Jump to content

User talk:Stevertigo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Leadwind (talk | contribs) at 14:22, 22 May 2009 (→‎minor edit?: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

Presence

Perhaps you didn't see the discussion on this but the consensus vote was to let Presence remain the Led Zeppelin album. It's on the Talk page. MegX (talk) 05:12, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not interested in what you have to say. The consensus was to keep this a Led Zeppelin album. I intend forwarding this to an admin. 05:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
    • I don't accept your "apology" because despite pointing out to you that there was already a vote taken, you still ignored my request to change it back to what it was. If you were really genuine about it you would have reverted back as an honest mistake. You did not. MegX (talk)
    • No I believe you're wrong. Wikipedia does things by consensus, not what you believe is "right". I notice you've backed down now from the God thing to the Dab page issue because others did not support your point of view. If you believe what you were doing was right the first time you wouldn't have backed down. MegX (talk) 06:36, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your comments, which you added in discussion at Talk:Presence. Please note that on Wikipedia, consensus is determined by discussion, not voting, and it is the quality of arguments that counts, not the number of people supporting a position. Consider reading about the deletion policy for a brief overview for the deletion process, and how we decide what to keep and what to delete. We hope you decide to stay and contribute even more. Thank you! --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 22:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments on Talk:Presence: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 22:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the record:
  1. User:HexaChord ("User") removed a note I left at Talk:Presence,
  2. User then leaves a templated note (top above) on my talk "welcoming" me to Wikipedia, and claiming that the "vote" (13 to 3) doesn't apply because Wikipedia is based on consensus.
  3. I respond to that note on his talk page with a pithy retort.
  4. I find that User has reverted the note at Talk:Presence, and undo User's removal of my note, referring to him in the comment as "kid."
  5. User removed my reply to his comment at his talk page, calling it "trolling" [1]
  6. User leaves me another form note on my talk page, this time accusing me of "personal attacks."
  7. User removes my note at Talk:Presence again.
  8. User:Bkonrad restores the note, calling User's revert "clueless"
  9. I restore my edit to Talk:Presence, informing Bkonrad that ANI is in order.
  10. -Stevertigo 22:56, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Criticism sections

Hi Steve, I wanted to run this by you. This move has been nominated for speedy deletion; do you have any objection? (Watchlisting) - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 17:44, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nevermind ... it was deleted in the time it took me to type that! - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 17:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New image project

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special Salvation edit

I changed that due to the fact that the phrase "The concept of special salvation refers to all theological doctrines that assert a one true faith, and that others will not be saved" sounds like predestination. While that might be what some consider that to be true, that would be a POV. By adding, "unless they repent", it seems to make it a less POV statement, and more accurate. If the phrase, "unless they repent of their sins.", would that be acceptable? Joshua Ingram 04:21, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Levelchecksig.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Levelchecksig.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MBisanz talk 23:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pinyinacc.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Pinyinacc.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paullusmagnus-logo (small) reloaded.png missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Paullusmagnus-logo (small) reloaded.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers. If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Odd template

Whats this all about, Template:Translateto?--Jac16888Talk 23:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

again, why? A simple redirect would suffice here if you're trying to add a variation of {{Notenglish}}.--Jac16888Talk 02:02, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Jac. Its for a project I won't get around to dealing with until later this week. If you like, you can just blank/redirect it until I can deal with it. -Stevertigo 02:08, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

minor edit?

It's not right to add oneself to a list of active page editors (talk:Jesus) and label it a minor edit. It gives the impression that you didn't want anyone to notice, and it's not how the "minor edit" designation is to be used. Leadwind (talk) 14:22, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Stevertigo&oldid=291618352"