were able to get in close and from 08:00 were engaging their own targets. At 09:50, two minutes after the McCook destroyed a 75 mm gun position in WN-74, the destroyers were ordered to get as close in as possible. Some approached as close as 1000 yards (900 m) several times, scraping bottom and risking running aground.[47] An engineer who had landed in the first wave at Fox Red watched the Frankford steaming in to shore, thinking she had been hit and was being subsequently beached. Instead, she turned parallel to the beach and cruised westwards, guns blazing at targets of opportunity. Thinking she was going to turn back out to sea, the engineer realized that she had started to back up, still firing. At one point the gunners aboard the Frankford observed an immobilized tank at the water’s edge still firing. They watched its fall of shot and followed it up with a salvo of their own. For the next few minutes the tank acted in this manner as the ship’s fire control party.[61]
German defenses inland
Whilst the coastal defenses had not succeeded in fully halting the invasion at the beach they did have the effect of breaking up and weakening the assault formations as they struggled through them. The German emphasis on devoting resources to this Main Line of Resistance (MLR) meant that defenses further inland were significantly weaker and based on small pockets of prepared positions less than company sized in strength. This tactic was however enough to disrupt American advances inland, causing difficulties even in reaching assembly areas, let alone achieving D-Day objectives.[62] As an example of the effectiveness of this defense despite its weakness in numbers, the 5th Ranger battalion was halted in its advance inland by a single machine gun position hidden in a hedgerow. The attempt by one platoon to outflank the position ran into another machine gun position to the left of the first. A second platoon dispatched to take this new position on ran into a third machine gun position, and attempts to deal with this ran into fire from a fourth position. The success of the MLR in blocking the movement of heavy weapons off the beach meant that after four hours the Rangers were forced to give up on their attempts to move any further inland.[63]
Beachhead
Despite penetrations inland the key beach objectives had not been achieved. The draws necessary for the movement of vehicles off the beach had not been opened, and the strongpoints defending these were still putting up a spirited resistance. The failure to significantly clear the beach obstacles tended to force subsequent landings to concentrate in the Easy Green and Easy Red sectors.[64]
Where vehicles were landing they found only a narrow strip of beach with no shelter from enemy fire and around 08:30 the decision was taken to suspend all such landings. The closure of the beach to vehicles resulted in a jam of landing craft out to sea. The DUKW’s had a particularly hard time of it in the rough conditions. The experiences of the 111th Field Artillery battalion of the 116th RCT are indicative of the general situation these craft faced. Of the 13 DUKW’s being used to carry this unit in, five were swamped soon after disembarking from the LCT, four were lost as they circled in the rendezvous area waiting to land and one capsized as they turned for the beach. Two were destroyed by enemy fire as they approached the beach and the lone survivor managed to offload its howitzer to a passing craft before it also succumbed to the sea. This one gun eventually landed in the afternoon.[65]
The official record of Omaha reports that "…the tanks were leading a hard life…". According to the commander of the 2nd battalion 116th RCT the tanks "…saved the day. They shot the hell out of the Germans, and got the hell shot out of them."[66] As the morning progressed the beach defenses were gradually being reduced, often by tanks. Scattered along the length of the beach, trapped between the sea and the impassable shingle embankment and with no operating radios amongst the commanders, tanks had to be controlled individually. This was perilous work; the commanding officer of the 111th Field Artillery who had landed ahead of his unit was killed as he tried to direct the fire of one tank, the command group of the 741st tank battalion lost three out their group of five in their efforts and the commander of the 743rd tank battalion became a casualty as he approached one of his tanks with orders. When naval gunfire was brought to bear against the strongpoints defending the E-3 draw, a decision was made to try to force this exit with tanks. Colonel Taylor ordered all available tanks into action against this point at 11:00. Only three were able to reach the rallying point and two were knocked out as they attempted to go up the draw, forcing the remaining tank to back off.
Reinforcement regiments were due to land by battalion, beginning with the 18th RCT at 09:30 on Easy Red. The first battalion to land; 2/18, arrived at the E-1 draw 30 minutes late after a difficult passage through the congestion off shore. Casualties were light, though despite the existence of a narrow channel through the beach obstacles the ramps and mines there accounted for the loss 22 LCVP’s, 2 LCI(L)’s and 4 LCT’s. Supported by tank and subsequently naval fire the newly arrived troops took the surrender at 11:30 of the last strongpoint defending the entrance to the E-1 draw. Although a usable exit was finally opened, congestion prevented an early exploitation inland. The three battalions of the 115th RCT, scheduled to land from 10:30 on Dog Red and Easy Green came in together and on top of the 18th RCT landings at Easy Red. The confusion prevented the remaining two battalions of the 18th RCT from landing until 13:00 and delayed the move off the beach of all but 2/18, which had exited the beach further east before noon, until 14:00. Even then, this movement was hampered by mines and enemy positions still in action further up the draw.[67]
By early afternoon the strongpoint guarding the D-1 draw at Vierville was silenced by the navy, but without enough force on the ground to mop up the remaining defenders the exit could not be opened. Traffic was eventually able to use this route by nightfall and the surviving tanks of the 743rd tank battalion spent the night near Vierville.[68]
The advance of the 18th RCT cleared away the last remnants of the force defending the E-1 draw. When engineers cut a road up the western side of this draw it became the main route inland off the beaches. With the congestion on the beaches thus relieved they were re-opened for the landing of vehicles by 14:00. Further congestion on this route caused by continued resistance just inland at St. Laurent was bypassed with a new route and at 17:00 the surviving tanks of the 741st tank battalion were ordered inland via the E-1 draw.[69]
The F-1 draw, initially considered too steep for use, was also eventually opened when engineers laid down a new road. In the absence of any real progress opening the D-3 and E-3 draws landing schedules were revised to take advantage of this route and a company of tanks from the 745th tank battalion were able to reach the high ground by 20:00.[70]
Approaches to the exits were also cleared, with minefields lifted and holes blown in the embankment to permit the passage of vehicles. As the tide receded engineers were also able to resume their work of clearing the beach obstacles and by the end of the evening 13 gaps were opened and marked.[71]
German reactions
Observing the build up of shipping off the beach and in an attempt to contain what was regarded as minor penetrations at Omaha, a battalion was detached from the 915th regiment being deployed against the British to the east. Along with an anti-tank company, this force was attached to the 916th regiment and committed to a counter attack in the Coleville area in the early afternoon. It was stopped by "firm American resistance" and reported heavy losses.[72] The strategic situation in Normandy precluded the reinforcement of the weakened 352nd division. The main threat was perceived by the Germans to be the British beachheads to the east of Omaha, and these received the most attention from the German mobile reserves in the immediate area of Normandy.[73] Preparations were made to bring up units stationed for the defense of Brittany, southwest of Normandy, but these would not arrive quickly and would be subject to losses inflicted in transit by overwhelming Allied air superiority. The last reserve of the 352nd division, an engineer battalion, was attached to the 916th regiment in the evening. It was deployed to defend against the expected attempt to breakout of the Colleville-St. Laurent beachhead established on the 16th RCT front. At midnight General Dietrich Kraiss, commander of the 352nd division, reporting the total loss of men and equipment in the coastal positions, advised that he had sufficient forces to contain the Americans on D+1 but that he would need reinforcements thereafter, only to be told that there were no more reserves available.[74]
End of the day
Following the penetrations inland, confused hard fought individual actions pushed the foothold out barely a mile and a half (2.5 km) deep in the Coleville area to the east, less than that west of St. Laurent, and an isolated penetration in the Vierville area. Pockets of enemy resistance still fought on behind the American front line, and the whole beachhead remained under artillery fire. At 21:00 the landing of the 26th RCT completed the planned landing of infantry, but losses in equipment were high, including 26 artillery pieces, over 50 tanks, about 50 landing craft and 10 larger vessels.[75] Of the 2,400 tons of supplies scheduled to be landed on D-Day, only 100 tons was actually landed.[76] Casualties for V Corps were estimated at 3,000 killed, wounded and missing. The heaviest casualties were taken by the infantry, tanks and engineers in the first landings. The 16th and 116th RCT’s lost about 1,000 men each.[77] Only five tanks of the 741st tank battalion were ready for action the next day.[78] The German 352nd division suffered 1,200 killed, wounded and missing; about 20% of its strength.[74] Its deployment at the beach caused such problems that General Bradley, commander of the U.S. First Army, at one stage considered evacuating Omaha,[79] whilst Field Marshal Montgomery considered the possibility of diverting V Corps forces through Gold beach.[80]
Aftermath
The foothold gained on D-Day at Omaha Beach, itself two isolated pockets, was the most tenuous across all the D-Day beaches. With the original objective yet to be achieved, the priority for the allies was to link up all the Normandy beachheads.[80] During the course of June 7, whilst still under random shellfire, the beach was prepared as a supply area. Surplus cargo ships were deliberately sunk to form an artificial breakwater and, whilst still less than planned, 1,429 tons of stores were landed that day.[81]
With the beach assault phase completed the RCT’s reorganized into infantry regiments and battalions and over the course of the next two days achieved the original D-Day objectives. On the 1st divisional front the 18th Infantry Regiment blocked an attempt by two companies from the 916th and 726th Grenadiers to break out of WN-63 and Coleville, both of which were subsequently taken by the 16th Infantry Regiment which also moved on Port-en-Bessin. The main advance was made by the 18th Infantry Regiment, with the 3rd battalion of the 26th Infantry Regiment attached, south and south eastwards. The heaviest opposition was encountered at Formigny where troops of the 2nd battalion 915th Grenadiers had reinforced the headquarters troops of 2nd battalion 916th Grenadiers. Attempts by 3/26 and B/18 with support from the tanks of B/745 were held off and the town didn’t fall until the morning of June 8. The threat of an armored counter attack kept the 18th Infantry Regiment on the defensive for the rest of June 8. The 26th Infantry Regiment’s three battalions, having been attached to the 16th, 18th and 115th Regiments the previous day, spent June 8 reassembling before pushing eastwards, forcing the 1st battalion of the German 726th Grenadiers to spend the night extricating itself from the pocket thus forming between Bayeux and Port-en-Bessin. By the morning of June 9 the 1st Division had established contact with the British XXX Corps, thus linking Omaha with Gold Beach.[82]
On the 29th divisional front two battalions of the 116th Infantry Regiment cleared the last defenders from the bluffs whilst the remaining 116th battalion joined the Rangers in their move west along the coast. This force relieved the 2nd Ranger companies who were holding Pointe du Hoc on June 8 and subsequently forced the German 914th Grenadiers and the 439th Ost battalion to withdraw from the Grandcamp area which lay further to the west. Early on June 7 WN-69 defending St. Laurent was abandoned and the 115th Infantry Regiment was therefore able to push inland to the south west, reaching the Formigny area on the June 7 and the original D-Day phase line the following day. The third regiment of 29th Division; the 175th, started landing on June 7. By the morning of June 9 this regiment had taken Isigny and on the evening of the following day forward patrols established contact with the 101st Airborne Division, thus linking Omaha with Utah Beach.[83]
In the meantime, the original defender at Omaha; the 352nd Division, was being steadily reduced. By the morning of June 9 the division was reported as having been "...reduced to 'small groups'..." whilst the 726th Grenadier Regiment had "...practically disappeared."[84] By June 11 the effectiveness of the 352nd was regarded as "very slight",[85] and by June 14 the German corps command was reporting the 352nd as completely used up and needing to be removed from the line.[86]
Once the beachhead had been secured Omaha Beach became the location of one of the two Mulberry harbors, prefabricated artificial harbors towed in pieces across the English Channel and assembled just off shore. Construction of 'Mulberry A' at Omaha began the day after D-Day with the scuttling of ships to form a breakwater. By D+10 the harbor became operational when the first pier was completed; LST 342 docking and unloading 78 vehicles in 38 minutes. Three days later the worst storm to hit Normandy in 40 years began to blow, raging for three days and not abating until the night of June 22. The harbor was so completely wrecked that the decision was taken not to repair it; supplies being subsequently landed directly on the beach until fixed port facilities were captured.[87] In the few days that the harbor was operational 11,000 troops, 2,000 vehicles and 9,000 tons of equipment and supplies were brought ashore.[88] Over the 100 days following D-Day more than 1,000,000 tons of supplies, 100,000 vehicles and 600,000 men were landed, and 93,000 casualties were evacuated, via Omaha Beach.[89]
Today at Omaha jagged remains of the harbor can be seen at low tide. The shingle bank is no longer there, cleared by engineers in the days following D-Day to facilitate the landing of supplies. The beachfront is more built up and the beach road extended, villages have grown and merged, but the geography of the beach remains as it was and the remains of the coastal defences can still be visited.[90] At the top of the bluff overlooking Omaha near Coleville is the American cemetery.
Dramatizations
Notes
- ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p11-16. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p20. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p40. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p42. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p25. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Bastable, Jonathon (2006). Voices from D-Day. David & Charles. pp. p132. ISBN 0-7153-2553-1.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p26. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Lt. Col. Fritz Ziegalmann (Chief of Staff of the 352ID). "The 352nd Infantry Division at Omaha Beach". Stewart Bryant. Retrieved 2007-08-19.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p30. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p33. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Major Carl W. Plitt, 16th Infantry S-3. "Summary of Regimental Situation on D-Day". National Archives (College Park, Maryland),Rg. 407, 301 INF(16)-0.3.0, Box 5919. Retrieved 2007-06-14.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "16th Infantry Historical Records". National Archives (College Park, Maryland), Rg. 407, 301-INF (16)-0.3, Box 5909, Report of Operations file. 9 July 1945. Retrieved 2007-06-21.
- ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p30. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p30-33. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p33. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p48-49. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p36. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p54. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p38-39. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p40. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p41. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p61. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p42. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Bastable, Jonathon (2006). Voices from D-Day. David & Charles. pp. p131. ISBN 0-7153-2553-1.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p45. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p47-48. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p43-44. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p47. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p48. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Neillands, Robin (2001). D-Day, Voices from Normandy. Cassell Military Paperbacks. pp. p189. ISBN 0-304-35981-5.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Ambrose, Stephen E. (2002). D-Day, June 6 1944, The Battle for the Normandy Beaches. Pocket Books. pp. p331. ISBN 0-7434-4974-6.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Official estimates put the casualties for A/116 as high as two thirds, but of the more than 200 strong company Neillands and De Normann report that the unit "...had 91 men killed and almost as many wounded. Less than 20 men got across the beach." Stephen Ambrose reports that the company "...had lost 96% of its effective strength."
- ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p48-49. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p42-43. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p49. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p50-51. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p53. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p50. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p51-52. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p52. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p53-54. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p54. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help)Two of I/16’s six boats were swamped on their detour to the east. As they eventually came in under fire at Fox Green, three of the four remaining boats were damaged by artillery or mines whilst the fourth got hung up on an obstacle. - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p54-57. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b c "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p57. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p113. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p135-136. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p71. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Gordon A. Harrison (1951). "Cross-Channel Attack". Historical Division, War Department. pp. pp320-321. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p58. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p75-77. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b c Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p72. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p59-62. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p77-78. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p73. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p63-65. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p73 & p76. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p76-77. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p71. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p66-73. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p73-75. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Ambrose, Stephen E. (2002). D-Day, June 6 1944, The Battle for the Normandy Beaches. Pocket Books. pp. p386-389. ISBN 0-7434-4974-6.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) The official history attributes a similar action to the Carmick: "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p81. Retrieved 2007-06-10.{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Gordon A. Harrison (1951). "Cross-Channel Attack". Historical Division, War Department. pp. p326. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p93. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p79. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p80. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. pp80-81. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p82-85. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p95. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p104. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p106. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p102. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Gordon A. Harrison (1951). "Cross-Channel Attack". Historical Division, War Department. pp. p330. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ Gordon A. Harrison (1951). "Cross-Channel Attack". Historical Division, War Department. pp. p332. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ a b Gordon A. Harrison (1951). "Cross-Channel Attack". Historical Division, War Department. pp. p334. Retrieved 2007-06-22.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p109. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p108. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p109. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
- ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p70. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ a b Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing
Limited. pp. p87. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help); line feed character in|publisher=
at position 18 (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p96-97. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p94-95 & pp98-100. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p92-94 & pp97-100. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p147. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p149. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "Omaha Beachhead". Historical Division, War Department. 20 September 1945. pp. p161. Retrieved 2007-06-10.
{{cite web}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help) - ^ "A Harbor Built from Scratch". Retrieved 2007-09-10.
- ^ "Operation Mulberry". U.S. Army Transportation Museum. Retrieved 2007-09-10.
- ^ "Bridge to the Past - Engineers in World War II". US Army Corp of Engineers. Retrieved 2007-09-11.
- ^ Badsey, Stephen (2004). Omaha Beach. Sutton Publishing Limited. pp. p12 & p128-184. ISBN 0-7509-3017-9.
{{cite book}}
:|pages=
has extra text (help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help)
External links
- Omaha Beachhead, Official Army report
- American D-Day: Omaha Beach, Utah Beach & Pointe du Hoc
- 352nd Infantrie Division History
- D-Day : Etat des Lieux : Omaha Beach
- Photos of Omaha Beach and the American Cemetery, with text by Ernie Pyle and President Clinton
- Website & resources on D-Day landing at Omaha beach IT/EN/FR/DE languages
- IX Engineer Command