Jump to content

Talk:North America

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pauldanon (talk | contribs) at 23:44, 30 June 2009 (→‎scope). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:VA Template:Outline of knowledge coverage

Template:WP1.0 Template:Archive box collapsible

Last page has been archived.--TownDown How's it going? 21:08, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Central North America

Should we include the three territories of North America?

  • Northern North America
  • Central North America
  • Southern North America

Allthough contrary to belief, The United States of America aka America is not located in Central North America as this entity is allready occupied by the City Of Winnipeg. Kind Regards, American(Can) (talk) 01:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More divisions? No, we should not. Not relevant. AlexCovarrubias ( Talk? ) 12:30, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why the countries are unclassified is because there isn't any consensus on what countries constitute each "region", besides, those "regions" that you mention are mostly unused, I can't think of the last time I heard in the news "Earthquake strikes in Central North America" or something like that. Supaman89 (talk) 21:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maps for continents - proposal

Currently a number of different styles of maps are used for continents (and for the poles), for example:

I'd like to try and standardise maps across the following articles: Americas, North America, South America, Africa, Asia, Europe and Oceania (and also, ideally, Arctic and Antarctica. My preference is for the orthographic projection currently used at Europe because:

  • It's an SVG instead of a PNG, so can be scaled easily.
  • New maps can be relatively created from existing SVGs (i.e. Europe's map - or the other SVG maps visible at File:Europe (orthographic projection).svg - can be recycled).
  • As an orthographic projection it allows the maps to be centred on the relevant continent or territory.

Assuming there's consensus for this, I'll post a request at Wikipedia:Graphic Lab/Image workshop (unless, of course, anyone volunteers beforehand!) However, before doing that I do want to check that there is consensus for this at each article affected. Additionally, I'm posting this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography to increase the exposure - I'd rather find out if this is a stupid idea before I start requesting new images ;-)

Personally I think it would be good if the Arctic and Antarctic maps were consistent with the continent maps. I realise that the poles may have different requirements, however.

This proposal is quite a radical proposal, affecting many articles, and deals with areas I don't normally edit in. I'm therefore prepared to be slapped down if I'm stepping on toes!

Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 19:16, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those maps look good, if you could make them I'll support using them in the articles you mentioned. Supaman89 (talk) 00:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Bosonic dressing (talk) 14:52, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nice map! Good job. AlexCovarrubias ( Talk? ) 19:53, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

scope

North America surely ends at the USA's southern frontier. Below that is central America. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauldanon (talkcontribs) 23:39, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it depends on the definition. Certainly NAFTA use a different definition, one that takes in Mexico. Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 23:43, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Definition is what we're talking about. Equally absurd is that Nunavut is America.