Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Anime and manga

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.81.95.231 (talk) at 20:04, 17 August 2008 (→‎Anime and manga). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject
Anime and manga
v · t · e · rc
Main project page  talk
talk
Guidance
Manual of Style talk
Online sources talk
Reference libraries
 → Books talk
 → Documentaries talk
 → Magazines talk
 → Manga magazines talk
Templates talk
Articles
Departments
  Assessment talk
 → Changelog
 Cleanup talk
 → Category
 → Cleanup listing
  Deletions archive · talk
  Requests archive · talk
Topic workshop talk
   Yellow pages talk
Task forces
Biography talk
Bleach talk
Conventions talk
Digimon talk
Dragon Ball talk
Evangelion talk
Gundam talk
Haruhi Suzumiya talk
Hentai talk
Light novels Joint TF! talk
Sailor Moon talk
Studio Ghibli Joint TF! talk
Visual novels Joint TF! talk
Yu-Gi-Oh! talk
Related projects
Parent
 → WikiProject Japan
Related
 → WikiProject Animation
 → WikiProject Comics
 → WikiProject Film
 → WikiProject Television
 → WikiProject Video games
  → WikiProject Pokémon
  → WikiProject Square Enix
Other
Wikipe-tan talk
Newsletter archive
Character articles
Shortcuts
Deletion Sorting
Project

This is a list of transcluded discussions on the deletion of articles related to Anime and manga. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting.

You can help maintain the list on this page as follows (open the edit box first):

  • add a new AFD discussion (once it has already been opened on WP:AFD). Place on this page:
{{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}}
Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. New entries go to the top of the list. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
{{afdl|article title|deletion debate link|debate start date (ISO format)|debate end date (ISO format)}}
  • remove an AFD from this page, which is not on a relevant subject, by deleting it.

Please note that adding an AFD to, or removing it from, this page does not add it to, or remove it from, the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page, before adding it to this page.

It is also helpful to:

  • tag an AFD, once it is on this page, by adding to it:
{{subst:delsort|Anime and manga}} <small>—~~~~</small>
  • If you wish, you can automate this task by adding {{subst:deltab|Anime and manga}} to your monobook.js file. See Template:Deltab for instructions.
  • This tag will display a note that the AFD has been listed here (in addition to the main AFD page).


 {{{linktext}}}

 {{{linktext}}}

{{{linktext}}}

{{{linktext}}}

{{{linktext}}}

|}

Related deletion sorting


Deletion Archive   Deletion Archive


Anime and manga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merged and redirected to List of extraterrestrials in Dragon Ball . I merged in the lead paragraph - anything more that is sourced and isn't just OR can be added. Black Kite 22:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Namekian

Namekian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

This article asserts zero notability through reliable sources, and is simply a repetition of the plot of various Dragon Ball articles plot sections in an in-universe way. It is therefore wholly duplicative, unnotable, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 15:27, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


  • Keep & Clean Up It shows notability through the references it uses, in the same way as Son Goku. I don't see any plot repetition in the article (except in the History section, but that's to be expected [you can't have a Dragon Ball race article that makes no mention whatsoever about plot]). Little to none of the information in the article is duplicative. An in-universe tag should be placed, but deletion is overkill.--KojiDude (C) 15:45, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. The article needs cleanup and reliable sources. Once that is done, then the article should be fine. RobJ1981 (talk) 15:53, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's great to hear, and I look foreword to seeing those references posted here so we can all know how notable this is. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:38, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well I never said I would do it, I just gave advice to KojiDude. Personally, I'm not so sure if sources do exist. RobJ1981 (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The Planet Namek article was some barely-linked to series of small paragraphs made by one guy a few weeks ago with no references and etc, on top of being a really minor part of the series in and of itself though. - Norse Am Legend (talk) 04:21, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List_of_Galaxy_Angel_characters; action to be taken by others. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 14:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nano-Nano Pudding

Nano-Nano Pudding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

It seems to me that such a minor fictional character as Nano-Nano Pudding should not have it's own entry. The article itself is just not notable enough! I can understand a brief summary in the game Galaxy Angel, but having an article on the character is just going too far. Tbsdy lives (talk) 08:52, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 02:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AD Vid-Notes

AD Vid-Notes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

Procedural Nomination: PROD, de-PROD, re-PROD. Initial PROD reason: "This article is about a DVD feature that may not be notable enough to be included on Wikipedia." For full prod notes, see Talk:AD Vid-Notes. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:11, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]



The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge with List of Doraemon media. Later split-out may become feasible as more information becomes available to support a separate article. Sjakkalle (Check!) 06:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doraemon The Musical: Nobita and the Animal Planet

Doraemon The Musical: Nobita and the Animal Planet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)
  • Comment: A more reasonable rationale would be WP:CRYSTAL. I note that most likely all information at this point would be in Japanese, so the incident English g-hit is not at all a convincing evidence of non-notability. I note also that given the strong notability of the franchise, that if/when the musical happens, it will almost certainly pass WP:N. Withholding !vote till evidence of Japanese searches are brought forth. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete lack of sources mean that there is no verifiable information to be merged anywhere. Spartaz Humbug! 19:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tenkaichi Budokai

Tenkaichi Budokai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View AfD)

This article asserts zero notability through reliable sources, and is simply an in-universe repetition of the plot of various Dragon Ball media articles plot sections. It is therefore entirely duplicative, and should be deleted. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 17:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Fair enough. The sources are the article now are all primary, and my Google search turned up nothing useful in terms of reliable sources. Based on that, I find it unlikely that reliable, non-fansite sources have ever covered this topic in detail. Ultimately though, the burden is not to prove non-notability as items are only presumed to be notable via significant coverage in secondary sources. In other words, someone needs needs to come up with good sources or the topic is presumed to be non-notable. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 16:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Anime and manga categories, templates, and misc

no categories, templates, or misc listed for deletion at this time

Proposed deletions

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Anime_and_manga&oldid=232545193"