I'm using IE 7, Java is enabled, and I'm not running or have popups installed. The problem I'm having with rollback is described here. Essentually, yesterday afternoon Eastern US time, I started experiencing a problem with rollback, when rolling back it rolls back the last edit, but identifies the edit before the one I'm rolling back as the one being rolled back: [1]. If I use one of the rollback and warn buttons, it warns the wrong editor, it will warn the editor who made the edit before the one I'm rolling back.[2], [3]. We've added this issue to the VP Bug Tracker.
Me too having the same problem.....the vandal edit gets reverted but in the summary it shows "Reverted edit by XYZ" where XYZ is the name of user who edited b4 the vandal user.....any idea how to fix this???? Gprince00707:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for looking into this. What does "partially fixed" mean? Which part was fixed..and how do fixes get to the client? I guess the client program is interacting with a program running on Wikipedia? Dreadstar†19:13, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It means on my dev version. When the dev version is ready for download, an announcement will be made. I'm having IE issues atm though, so I don't know when that will be. Ale_Jrbtalk19:19, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007
The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
melt the clouds of sin and sadness, drive the dark of doubt away!
MarlithT/C has wished you well! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the WikiJoy by sharing the joy someone else, Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Ale, I am getting a notice that the User list is corrupted when I attempt to verify authorization. It also directs me to a moderator. Maybe this is related to the bug that is being repaired; if not, I would like to use the current functional features of VP. Any assitance you can provide would be appreciated. Cheers. --Storm Rider(talk)17:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am aware of this issue. However, due to some severe connection issues with Wikipedia, I am unable to edit the large userlist to fix the issue. I have alerted other mods, so you'll have to wait for them to fix it. Sorry about that. Ale_Jrbtalk17:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVII - October 2007
The October 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XVIII - November 2007
The November 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIX - December 2007
The December 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008
The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an article that you nominated for deletion. You said it was spam, or a blatant advertisement. I think that with a complete re-writing, it wouldn't be such a bad article. Oh, when you patroll a page, after checking, or while checking, please go to the bottom right of the page, where you'll find a link named "Mark this page patrolled." Cheers, Basketball110the pages I've messed up completely23:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. It still reads as a blatant advertisement to me "Every Bossa Nova you drink saves one rainforest tree. You save the tree's life, the tree returns the favor. Nice.", but if you disagree, that's fine by me :). Ale_Jrbtalk23:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I'm not sure what it is I've written wrong since you wanna delete the Jonas Jeberg info.
I'm just trying to inform about the songwriter Jonas Jeberg and the records he's been involved with.
Please reviews the specification for WP:CSD before you make further semi-automated deletions. In particular, watch out about CSDA1 "No context. Very short articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car and makes people laugh." Context is different than content, treated in A3, below" If you can figure out what the article is about, this criterion is not applicable. For example, for a album with a track list and a stated performer, one can figure out what the article is about. If you dont think the article gives sufficient information, use PROD. ::on the other hand, an article saying only "Chrimson Viper Might Be Coming Into The Series as an all new character." is indeed a valid speedy under this criterion.DGG (talk) 00:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, schools can not be speedied for lack of notability. See WP:CSDA7. High schools are always defended, so there';s no point using prod for them either, and you need to go to afd. For elementary and intermediate schools, prod usually works.
And an article about a person asserting an national level award is an assertion of notability, and does not possibly fall under CSD A7. Ditto aboutthe Dean of BYU business school, or any other notable position If you think the notability is insufficient, use prod or afd.
Please do keep on patrolling,we really need it, and most of your tagging is excellent, but try for greater accuracy. DGG (talk)
Hmmm... IIRC, a number of other similar tagged notability articles were successfully deleted by admins. Ah well... I guess if I can be bothered to do it again, I'll have to be more careful. Cheers, Ale_Jrbtalk10:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please tell me why you removed my Fred Schneider edit - I'd already reported it as a false positive after the bot removed it. The song, and album 'The Power of Pussy' by Bongwater is a well-known (and great) album from the early 90's, and Fred sang on the title track!
