Jump to content

Semi-periphery countries

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by D.j.weingart (talk | contribs) at 22:14, 30 November 2009 (terlouw cites). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In world-systems theory, the semi-periphery countries (sometimes referred to as just the semi-periphery) are the industrializing, mostly capitalist countries which are transitioning from the periphery to being core countries. As the semi-periphery countries, they feature organizational structures of both the core countries and the periphery countries and are geographically located between core and peripheral regions as well as between two or more competing core regions. The semi-periphery are regions in which the mediating activities that link core and peripheral areas take place.[1]

The semi-periphery is fertile ground for social, organizational, and technical innovation and has an advantageous location for the establishment of new centers of power. These changes often lead to the upward mobility of these same semi-peripheral actors in the core/periphery hierarchy.[1] "Semi-periphery" is, however, more than a categorical description, as it also serves as an analytical tool to interpret the social and economic change within a region.[2]

World-systems theory describes the semi-periphery as a key structural element in a world economy.[3] The semi-periphery plays a vital role comparative to that of the middle trading groups within an empire.[3]

Today, the semi-periphery is generally industrialized.[4] Semi-peripheral countries contribute to the manufacture and exportation of a variety of goods.[5] They are marked by above average land mass, as exemplified by China, India, Mexico, Iran, and other countries.[6] More land mass typically means an increased market size and share.[7] Semi-peripheral nations are not all large though, as smaller countries such as Italy, Israel, Poland, and Greece exist within the semi-periphery.[7]

Origin in sociological theory

The term "semi-periphery" originated in the thirteenth century.[8] World-system theorists originally used only two categories: periphery countries and core countries. A need for an "in between" category became quickly apparent,[9] leading to the establishment of the semi-periphery category for societies that have moved away from the periphery but have not become core. In other words, the category describes societies that remain dependent, and to some extent underdeveloped, despite having achieved significant levels of industrialization.[9] Semi-peripheral countries are tied into dynamic world systems that focus on the reliance of poor nations upon the wealthy, a concept known as the dependency theory.[10]

Function

File:China fuels 1983.jpg
Energy and mineral resources

The semi periphery is needed to stabilize the world system,[11] as it absorbs the shock between the low-income peripheral states and the high-income core states.[11] As the middle ground, semi-peripheral countries act as peripheral countries to core countries and as a core countries to periphery countries.[7] They also serve as a "political buffer zone" in that while they are exploited, they are also the exploiters.[11] These areas have either been core regions in the past or formerly-peripheral areas that have since advanced in the world economy.[7]

Semi-peripheral nations are a necessary structural element in a world-trade system,[11] since such nations can serve to alleviate the political pressures that the core can exert upon the periphery and the political unrest that the periphery can direct back at the core.[11] On the other hand, the semi-periphery can find itself excluded from the region's politics, as it lies just outside of the bounds of political arena of the core states.[11]

Semi-periphery exists because it needs to divide the economic power between the core and the periphery. Semi-periphery, refer to middle class by Wallerstein, is what makes the capitalist world function because it is much like the sociological structural functionalism theory, where norms, customs, traditions, and institutions act as “organs” that work toward the proper functioning of the “body” as a whole. Without these industrializing countries, change will never reach the periphery.[12]

In terms of their contribution to industry and economy, the contemporary semi-peripheral states are semi-industrialized.[4] Semi-peripheral countries are major exporters of minerals and agricultural goods. They are often focused in the manufacturing and exportation of industrial goods and commodities. While these advances separate the semi-periphery from the periphery, they lack the power and the economic dominance of core nations and still have a lot of un-managed poverty, which places them beneath the core.[6] Semi-peripheral countries are important contributors to the world economy for the above reasons and because they tend to have above average land mass, meaning that they are host to an above average market.[6] A primary example is China, a country with not only a large area but with a booming population.[6]

History and development

13th century

Ancient silk road trade routes across Eurasia

This era of human history found the semi-periphery concentrated in the area stretching from the Middle East to China, including India and the Mongol Empire.[8] This was the first time in history that the peripheries and semi-peripheries of the world became connected and involved in the trade of the world, both with cores and with each other.[13] Through a lucrative trade system, including heavy taxing of goods traveling through their borders, they were able to maintain a steady stream of wealth, becoming the driving forces of economic change throughout this time period.[8] In addition, a heavy emphasis on defense and border security, particularly among the Mongols, allowed them to be fairly impenetrable trade obstacles.[8] Geography also played a role, as seen in India's development of an impressive maritime industry. Because of its position along a convenient route through the Indian Ocean, India established its role as a "hinge" between the East and West.[8] Through their positions within the world trade system, semi-peripheries in the Middle East became crucially important in connecting the cities of Chinese and Indian cores with the fledgling cities of Europe, as well as serving as key points between other, more major core cities in the region, such as Baghdad, Cairo, and Aden.[8]

1875-1914

A ration party of the Royal Irish Rifles in a communication trench.

The West represented both the core and the semi-periphery, as Europe dominated 80% of the world's market share.[14] The rest of the world was a diverse periphery, with the exception of only some nations, like Japan.[14] As expansionism continued, new core nations emerged, such as the Britain, Germany, and the United States, while old cores such as Spain and Portugal faded to the semi-periphery.[14] The growth of the power of the common man led to an expansion of thought concerning democracy, communism, and revolution, which pervaded the weaker semi-peripheral nations overcome with civil distress.[14] In some cases, this led to the weakening of the nations, such as the violent revolution in France.[14] This contributed to the adoption of totalitarian leaders, as seen in Germany and France.[14] The major factors contributing to world war were the conflicts and power struggles taking place between the three classes of nations in the global system.[14] Nations considered part of the semi-periphery felt oppressed by the stronger, larger core nations.[14]

Today

  Advanced economies
  Emerging and developing economies (not least developed)
  Emerging and developing economies (least developed)
Classifications by the IMF and the UN

In today's global hierarchy, some states are transitioning upward while others are moving downward in terms of status and influence. Former colonial powers no longer exercise control over an international domain and are instead mostly relegated to their core; for example, former European world powers do not exert influence over colonial outposts in the Americas, Africa, or Asia, but rather have consolidated their power in the form of the European Union.[15] The new leading powers are mostly non-European (United States, China, Japan). Outside of these developed countries are countries (see list below) that are considered semi-periphery and are both dominant and dominated within economic, political, and social realms. These middle powers are a combination of nations that have emerged as a result of the fragmentation of the Soviet Union and nations that have risen because of their possession of resources in high demand, like oil in Saudi Arabia.[15] While these nations are by no means on the level of the stated world powers, they are able to exert influence over the weaker nations of the impoverished Fourth World.[15]

Other terms used to describe semi-periphery countries include sub-imperial and semi-industrial.[15] Immanuel Wallerstein identifies three ways by which countries can emerge from the periphery into the semi-periphery.[15] Countries with a large market and room for industrial growth, like Brazil, South Africa, and Mexico, and countries with valuable energy resources, like Iran and Saudi Arabia, can utilize the strategy of seizing the chance.[15] The strategy of promotion by invitation can be utilized by countries willing to be open to foreign governmental and regional administrative centers.[15] Examples of past countries to utilize this strategy are the capitalist regimes in Africa like Egypt, Kenya, Nigeria, Zaire, Senegal, and the Ivory Coast.[15] These countries use dependent development to integrate into the world economy and establish local dominance.[15] Outside of these strategies is that of self-reliance, a basic theory that as some countries grow, others will decline.[15] Many countries in Africa and Latin America have exhibited the qualities of a sub-imperial or semi-industrial power.[15]

Wallerstein examines the role of semi-periphery countries during a period of economic downturn,[7] certainly relevant in the current global economy. To redefine core and periphery countries in an economic sense, core countries are characterized by advanced technology, high profits, high wages, and diversified production while periphery countries have less technology, low profits, low wages, and less diversified production.[7] Semi-periphery countries fall in the middle of these spectra, and their unique political and social structure place them in a position where they can best take advantage of economic downturns.[7]

These economic downturns occur because of increased supply and decreased demand, which combine to create a shift in surplus and power to the semi-periphery, which takes advantage of the situation by expanding control of their home markets and the surrounding periphery countries at the expense of core countries.[7] The underlying reason for this shift in power lies in the basic economic principle of scarcity. As long as core countries maintain scarcities of their goods, they can select customers from semi-periphery and periphery countries that are competing over them. When excess supply occurs, the core countries are the ones competing over a smaller market. This competition allows semi-peripheral nations to select from among core countries rather than vice versa when making decisions about commodity purchases, manufacturing investments, and sales of goods, shifting the balance of power to the semi-periphery.[7] While in general there is a power shift from core to semi-periphery in times of economic struggles, there are few examples of semi-peripheral countries transitioning to core status.[7] To accomplish this, semi-peripheral nations must not only take advantage of weaker core countries but must also exploit any existing advantages over other semi-peripheral nations.[7] How well they exploit these advantages determines their arrangement within the semi-periphery class.[7]

Effects

A ballot box

The semi-peripheral nations of the world have played an important role to world trade and interaction since early periods of globalized trade. This "middle ground" between the very powerful cores and the backwaters of the far periphery allowed those two zones to interact with greater ease. For example, during the 13th-century world system, the semi-periphery areas around Europe's Mediterranean Coast facilitated trade between the peripheries of the more manufacturing based Northern Europe and the cores of India and China.[8] John Markoff, a sociologist at the University of Pittsburgh, also notes that political developments, particularly in the advancement of democracy, originate in the semi-periphery.[16] He notes that innovations in democracy came from the semi-periphery rather than the more established, stable core nations, where profit discourages great reform, or the extremely poor periphery where instability makes reform too dangerous to attempt.[16] It has been within semi-peripheral nations where democratic reforms like the expansion of suffrage and the institution of the secret ballot have been implemented.[16]

Examples

World map indicating a Human Development Index (2008 Update)
Developed
  0.950 and Over
  0.900–0.949
  0.850–0.899
  0.800–0.849
Developing
  0.750–0.799
  0.700–0.749
  0.650–0.699
  0.600–0.649
  0.550–0.599
  0.500–0.549
Under-developed
  0.450–0.499
  0.400–0.449
  0.350–0.399
  under 0.350
  not available

The following are semi-periphery countries according to Wallerstein (1976).[7]

 Brazil  China  India  Italy  Greece
 Malaysia  Poland  Mexico  Norway  Indonesia
 Singapore  India  South Korea  Spain  Norway
 Taiwan  Argentina  Venezuela  Portugal  Finland
 Algeria  Egypt  Saudi Arabia  Nigeria  Zaire
 Turkey  Iran  Israel

See also

Further reading

  • Chase-Dunn and Thomas D. Hall, Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.The Semi Periphery: The Seedbed of Change.Chapter 5 of C.
  • Kaplan, David H.; Wheeler, James O.; Holloway, James O. Urban Geography. York, PA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2004., pg. 412.
  • Kees Terlouw, The Regional Reography of the World-system:External Arena,Periphery,Semi-Periphery,Core.(Utrecht:KNAG,1992),pg 36-45
  • Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 229-233.
  • Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974).
  • Semi-Peripheral Countries and The Contemporary World Crisis, Immanuel Wallerstein, Theory and Society,Vol.3, No.4.(Winter,1976),pp 461–483.
  • Windows on Humanity by Conrad Phillip KOTTAK. Chapter 17, page 390.

Notes

  1. ^ a b Chase-Dunn and Thomas D. Hall.The Seedbed of Change.Chapter 5 of C.
  2. ^ Terlouw 1992 pg 36-45"
  3. ^ a b Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 229-233.
  4. ^ a b Semi-Peripheral Countries and The Contemporary World Crisis, Immanuel Wallerstein, Theory and Society,Vol.3, No.4.(Winter,1976),pp 461-483.
  5. ^ Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World Economy in the Sixteenth Century (New York: Academic Press, 1974)
  6. ^ a b c d Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Immanuel Wallerstein, Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis:Theory and Soiety, Vol.3,NO.4,(Winter, 1976),pp461-483
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Janet Abu-Lughod. Before European Hegemony: the world system a.d. 1250-1350. New York: OUP, 1989. Print.
  9. ^ a b Chirot, Daniel. 1977. Social Change in the Twentieth Century. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  10. ^ Tausch A., Social Cohesion, Sustainable Development and Turkey's Accession to the European Union: Implications from a Global Model
  11. ^ a b c d e f Immanuel Wallerstein, The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic Press, 1976
  12. ^ Chirot, Daniel, and Thomas D. Hall. 1982. World-System Theory. Annual Review of Sociology 8:81-106.
  13. ^ Janet Abu-Lughod. Before European Hegemony: the world system a.d. 1250-1350. New York: OUP, 1989. Print. pg 3.
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h Hobsbawn, Eric. The Age of Empire. New York: Random House, 1987. Print.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Shaw, Timothy M., "The Semiperiphery in Africa and Latin America: Subimperialism and Semiindustrialism," The Review of Black Political Economy: pp. 341-358. [1]
  16. ^ a b c Markoff, John. Where and When was Democracy Invented. Comparative Studies in Society & History. 1999-1041:4

References

Chase-Dunn and Hall, Thomas D. Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems The Semi Periphery: The Seedbed of Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Terlouw, Kees (1992). The Regional Reography of the World-System. Utrecht: KNAG.