User talk:Everard Proudfoot

Re: Further disruption

I noticed. It was as the block confirmation page was loading that I saw your message, actually. Thanks for letting me know, anyway! - Vianello (Talk) 22:09, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you advise me just seconds after it's acted upon! But hey, it means it was good advice. Talk page access has been revoked. After seeing how much further the abuse went I had a feeling this'd happen. - Vianello (Talk) 22:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Keep up the good work. - Vianello (Talk) 22:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"VampiressOnDaProwl" - Thank you for the comments you sent. I sincerely apologize for problems and misunderstanding. But I didn't violate anybody's copyright. i added Wikipedia content to the MSNBC Wikipedia location from other Wikipedia locations, written by Wikipedia. i just transferred content within Wikipedia that was already Wikipedia approved content. i didnt put any content from non-Wikipedia websites to Wikipedia. i forgot. how would i use the sandbox and what is it?

I HATE YOU , Firstly, Do you know that I do not have all information around, therefore people such as you man add onto the information given. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LEEYOOHEE (talk • contribs) 07:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandon Soo Hoo did attend my middle school, I am serious. You may go on Google to double check, but you can ask him in real life. I live in Temple City, and he is my friend. If you dont believe me, he only adds close friends on Facebook and I am one of them. You can't assume that I am lying until you have checked whether I lied or not. Just because I've put many pages that are said to be "inappropriate" doesn't mean that when I post real facts, I can get banned. I just wanted the page to have my school on it because he really went there, so did his sister brittney soo hoo . I don't know what your problem is, but if I'm telling the truth, deal with it, the right way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LEEYOOHEE (talk • contribs) 07:49, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well then if I put in the year he promoted from Oak will that be a reliable fact ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LEEYOOHEE (talk • contribs) 07:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reference desk query

Hi, just to let you know I have answered your reference desk query. -- role^player 01:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfDs

Sorry about that. I decided that my solution was the best to keep the information (improving Humble ISD's article in the process) and to redirect the articles as typical. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 04:47, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Forge tipsy

See WP:LTA/HK. Thanks for the help. Will Beback talk 06:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox

Is it OK if I mess around on the sandbox thingy? I'm doing that instead of being bad and all... I was warned by you so I thought you could answer that, ha. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubba Dubba Hubba (talk • contribs) 06:50, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism to Gaspar de Portolà article

Hi, I've noticed you are not following Wikipedia's conventions by continually editing back Gaspar de Portolà's article, which should show it's real nationality and not a non-existent one. I've tried to discuss with you the changes in the discussion page of the article, but you have keep abusing of your powers, so I'm very sorry to tell you that I've asked for an administrator intervention and a cancellation of your roll-back powers. Yours faithfully --84.126.10.233 (talk) 22:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I see your agenda now. Your comment on my Talk page make it clear that you're a Spanish nationalist who doesn't believe that anybody born in Catalonia could possibly be Catalan. The people who live in Catalonia seem to disagree with you. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 22:22, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Actually, your comment shows your agenda and prove that your changes are based in your political believes, not in facts. Thanks for giving me a further prove. All yours and best regards. --84.126.10.233 (talk) 22:25, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no agenda. I don't care if Portola is Spanish or Catalan, all I'm trying to do is to prevent edit warriors such as yourself from putting their particular POVs on Wikipedia articles. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 22:26, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, 1st, you showed you care enough to NOT follow wikipedia conventions. Second, I edited the article followin the maxima "Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia anyone can edit" and I did it to make the article follow the conventions that are seen in any other army officer article. I do not know if the Spanish Army is so special that needs officers like Portola be presented diferently from, let's say, an U.S. Army or French Army officer. And third, by not following wikipedia's conventions, you put YOUR particular POV on a wikipedia article. Looking to hear forward from you --84.126.10.233 (talk) 22:33, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Everard. Just in case you didn't notice yourself, the IP above has reported you for vandalism. I lolled. Millahnna (mouse)talk 22:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question

I'm sorry to ask you. But how do you make the nice expanded user signature with timestamp? User:atomicbre —Preceding undated comment added 20:39, 12 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

English Bobby

I have no idea what happened or how I did it, a complete accident. Justin talk 02:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And you were quick, I tried to revert it immediately. Justin talk 02:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Everard Proudfoot. You have new messages at Endofskull's talk page.
Message added 00:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Media Matters edits

Edit summaries did give reasons for edits, and my MM Talk posting notes them again. Please have a look at them before making bulk reverts. Mr Anon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.228.156.201 (talk) 20:52, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very aware, thank you. It might help if you held the trigger and looked at the edit summaries and MM Talk more carefully. The edits are indeed in good faith and well-explained. Mr Anon

The IP you reverted.

Perhaps you can help me keep an eye on them. All their edits have been to promote the POV of the Zeitgeist Movement, and I suspect some kind of conflict of interest. They've also created an article, which seems to have been copied and pasted directly from a Zeitgeist website. Zazaban (talk) 06:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?

What makes you think this was a test?71.88.58.198 (talk) 05:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I certainly agree that it was good faith and not vandalism. It merely took information from the image page and put it in the caption. I'm not objecting to your revert, just to the implication of vandalism. Thanks for thinking it over.71.88.58.198 (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I too am puzzled by your revert. Victor Victoria (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I assume the warning at User talk:71.88.58.198 was due to a misunderstanding, and I have removed it. Please let me know if there is something that I am missing. Johnuniq (talk) 10:30, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Princes of Savoy

Hey, thanks! Dim moment lol sorted now! =] Monsieur le Duc (talk) 02:38, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Combined Endeavor

I am working with the PAO (Public Affairs Officer) of Combined Endeavor and do have the right to use this official text. And the website does not contain malware. It's an official website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Just4smone (talk • contribs) 07:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Categories

Yes, I do have a source for my edits at Kamie Crawford. The source is already in the article. It's at http://www.missmarylandusa.com/mdteen_bio.html MissAmericaGirl (talk) 02:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure! No problem. I fixed it. MissAmericaGirl (talk) 02:53, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

You have new messages (last change).

—fetch ·comms 22:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Patrice Martinez

Hi, I have noticed that you revised the article recently. Can you check it again? It seems that some of the maintenance boxes might be out of place such as (unsourced section). Some of the awards are mentioned in the external links provided with article. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 22:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it is not unsourced if some sources are provided. I am not familiar with maintenance boxes therefore asking you maybe to reconsider. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 22:06, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, understood. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 22:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

University of Hungary

I am being a bit deliberately vague here, but I see you reverted a change saying there are only two universisties in Hungary. I might or might not agree with tahat revert, but wanted to ask you opinion, since on another arrticle is written "University of Hungary" which is obiously even more vague thhan this. Can you reply on my talk ppage and I will give you the details, because I would like yuor opinion.

Si Trew (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse my bad typing. Si Trew (talk) 06:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jonas Brothers Live in Concert

Oops. I was removing the other set lists (that seemed fake to me, and were unneeded, just alternate set lists) and I guess I must have deleted that tag with it by mistake. —ΣПDiПG-STΛЯT (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dealing with Talk:Labshare

Hi, note that the page is subject to vandalism from what appears to be a regular troll (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/ID908237835). It is probably easier to not engage the latest Single-purpose account in discussion, it might then have been possible to revert all his/her contributions as vandalism. I suggest you let them have their rant and if not reverted within a few hours by one of the admins monitoring the page, then you can report any libellous comments or legal threats to WP:ANI in line with WP:NLT. Thanks, Fæ (talk) 07:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Hello, Everard Proudfoot. You have new messages at Reconsider the static's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-Reconsider! 13:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Yvonne Thornton biography: As the subject, I did not initiate this biography. I did not write it so it is not an autobiography. I don't know who did. However, in reading the post, there were many edits to correct errors in accuracy, i.e. my birthplace and academic degrees. The substance has not been changed. Therefore, I would appreciate your specific concerns particularly about a conflict of interest because I didn't write this biography. I corrected it. Yvonne S. Thornton (talk) 01:59, 14 September 2010 (UTC) My name is Yvonne Thornton[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polar Tree

I have relisted the above AfD, as the nominator withdrew their nomination. However, you had !voted 'delete', and so your response would be useful, either to confirm that you still think that the article should be deleted, or that the article should now be kept. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 14:46, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for looking after my talk page. Jan1naD ^{(talk • contrib)} 22:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard L. Albert declined speedy

asserts significance with "president of award winning advertising agency." Dloh cierekim 00:55, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aryan Shahabian

Hey there! Just to let you know that even though your request at RfPP was declined on salting this article, it had already been salted when Anthony Bradbury (talk · contribs) deleted it. Ged UK 07:04, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator intervention against vandalism

I have seen your report on DanielCooke94 at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. i have decided to deal with this user, but in fact this was not an issue of vandalism, so that was not the right place to report it. Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring would have been better. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:59, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Everard Proudfoot. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 21:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Question

See the article's talk page as to why. --NortyNort (Holla) 01:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ephren Taylor

None of Ephren taylors material is sourced, but you do not edit his page after he edits it himself to continue his fraud. You did the same thing with 2 other fraudsters, and you cost investors millions due to your failure to allow the truth to be posted. All of Ephren taylors links are either to non functioning sites or sites that are unrelated to the matter at hand entirely. His claims are wilding fictitious, can anyone just post lies about themselves? Look for yourself his company is on pinksheets, the SEC listed his company in a list of co.s to be probed, what more do you want. Their SEC filings show their company does nothing but collect appearance fees. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.155.162 (talk) 01:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

==

People find him on wikipedia to confirm his legitimacy. Based off of the misleading and grossly incorrect information you allow himself to post on his own behalf, investors (more like poor retirees with maybe 50000 to their name) send him their money as he approaches them through churches and uses faith to leverage their belief in him, along with wikipedia. YOU ARE AIDING AND ABETTING. EITHER TAKE THE PAGE DOWN ALL TOGETHER OR SLEEP WITH YOURSELF KNOWING PEOPLE WILL BECOME HOMELESS BECAUSE OF YOUR FAILURE TO ACT TO STOP IS LIES. LOOK HIM UP ON PINKSHEETS AND RIPOFFREPORT. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.155.162 (talk) 01:44, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories

Several Obama articles, including Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories, are under probation. Any edit warring on that article will get you blocked. Take your suggest edits to the article's Talk page and get consensus there before making major edits like that. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 01:54, 5 September 2010 (UsC)

There is a consensus on this. I suggest you read the talk pages before posting edits like that.John2510 (talk) 02:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Considering the consensus is that the article retain that name, where is the consensus on the talk page to remove the discussion of the article's title? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:14, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's no consensus for the article to retain the name (which is a non-existent Phoneomenon) and certainly no consensus regarding the description. John2510 (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories#Consensus_for_an_edit.3F. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:21, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Have you read Q1 of the FAQ at the top of the article's Talk page? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

I've seen it. It doesn't relate to my edit. Also, it's contrary to wp:npov and was originated by an account called "Dems on the Move." It was drafted by a political party specific acount. While labeled a "FAQ" it means nothing... other than an attempt to describe clear political bias as Wikipedia policy. It's just plain vile. John2510 (talk) 03:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by John2510 (talk • contribs)

Linda McMahon

I'm not sure where the 3RR warning came from, as I'm nowhere near this. User Screwball23 has, however, issued multiple reversions not only against my edits, but edits by users Collect and Off2riorob as well. If you examine the history of the article more closely, you can easily verify this. Furthermore, much of the material I am removing is due to BLP concerns. Fell Gleaming^talk 02:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious why you believe I'm involved in an edit war. I've made a large number of edits to this article, but since the 3rd, I've only reverted a single edit of Screwballs, or anyone else's, and when he reverted it out for the second time, I left it alone. How is this edit warring? Screwball, on the other hand, has made several reversions, coupling them with abusive language and accusations. Fell Gleaming^talk 02:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User Screwball23 is continuing to revert out edits after your warning. All of his edits are reversions of recent changes to the article. Fell Gleaming^talk 03:00, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further, he is continuing to reinsert unsourced contentious material into a BLP. As example, this text was just reinserted: "After he filed for unemployment, Linda McMahon repeatedly challenged him at unemployment hearings with a company lawyer. Cole successfully received unemployment benefits from the company until 1995.", sourcing it to a Politico story at [1]. The claim is nowhere in the source. I just cleaned out a large number of such unsourced or distorted claims from the article, as per BLP policy. Now they're all coming back. Fell Gleaming^talk 03:08, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I've stopped editing of this article of respect. User Screwball23, however, is continuing to edit war with other editors, having performed eight more revisions to the article since you issued a 3RR warning, many edits of which myself and other editors believe contain BLP violations. Fell Gleaming^talk 13:26, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your comment

He has a username from a company named: Roblox. So I think it violates Wikipedia's Policy to usernames. The Instant Kid (talk) 03:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roommate (Korean band)

Alright. Sorry, I didn't realize, I thought that the page was supposed to be redirected because that's the only content it showed. —ΣПDiПG-STΛЯT (talk) 05:04, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Weiner

It's stated in #2 under "References". However, I am not familiar with the convention for citing references for categorizations. bbi5291 (talk) 17:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of high schools in the Peoria Unified School District

Do you think the article would be better as a table? I've used some tables in other district articles: see Humble Independent School District (the pilot) for how I took on an AfD of Humble ISD's middle schools (prior to that, the article was a list). I was so satisfied (so was one of the people that voted in the AfD) that I extended the table to the high schools. This actually adds information and I believe makes parent articles more indicative of their child articles' contents (for HS) and sometimes adds content (for MS). The Peoria list is actually entirely composed of the exact type of information that I put in the "Humble table" format – feeder schools, principal, school colors and mascot, enrollment, history, athletic conference, etc. Raymie (t • c) 04:34, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

You are right, apologies for my mistake. --REZTER ^TALK ø 19:59, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yvonne Thornton

User:Yvonne S. Thornton has responded to your comments on my talk page. I think it's because the last message on your talk page was the tb notice which I had left with my signature. Anyhow, I just thought you should know :) -Reconsider! 09:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do I speak with Everard Proudfoot? Yvonne S. Thornton (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Yvonne Thornton[reply]

I think I hit the wrong button or something, i.e. for my own page. Anyway, I think this is the correct way to correspond. I didn't initiate the biography, I just wanted to correct errors in the text and it was not meant to be deliberate or self-serving, just for accuracy. If I didn't do it correctly, or it triggered something, I apologize, but what happens now? Is there a panel who authenticates the information? What do I need to do now? Please know that I have very few computer skills and this site is very intimidating. I would appreciate any guidance because, quite frankly, I am terrified of this wikipedia.Yvonne S. Thornton (talk) 00:28, 15 September 2010 (UTC)Yvonne Thornton[reply]

Actually, it's Dr. Thornton, and I understand the concern about peacockery. I thank you very much for your advice.Yvonne S. Thornton (talk) 04:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)Yvonne Thornton[reply]

Hi

Pl note. Thanks and regards. Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 07:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup!

Ten thousand thanks to you for catching and reverting the "edit" to my userpage by PieInFace. I am sincerely grateful.Writtenright (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2010 (UTC)writtenright[reply]

List of names

I saw your comments on the Biography project's talk page. Really, it isn't a matter of the Project's opinion one way or another, it is a matter of wikipedia policies and guidelines. So far as I remember, lists of people from a city, alumni of a school, etc. are generally considered perfectly acceptable provided that they do not take up a disproportionate amount of space and attention in the article. If you had a more specific indication of which articles in question you are concerned with, that would be helpful. John Carter (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you ever get the feeling an editor is being paid by a politician?

I've got that feeling right now.

I cited my sources yet that's not good enough. --Nydied (talk) 02:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in the discussion on Talk:Carl Paladino. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 02:06, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hi :) Reply on my talk page. Sincerely Wifione _.......^{Leave a message} 06:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Joaquin Phoenix

Unprotected, let's see how it goes. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

folly reverts

I was leaving a msg on their talk page at the same time you were. Thanks for paying attention to the situation. SpikeJones (talk) 02:09, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

Why do you keep hassling me? Is there a reason to why you keep removing that photo? Ohlly (talk) 05:44, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Re: Further disruption

Reference desk query

AfDs

User:Forge tipsy

Sandbox

Repeated vandalism to Gaspar de Portolà article

Question

English Bobby

Talkback

Media Matters edits

The IP you reverted.

?

Template:Princes of Savoy

Combined Endeavor

Re: Categories

Talkback

Patrice Martinez

University of Hungary

Jonas Brothers Live in Concert

Dealing with Talk:Labshare

Talk

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polar Tree

Thanks

Richard L. Albert declined speedy

Aryan Shahabian

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Re: Question

Ephren Taylor

Barack Obama citizenship conspiracy theories

Linda McMahon

In reply to your comment

Roommate (Korean band)

Zach Weiner

List of high schools in the Peoria Unified School District

Revert

Yvonne Thornton

Hi

Merci beaucoup!

List of names

Do you ever get the feeling an editor is being paid by a politician?

Talkback

Re:Joaquin Phoenix

folly reverts

Reverts