Jump to content

User talk:ST47

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EpicFlame (talk | contribs) at 06:50, 10 November 2007 (Hey: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Tuesday
12
November
2024
03:35 UTC
Archives
0x00
0|1|2|3|4|5|6|7
8|9|A|B|C|D|E|F
0x10
0|1|2|3|4

I am currently using a bot to delete links to a website that has been vandalized from some IP talk pages. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: To those using BAGBot code for other bots or using the STWP module, we are currently in revision 19 (log, current version) The individual scripts were last updated in:

  • BAGBot: Revision 16
  • AccReqBot: Revision 19
  • IMGBot: Revision 17
  • CSDWarnBot: Revision 19
  • STWP: Revision 18
  • AdminStats: Revision 19

Forks:

  • IMGBotL: Revision 11

Also available in the repository is the Perlwikipedia module, currently at revision 104. The current version is also available at the authors' repository.

Ensure that you are running the latest versions.

ATTENTION! IF YOU ARE REPORTING AN ISSUE WITH ONE OF MY BOTS, AND YOU'D LIKE IT TO BE FIXED BEFORE THE HEAT DEATH OF THE UNIVERSE:

  • Visit https://jira.ts.wikimedia.org/secure/CreateIssue!default.jspa (you will need to register)
  • Select:
    • Project: ST47's tools
    • Issue Type: Bug, new feature, whatever. If you don't know what this means, choose bug.
  • Click next.
  • Fill in a short summary, select a priority level, and look to see if the name of the bot is listed in the components section. If it is, select is, otherwise, select unknown.
  • Ignore affects version and fix version, I'll fill them in myself
  • Ignore assignee
  • If this is a problem with the bot that I am running, ignore 'enviroment'. If you are running my code, put your operating system and other information there.
  • Add a detailed description, and
  • Hit 'create'.

I'll receive an email immediately, and you will get an email back if I need more information, or once I fix the issue.

While I will receive a message on my talk page eventually, I have Ways of Knowing when I get new bugs filed through this process.

Notice to vandalizing halfwits, linkspammers, and people who don't read WP:NOT

Before you sit down and construct a series of vandalizations to this page, or whine about the article I put a CSD tag on, or my AfD vote, you should be informed that your world orbits a ball of fire. This ball of deadly heat is paradoxically far enough away that it actually provides some level of benefit to those who spend a measured amount of time in front of it. While you should not in any way stare at it, a respectful glance in its direction will show you that it is warm and in some ways healthy.

Accompanying the ball of fire is a collection of variant photosensitive lifeforms and constantly recycled breathing material, suitable for your use at any time you so please, and containing life-giving elements. As an added bonus, most of these materials are available to you entirely for free and 24 hours a day.

We encourage you to cease vandalizing or whining on this page and get to know the magic ball of fire.

Credit to User:Elaragirl for the above

Disclaimer: The above is intended as a humorous way to emphasize a point. If you are not humorous, feel free to continue to be a halfwit or linkspammer, or both if you prefer. You may also ignore the fiery ball, if you so please, however I warn you that without it, you would never have been permitted to enjoy linkspamming or halfwittedness or ignorance of WP:NOT.

Please sign your comments. To make a new section, click here, or just add a section to the bottom of the page. Remember to use a meaningful header.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.

If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:ST47.

Wikimedia Foundation
Wikimedia Foundation
Contents

Hi, can you add the stats of this account as well, combine them with the stats of my old account (Jaranda). Thanks Jbeach sup 21:57, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I cannot. The bot really just parses SQL results, and I can't manipulate them in this way. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 22:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JemtalentsearchVHS.JPG

Hi,

I created this image of the Jem: Talent Search VHS the other day, by scanning my copy of the video tape. This image belongs to me, but I'd like for it to stay on Wikipedia on the Jem (TV series) listing on Wikipedia for the purpose of showing an old video tape release of the TV series from the 1980s from Family Home Entertianment, under the show's Home Video releases section. Is there anyway I can get this image to stay on, or what proper copyright terms would fit this category? I just don't know anything about posting images on Wikipedia without the situation over copyright infrngement, etc., or whatever it is.

Thanks.

--User:Queen of Swords Oct. 23, 2007 1:02 AM

Lord Loxley

Hi, Yesterday you deleted the user pages for Lord Loxley (talk · contribs). I think I had a look at his talk just before, and if I remember correctly this was a banned user. In view of the editing history of Honour of Richmond, I wondered if Regiment (talk · contribs) could be a reincarnation. Was the deletion done at Regiment's request? /Pieter Kuiper 07:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there.

BAGBot seems strangely quiescent. Mayhaps a swift kick in the diodes is in order?  :-) — Coren (talk) 00:14, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lot of big words... --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 00:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have an objection to this. Where do I go to say I support this speedy deletion? Your bot did not make that clear to me? Chris 01:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I've deleted it - thanks! --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 01:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Post Philosophy

i am suprised that this article is deleted in just one day

i cannot figure out the urgency of the deletion

please inform me of what next to do —Preceding unsigned comment added by Motegole (talkcontribs) 10:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my talk page!!!!

Where are all my conversations?? Why did you delete my talk page???? --Hetfield1987 (Wesborland | James Hetfield) 12:33, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's marked as a temporary userpage, make sure you remove that category by the next time I go though. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 17:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why deleting

hi!

please be as kind as to enlighten me about the politics of this Wikipedia (i'm more frequent in the Portuguese version of it) concerning redirects ?

I mean Municipal wireless network is more frequently described as Municipal Wi-Fi, Muni Wi-Fi, Muni-Fi or even Mu-Fi. so, at least in Portuguese Wikipedia, these alternatives would have a redirect.

But they all have been removed ?!?!?

So, please tell me what should be done.

All the best,
--Hgfernan 17:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you're talking about. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
since you, an administrator knows nothing about a policy concerning redirects, i suppose the links were removed for no good reason.
so i recreated them.
all the best,
--Hgfernan 18:50, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't remove your links. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

javascript security

I just checked the pages listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts and protected some that weren't. Could you check to see that I didn't miss any? -- Flyguy649 talk 18:35, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

STBotI

I uploaded the Box art Gauntlet (NES) Unlicensed version, with the information;
Gauntlet by Tengen, for the Nintendo Entertainment System.
I found most of the cover art images on Wikipedia use this, and I've done it before without it being caught by a bot, as stated on the Licencing summeray thing that is applied when selecting box art, it says. "This image is cover art for a video or computer game, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the game's publisher or developer. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of game cover art to illustrate the packaging of the game in question on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, constitutes fair use under United States copyright law. Other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, might be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information."

I added the following message "The words "The #1 Arcade Hit" can be read just barely in this low-resolution image." but wasn't sure if it was because of the images size that the bot caught it or if I've been putting the discription stuff in the wrong place and this is the only bot that has caught it so far.(Floppydog66 19:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Have a look at WP:NFURG for the information you need to add. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 23:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like the source code for this bot, if you could. I would like to create a bot, and your bot is doing a lot of what my bot should do. Thanks in advance! Dreamy § 20:37, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's easy ;) it's here :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 20:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I thank you royally!!!*Bows deeply*... Dreamy § 21:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Now, I would just like to ask one more question. How do I implement the code for use with a bot account? Dreamy § 21:26, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just change the username, add a second argument for the password (line 7), and run it. You'll also need the two modules in this directory for it to work. (If you don't understand that, I'd suggest that you not run the bot, and post at WP:BOTREQ or here for another user who is more capable of operating it.) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 21:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion notice sent to the wrong person

Regarding the speedy deletion of Greg Shaw Urologist, the bot sent the warning to the wrong person. I am the one who put the speedy deletion tag on this article. --Blanchardb 02:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jira is that way. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 13:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

Can you remove my autoremove on Chanserv?

--Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 03:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 13:23, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why? Tell me why :) --Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 23:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:209.254.12.73

Yes, it was two hours ago, but this user edits pages on my watchlist while I'm at work and I get back to find he's still ignoring the warnings. It's not possible for me to report him from work. It's not like he's ever intending to stop until forced, as his previous IP, User:207.74.196.20 will testify. Any suggestions? Miremare 17:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The courtesy of a reply is too much bother, eh? Cheers then. Miremare 16:56, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Politics of Canada

I just wanted to express my sentiments about your comment at Template talk:Politics of Canada: rude, bullyish, and brutish. Poor form. --G2bambino 15:11, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

PS: seeing as you're so thorough with images and their use, please do something about the non-free image used in this template; it consists of a collection of non-free images. It's apparantly acceptable use was what inspired me to create a similar image for Template:Politics of Canada.

Furhter, Template:Politics of Australia, Template:Politics of Australia (side), Template:Politics of New Zealand, Template:Politics of the United States, Template:PoliticsUK, Template:Politics of Thailand, and, in fact, just about every politics template for every country, use non-free images. Seems you'll be busy. --G2bambino 15:16, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cricketer up for deletion

Hello. I am the creater of this article Morshed Hossain. This is notable under the wikiproject cricket notablity criteria. To be notable you need to have played at least one first class or list A match which this player has acheived making him notable. I hope this explanation means that the article will now not be deleted. Thanks. 02blythed 09:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned as to your reference to "Wikiproject Cricket notability criteria" - surely arbitrary groups of editors aren't making rules that affect the whole community?
However, I didn't tag that article for deletion, I was just letting you know. If he does pass Wikipedia's notability criteria, WP:BIO, then I'm sure it will be kept. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

About the picture that is up for deletion uploaded by me. Stop messaging me about it all the time. I have reverted it several times but you still put it back. Delete it right now. Thank you Woop-Woop That's the sound of da Police 11:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted it, thanks. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 22nd, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 43 22 October 2007 About the Signpost

Fundraiser opens, budget released Biographies of living people grow into "status symbol"
WikiWorld comic: "George Stroumboulopoulos" News and notes: Wikipedian Robert Braunwart dies
WikiProject Report: League of Copyeditors Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

Sorry for the tardiness in sending the Signpost this week. --Ral315

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 14:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot reaction time adjustment request

I uploaded a few logos recently and before I had the chance to construct a fair use rationale the bot had tagged the image within 2 minutes and spammed my talk page at the same time as in here and here. Could we make it wait a few more minutes? (Or alternatively teach it to be slightly more patient?) Many thanks. Dr.K. 01:05, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

and here with reaction time, a record breaking 1 minute. Any less and we'd be pulling in the milliseconds. Dr.K. 01:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the unit of time just less than the minute is the second, not the millisecond. The bot is intended to tag recently uploaded images. Once someone uploads it, it leaves a bit of time for someone to modify it, then it processes the image. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 10:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply, but I was taking the limit of time as Dt->0 to emphasise the point. I was not following the next smaller order of magnitude. Aside for the math technicalities, one or two minutes is not enough to create a new rationale. If we can increase it to let's say five or six, it would be nice. Thanks. Dr.K. 15:42, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There IS a box on Special:Upload for this sort of thing, that way the instant it is uploaded it becomes legal. You're asking for a distinction between "Hey, I stole this laptop" and "Hey, I stole this laptop, but I'll come back and pay for it once I get enough money", and there is no such distinction. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 17:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes there is an upload field that takes some details such as summary etc. But it looks small so I did not attempt to paste a fully functioning fair use template inside. But if you say it works I'll try it next time. Thanks for the suggestion. Dr.K. 18:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your tone

I consider this tone unnecessarily hostile and disruptive. Signature issue was not even in my mind. My concern was spam bots and you just had to talk down on me. -- Cat chi? 02:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Block request on User:216.37.203.62

I put up a block request on the administator intervention page, and it seems like your bot treated my request as a comment on another request, which lead to my request being removed when the bot addressed the request above it. If you could look into this, I would appreciate it. – SJL 20:43, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably because of the spaces on either side of the pipe in your addition. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 21:25, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for October 29th, 2007.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 3, Issue 44 29 October 2007 About the Signpost

From the editor: Florence Devouard interview
Page creation for unregistered users likely to be reenabled WikiWorld comic: "Human billboard"
News and notes: Treasurer search, fundraiser, milestones WikiProject Report: Agriculture
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:09, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Watchlist details

Hi - I see you've moved the arbcom message from MediaWiki:Watchdetails‎ to MediaWiki:Watchlist-details‎. I have some css code in my skin css (classic skin) to switch off displaying these messages, unfortunately it doesn't seem to work for the new message. I don't recall where I originally found the information about how to switch off the messages. Can you offer any advice please? – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:42, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated your standard.css - you have to add:
#arbcom-election-2007 {display:none}
Replacing arbcom-election-2007 with the name of the div, which you can find from looking at page source. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 10:31, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That works - many thanks. – Tivedshambo (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tangler speedy deletion

Hi. Ive recently rewrote an article for Tangler which has been deleted a total of 4 times in the past. Could this article please be left on Wiki just for a week or so as I want to add more information to it and improove it before it is deleted again. Thanks. HappyWanderer 14:24, 1 November 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HappyWanderer (talkcontribs) 13:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the one who nominated it, however I agree with the nomination. You've added the hangon tag, but it may be easier to write it first, then post, rather than storing an incomplete article on the wiki. Also, if it is deleted, please use WP:DRV instead of recreating it. Thanks, --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:15, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

bot spam

While I appreciate the notice that an empty category I originally created is being deleted, I only need that info posted to my talk page once, not 3 times.

I've removed that entry from my talk page 3 times now and it just keeps coming back. Please fix your bot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtphokie (talkcontribs) 12:04, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for korean system messages. :)

WonYongTalk 12:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that's my job :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 12:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion notice

I asked that all my messages be left at User talk:Porcupine; you may not have noticed this.--Porcupine (see my userpage for details) 15:01, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clarifications to my RfA

I have clarified question #5 on my RfA, please check again to see if you wish to change your stance. Thanks. OhanaUnitedTalk page 18:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unicode problem

STBotI notified users who don't exist, i.e. User talk:Óðinn rather than User talk:Óðinn. Dragons flight 22:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ko: mediawiki pages

ST47, I noticed you created several foreign language MediaWiki pages here on en: what are these for? — xaosflux Talk 05:24, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They're translations of names in our navigation bar - main page, and so on - into korean. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 11:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

signature illegible

Your signature is very, very interesting but difficult to read and doesn't say "ST47". Consider a minor change to (ST47) uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs 18:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regards,
Mrs.EasterBunny 19:00, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right ;) How's this: --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-Tor blocks

Hi ST47,

During August and September, you blocked hundreds of Tor network open proxies without any contributions, some for five years. However, searches on these IPs using this tool indicate many of these are not Tor proxies, and are reporting NAK. For example, user:211.69.195.34, with no contributions, was blocked for five years as a TOR proxy, but the tool reports it is not a Tor proxy. When you blocked the IP, you also subst'ed the TOR proxy block template onto the page, which at that time unfortunately contained a link to this sperm image, and now all the pages that were subst'ed contain that link (the template itself has since been fixed, but the subst'ed IP pages all have the link to the sperm image).

It looks as though you blocked quite a few non-Tor IPs with the 5 year Tor block. Did you use a script to block all of these? I undid a few the other day where there were complaints. Will you help me sort through this? Firsfron of Ronchester 21:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a script which took the IP and exit policy was used to assist in the banning. Unfortunately, many Tor nodes change IPs, which is why I started using shorter blocks. I haven't reviewed the early blocks, but I can do so in the coming week. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 21:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. I'm going to go ahead and unblock a few of the IPs that aren't (now) Tor exit nodes that were blocked for five years, to try to prevent collateral damage. Do you have a script to fix the links to the sperm image? Firsfron of Ronchester 21:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See this. Cheers. --MZMcBride 21:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for removing so many of the links. I removed a few myself. Of course, this still leaves the blocked IPs, which I haven't yet gone through. Firsfron of Ronchester 23:38, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeesh, this is a bigger project than I expected. I found 47 5-year-blocked IPs on this page alone. What sort of script were you using? Firsfron of Ronchester 00:16, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can I now delete this warning from my user Talk page? It appears to be "second time lucky". Martinevans123 22:03, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, looks like the image is good now. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 22:31, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HBC AIV helperbot4

Why does the bot remove my reports to AIV [1] [2]? Doesn't he like me, because I'm creating too much work for him there? ;) --Oxymoron83 19:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, he doesn't like you! I'd say you're right, it's an edit conflict, except the software just lets the bot go through, since it doesn't edit like a normal user. I'll look at the code later on to see if I can optimize the amount of time between loading and saving. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, I just benchmarked this, and it takes 1-2 wallclock seconds for the marking routine to run, timed from right before it loads the page to right after it saves it (thus, including server load time). Benchmarking from exactly after the load to exactly before the save, it takes 0.0006 wallclock seconds, give or take. Probably not a lot that can be shaved in there :) I think this was just a matter of bad luck for one user to be hit that way twice in the same day. I don't see much that can really be pared out in the code, but feel free to look and see if you find anything that I didn't! —Krellis (Talk) 16:38, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I got similar results yesterday. :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bot keeps restoring its warning

The bot has warned me about Grant Street (Pittsburgh) three times now, the first one now on User talk:NE2/Archive 9 and the others on User talk:NE2. --NE2 07:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Further, I can understand why this edit from the bot happened - it's annoying that it didn't notice the warning above, but since the one above was manual, I can forgive the bot. But this edit, when it had already warned me? That should be coded for! :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 05:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the first edit, it isn't supposed to do that, at least, I don't want it to do that - I'll review it and open a bug.
Regarding the second edit, it's a known issue, and I'll add it to the same bug as the above issue. (info be here) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 11:43, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let me be the first to congratulate you.

...that is if you are the user ST47 on stardust@home; for discovering a possible particle from outer space. (Just was looking through the candidates list, and your name looked familiar from irc and wikipedia) -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 15:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Please restore Josephine Ho.

She is extremely famous here in Taiwan and you must have been crazy to delete it. Jidanni 10:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Caknuck deleted it, not me. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 13:40, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, you might even want to emphasize on your templates:
"xxxx" is the bad guy who deleted your article, User:ST47 is the good guy who alerted you to the damage. Jidanni 00:36, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
heh! Maybe I should make that more clear :) --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 00:47, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two of your bots

Hi, I've found a couple of bugs with two of your bots:

  • At [3], ImageBacklogBot did not remove the image correctly. It incorrectly assumed that the ]] at the end of 'India' was the end of the image tag (it wasn't) and also it left a space at the beginning of the line which messed up the formatting.
  • Looking at the code for AccReqBot, at lines 97 and 104, you've hard coded in the year 2007. You might want to change this so that the bot still works next year. Tra (Talk) 18:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! The second is easy enough, I'll have to fix the regexes for the first - maybe I'll just make it throw a warning in that case, also pretty easy. --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 19:01, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: extension

It's been awhile since I've looked at that one, but I've copied to SVN and done a little cleaning. -Steve Sanbeg 20:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll have a look :D --uǝʌǝsʎʇɹnoɟʇs(st47) 20:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

How are you? --Flaaaaaaaaaaaming! 06:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]