Jump to content

User talk:Gogo Dodo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anglswings6510 (talk | contribs) at 18:05, 22 March 2009 (→‎'god' are you?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

  Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an editor without an account, I will reply here.
When leaving messages, please keep these tips in mind:
  • Use a descriptive subject/headline.
  • If you are asking a question about an article, please tell me which article you are referring to.
  • Please do not add your message to another editor's conversation unless you are commenting on the same topic. Start a new section, unless...
  • If you are continuing a conversation with me, please edit the relevant section instead of starting a new section.

Click here to leave me a message

Dried fruit

Hey Gogo (if I may; if not, Dr. Dodo?), thanks for reverting this act of spamming. The user is a repeat offender, by now; care to apply a more serious warning? Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:44, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Professor Dodo! Drmies (talk) 01:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italy-Malta relations

May I ask you the reason for your revert? I was undoing an undiscussed, and non-supported merge - not deleting content, which you'll see was returned to Pro-Italian Maltese. If you did not realise this, I would be very grateful if you could revert again. If of interest, the request for page protection I filed is here. Cheers Geocourrier (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Geocourrier. BTW I am not Geocourrier, as you can verify if you wish by CU. All this mess has been created by the "hate toward everything italian" of PiccoloModificatoreLaborioso, who now uses even a french name probably because of that rejection. --Right2 (talk) 15:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

drookie98

I have been informed that Random.Person219 is drookie98. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclarenaustralia (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:17, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you look on his userpage it has drookie98 in the Aliases section. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:24, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:28, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know until he filled it in. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:32, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I said I was informed that it was him, I didn't said if I thought it was true or not. Mclarenaustralia (talk) 07:47, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mike's Day Off

Lucky you finally did. It's been about ten months since I've seen the episode, so my memory of it is somewhat fuzzy now. The only dilemma was why only this year and not the year it was produced. Because it seemed to me that it followed the rerun of the 200-jobs lookback episode. Also, did you see the episode in 4:3? All I know is that the show switched to 16:9 after the 100 Jobs Special. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 08:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:13, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Why have you reverted my edit on Mike's Day off? Its not aired yet. Can not find proof of that anywhere!? Kalistorm (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Where did it air? Link? Kalistorm (talk) 01:33, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

James Teej

Hi, I am not sure as to why the James Teej article is seen as advertising or whatever else is has been deleted for. Pls adivse me as to how I should change this. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecraigon (talk • contribs) 05:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:23, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Julianathomas

Thanks for your help and advise.

Julianathomas (talk) 05:58, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

deleting article

new to wikipedia confused to why our article/page on our band keeps getting deleted maybe you can help we looked at other band sites and added what we thought was enough to start our article Apparently we are doing something wrong. Appreciate the help

(67.117.172.234 (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC))Carbon 9[reply]

The article was deleted because it was blatant copyright infringement. The article also does not establish why the band is notable enough for inclusion on Wikipedia per the notability guideline. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OnMobile

Re. declined speedy for OnMobile

A related, very similar speedy was agreed; I don't see this company is notable, and specifically I don't see how this article can be cleaned up to make a valid entry without starting from scratch.

As you decided to decline the speedy, will you be checking all the links to see what portions of the facts they support, or will you be listing the article for AfD?

From a quick glance, I see that there is a long list of awards, which is not supported by a reference; the article, therefore, acts as an advertizement for the company concerned; the mere fact it appears on wikipedia serves to promote the organisation.

Do you believe that the article will be edited to create useful content? Or will nobody bother, and it will sit here promoting the company, thus abusing the principles of wikipedia?

I realise that, technically, it might be possible to find sufficient notability in some obscure financial news item, but I fail to see the value in keeping the article. I would ask you to consider WP:COMMONSENSE, ie what value will this article add to wikipedia.

I hope this doesn't sound too accusatory; that's not my intention. I hate spam, I hate spammers, and I'm fed up of spending hours checking obscure reference links, flagging articles as unreferenced, removing spam links, etc etc, just for an anonymous IP to pop in and reinstate them or put yet another odd reference in, which takes time to follow, and often there is a WP:SRS at the end of it.

Thanks for your time reading this - again, apologies for a bit of a rant,

--  Chzz  ►  09:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please feel free to put back any parts that you feel are referenced with a suitable reliable source.
Thanks, --  Chzz  ►  19:49, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On the above article, you have just reinstated the following fact;
"60-70% p.a revenue growth"
Please could you tell me where the reference is for this information,
Thank you. --  Chzz  ►  19:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry that you felt my edit summary was inadequate; I genuinely believed that the information I removed was the non-referenced portions of the article. My question above was a genuine one, and I think it's clear that there are no supporting references for either that specific information, or almost all of the other assertions in the article. Following your reversion, I have removed some specific segments of the article, in separate edits, with full comments in the edit summary and further information in the article talk page. If you do have any further objections or suggestions regarding the edits, I would appreciate it if you could discuss them in the talk page, especially prior to any further reverting. Regards, --  Chzz  ►  21:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for helping me out!


KSWarrior8 (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

re the reverting of vandalism on my userpage. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for protecting the hoax article Ashlie Michelle Cebak from recreation

I was taken in by it and spent 2 hours giving it a copy-edit... THEN realized the thing was probably fake... THEN got verbally abused by the creating editor.

I'll be a bit more leery before investing time in young articles. :)

Thanks for doing the admin thing, too. :) Have a great weekend! :)sinneed (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WQA notification

You may want to check out WP:WQA in regards to the comments made by your new friend WLaccount (talk · contribs). However, I probably should have went straight to ANI on this right away, as this is starting to spiral. MuZemike 08:42, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard all that. I'm going right to ANI. MuZemike 08:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:55, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from 121.96.122.156

i think this is still important, even with the season having no mutinies as of yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.96.122.156 (talk) 08:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but I think the method you used only with the wording is a bit klunky. I recommend bringing it up on the article Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:53, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

excuse me?

have you been in ohlkahoma? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidyman7 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i forgot to sign on the subject "Excuse Me?". i will sign NOW. Aidyman7 (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

whoops

sorry ... missed that part. Good catch. — Ched ~ (yes?) 05:26, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:32, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'll get there ;) .. was the 4im warning to User talk:ScHoOlThAtFoOl for the 2 edits they did to White supremacy a proper use of that warning? — Ched ~ (yes?) 05:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CloseXFD.js

Hi there. I feel a bit bad for bothering you again but I thought you might allow me to. I'd like two improvements to the CloseXFD script you have written. First of all, it would be nice if the "close" link would appear on log-subpages as well for those XFDs that use them, for example on Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 4 or Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 3. That would make using it much easier. As for the other improvement idea, a bit complicated I guess, it would be great if (if one chose "delete") the script could open new windows/tabs with the deletion page and the reason prefilled (e.g. [[Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 3#Template:The Mysterious Cities]]) for each page linked by templates like {{tfdlinks}} in that section. It would be great if you could consider this. Regards SoWhy 09:57, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adding the close link to the FfD and TfD sub-pages should be easy enough since I would expect them to be like the AfD sub-pages. I'll look into it. As for the second request, I'll have to think about it. The problem isn't opening the tabs and inserting the right deletion reason. The problem is parsing the deletion discussion to figure out which articles/files whose tabs I need to open. With the section being a potential mess of anything and everything added to it, I'm a bit worried about parsing the wrong thing. That's why I'm also very leery about automatically deleting anything. One false parse and a very wrong deletion can occur. =\ One other thing I want to do is restore a Close link into the individual AfD sub-pages. I wanted the Close link on the AfD sub-page the other day when I followed the AfD link on the article to close the AfD as speedy delete, but then had to go search around the daily sub-page to find the Close link. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:42, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
FFD and TFD don't behave like AFD, there is not a page for every nom but for every date with the nominations as sections. But it's like the layout on the main page, so it should be easy to do. As for the second thing, my request was not to auto-delete those things but to open a window with the deletion reason prefilled because it's quite annoying to have to manually create that section link. The deletion itself should still be manually. As for the links to parse, at least at TFD there is {{tfdlinks}} that should be only used to list the nominated template. Regards SoWhy 11:34, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nvm the latter thing, I forgot that {{tfdlinks}} has a special delete link for that ;-) SoWhy 11:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Adding the close link to the FfD and TfD date sub-pages shouldn't be a problem. Everything is clean to parse, so it shouldn't be a problem. As for the second request, I understand what you are asking, it's how to get there without making a mistake that is the problem. Opening the tab and filling the form out is easy, it's figuring out to open with the tab that is the problem. I'm having some difficulty explaining what the problem is, but I'm trying to work out the programming issue in my head. I'll see what I can do. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reply

I got your reply.

Thanks for the info that your friend is on wikibreak. I have requested a deletion review. Geo Swan (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I appreciate the restoration. In his article Pountain said:

"I was permitted an appeal, but it was disposed of in about two minutes and then the piece was gone."

I thought maybe User:Tiggerjay might have left a reply on the talk page, but there is no sign of that. Geo Swan (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Boba Jango

Those grey rectangles annoy any casual reader, they aren't necessary. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boba Jango (talk • contribs) 01:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Globally

Hey there, I saw your spammer warning note on Globally's talk page from 5 March. I removed some more Globally links from the San Clemente, Mission Viejo, and Laguna Niguel articles a few minutes ago. Since you left the final warning on their page a couple weeks ago, this is just a heads up if you need to / want to follow up on it. Townlake (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Saw the reply; thanks. Heads up - new account, similar name, same purpose. Townlake (talk) 15:39, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:52, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on "John Adler"

I just wanted to say thanks for stepping in and reverting Larueness's edits. Larueness and a number of other new users have no edits other than this persistent vandalism to the John Adler article (I suspect sockpuppetry). In any case, it is very frustrating that they keep re-adding this "teabag incident" under the Controversies section, as it is completely unreported by reliable sources, unconfirmed, and possibly a hoax. My request for temporary semi-protection of the article was denied. Since you are an administrator, I was hoping you could block the offending users. (I'm unfamiliar with the procedure for that, as I've never had to deal with such a problem during my time on Wikipedia -- until now, that is.) Thanks. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 14:56, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Adams

Hey why do u keep deleting my page about Nick Adams? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtremenick (talk • contribs) 17:46, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from EnigmaKH

You must be a robot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by EnigmaKH (talk • contribs) 17:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

delete wittygraphy

Hi you just deleted my article. I saw many other smaller social networks w/ a similar page thus I am wondering what is the qualifying critetria, thank you Heidi —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wittygraphy (talk • contribs) 04:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why Did You Delete the Hero Cruz?

Please explain as the SOA and many in SF plus the FBI would like to have this page.

Jon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.157.35.2 (talk) 05:09, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted because it does not establish the notability of the person. Additionally, the article had issues related to biographies of living persons. Any criminal activity should reported to the local authorities, not posted on Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Gogo Dodo. Thanks so much for your concern and care wrt this entry. Please help me understand what we need to do to get this entry back up. I'm new to the structure of wikipedia and definitely need help/guidance ... cognitonium (talk) 15:11, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Mr. Gogo Dodo.
I concur with your deletion of the Cruz page. He is a fraud, and any legitimate special operations solder can tell simply by looking at his absurd photographs, which we have downloaded and safeguarded.
Mr. Cruz has been referred to the POW Network, where his name and photograph have already been enshrined on one of their Walls of Shame. We will be referring him to the Assistant Attorney's Office, and to the Inspector General of the Veteran's Association. Mr. Cruz is in violation of multiple Stolen Valor statutes, and it is quite possible that he is drawing VA benefits under fraudulent circumstances.
For those who wish to see the original page in its pristine form, all that they need to do is search on Google and view a cached page.

Estéban (talk) 15:43, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

you are wrong

i will make 9 clicc again why because i am putting it up u have no right 2 put it down i dont care what yo own on the site delete everone else's pages then because as long as theres a computer in america 9 clicc will be posted —Preceding unsigned comment added by J648 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ford Europe

Several users including yourself are intent on reverting my edit and accusing me of vandalism and disruption. That article is in a terrible state. But if you want to leave the article full of unreferenced nonsense then fine, I won't bother making any improvements to it. Fordline (talk) 19:25, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting content is no improvement. If you want to question certain statements you can add {{fact}}-tags to the article. Also, you can discuss serious issues on the article's talkpage. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 19:31, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for indefinitely blocking that person who repeatedly vandalized "The Brady Bunch"

Thanks for indefinitely blocking that person who repeatedly vandalized The Brady Bunch. Is nothing sacred? :)

That is a comforting show in a scary world. Imagine if some young people had read that stuff.

Good job. LA Movie Buff (talk) 22:51, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My post

why delete my article, i spent 3 hours on it my dads gonna go mad —Preceding unsigned comment added by M 1132 (talk • contribs) 22:56, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Message from Xtremeskater007

I'm sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtremeskater007 (talk • contribs) 23:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perplexed by your Non helpful deletions

I have been trying to add some interesting and factual information to my son-in-laws living bio page. (Senator Beau McCoy). Rayc helped me by getting a photo I had taken during the innauguration onto the page. Needless to say I don't know much about this cyber experience. I put in some facts about Beau that my own memory can attest to; and yet I found these things online. The first time you deleted I figured it was because there was no proven reference cited. I did not know how to do this, but I found the "Link" symbol and knew what that was, so I put the pieces back in and then put in links to where they were found online (news stations, newspapers, online groups, and the senators own webpage). Yet you deleted them all again. SO are you totally offended by Beau's political stands and beliefs? Are you doing this for personal reasons? It would seem if I simply have made a mistake in citing references you could send me an e mail or 'talk' and tell me what to do...of just do it by editing the links to what they should be? I'm trying my best...for a grandmother who doesn't do much but read e mail online, I thought I had done pretty well. Anglswings6510

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion "Asian Medical Students' Association"

Hi there, I am Peter, the current Secretary of Promotion and Publication (an Executive Committee) of Asian Medical Students' Association-www.amsainternational.org I've posted articles about AMSA International but was deleted because of on 05:28, 16 September 2008 by you, because of (G12: Blatant copyright infringement). I need to clarify that AMSA International is a student-led, non-profit, non-political organisation. We're just like other international students organisation, and have been linked by several article (e.g, International Federation of Medical Students Association). And since I'm an official of AMSA, I have the right to copy sentences from our website.

Could you please restore it, made an article of it, or explain what should I do?

Thanks heaps, ‎ Peter Wijaya (talk) 18:24, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

can u not delete my article erosion of privacy

first of all cause its not finished

second of all its for an ITM school assignment. which we have to make it look like a wiki artcile n i found it easier to create on then print screen n make one in dreamweaver

thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Geeorgia (talk • contribs) 00:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Republic D-T

Hi, I was creating a page with the name of Republic D-T I want to keep it in Wikipedia Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runetri250 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HEEEEEY!!

quit doing that! everyone likes pepsi! it should be heard! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Inthe614 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well Mr. 'god'..is it? Neutral? Politics is not neutral and neither are we. We have beliefs and passions, emotions, ideals etc. I was a Democrat for a while, then an Independent. I changed to the Republican party after meeting Senator McCoy in real life, following him for over a year on TV, in newspapers, and hearing speeches. I don't read campaign fliers so YOUR prejudice is showing. By totally obliterating all of my posts, you showed your own biased viewpoint. I also have met US Senator Johanns, Governor Heineman, Shane Osborne, and Chuck Hagel to name a few. I have nothing positive to say about Hagel so I won't post anything to be polite and unoffensive. The others I am not moved by enough to post anything. But Senator McCoy is special and I wanted to let others know a bit about him. I used sources but they weren't good enough for you. Even McCoy's own words about what motivated him to get into politics and how he encourages children to follow their dreams and work hard...were not worthy enough for you to allow to be put on Wikipedia. Again...your prejudices continue to show. I find you and your 'editing' offensive. You don't try to teach, you don't talk with the person whose posting you disagree with, you are no help at all. You are egotistical too. I am thankful there are others on Wikipedia who are willing to help newcomers, teach them, and aren't so completely mean spirited. I hope you are very proud of yourself and get off on your 'power' to delete other's thoughts and words and opinions. Anglswings6510 (talk) 18:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Anglswings6510[reply]

'god' are you?

Well Mr. 'god'..is it? Neutral? Politics is not neutral and neither are we. We have beliefs and passions, emotions, ideals etc. I was a Democrat for a while, then an Independent. I changed to the Republican party after meeting Senator McCoy in real life, following him for over a year on TV, in newspapers, and hearing speeches. I don't read campaign fliers so YOUR prejudice is showing. By totally obliterating all of my posts, you showed your own biased viewpoint. I also have met US Senator Johanns, Governor Heineman, Shane Osborne, and Chuck Hagel to name a few. I have nothing positive to say about Hagel so I won't post anything to be polite and unoffensive. The others I am not moved by enough to post anything. But Senator McCoy is special and I wanted to let others know a bit about him. I used sources but they weren't good enough for you. Even McCoy's own words about what motivated him to get into politics and how he encourages children to follow their dreams and work hard...were not worthy enough for you to allow to be put on Wikipedia. Again...your prejudices continue to show. I find you and your 'editing' offensive. You don't try to teach, you don't talk with the person whose posting you disagree with, you are no help at all. You are egotistical too. I am thankful there are others on Wikipedia who are willing to help newcomers, teach them, and aren't so completely mean spirited. I hope you are very proud of yourself and get off on your 'power' to delete other's thoughts and words and opinions. Anglswings6510 (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)Anglswings6510Anglswings6510 (talk) 18:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gogo_Dodo&oldid=278978707"