Jump to content

Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 212.93.55.37 (talk) at 17:26, 28 January 2008 (→‎Errors in Did you know?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Error reports
Please only post error reports regarding what is currently on the Main Page or on Main Page/Tomorrow here.
For general main page discussions, go to Talk:Main Page.

Main Page error reports

To report an error you have noticed on the current Main Page or tomorrow's Main Page please add it to the appropriate section below. You can do this by pressing the [edit] button to the right of the appropriate section's heading. Also, please sign your post using four tildes (~~~~)


Note that the current date and time are in Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), which may not coincide with your local time zone. The next day's featured article of the day, picture of the day, and anniversaries update at midnight (00:00) according to UTC. The current time is 05:48 on September 16, 2024 (UTC). (Update)

Once an error has been fixed, the error report will be removed from this page; please check the page's history to verify that the error has been rectified and for any other comments the administrator may have made. Lengthy discussions should not take place here, and should be moved to a suitable location elsewhere.

References are helpful, especially when reporting an obscure factual or grammatical error, and a suggested rewording is helpful with a stylistic complaint. The main page usually defers to supporting pages for facts.

Errors in the summary of Today's featured article on the Main Page

Monday's FA:

  • Louis now pressed Marshal Villeroi to seek out Marlborough: if Marlborough is not linked, it looks like he sent the marshal out to buy cigarettes: an appealing image, but perhaps not an historically valid one. I would also query the now in this phrase: he pressed him back then.
  • Allies: an alliance consisting of whom?
  • Accordingly, the French Marshal set off The word marshal should be capitalised when it is used as a title, but not as a common noun.
  • and provocatively marched towards Léau: wearing suspenders and flimsy pants perhaps? I would suggest dropping the adverb, especially in the light of the British-English near-homophone of Léau.
  • the Duke: I would again question the capitalisation, but also whether readers who come across this on the main page, rather than seeking it out on a page of interest to historians, will know that the title refers to Marlborough.
  • Marlborough's subtle moves and changes in emphasis during the battle – something the French and Bavarian commanders failed to realize until it was too late – caught his foe between a tactical vice. Grammatical inconsistency in whether the tactics are considered singular (something) or plural (moves, changes, caught)
  • Town after town: a cliché, and followed by a list of three cities as examples. Kevin McE (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the brand of fags is called Marlboro. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.106.165 (talk) 19:37, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed numbers 1 and 3 above, along with 3 more of my own. Thank you. I'm not sure what to do with the rest. Art LaPella (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The involvement of C18 British forces indicates that British English would be more appropriate, in which case vice, not vise, would be proper. However, this was another clause I was tempted to take issue with yesterday: not only is it a loosely applied clichéd analogy, but it invites the question "between a tactical vice and what else?". If it must stay, then "between the jaws of a tactical vice" woiuld at least make sense. Frankly, with that many errors of basic presentation in one paragraph, I am surprised that it reached FA status at all. Kevin McE (talk) 17:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in In the news

Blockade

Isn't it Egypt's blockade, not Israel's? It was their wall, on their border. Shouldn't that be changed? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.209.221 (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The border is Egypts, the blockade is Israel's, disingenuous to call it otherwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.156.240.232 (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Both parties are active in the blockade.--mitrebox (talk) 00:07, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The two sides with an agreement to control that border, since the Six Day War, are Israel and Egypt, even after Israel's 2005 withdrawal from Gaza. Therefore Israel was free to close the border unilaterally. That's why there are talks planned to let Hamas or Fatah control the border, as Israel seems to want nothing to do with it. -- Kendrick7talk 01:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sentence starting "Thousands of Palestinians cross" should say "Hundreds of thousands of Palestinians cross." I haven't seen an estimate in the mere thousands in the sources. -- Kendrick7talk 01:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in Selected anniversaries/On this day

Errors in Did you know?

What sport is referred to in the item 1928-29 Boston Bruins Season? The teaser on the Main Page does not give any indication, while following the link to the article provides us with no more light. If it's chosen as an interesting Main Page highlight for users of Wikipedia, it should give some indication what it's about. Instead, it's all very obscure.

2024-09-16T00:00:00Z

Follow-up and old items

This holding area is for items that require further follow-up (for example, a general point that needs to be raised elsewhere), or for items that haven't been dealt with but where the topic under discussion is no longer on the Main Page. The items listed here should eventually be moved to a suitable location elsewhere, such as:

Any other problems

Please report other problems on Talk:Main Page.