Jump to content

User talk:193.63.48.253

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 193.63.48.253 (talk) at 22:18, 25 February 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some other hints and tips:

  • I would recommend that you get a username. You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and there are many benefits of having a username. (If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.)
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username (or IP address) and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my Talk page, or type {{helpme}} on this talk page and a user will help you as soon as possible. I will answer your questions as far as I can. Again, welcome!

Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. -- THLCCD 19:14, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

February 2007

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lampard. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 16:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lampard, you will be blocked. Gwernol 16:49, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalise Wikipedia, as you did to Frank Lampard, you will be blocked from editing. Gwernol 16:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by replying here on your talk page, by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

Gwernol 16:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 193.63.48.253! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.jpg, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:56, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Your recent edit to Alan Shearer (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

EVula // talk // // 17:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Viking. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Treygdor 18:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. ---- Neverquick (talk) 19:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. utcursch | talk 08:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to St Joan of Arc Catholic School, Rickmansworth. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Animum (talk) 15:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
193.63.48.253 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
193.63.48.253 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Longschlong McHungenrod". The reason given for Longschlong McHungenrod's block is: "inappropriate username - vandalism".


Decline reason: Sorry, address currently being used for vandalism. In the future, please consider registering an account to avoid being lumped in with the vandals. — Yamla (talk) 22:59, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Resistance: Fall of Man has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One (Talk) (Contribs) (Review) 18:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Space. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Matt Deres (talk) 21:09, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Block.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

· AndonicO Hail! 17:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Blackburn has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Sionus [talk] 19:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jiah Khan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jiah Khan was changed by 193.63.48.253 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-01-19T21:07:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:07, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Transistor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Transistor was changed by 193.63.48.253 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-03-22T15:32:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to E.ON, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: E.ON was changed by 193.63.48.253 (u) (t) deleting 9323 characters on 2009-11-08T15:34:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at E.ON, you will be blocked from editing. JForget 15:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi

Hello. I noticed your recent edits seem to be vandalism. You should try and be productive at Wikipedia. Thanks. Keegscee (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Keegscee (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Rankin Location 15D, Ontario has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Marek.69 talk 18:14, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page University of Bolton has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  arun  talk  12:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page University of Bolton. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  arun  talk  12:01, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tyranid genetics. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Piano non troppo (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Fight Club (film) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:25, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fight Club. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Who Dey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:56, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Minnesota Vikings. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. MaenK.A.Talk 22:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Drew Brees. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:07, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Shotgun formation. MaenK.A.Talk 22:09, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

193.63.48.253 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

193.63.48.253 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=come off it i stopped after my final warning so give me a break mate and unblock i'll be good i promise |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}