Jump to content

Party for Freedom

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 78.53.47.215 (talk) at 11:20, 13 August 2010 (reverted and readded sourced information which Pan Miacek doesn't like). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This article is about the Party of Freedom previously known as Wilders Group. For the historic party, see Freedom Party (Netherlands).

Template:Infobox Dutch political party The Party for Freedom (Dutch: Partij voor de Vrijheid, PVV) is a far-right[1][2] Dutch political movement. Founded in 2005 as the successor to Geert Wilders' one-man party in the House of Representatives, it won nine seats in the 2006 general election, making it the fifth largest party in parliament, and third largest opposition party. It came second in the 2009 European Parliament election, winning 4 out of 25 seats. In the 2010 general election it won 24 seats, making it the third largest party.

With programme items like administrative detention and hardliner assimilationist stance on the integration of immigrants into Dutch society, the Party for Freedom breaks from the established centre right parties in the Netherlands (like the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy). In addition, the party is consistently Eurosceptic.

PVV is the name under which the association Stichting Groep Wilders operates. It has Geert Wilders as sole member.[3][4][5]. This makes it unique in the Dutch parliament.

History

The party's history starts with Geert Wilders' departure from the People's Party for Freedom and Democracy (VVD) in September 2004. Wilders could not accept with the VVD's positive stance towards Turkey's possible accession to the European Union, and left the party disgruntled.

Although the VVD expected Wilders to return his parliamentary seat to the party, he refused, and continued to sit in parliament as a one-man party, Groep Wilders (Wilders Group).

In June 2005, Wilders was one of the leaders in the campaign against the European Constitution, which was rejected by Dutch voters by 62%.[6]

Bart Jan Spruyt, director of the conservative Edmund Burke Foundation, joined the party in January 2006, in order to formulate a party programme and to train its prospective representatives for the forthcoming national election (then still scheduled for 2007).[7] Spruyt left the party in the summer of 2006, after it proved unable to build broad conservative backing, and people like Joost Eerdmans and Marco Pastors proved unwilling to join.[8] After the 2006 elections, Spruyt said he was not surprised that the Party for Freedom had gained seats but maintained that, if the Party for Freedom had sought cooperation with Eerdmans and Pastors, it would have won more, even enough to bring about a CDA-VVD majority government .[9] Later, Spruyt commented that the PVV had a 'natural tendency' toward fascism.[10] He later qualified the statement, though he didn't withdraw it. Former PVV candidate Lucas Hartong called Spruyt's claims 'a cheap insinuation'.[11]

In a HP/De Tijd profile dated December 2006, the party was described as a cult, with an extremely distrustful Wilders only accepting fellow candidates completely loyal to him, and compared to the SP led by Jan Marijnissen but without reaching that degree of organisational perfection.[12]

On 10 January 2007, the PVV announced it would not field candidates at the forthcoming Provincial elections. This meant it would be unrepresented in the Senate.[13]

Geert Wilders

On 13 January 2007, NRC Handelsblad reported that a PVV intern had solicited for signatures on the website forums Dutch Disease Report and Polinco, the latter a forum described as far right by various organisations, among them the Dutch Complaints Bureau for Discrimination on the Internet.[14] Any party participating in this election was required to collect at least 30 signatures from supporters in each of the 19 electoral districts; of the 1500 signatures the PVV received, the Dutch Antifascist group identified 34 known far-right supporters. In a response, Wilders said he regretted that far-right sympathisers had provided signatures, denied any personal responsibility for them and reasserted his dislike of far-right parties like Front National and Vlaams Belang.[15][16][17]

Noted writer and columnist Leon de Winter later declared the affair to be the result of a campaign of demonisation against Geert Wilders led by NRC Handelsblad and Volkskrant newspapers, as well as the broadcaster VARA.[18]

Former labour union leader and prominent Christian Democrat Doekle Terpstra proposed an initiative against Geert Wilders and the PVV on 30 November 2007, in newspaper Trouw.[19] Terpstra sees Wilders as promoting intolerance, and discrimination against Muslims. He is supported in his cause by the large Dutch trade unions and refugee organisations. Politicians and the public are divided on Terpstra's initiative.[20] The newspaper De Pers reported the next day that much of Terpstra's support did not actualize.[21]

Polling by Maurice de Hond published in March 2009 indicated that the PVV was the most popular parliamentary party. The polls predicted that the party would take 21 per cent of the national vote, giving it 32 out of 150 seats in the Dutch parliament. If the polling results were to be replicated at a genuine election, Wilders would be a major power broker and could become Prime Minister.[22][23][24] However, De Hond's are not uncontroversial, as they are based on a panel of people who have signed up for the election poll on internet and thus are not a random sample. According to Joop van Holsteyn, professor of election research, therefore, De Hond's polls are not representative of the population.[25] Other Dutch polls (Politieke Barometer and TNS NIPO) have shown contrasting results, with the PVV often getting less support, though still remaining very popular.

By February 2010, the PVV had once more become the most popular party, according to a poll by Maurice de Hond which said it would win 27-32 parliameary seats in the next election, up two from the previous poll in early January.[26][27]

By July 2010 the PVV again became the biggest party in the polls after the parliamentary elections, following difficulties in forming a new coalition and the PVV technically being excluded from the coalition talks because the CDA showed reluctance to cooperate with the PVV. According to the polls, the PVV would get 35 seats in a new election, which is a record high number.[28]

In August 2010, during the difficult cabinet formation following the elections, the PVV emerged as a prominent player in a proposal for a new minority government in The Netherlands. While the party would not gain a ministerial appointment, the PVV would tolerate a centre-right minority government coalition: a proposed deal that would make the party one of the most influential forces. Led by Ivo Opstelten, a former mayor of Rotterdam who was appointed mediator for the next stage of negotiations, the forming of a government of VVD and CDA with support of the PVV was negotiated. The former two parties would have to rely on the latter to get important legislation through. With this deal The Netherlands would follow the "Danish model", since in Denmark the anti-immigration Danish People’s Party also stayed out of government but supported a minority center-right administration. [29]

After the elections, CDA parliamentary fraction president Maxime Verhagen first had stated that as a matter of principle he refused to negotiate with VVD and PVV about a conservative government, saying that the PVV represented views that could not be reconciled with Dutch law. These objections on principle disappeared in five weeks and Verhagen turned out to be willing to negotiate over a cabinet whose fate would lie in the hands of Wilders. [30]

Platform

The Party for Freedom combines economic liberalism with a conservative programme on immigration and culture. The party seeks tax cuts (€16 billion in the 2006 election programme), de-centralisation, abolition of the minimum wage, and limiting child benefits and government subsidies. Regarding immigration and culture, the party believes that the Judeo-Christian and humanist traditions should be taken as the dominant culture in the Netherlands, and that immigrants should adapt accordingly. The party wants a halt to immigration from non-Western countries. It is sceptical towards the EU, is against future EU enlargement to countries like Turkey and opposes a dominant presence of Islam in the Netherlands.[31] The party is also opposed to dual citizenship (see below).

Originally an economically liberal party, according to some commentators the PVV has drifted to fiscally Left positions while still retaining a hard right approach on immigration and crime. [32][33]

Political issues

Dual nationality

In February 2007, PVV parliamentarian Fritsma introduced a motion that would have prohibited any parliamentarian or executive branch politician from having dual citizenship. The PVV claims that it is unclear where a dual national's loyalty lies. The motion would have made it difficult if not impossible for Labour MPs Ahmed Aboutaleb and Nebahat Albayrak to become members of the new government. The motion had to be withdrawn, however, after heavy pressure from the President of the House of Representatives, Gerdi Verbeet (Labour Party).[34] University of Maastricht law professor Twan Tak sees a risk in executive branch officials having dual citizenship, and was angered by Verbeet's insistence to close the debate.[35] In spite of this, the PVV planned to call for a vote of no confidence against junior ministers Aboutaleb and Albayrak when the new cabinet had its first meeting with the House of Representatives, claiming that their respectively Moroccan and Turkish passports put their loyalties into question.[36] In the event, the motion was only supported by the PVV itself.[37]

The issue of dual nationality, however, was not over yet. On 2 March, Radio Netherlands reported that Labour Party MP Khadiya Arib, who had been sworn into parliament the day before, was sitting on a commission appointed by the king of Morocco.[38] The PVV held that this commission work endangers Arib's loyalty to the Netherlands, and that she should choose between being the Dutch parliament and the Moroccan commission. Geert Wilders said that Arib's remark on national television that her loyalty lay neither with the Netherlands nor Morocco was shameful.[39] The liberal VVD had also problems with Arib's work, saying that her "double orientation would hurt Dutch integration."[40] All other parties were appalled by the PVV and VVD's behaviour.[41]

The party fielded a controversial motion in the 2007 general deliberations on the immigration budget, calling for a stop to immigration from Muslim countries. The House of Representatives at first declined to bring the motion forward for debate. Justice Minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin said it was in violation of the Dutch constitution and international law.[42] Another motion by the PVV, against police officers wearing veils, did gain a parliamentary majority.[43]

Wilders has also put forward the idea that the Netherlands should open up its own "Guantanamo Bay" that would detain people which the intelligence service sees as a security threat, somewhat akin to the Israeli and Algerian administrative detention.[44]

Party programme

Other noteworthy policies that Wilders mentions in his party program:

  • Ethnic registration, page 11
  • Active repatriation of criminals of foreign citizenship and Dutch nationals originating from the Netherlands Antilles, page 11
  • Restrictions on immigrant labour from new EU member states and Islamic countries, page 15
  • Removal of resources from anti-climate change programmes, development aid and immigration services [45]
  • Abolition of the Senate, page 19
  • Governmental communication to be exclusively in Dutch or Frisian, page 35
  • Dutch language proficiency and a 10-year Dutch residency and work experience requirement for welfare assistance, page 15
  • Constitutional protection of the dominance of the Judeo-Christian and humanistic culture of the Netherlands, page 35
  • Repeal of anti-smoking legislation in bars, page 39
  • Investment in more nuclear power plants and coal plants to reduce dependency on imported oil and because coal is cheaper, page 47

Name

as a reference to the Freedom Party (Partij van de Vrijheid), a Dutch political party founded just after the Second World War, which eventually merged with a faction of social-liberal dissidents from the PvdA led by Pieter Oud to become the VVD in 1948.[46]

Election results

House of Representatives
Election year # of total votes % of overall vote # of seats won
2006 579,490 5.9% 9 (out of 150)
2010 1,435,349 15.5% 24 (out of 150)

In the elections for the European parliament in 2009, the party won 17% of the votes.[47][48]

European Parliament
Election year # of total votes % of overall vote # of seats won
2009 769,125 17.0% 4 (out of 25)

[49]

  • In March 2009, according to a poll by Maurice de Hond the PVV, if there were elections, would take 18 per cent of the vote and win 27 seats in the 150-seat House of Representatives.[50]
  • In December 2009, the party was in joint first place with the governing Christen-Democratisch Appel (CDA), according to a new poll by Maurice de Hond: both parties would get 26 seats.[51]
  • On March 3, 2010, elections for the local councils were held in the municipalities of the Netherlands. The PVV only contested these in The Hague and Almere, because of a shortage of good candidates. MP Raymond de Roon headed the campaign in his home town of Almere. Fellow MP Sietse Fritsma was appointed head of the local election campaign in The Hague. Both men would continue to serve as MPs as well as local councillors after their election.[52] The PVV made big gains, suggesting that the party and Wilders might dominate the political scene in the run-up to the parliamentary elections scheduled on 9 June 2010. The PVV won in Almere and came second to the Labour Party in The Hague. In Almere, the PVV won 21 percent of the vote to Labour's 18 percent, preliminary results showed. In The Hague, the PVV had 8 seats — second to Labour with 10 seats. The local elections were the first test of public opinion since the collapse of the 4th Balkenende cabinet in February 2010. The municipal elections were ovshadowed by the fall of the cabinet and the forthcoming parliamentary elections.[53] If voters had elected a new parliament, the PVV would have won between 24 and 27 seats in the 150 seat Dutch parliament [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] The Maurice de Hond poll published on 6 March 2010 put the PVV at 27 seats in the 9 June national elections, while the CDA and the Labour Party (PvdA) were both on 24 seats. This poll also showed that none of the three most likely coalitions could form a majority government without taking on a fourth or fifth party.[62]
  • On 8 March 2010, Wilders announced he would take a seat on The Hague city council, after it became clear that he had won 13,000 preference votes. Earlier he had said he would not do so.[63][64] One week after these local elections, the PVV called for an inquiry into the elections in The Hague, since a YouTube clip allegedly showed irregularities, including more than one person entering polling booths at the same time and a voter not putting the ballot paper into the box. These calls were rejected. The Hague council said the municipal elections had gone well and that any complaint should anyway have been lodged immediately after the results were announced. In Rotterdam, a full recount was held after a protest by Leefbaar Rotterdam, a local party with a programme broadly similar to that of the PVV.[65][66]
  • On 18 March 2010, the PVV gave up trying to form a governing coalition in Almere. In a press release, the party said most of the other parties had refused to give ground to PVV demands on what it describes as "essential issues". These include what the party calls ‘city commandos’: street patrols to keep order in the face of inadequate proper law enforcement. Other obstacles were the PVV’s demands for reduced taxes for Almere residents and its fight against what the party sees as "the increasing influence of Islam in Dutch society". The PVV complained that it was forced to stay in the opposition through the manoeuvring of the political elite.[67]

Representation

Members of the House of Representatives

After the 2006 elections the party had 9 members of the House of Representatives:

Given that the party is still relatively young, its 2006 electoral showing was quite remarkable, giving the party more seats in the House of Representatives than well-established parties such as GreenLeft, Democrats 66 and ChristianUnion. Its surprisingly rapid rise in popularity also caught many political pundits off guard, especially as the pre-election polls were predominantly predicting a gain of no more than 6 seats.[citation needed]

The party has seen waves of popularity in the past. In December 2006, some polls put it ahead of the Labour Party, indicating it would win 24 to 32 seats or more.[69] Its backing for a referendum on Dutch ratification of the European Constitution was in line with the wishes of the majority of voters.[70] New prosecution attempts against its leader for hate speech and other related events may have helped propel the Party for Freedom to position in the polls in March 2009.[71] The PVV's supporters are better educated and better off than previously thought: it has found favour with middle-class voters in white neighbourhoods, who fear their freedom and self-expression are threatened by unassimilated Muslim immigrants.[72]

After the 2010 elections the party has 24 members of the House of Representatives.

Classifications

In January 2010, the report Polarisatie en radicalisering in Nederland (transl. "Polarisation and radicalisation in the Netherlands") by political researchers Moors, Lenke Balogh, Van Donselaar and De Graaff from the Tilburg University research group IVA [73] stated that the PVV was not an extreme right-wing party, but contained some radical right-wing elements. The PVV statements on 'islamisation' and non-western immigrants appear to be discriminatory and the party organisation is authoritarian rather than democratic, said the researchers, who were looking into polarisation and radicalism across the Netherlands. They described the PVV as the "new radical right", a party with a national democratic ideology but without extreme right-wing roots. In particular, the report stated that the party's pro-Israel stance showed that it was not neo-Nazi. It tends however towards a national democratic ideology. Wilders called the report "scandalous" - in particular the link between defending the national interest and the radical right.

An alleged earlier version of the report, leaked to the Dutch daily newspaper de Volkskrant in November 2009, said that Wilders' party is an extreme right-wing grouping and a threat to social cohesion and democracy. The paper claimed at the time the researchers were under pressure to water down the conclusions because of their political sensitivity. The Dutch Ministry of the Interior Guus ter Horst, who commissioned the research, denied exerting any interference.[74][75] In response, Wilders accused her of "playing a dirty game" [76][77]

International media outlets and newspapers have repeatedly referred to the party as "far-right",[78][79][80][81] although it has occasionally been regarded by some as "centre-right".[82]

Fitna financing

In 2008, the Friends of the Party of Freedom, under the name of "Scarlet Pimpernel Productions", a pseudonym adopted out of fear of reprisal,[83] funded the production of Fitna (Arabic: فِتْنَةٌ), a short film by Geert Wilders. Approximately 17 minutes in length, it shows selected excerpts from Suras of the Qur'an, interspersed with media clips and newspaper cuttings showing or describing acts of violence or hatred by Muslims. The film attempts to demonstrate that the Qur'an motivates its followers to hate all who violate Islamic teachings. Consequently, the film argues that Islam encourages acts of terrorism, antisemitism, violence against women and homosexuals, and Islamic universalism. A large part of the film deals with the influence of Islam on the Netherlands. The film's title, the Arabic word "fitna", is used to describe either "disagreement and division among people" or a "test of faith in times of trial".[84] Wilders, a prominent critic of Islam, described the film as "a call to shake off the creeping tyranny of Islamization".[85]

'Infiltration'

In January 2010, Karen Geurtsen, a Dutch journalist from the magazine HP/De Tijd, revealed a painful breach of security in the PVV and especially around leader Geert Wilders. The Party had often been depicted as a fortress, having no members and avoiding the ‘left-wing’ Dutch press. In 2009, Geurtsen spent four months working for the party undercover, posing as an intern, "to find out what the party is really like". Afterwards, she claimed that she had enjoyed unchecked access to Wilders. "I could have killed him", were the first words of the article that she published about this operation. She said she had had "dozens" of opportunities to take his life.[86]

On Twitter, Geert Wilders responded that "the left-wing media had sunk to new depths". Geurtsen insisted that she infiltrated the party "as a service to potential PVV voters who want to know more". She reinforced the general image that the PVV revolved around just one person, Wilders.[87]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Wilder's things", The Economist: 22, 2010 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |day= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  2. ^ Hans Moorsm, Lenke Balogh, Jaap van Donselaar, Bob de Graaff (2009), Polarisatie en radicalisering in Nederland. Een verkenning van de stand van zaken in 2009 (PDF) (in Dutch), Tilburg, p. 16 {{citation}}: Unknown parameter |filetype= ignored (|format= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ PVV net NSB, Telegraaf 27 april 2009
  4. ^ Nu.nl 27 april 2009
  5. ^ http://www.nrc.nl/binnenland/article1790538.ece/Alleen_Wilders_lid_PVV
  6. ^ "Dutch say 'No' to EU constitution". BBC News. 2005-06-02. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  7. ^ "Spruyt sluit zich aan bij Geert Wilders" (in Dutch). Elsevier. 2006-01-04. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  8. ^ de Jong, Addy (2006-08-17). "„Historische kans voorbij"" (in Dutch). Reformatorisch Dagblad. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  9. ^ Hoekman, Jacob (2006-11-23). "Spruyt: Negeren van Wilders onverstandig" (in Dutch). Reformatorisch Dagblad. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  10. ^ Spruyt, Bart (2007-01-01). "Weimar in aanbouw (deel 1)" (in Dutch). The weblog of Bart J. Spruyt. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  11. ^ Hartong, Lucas (2007-01-02). "Het is me wat!" (in Dutch). Het Vrije Volk. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  12. ^ a b van der Horst, Alain (2006-12-01). "Haagse Sekte" (in Dutch). HP/De Tijd. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  13. ^ "Partij Wilders doet niet mee aan Statenverkiezingen". ANP (in Dutch). Volkskrant. 2007-01-10. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  14. ^ "Meldpunt Discriminatie Internet" (PDF) (in Dutch). Magenta Foundation. 2004-03-01. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2004-08-08. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  15. ^ Dohmen, Joep (2007-01-13). Link "PVV riep steun van extreem-rechts in" (in Dutch). NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved 2009-04-04. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help)
  16. ^ "Wilders ontkent oproep tot steun extreem rechts" (in Dutch). Trouw. 2007-01-13.
  17. ^ "Extreem-rechtse steun verdriet Wilders" (in Dutch). de Volkskrant. 2007-01-15. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  18. ^ de Winter, Leon (2007-01-15). "De demonisering van Geert Wilders" (in Dutch). Elsevier. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  19. ^ Terpstra, Doekle (2007-11-30). "'Nee' tegen kwade boodschap Wilders" (in Dutch). Trouw. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  20. ^ Andringa, Hans (2007-12-04). "Dutch show mixed reactions to anti-Muslim party". Radio Netherlands Worldwide. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  21. ^ Bessems, Kustaw (2007-12-05). "Tekort aan redelijke positivo's" (in Dutch). De Pers. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  22. ^ "Geert Wilders' Freedom Party rises to 32 seats". Radio Netherlands Worldwide. 2009-03-29. Retrieved 2009-03-29.
  23. ^ Waterfield, Bruno (2009-03-03). "Geert Wilders leads Dutch polls". London: The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  24. ^ "Wilders Now a Celebrity in US and Prime Minister in Poll". NIS News Bulletin. 2009-03-03. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  25. ^ Joop van Holsteyn. "De peiling van Maurice de Hond deugt niet; De waarde van een peiling staat of valt met een representatieve steekproef". NRC Handelsblad.
  26. ^ ""Dutch Party for Freedom Recovers Top Rank"". Angus-reid.com. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  27. ^ ""2e Kamerverkiezingen 2010 – Peilingen 31.01.2010 Maurice de Hond PVV de Grootste"". Digitalehofstad.wordpress.com. 2010-01-31. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  28. ^ ""PVV historisch hoog in peiling"". www.nu.nl. 2010-07-18. Retrieved 2010-07-20.
  29. ^ "Outspoken Dutch Politician Makes Inroads"
  30. ^ "Vooral het CDA heeft niets te zoeken in zo’n ’bijzonder’ kabinet"
  31. ^ "Standpunten". Voor Nederland in Europa (in Dutch). Party for Freedom. 2009-04-01. Retrieved 2009-04-07.
  32. ^ http://www.volkskrant.nl/binnenland/article1351335.ece/Wilders_AOW-leeftijd_moet_65_blijven
  33. ^ http://www.studned.nl/2934/onderwijs/wilders-wil-basisbeurs-behouden-en-islamitische-scholen-sluiten
  34. ^ "MPs unimpressed with motion from PVV". Expatica. 2007-02-16. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  35. ^ "'Smoren discussie dubbel paspoort schandalig'" (in Dutch). Elsevier. 2007-02-15. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  36. ^ "Dutch politician doubts Muslim ministers' loyalty". Reuters. 2007-02-24. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  37. ^ "Opposition criticises cabinet in debate". Expatica. 2007-03-01. Archived from the original on 2007-09-29. Retrieved 2009-04-04.
  38. ^ el Ayoubi, Mohammed (2007-03-02). "Dutch MP to serve as advisor to Moroccan king". Radio Netherlands. Retrieved 2009-04-05. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  39. ^ "Kamer akkoord met Marokkaans advieswerk Arib" (in Dutch). Elsevier. 2007-03-08. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  40. ^ "Kamp: Nevenfunctie Arib schaadt integratie". ANP (in Dutch). Reformatorisch Dagblad. 2007-03-08. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  41. ^ Stokmans, Derk (2007-03-09). "Lange dag in de Kamer met veel hatelijkheden" (in Dutch). NRC Handelsblad. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  42. ^ "Minister: Wilders' moslimmotie is onmogelijk" (in Dutch). Elsevier. 2007-11-22. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  43. ^ "'Agente met hoofddoek absoluut onwenselijk'" (in Dutch). NU.nl. 2007-12-04. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  44. ^ "Wilders wil Nederlandse Guantanamo" (in Dutch). Algemeen Dagblad. 2007-10-26. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  45. ^ {page 17|language=Dutch|accessdate=2010-07-01
  46. ^ "Groep Wilders wordt Partij voor de Vrijheid" (in Dutch). Elsevier. 2006-02-23. Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  47. ^ Soares, Claire; Lichfield, John (2009-06-06). ""Wilders strikes first blow for European extremists"". London: Independent.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  48. ^ ""Derk Stokmans: The dilemma facing mainstream Dutch parties"". London: Independent.co.uk. 2009-06-06. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  49. ^ "De website van wakker Nederland". Telegraaf.nl. 2009-07-10. Retrieved 2010-06-11.
  50. ^ Waterfield, Bruno (2009-03-03). "" Geert Wilders leads Dutch polls - Britain's controversial ban on the anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders has pushed his Freedom Party into the lead for the first time, according to Dutch opinion polls"". London: Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  51. ^ ""Dutch Far-Right PvdV Tied with Ruling CDA"". Angus-reid.com. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  52. ^ ""PVV picks second MP for local elections"". Dutchnews.nl. 2009-12-21. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  53. ^ ""Local elections overshadowed by national politics"". Nrc.nl. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  54. ^ Ian Traynor, Europe editor (2010-03-03). ""Big gains for far-right leader Geert Wilders as Dutch go to the polls - Anti-Muslim populist looks to dominate political landscape as general election looms"". London: Guardian. Retrieved 2010-06-18. {{cite news}}: |author= has generic name (help)
  55. ^ ""Dutch anti-Islam leader is major winner in polls"". Reuters.com. 2010-03-04. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  56. ^ ""Gains for far-right in Dutch elections"". Ft.com. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  57. ^ Van, Maarten (2010-03-04). ""Anti-Immigrant Party Strong in Dutch Polls"". Online.wsj.com. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  58. ^ Template:Nl"Uitslagen verkiezingen Gemeenteraad 2010"
  59. ^ Template:Nl"Uitslagen verkiezingen Gemeenteraad 2010"
  60. ^ Template:Nl"Gemeenteraadsverkiezingen 2010"
  61. ^ ""Geert Wilders is major winner in Dutch polls"". Nrc.nl. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  62. ^ ""Wilders three seats ahead of rivals in Dutch poll"". Reuters.com. 2010-03-07. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  63. ^ ""Wilders to take council seat in the Hague"". Dutchnews.nl. 2010-03-08. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  64. ^ ""Anti-Islam MP Geert Wilders has announced he will take up a seat on the local council of the city of The Hague"". Rnw.nl. 2010-03-08. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  65. ^ ""Calls for local poll recount in The Hague"". Rnw.nl. 2010-03-10. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  66. ^ ""Rotterdam to investigate proxy voting"". Rnw.nl. 2010-03-10. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  67. ^ ""Wilders' PVV party 'kept in Almere opposition'"". Expatica.com. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  68. ^ "H. Brinkman" (in Dutch). Parlement & Politiek. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  69. ^ "PVV verslaat PvdA in peiling" (in Dutch). nieuws.nl. 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  70. ^ "Nieuw Referendum EU". Maurice de Hond (in Dutch). Online Research Solutions. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  71. ^ "Wilders' Freedom Party leads polls". Radio Netherlands Worldwide. 2009-03-01. Retrieved 2009-04-05.
  72. ^ Hoebink, Michel (2009-03-17). "Wilders' supporters - what do they want?". Radio Netherlands Worldwide. Retrieved 2009-03-19.
  73. ^ ""Polarisatie en radicalisering in Nederland - Een verkenning van de stand van zaken in 2009"". Iva.nl. 1967-06-01. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  74. ^ ""Wilders' party is 'new radical right'"". Dutchnews.nl. 2010-01-28. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  75. ^ ""Putting Geert Wilders on the political map"". Rnw.nl. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  76. ^ ""WC-eend adviseert Guusje ter Horst"". Extra.volkskrant.nl. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  77. ^ ""Wilders: Minister Ter Horst speelt vuil spelletje"". Elsevier.nl. 2010-01-30. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  78. ^ "Dutch liberal leader topping polls ahead of next week's election - The Irish Times - Wed, Jun 02, 2010". The Irish Times. 2010-06-02. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  79. ^ Peter Beaumont, Almere (2010-05-16). "Geert Wilders, the ultra-right firebrand, campaigns to be Holland's prime minister | World news | The Observer". London: Guardian. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  80. ^ "Dutch voters boost far-right party of Geert Wilders". CSMonitor.com. 2010-06-10. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  81. ^ "The Dutch elections: Right turn". The Economist. 2010-06-10. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  82. ^ "Netherlands - Political parties". European Election Database. Retrieved 27 June 2010.
  83. ^ "Rapper wil 25.000 euro van Wilders". Algemeen Nederlands Persbureau (in Dutch). de Volkskrant. 2008-04-07. Retrieved 2008-04-08.
  84. ^ "Hold your breath: 'Fitna' spreading seeds of hatred". Today's Zaman. 2008-03-29. Retrieved 2008-04-01.
  85. ^ Park, Michael (2008-01-21). "Iran Warns Netherlands Not to Air Controversial 'Anti-Muslim' Film". Fox News. Retrieved 2008-03-08.
  86. ^ ""Undercover journalist gains easy access to Geert Wilders"". Nrc.nl. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
  87. ^ ""Undercover journalist infiltrates Freedom Party"". Expatica.com. Retrieved 2010-06-18.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Party_for_Freedom&oldid=378696751"