User talk:Feydey

Welcome User, please state your comments after the others. -- Feydey.

Click to leave me a new message

Sign your comments by adding four tildes (~~~~). Messages left on this page will usually lead me to reply on your talk page; however, I may use both for extended discussions. Questions?

Template:Col-1-of-62005

Talk archive 1 2005

Template:Col-2-of-62006

Talk archive 2 Jan. - Apr. 2006
Talk archive 3 Apr. - June 2006
Talk archive 4 June - July 2006
Talk archive 5 July - Sep. 2006
Talk archive 6 Oct. - Dec. 2006

Template:Col-3-of-62007

Talk archive 7 Jan. - Mar. 2007
Talk archive 8 Mar. - May 2007
Talk archive 9 May - Oct. 2007
Talk archive 10 Oct. - Dec. 2007

Template:Col-4-of-62008

Talk archive 11 2008

Template:Col-5-of-62009

Talk archive 12 Jan. - Jun. 2009
Talk archive 13 Jun. - Dec. 2009

Template:Col-5-of-62010

Talk archive 14 Jan. - Jun. 2010

Your deletion of San diego Floorball.

There was no free media. We have our own website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennythebenny (talk • contribs) 09:09, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Shaista Ikramullah.jpg

I noticed that you removed the recently uploaded image: Shaista Ikramullah.jpg. The image was uploaded with copyrights information: Public Domain of Pakistan

This image is now in the public domain in Pakistan, as one of the following apply:
In the case of photographic works, it was published more than 50 years ago (before January 1st, 1974), or

In the case of other works, the creator died more than 50 years ago (before January 1st, 1974)

PD-Pakistan Public domain in Pakistan //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Feydey

This file is NOT necessarily in the public domain in the United States because a non-simple image can only be in the public domain in the U.S.:

if it entered the public domain in Pakistan prior to 1996, or

when, after that date, its copyright term expires in accordance with U.S. law.

Information about the creation date and creator should be provided.
If the image is not in the public domain in the United States, in addition to the license tag for its status in Pakistan an appropriate fair use license and rationale should be provided, or the image should be proposed for deletion.

If the media is in the public domain in both Pakistan and the United States, it may be transferred to the Wikimedia Commons.
Note: If this image is in the public domain in the U.S., modify the end of the copyright tag from }} to |commons}}.
This will replace the preceding U.S. copyright notification with a nomination for this image to be moved to the Wikimedia Commons.

Please specify how this upload violates copyrights law.
--Muzammil 09:31, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Re: Removal of Shaista Ikramullah.jpg
Thank you for your reply.
Indeed I mentioned PD in Pakistan with the image. As you said that it is under URAA and wasn't properly licensed, Cannot we re-upload the image in Wikipedia?
--Muzammil 10:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Muzammil786 (talk • contribs)
Deletion of Brenda Barrett picture
How is there no way to prove who is in the image, the source link that I provided says the picture if of Vanessa Marcil. Here is the link the photo: http://ghspoilers.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/vanessa_marcil_1280_800_aug052009.jpg and here it the original page I found it on - http://ghspoilers.info/2010/06/08/comings-goings-2/ So what is the problem--Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 04:29, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The image was also used on soapnet and the article says that the photo source is ABC, here is the link - http://sn.soapnet.go.com/news/article/comings-and-goings-brendas-back --Nk3play2 ^{my buzz} 04:38, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
John Soares photo
Actually, I've contacted John Soares, and he said he emailed permission today to WP to use that image under a creative commons license, so they should be getting to fixing the permissions for that themselves shortly. (Personally all of that legalese is just too confusing for me...) --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 10:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
iPhone image
Hi, I saw you deleted an image from iPhone. I cam here to complain when I realized that 1, the deleted image had no fair use rationale and 2, you were kind enough to move up another image to fill the slot. The new image, which I particularly admire because it shows the device being held in a lifelike way, I presume is acceptable because you didn't delete it too. As for the old image, the uploader and I had a discussion yesterday as to how to best crop it and came to a nice compromise, so we've been in touch. If I instruct him how to properly add a fair use rationale, would you object to him re-uploading the photo? HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 22:55, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Duh!
If you bothered looking at the template on the Jean Colin jpg page, you would find that it is used where the copyright in the EU has expired since the image is over 70 years old. The image come from a British magazine 72 years old, as it is stated there. Is 72 years older than 70 years? I don't want to know about American copyright since it has no relevance here. British magazine. British image. Unknown author. Publicity picture. I removed your deletion notice as you probably don't want others to realise you do not have a clue. Ask someone next time if you are not sure. (Cyberia3 (talk) 17:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
America does not rule Europe
If something is copyrighted in Europe, that is nothing to do with America, despite what Americans might think. Not a damn thing. If the copyright runs out in Europe, that is nothing to do with America either as America is not part of the Commonwealth since 1776. If an American tried to interfere with British copyright anywhere in the EU, he would be sent packing with a footprint on his backside.
Do you understand that if something is not copyrighted in America, it is not copyrighted in America? Copyright on the 1938 magazine concerned is for England (no actual mention of UK), Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. There is no such thing as retroactive copyright and copyright is only where stated, as in no mention of America.
I doubt that people have to jump through as many hoops to get something published in the 240 year old Encyclopedia Britannica volumes as they have to to add something to the wiki which is a glorified website. If someone complains to the wiki that they do not like the way something they own the copyright on was used, it does not mean a massive recall of encyclopedia volumes to be pulped. It is the work of a minute to delete it. That is if the person themself does not do it. (Cyberia3 (talk) 18:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC))[reply]
I might be a Wikipedia newbie, but I just don't understand something...
Hello! :)
Firstly, just wanted to say that I'm a complete Wikipedia newbie and I'd genuinely appreciate your input on the changes you made to the page I was writing about Serif DrawPlus
I was just trying to copy the Inkscape page in format and style, but list the features available in Serif DrawPlus, obviously. It's most definitely not meant to be written like an advert, it's meant to be information and factual, so why was it flagged as being written like an advert? Have you any suggestions for terms which particularly read badly that I could change? Why was the object creation category removed? I just tried to list things like Inkscape, but maybe phrased a little more wordily rather than with brevity, lol!
I'm genuinely just interested in making a nice looking, factual page and thought I had, so any comments are welcome as I just want to get it sorted properly and leave it there. I was fed up with looking at a screenshot of DrawPlus 7 whenever I searched Wikipedia for DrawPlus...
EDIT - Actually, why have you said it's the wrong logo? It's the company's new logo - the one on the Serif Europe Wikipedia page is the old logo. Why are the free usage images wrong? They're just screenshots and I thought I'd uploaded them and tagged them as such?
Cheers, Matt —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattP4478 (talk • contribs) 08:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:AL Desktop.JPG (again)
I've seen that my screenshot has been deleted again, despite I've insert adequate elucidation in template intended for same. Why for heaven's sake? Thanks in further notice Alex^discussion 17:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyrighted screenshot uploaded as in Public Domain. feydey (talk) 20:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
iPhone 4 Image
Before I get into this, I should mention that I'm probably going to be away from Wikipedia for large amounts of time coming up, so don't count on a quick reply. That out of the way, I wanted to let you know that I take issue with your claim that the image Image:iPhone 4.jpg needs fair use licensing. It's a photo I did completely by myself. Yes, it does happen to capture parts of the UI, but it's not a photo of the UI. If it were an actual screenshot, yes, I could see the need for fair use licensing, but it's not. I realize this is an ongoing debate here on Wikipedia. aido2002talk·userpage 18:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
Hi Feydey, thank you for examining my images. I have been using wikipedia for about 4 months and still I am learning its features. Some Images were uploaded by me when I was a newbie (i did not now these copyright stuff) so these images may be a copyright Infingement. Sorry for those uploads, i will not do that again. Sorry if you felt that this message is abusing. I meant no disrespect.
Just if you can give a list of Images you have deleted of mine, so that I can tell you which are taken by me and which aren't
Thank You and Sorry.
Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 10:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Where should I add the text you have given in the images taken by me? And what should I write in the place of"+signature"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatiraju.rishabh (talk • contribs) 10:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright
I, Tatiraju.rishabh verify that the images below are my own work (from my camera):
* File:Natural stone arch in tirumala.JPG * File:Rajdhani Express.jpg * File:Nwgbridge.JPG * File:Archbridgegodavari.JPG * File:Panorama of Tirumala Hills.JPG * File:Rameswaram tv tower.jpg * File:Baner hill nature from my house.JPG * File:Imperail mumbai tower.jpg * File:The Imperial, Mumbai.jpg * File:Kkr shirt from my mobile.jpg * File:Anu-malik.JPG * File:Salim-sulaiman.jpg * File:Kvgk maingate.jpg * File:Panorama of tirumala from srivaari paadalu.JPG * File:Prachi Desai.jpeg * File:Paapa vinaasanam.JPG * File:Srivari paadamulu.jpg * File:Budhwar peth in pune.jpg * File:The algoza instrument.jpg ‎ * File:Ongole bull.jpg ‎ * File:Ongole railway station.jpg * File:Iball mouse.JPG * File:I ball keyboard.jpg * File:Deccan-odyssey luxury train with my friend.jpg * File:Goldenchariot train luxury service in india.jpg * File:NewDeli Mumbai Rajdhani AC 2 tier new livery.jpg * File:Rajdhani-Express howrah to delhi.jpg * File:Tirupati airport arrival gate from airplane.jpg * File:Ambassador taxi in tiumala.jpg ‎ * File:Tirupati rail station.jpg * File:Apsrtc bus in tirumala.jpg * File:1 rupee bill historical.jpg ‎ * File:Mvdubaimoon sinking.jpg * File:Mvdubaimoon sinking.jpg * File:Mvdubaimoon rescue.jpg * File:Goadavari bridge full view.JPG ‎ * File:Nwgbridge2.jpg * File:Newgbridge1.jpg * File:Lodha bellissimo.jpg * File:Orchid enclave.jpg * File:Kasturba gandhi burial.JPG
Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 10:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This is my Image Upload List. I have a question, do I also have to include the images which are in Non-Free Fair Use Rationale (Such as logos, screenshots and magazine covers)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatiraju.rishabh (talk • contribs) 10:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Is there anything else I have to do? Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 10:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that too, I just copy pasted my contributions list, i forgot to remove that. Sorry again Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 10:59, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey feydey, I also have som flickr images uploaded. Some of them are in the list I have given. What should I do for those images. Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, they are all Creatuve Commons 2.0 License., One for exampe is Rameswaram TV Tower. Original Link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/prince_tigereye/2505235863/sizes/l/ Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 11:11, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Final List of Contribs
I, Tatiraju.rishabh verify that the images below are my own work (from my camera):
* File:Natural stone arch in tirumala.JPG * File:Nwgbridge.JPG * File:Archbridgegodavari.JPG * File:Panorama of Tirumala Hills.JPG * File:Rameswaram tv tower.jpg * File:Baner hill nature from my house.JPG * File:Kkr shirt from my mobile.jpg * File:Panorama of tirumala from srivaari paadalu.JPG * File:Paapa vinaasanam.JPG * File:Srivari paadamulu.jpg * File:Budhwar peth in pune.jpg * File:Ongole bull.jpg ‎ * File:Iball mouse.JPG * File:I ball keyboard.jpg * File:Ambassador taxi in tiumala.jpg ‎ * File:Apsrtc bus in tirumala.jpg * File:1 rupee bill historical.jpg ‎ * File:Goadavari bridge full view.JPG ‎ * File:Nwgbridge2.jpg * File:Newgbridge1.jpg * File:Kasturba gandhi burial.JPG
This is my final list. I have left the flickr images. Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 11:24, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright
So, is there anything that I can do next. By the way, I just wanted to know what should I write in the summary section of the images uploaded from Flickr. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatiraju.rishabh (talk • contribs) 11:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi
I believe that I have removed that from the list.....Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 11:47, 14 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
I am posting the list full and final. I have aso marked those which are taken from flickr.
File:Natural stone arch in tirumala.JPG

File:Nwgbridge.JPG

File:Archbridgegodavari.JPG

File:Panorama of Tirumala Hills.JPG

File:Rameswaram tv tower.jpg - Flickr

File:Baner hill nature from my house.JPG

File:Panorama of tirumala from srivaari paadalu.JPG

File:Paapa vinaasanam.JPG

File:Srivari paadamulu.jpg

File:Budhwar peth in pune.jpg - Flickr

File:Ongole bull.jpg ‎- Flickr

File:Iball mouse.JPG

File:I ball keyboard.jpg

File:Ambassador taxi in tiumala.jpg ‎- Flickr

File:Apsrtc bus in tirumala.jpg - Flickr

File:1 rupee bill historical.jpg ‎

File:Goadavari bridge full view.JPG ‎

File:Nwgbridge2.jpg

File:Newgbridge1.jpg

File:Kasturba gandhi burial.JPG
Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 11:55, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Christ Episcopal Church
Feydey,
Thank you for catching the lack of a copyright tag on one of my images on the Christ Episcopal Church (Waltham, Mass) page. I am new to Wikipedia - have I fixed the problem sufficiently?
Thanks!
Mbalulescu (talk) 12:01, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks
Hi, thankyou. I did not know anything about this Licenses and Copyrights as I am new to Wikipedia. Thankyou. Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 12:03, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When is 'Needless' NOT 'Needless'?
Re: Your edits to my DrawPlus Wikipedia entry... The last time you removed chunks of this article due to it being 'written like an advert' I asked you to tell me what terms you thought were bad and I'd change it... I got no response so removed everything that looked like it was a positive word and put it back up. Now you remove it again saying it is a 'needless' section? I view a Feature List as a very useful section... as do the people on the Inkscape Wikipedia entry that I told you last time my article was modelled on. Why have you removed it? I'm happy to change the article if there's actually a real reason to, rather than just an opinion of one person over one other person - I only wanted to put something up there for anyone like me that's actually interested to find out about it!?! Please tell me why you want to change it and justify this against the precedent already set by other articles - in particular tell me why it is less relevant than the feature list in the Inkscape article that has happily existed for quite some time? MattP4478 (talk) 12:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Upload Question
Which license should I use if I have uploaded a flickr image? I have used Creative Commost Attribution-Share Alike 3.0. Is it correct?Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have corrected this photo as requested —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brager (talk • contribs) 19:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
image info
I wrote you on my talk page. I'm hoping to get your feedback.
Designsbyd (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
actually I was hoping you would do more than simply repeat yourself. If I wanted to I could have re-read your original post. I meant that I was hoping you could tell me if the updates I added will help me to avoid these pictures from being deleted so that if I still need to do something further, I can try to do so before the review.
Designsbyd (talk) 19:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:SM City Xiamen logo.png
Why have you reverted this logo to a version that doesn't comply with the usual image standards? 300px for the longest dimension is the norm. Cheers. Rodhull andemu 20:36, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Discussion now on my Talk page. Rodhull andemu 20:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, now I understand what you are saying. How do I get back into that window to do it? Do I have to totally reload them again? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brager (talk • contribs) 20:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Now you tell me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brager (talk • contribs) 21:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My changes will have to wait until 7-18-2010; I'm losing access to this computer for a few days. Thank you for your help, I will take care of the problems. Brager (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Photo: PeteButtigieg.JPG
Thanks for your help. The copyright-holder should be sending an e-mail to permissions-en@wikimedia.org soon granting permission, so please look out for that. Hanumang06 (talk) 22:05, 14 July 2010 (UTC)Hanumang06[reply]
Image License Question
I have a image of a historical painting. Should I add CC-BY 3.0 or should I add "copyright Expired" license? Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Re: image permissions/La Carmina
Hello, it seems I made a mistake in applying the code for the OTRX pending template. I forwarded permission information to Wikimedia Commons regarding this upload earlier tonight. Could you please help me correct the tag on the image page? Thanks, Feather Jonah (talk) 10:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I Fixed The File:OMOTM-14july2010.JPG Problem.--S1312 (talk) 13:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Adding empty {{Information}}
Hi Feydey, could you explain how this edit helps people? multichill (talk) 15:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It helps folks to go and add author, source, description etc. -- needed info to the image's page. The image summary provides necessary details to support the use of the image copyright tag. I would assume, that as an administrator on Wikimedia Commons You would understand the requirements needed for images to be included in en.wikipedia. Wikipedia:Image use policy is a good policy page for image requirements.
The recommended image summary contains some or all of the following:
Description: The subject of the image

Source: The copyright holder of the image or URL of the web page the image came from

Date: Date the image was created. The more exact, the better

Location: Where the image was created. The more exact the better

Author: The image creator, especially if different from the copyright holder

Permission: Who or what law or policy gives permission to post on Wikipedia with the selected image copyright tag

Other versions of this file: Directs users to derivatives of the image if they exist on Wikipedia.
Hope this helps. If this communiqué has been insufficient You are more than welcome to entreat for more details. Best, feydey (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
False positive report
The other day you submitted a false positive report because you found yourself unable to edit someone's talk page. If you have not already seen, it was due to an accident in the code of a particular edit filter which was quickly fixed by the MediaWiki software itself. The code has been reverted to the last good version and this should not happen again. Thank you for bringing this to our attention, however; if people hadn't reported it we wouldn't have known there was a problem. I have removed the false positive reports as I felt it was easier to just go to the people who submitted them directly. —Soap— 23:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File source problem with File:Battle-City-Awesome.jpg
I've added additional information for Battle-City-Awesome.jpg. This is a screenshot taken by myself within the game. The game is GPL and I own the copyright to the game and to the screenshot. Thank you. Please let me know if I can do anything else to improve the information. Weebo (talk) 12:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File copyright problem with File:Iestyn_Davies037_1-300H.jpg
Hello, You raised a query about copyright on the photo file discussed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mag-Linders . Please could you comment at that page as to whether I have now answered your query satisfactorily? I am a Wiki-beginner and want to get things right. Thank you.maglinders 15:18, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Mag-Linders--maglinders 15:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC) maglinders 15:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mag-Linders (talk • contribs) [reply]
I know you mainly mess with pictures...but...
Hey Feydey,
I stopped uploading media files, they gave me a headache to deal with but I was going to ask you if you would add some code to a red coded lock page, on the Georgia WikiProject page. I added this code, here to the talk page so that it could be added into the main template banner of the Georgia WikiProject page. I asked another administrator to do this but it looks like they have not been active in over a month. It shouldn't take you too long to do. Let me know if you need to discuss this further with me or anything. Thanks for your help! Tamer_of_Hope talk 22:30, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
iPhone
Could, but that would be like taking a photo of a phone with the buttons missing. The onscreen UI is part of the phone. aido2002talk·userpage 03:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]