User talk:ScienceGolfFanatic

Welcome!

Hello, ScienceGolfFanatic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 03:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Dbacvdeifdgthoimjskflan Golf Subpages

Hello. I have nominated four subpages of yours for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Dbacvdeifdgthoimjskflan Golf Subpages. Basically, Wikipedia is not a webhost, an doesn't have enough space to keep material unrelated to Wikipedia on its servers. You are welcome to leave your input in the aforementioned discussion, but I recommend you save a local copy of the pages before the nomination expires and the pages are deleted. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 03:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I deleted those pages. If you want the text, feel free to leave me a note. A realize a lot of work went into this. Xavexgoem (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Can I have your email address? (alternately, set that up in your preferences. That way, no one can see what it is, and I can email you using WP software. Very handy.) --Xavexgoem (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocked

This account, ScienceGolfFanatic, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

This is often not a reflection on the user, and you are encouraged to choose a new account name which does meet our guidelines and are invited to contribute to Wikipedia under an appropriate username. If you feel this block was made in error, you may quickly and easily appeal it—see below.

Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a 'real-world' group or organization. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. This is possible because even when you are blocked, you can usually still edit your own talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note, you may only request a name that is not already in use. The account is created upon acceptance – do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change since we can far more easily allocate your new name to you, if it is not yet used. Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. For more information, please visit Wikipedia:Changing username.
Alternatively, you can "abandon" the contributions under this username and create a new account, which is much faster and easier, especially if you have few or no edits.

Last, the automated software systems that prevent vandalism may have been activated, which can cause new account creation to be blocked also. If you have not acted in a deliberately inappropriate manner, please let us know if this happens, and we will deactivate the block as soon as possible. You may also appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

--BorgQueen (talk) 02:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScienceGolfFanatic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An explanation is required to why this username is inappropriate.

Decline reason:

Your username is confusing, in that it is a long and apparently random sequence of letters, making it difficult for other editors to use in communication or discussion relating to yourself. As has been stated above, you are encouraged to edit under another name. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 12:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rename request

Please verify that the rename request posted at Wikipedia:Changing username#Dbacvdeifdgthoimjskflan is you. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:11, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My account has been blocked, so it's unverifiable. Dbacvdeifdgthoimjskflan (talk) 16:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But indeed, it was me who posted the username renames. Dbacvdeifdgthoimjskflan (talk) 16:15, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was indeed the verification needed. Give me a second while I unblock and rename. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. ScienceGolfFanatic (talk) 16:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked and renamed

There you go, all done. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:20, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and do not make experimental edits to articles, as you appear to have done with Mucus. Most of your edits are perfectly constructive, but you seem to have slipped here. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:32, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at ANI

You are the subject of a discussion at WP:ANI related to your possible sockpuppets and their vandalism. See WP:ANI#Several new users with similar pattern of creating nonsense redirects. You comments are welcome. Edison (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account and the sockpuppet accounts have been blocked indefinitely. If you wish to contest this block, you are welcome to add the text {{unblock|reason}} with a reason for an unblock. If you have any questions or concerns, you are welcome to post them here or contact me. Icestorm815 • Talk 21:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScienceGolfFanatic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It seems unfair and very penal for the main account of many sock puppets to be blocked indefinitely. And this account isn't even used for vandalism only, since most of the edits made in this account are completely constructive and useful. Knowing that Wikipedia blocks are meant to stop vandalism rather than punishment, this account should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Since there's no evidence that you intend to stop creating sock puppets, or to stop vandalizing (indeed, you don't seem to be saying any such thing), I can't justify undoing this block. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 03:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScienceGolfFanatic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The guide to appealing blocks indicates that blocking is to prevent damage or further disruption to Wikipedia. This account itself isn't doing anything to disrupt Wikipedia because the edits made here are very constructive, so it's not, and longer necessary for this account to be blocked. And blocking wouldn't make a big difference because even if I don't have this account, sock puppets can still be created.

Decline reason:

Humans are blocked, not accounts. No need to argue this; you're hardly the first person to create multiple accounts and then complain when the non-vandalizing ones are blocked along with the vandalizing ones. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScienceGolfFanatic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've understood that I've been blocked because I've abusively used multiple accounts to vandalize Wikipedia. I'm willing to stop using sock puppets disruptively if my account is able to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

Per Jpgordon. You're clearly not welcome here. Spellcast (talk) 03:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: he's been creating disruptive socks as recently as today. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note to Jpgordon: Just to let you know, I did NOT create sock puppets today. Just because you don't welcome me here doesn't mean you should give false information so that they would decline my request. ScienceGolfFanatic (talk) 10:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ScienceGolfFanatic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not create a sock puppet today. I've created sock puppets yesterday, but today's different now. I think that every puppet master, including me, should be given a second chance to prove that they are willing to stop vandalizing Wikipedia behind multiple accounts.

Decline reason:

If you created sockpuppets yesterday, then today is too early to give you a second chance. Please read our guide for appealing blocks - especially the end of this section. I would say that 1 month is an absolute minimum time you should wait before making an other request (some admins may allow for less) - or else your ability to edit this page will be disabled. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 11:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User talk:ScienceGolfFanatic/Archive0

-