User talk:Chrishmt0423

Welcome to Chrishomingtang Talk Page!

[[File:|35x35px|link=User_talk:Chrishmt0423|Talk]]
Talk

Hi chris...

I think you should ask her. Goodshoped35110s 04:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And I was visiting your userpage two months ago and said that you are anti-gun. I am currently creating a userbox for that. Do you want the template? If so, visit my userpage and pick it up, soon. -Go od sh op ed 00:59, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go:

This user despises
"Guns and Violence".

-Go od sh op ed 01:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Woods Division

I don't really care. Go right ahead and delete it, I don't even really know why I even created the article, I mean the title is wrong, and stuff, but some of the California and PH/PM cable cars were built in its carpentry division. -Go od sh op ed 02:33, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And two other users have made edits to that article. -Go od sh op ed 02:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 38 Geary

The article was nominated for deletion once by User:Kurykh. It was withdrawn when it was convinced that the route was notable. If possible, you might as well redirect the page to B Geary. -Go od sh op ed 01:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Adopt-An-Alleyway Youth Empowerment Project

This organization is actually notable. I happen to know because I happen to be a member of this organization, which has been featured as a community hero over at Crissy Field (I think it's still there...), but, you probably never heard of it. It's been featured in the Chronicle (I think) twice, so people know about this youth organization, and it is a good club that can get people into college. I am not starting that article just for the spam thing, in fact, I do not intend to spam anyone here in Wikipedia, because that's what I do not do. So, anyway, I would like to tell you in a lengthy reply on how the AAA is notable, but, you probably know that Norman Fong started it in the 1990s as a recruitment for High School students (there's even a video of that in Youtube!), because back then people simply didn't give a care about the alleyways in Chinatown, nor were they even officially recognized as city streets. So, that's how it started, and we usually clean up every 2nd Saturday of the month, and they even run the Chinatown Alleyway Tours, which is a hit to tourists, and has been featured in Bay Area Backroads one time. That's how notable it is. I'm just saying. :) Cheers, -Go od sh op ed 04:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And can you please give me a more detailed reason why other than the fact that it is "non notable". -Go od sh op ed 05:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment

It says here that "I dislike people who destroy other's work." Well, I have a question, and it is not a personal attack, just to let you know. You've nominated three of my articles for deletion in the past two weeks! The first article was Woods Division, which I went ahead with, and the second article is the 38 Geary, which I convinced you to redirect it to the B Geary page. Now, you're on Adopt-An-Alleyway Youth Empowerment Project, which I created. Now I want to know, are you doing this because of its notability, or are you trying to personally attack me? The comment I made is nothing personal, and it should not be mistaken for a personal attack. Thank you very much and have a great evening. -Go od sh op ed 02:46, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi chris (Justin Doerr)...

I have been looking around Wikipedia and I have been getting information and re-editing it. The thing is I was reported for vandalizing an article by you when I was actually providing real information. it says in the San Jose article that the metro area has 1.8 million people but when I looked around and typed in San Francisco Bay Area which is considered a metropolitan area it says that there are 7.2 million people. you may be using sources from the U.S. census bureau but I happen to live in the Bay area and its universally agreed here that San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose metropolitan area is considered to be a whole consolidated area. therefore it is a FACT that San Jose is actually considered to be part of the San Francisco Bay Area —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.204.29.14 (talk) 03:46, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :D

WP:AWB

Hi Chrishomingtang. Thanks for you contributions. Unfortunately, I'd like to alert you to the following point from the AWB rules:

Avoid making insignificant or inconsequential edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists.

Thanks. —METS501 (talk) 03:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Chris, I'm kind of concerned that you jumped the gun with setting up multiple AfDs with such a short explanation in "per WP:OR". I don't believe that WP:OR stands alone as an argument because it can be considered proper to write neutrally while drawing from primary sources, such as implementing plot summaries. You can see my extensive argument here, which was necessary to basically cover all the bases from the beginning. At this, one editor even says, "Even the nominator doesn't offer a good reason to delete it." I won't be providing recommendations at these AfDs -- based on their outcome, I will revisit these articles in 6 months and make a more detailed argument. You have to present such AfDs in a manner in which people find it hard to submit a keep vote. I hope you understand. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 05:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is adding my blog considerd vandalism?

I have been trying to add my blog as an external link for the Golden State Warriors but you have removed and flagged it as vandalism. Can you please provide me with an explanation as to why you consider my blog to be vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vito.Delucchi (talk • contribs) 22:42, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why allow other blog links but not mine?

Can you please tell me why my addition to the external links was removed and what I can do to legally add the link I have been trying to add. I would like to follow the rules but I would also like the same rights to exists that the other blogs have seemed to have been granted but I for some reason unexplained to me have been denied. I look forward to hearing back from you.

You have no right now to keep removing the external link to the Blog. I have read the rules and will cite them if need be. You cited the rule:

"Sites that violate the copyrights of others per contributors' rights and obligations should not be linked. "

So I followed the terms and fixed the Blog. Even though both the other external links have violated the same exact rule you cited. This is unjust I ask you show some compassion as I have continued to try and appease your relentless effort to remove my additions. I only wonder what your motive is for this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.245.217.237 (talk) 01:39, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to continue this stubborn behavior at least let me know why? I have met the guidlines you have no basis. Please explain your intentions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.245.217.237 (talk) 02:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Chris (from Godisender)

Thanks for evening out the Ocean Park page, and sorry for over criticizing it. But I think we should still leave the price increase in, because to Hong Kongers it was pretty big news as it made its tickets almost as much as HKDL. The reason why I put the 14 rides thing on the criticism page was because Ocean Park claims it has 30+ attractions when it only has 14. DO you think it's possible to somehow say that without harming the neutrality of the page? Thanks a lot, Godisender —Preceding unsigned comment added by Godisender (talk • contribs) 14:33, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ghosttown, Oakland, California

Your hollow threats regarding the edit war there is not solving anything. Please try to actually resolve the problem instead of linking to WP:3RR wherever you go. Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 21:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Al Gore's Nobel Prize and Oscar Award

To: User talk:Chrishomingtang and User talk:JackofOz

From: User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro

Re: Academy Award#Miscellaneous records

Hi. I noticed your edits to the Miscellaneous Records section of the Academy Awards article, in which you indicate that "Al Gore really did not win an Oscar" in your edit summary box. Nonetheless, the substantive edit in the article states: "George Bernard Shaw is the only person to have been awarded both an Oscar and a Nobel Prize. Al Gore is arguably the second person to have been awarded both a Nobel Prize (the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 shared with Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) and an Oscar (presented by Davis Guggenheim, director of the Academy Award winning An Inconvenient Truth, in 2007)." I am pretty confused about this situation ... and this wording in the article is even more confusing. Did Gore win an Oscar or not? If he did ... or even if he did not ... why is his status "arguable"? Please reply at my Talk Page and clear this up for me. Please reply -----> User talk:Joseph A. Spadaro. Thanks. (Joseph A. Spadaro 04:37, 17 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

May I comment here? I was also under the impression that Gore won an Oscar, and that last week he joined the exclusive GBS club of Oscar/Nobel winners. I even made edits to both Gore's and GBS's articles saying this. But I was reverted and informed that Gore did not win an Oscar. The Oscar was awarded to the director of An Inconvenient Truth (whatever his name is), not to Gore. Gore got all the attention and the limelight, and he joined the production team on the stage at the Oscars ceremony, and it was widely reported that "Al Gore's film AIT has won the Oscar for Best Documentary" - so it's perhaps understandable why he was often referred to as an "Oscar-winner", but that is simply not the case. Either he was awarded an Oscar, or he wasn't - there's no middle ground with "arguably" etc. He wasn't awarded an Oscar. The Oscar-winning director (whatever his name is) must be fuming - could 1 person out of 1000 name him?

This reminds me of another case where misinformation was perpetuated for years. When I was at school, I was told, many times, that Australia's first Oscar winner was the photographer Damien Parer, who supposedly won the 1942 Best Documentary Oscar for Kokoda Front Line. This was something that every Aussie kid knew, because Parer was an icon in 1950s Australia, having been killed on duty in the Pacific while filming our boys in action against the enemy (he's a lot less remembered these days). But it was never true. The film that won that Oscar was produced by Ken G. Hall, and Hall was the one who was awarded the Oscar. When I first heard this, I said "Ken G who?". But it's true. -- JackofOz 05:11, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jack of Oz. Sorry that it has taken so long for me to reply back to you -- but lately I have been pretty busy with "real life" (i.e., non-Wiki life). Yes, you may comment here ... your comments are appreciated ... and, in fact, I was glad to get some input on this very issue. I had suspected all along exactly the scenario that you described. That is, Gore never really won that Oscar -- it was just sort of hyped up that way in the media. And, I agree -- no middle ground -- no "arguably" -- Gore either did or did not ... and, in this case, he did not. But, I wanted to give the original poster the benefit of the doubt, and -- as such -- I asked them to clarify this point for me ... just in case there was something that I was missing / unaware of. At this point, I am going to revert and/or edit the Academy Award article to reflect the actual scenario ... that is, George Bernard Shaw is the only winner of both an Oscar and a Pulitzer ... and Gore is not. Thanks for your input -- it is appreciated. Thanks! (Joseph A. Spadaro 19:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the heads up

I remember when I first got AWB, I know it specified not to just do it if it was blank spaces, but I didn't remember it being quite this specific. If you'll notice my history, I don't edit often anymore, and it's partially rules like this (or stuff like the discouraging of trivia sections or the many deletionists) that make me choose not to. This site is really good for information, but it's also by far one of the worst websites as far as discouraging information and improving web pages. Things shouldn't be taken nearly as seriously as people do (it's the Internet, after all), but clearly this is only getting worse. I sorta expected I might get a response about this, but figured I might not since no one's mentioned it before. Thought if I did, I'd just go on and give up editing anything else, so there it ends. Calaschysm 02:10, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:24617f.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:24617f.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:48, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of RfC on Ghosttown talk page

Just thought you might want to know that Alansohn removed the RfC you put up, in this edit. Since I'm apparently being quarantined there, maybe it's better if you put it back up (and perhaps warn him about such behavior while you're at it). +ILike2BeAnonymous 06:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Of possible interest

This, since you too were a target of that link. Thank you, by the way, for making an eloquent case on that rather dispiriting discussion. Biruitorul 01:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two things: one, that's a meta.wikipedia essay, so we don't have the power to do that over here. Two, even though I'm not a big fan of it either, it's regarded as a basic guideline and is much better known, making deletion far more difficult. So I would support an eventual deletion or at least discussion, but I suggest sticking to smaller, more winnable battles for the time being. Biruitorul 03:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MfD of historic pages

re: Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Wikipedia:Don't_be_a_dick_(3rd_nomination)

I'd like to officially warn you to not attempt to delete historic pages for whatever reason in future.

The reason for this is that we need to keep a complete historic record of how wikipedia is/was managed. Deleted information is not kept permanently. --Kim Bruning 22:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite!

Some invite, click here for more!
Hello, Chrishmt0423. Would you be interested in joining my new Wikiproject, the User:Goodshoped35110s/Wikipedia:Wikiproject Streets of San Francisco project. If you are interested to join, click on this link and put your name there! Hope you join! -Go od sh op ed 23:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know. It's bland.

Your title change proposal

I've left a note on Wikipedia talk:Don't be a dick#Proposal to rename article. - Rjd0060 05:19, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

I am not the other person reverting your changes, don't get paranoid. I am in California today. North of you. Even though we differ on certain topics, I still respect your knowledge. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 02:31, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Islais Creek Article

Good work on the Islais Creek article! It's an essential piece of San Francisco history that has been sorely missing from Wikipedia.Easchiff 14:03, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makedonsko Devoiche

Please explain which of the links in the article are actually reliable sources from which an article about the song can be written. Corvus cornix 22:23, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Milestone home runs

You may have an opinion on Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Milestone home runs by Barry Bonds.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 14:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comixtalk AfD

I don't know what that guys problem is but I just wanted to say thanks for your comment about me there. - Rjd0060 16:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for un-doing what user "ILike2BeAnonymous" did to my changes. I do not know who this person thinks who he/she is. Thanks for the help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Native94080 (talk • contribs) 08:32, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of how the average Wikipedia reader is currently moving

I just wanted to say that I thought your comment that my science article was: "an unencyclopedic piece of garbage. I can't believe we are discussing this." was totally out-of-line and rude. I would hope that if you have such strong feeling you could specifically add comments on what was "unencyclopedic" about it. That statement is not helpful and undermines the "consensus" process upon which Wikipedia is built. Wikipedia is such a broad project that what might seem obviously strange and unencyclopedic to an editor of the type of articles that you edit, might be very ordinary and obviously encyclopedic to people with other interests and backgrounds. Earthdirt 04:17, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Steve Kerr

A while back you made an edit that stated Kerr was a commentator for TNT and that he had retired. Do you think it would be appropriate you change this because he is so far still commentating. I dont know what is going on or when he will leave but i heard his voice during a recent telecast. I dont live in America so dont have access to TNT, can you help me out whats going on with him. Roadrunnerz45 04:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject World Heritage Sites has been created!

Some time ago, you showed support for the creation of such a WikiProject. It has now been created, active immediately. Your name has been automatically included in the list of participants. If you do not wish to participate, please remove your name from the list. Sorry for the inconvienience — _Jame§^ugrono 12:43, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great Barrier Reef

I'm not sure that I can agree with you on the importance of the Great Barrier Reef. I think that it should be of high importance — I mean, it is listed under all four natural criteria! _Jame§^ugrono 23:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Premier of the Republic of China, and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Wikipedia, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, Daniel 01:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go...

Goodshoped35110s would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Goodshoped35110s to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Chrishmt0423. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

-Go od sh op ed 17:39, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two optional questions waiting. I recommend you answer them, I mean, you're at 44%! -Go od sh op ed 19:22, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Chris, I have added a question to your RfA. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 17:54, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfA was unsuccessful

I am sorry to inform you that I have closed your RfA early as realistically it was no longer capable of succeeding. Do not be too disheartened - many of our finest admins were unsuccessful on their first attempt. I hope you will take onboard the concerns raised by those opposing and will consider running again in the future when you have more experience. Best wishes, WjBscribe 17:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, mine too. Don't worry, maybe you'll get it next time. I tried twice, and both times I've failed. -Go od sh op ed 04:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Premier of the Republic of China.

For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 17:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Christians in China

Hi! In your opinion, how many Christians are there in China?

We have some problems in making NPOV the articles Christianity in China and Protestantism in China because there are two users/missionaries that continue to rollback their POV version. --Xi Zhu (talk) 18:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

You have made me laugh out loud! Thanks to your witty sense of humor, I have added a quote of yours to my page, forever preserving it for posterity. Consider this a great compliment, as I only add one or two quotes per month. Great work, happy editing! Click here to view your quote. Thanks, Keeper | 76 20:56, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays!

Open your card →→→

—B oL @ 00:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Banned user TyrusThomas4lyf

Sorry! — I didn't get your message until just a little while ago, and by then you had already cleaned up most of the sock-puppetry. Thanks for catching this and dealing with it. Unfortunately, I'm sure we'll be at it again before too long. Myasuda (talk) 01:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, a determined person who commits sock-puppetry using an anonymous IP account is pretty hard keep off wikipedia. For example, see the comment from Fut.Perf. ☼ in the Conclusions area Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/TyrusThomas4lyf (4th). For what it's worth, I've tried a number of routes:

I've listed these in decreasing order of overall effectiveness, from my own personal experience. The first one tends to get a very quick response, while the second one is relatively labor intensive (although one can do a lot of copying and pasting — btw, the latest incarnation of this series of cases is Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/TyrusThomas4lyf (7th)). Another alternative is to contact an admin (such as KnowledgeOfSelf or Daniel Case) who is knowledgeable of the User:TyrusThomas4lyf case history as soon as sock-puppetry is detected. Still, if you can find a better long-term solution, by all means utilize it! I do appreciate your vigilance — allowing a banned user such as User:TyrusThomas4lyf to circumvent a block rewards persistence and deception, and so I feel that it's important to discourage further editing from this user. Thanks for your help! Myasuda (talk) 02:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to take up this person. I've taken PWee before, and I'm willing to go through this person. By the way, you tried checkuser? —B oL @ 02:42, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did not use checkuser because it is obvious that the ip is a sockpuppet of TyrusThomas4lyf. But anyhow, thanks. Chris! _ct 03:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Results came back. Confirmed. IP blocked. He should be out of commission for awhile... —B oL 01:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NBA season 2007-08

Hi there. On the page of the 2007-08 NBA season do you think its necessary to put down the fact Kobe was youngest to 20,000 points? Just about a week ago LeBron was youngest to 9,000 and i just dont think it really is a notable occurence. What do you think? Roadrunnerz45 (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Column vs Rows for NBA 07-08 Season Page

How does having conferences as ~~rows instead of columns~~ (I mean columns instead of rows) mess up the data? If there is a problem, I am happy to discuss it; I was just trying to fix the problem of teams like Minnesota going to two lines. Thanks.

Sometimes somethings (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thickness of computers...

Hello! You edited the Pedion and Actius MM10 Muramasas pages. I think there are some small errors:

"official data by Sharp, the minimum height of the Actius MM10 Muramasas was 80 millimetres (3.15 in)". I think it should be "0.54" (min.)/0.78" (max.)" not 3.15 inch in height.
"minimum height (thickness) measured at" should read maximum height (in both articles).

(rewrite - don't label the source as incorrect (that is pov) - let editors decide) <-- Sorry about that, I was in a hurry. :) Kricke (talk) 12:37, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hi there. I've seen that you're a great Wikipedian and that you speak Chinese. I would like to make a request: could you do a small translation of the Elaine Paige article into chinese? If you've no time then it's not to worry. Many thanks. Eagle Owl (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Acorn, Oakland, California

An article that you have been involved in editing, Acorn, Oakland, California, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acorn, Oakland, California. Thank you. Icamepica (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Confederate Florida Currency link

Hi, Chris.

The reason I added the mentioned link was because it did not contain any advertising links within in it. I had that come up with others I did, so I think it would be okay to include it since it has to do with part of Florida's history, and there's nothing to distract from the link's main objective. Take care. Igo4U —Preceding unsigned comment added by Igo4U (talk • contribs) 14:14, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Quadruple-double‎ . Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Illadelph halflife (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Thanks Chrishmt0423
	I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5)^[1]. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Wikipedia.
	Regards, nat^tang 04:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]