User talk:80.2.189.171

This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.

The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

Vandalism

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to George VI of the United Kingdom. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. LibLord 19:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Margaret Thatcher. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 63.215.122.7 19:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Paul Norfolk Dumpling 18:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced Information

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Paul Norfolk Dumpling 18:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Glossary of cue sports terms, you will be blocked from editing. Pennstatephil 19:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Disagree with warning level; that was not severe enough vandalism for a final warning. Use this instead:

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Glossary of cue sports terms. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Thank you. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 00:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

user had already recieved level 3 vandalism warning in june.

May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Enemy Territory: Quake Wars, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Enemy Territory: Quake Wars was changed by 80.2.189.171 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-05-28T17:30:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sale, Greater Manchester, you will be blocked from editing. Parrot of Doom (talk) 23:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.189.171 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for experimenting with the page Smarties (Nestlé) on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 23:53, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Alex Salmond, you will be blocked from editing. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Someone may have nicknamed him that—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.189.171 (talk • contribs)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Yorkshire. Sionus [talk] 00:15, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom of speech?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.2.189.171 (talk • contribs)

Not for clear, unhelpful vandalism about you not liking Yorkshire, no. Have a look at WP:NOTFREESPEECH. --McGeddon (talk) 00:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Fact. PWN!

Also be thankful, this is keeping you in a job.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.2.189.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i dont see what i've done wrong?

Decline reason:

If you don't understand why this is not a helpful way to make the encyclopedia better, then you lack the good judgment needed to help write the encyclopedia. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am most frightfully sorry about not leaving you a note to say you were blocked. As you've noticed, you are. Vandalism. It's not funny. Angus McLellan (Talk) 01:51, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.2.189.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i've learnt my lesson honest sir, i dont do it again

Decline reason:

This only a short while ago, combined with this cited above by the prior reviewing admin, FisherQueen (talk · contribs), is not encouraging. — Cirt (talk) 04:48, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.2.189.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

last edit was not vandalism and could be correct?

Decline reason:

yes it was vandalism— Jac16888 (talk) 19:27, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Celtic F.C. has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ^LeaveSleaves _talk 19:35, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Westminster constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:45, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pork pie. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alansohn (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC) This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Harry Potter (character). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 01:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.2.189.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i forgot what was inappropriate

Decline reason:

Sure you did — Jac16888 (talk) 01:32, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

80.2.189.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i forgot what was inappropriate but i have a fair idea now

Decline reason:

You forgot that changing a picture of a french fry to a used condom was inappropriate? You really think we're stupid, huh? — Smashville^talk 01:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Academic Challenger (talk) 01:20, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Brechin City F.C.. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sceptre ^(talk) 23:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John Major, you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sceptre ^(talk) 23:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ash Ketchum. DA Skunk - (talk) 23:51, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru ^talk 00:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

80.2.189.171 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This seems to be a persistant and re-occuring conflict between both myself and some of the incompitant administrators at wikipedia. I feel i have been harshly punished for my own unique, inspiring and alternative conributions towards wikipedia. Please would you prvide me with a list of exactly what it is i have done that requires such a ridiculous and unjustified ban and help me to contribute better articles in the future. I have provided a self portrait to show you that i am in fact one of the few contributors who is young, good looking and a man who should be ncouraged to edit and help inspire the younger community to further the need to expand wikipedia. Thankyou and i hope this issue can be resolved quickly to ensure i can continue my contributions.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This seems to be a persistant and re-occuring conflict between both myself and some of the incompitant administrators at wikipedia. I feel i have been harshly punished for my own unique, inspiring and alternative conributions towards wikipedia. Please would you prvide me with a list of exactly what it is i have done that requires such a ridiculous and unjustified ban and help me to contribute better articles in the future. I have provided a self portrait to show you that i am in fact one of the few contributors who is young, good looking and a man who should be ncouraged to edit and help inspire the younger community to further the need to expand wikipedia. Thankyou and i hope this issue can be resolved quickly to ensure i can continue my contributions. [[File:L Sanger.jpg|thumb|upright|, Future face of wikipedia]] |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This seems to be a persistant and re-occuring conflict between both myself and some of the incompitant administrators at wikipedia. I feel i have been harshly punished for my own unique, inspiring and alternative conributions towards wikipedia. Please would you prvide me with a list of exactly what it is i have done that requires such a ridiculous and unjustified ban and help me to contribute better articles in the future. I have provided a self portrait to show you that i am in fact one of the few contributors who is young, good looking and a man who should be ncouraged to edit and help inspire the younger community to further the need to expand wikipedia. Thankyou and i hope this issue can be resolved quickly to ensure i can continue my contributions. [[File:L Sanger.jpg|thumb|upright|, Future face of wikipedia]] |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This seems to be a persistant and re-occuring conflict between both myself and some of the incompitant administrators at wikipedia. I feel i have been harshly punished for my own unique, inspiring and alternative conributions towards wikipedia. Please would you prvide me with a list of exactly what it is i have done that requires such a ridiculous and unjustified ban and help me to contribute better articles in the future. I have provided a self portrait to show you that i am in fact one of the few contributors who is young, good looking and a man who should be ncouraged to edit and help inspire the younger community to further the need to expand wikipedia. Thankyou and i hope this issue can be resolved quickly to ensure i can continue my contributions. [[File:L Sanger.jpg|thumb|upright|, Future face of wikipedia]] |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.