User talk:Luna Santin
Luna Santin is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia in December or January ish |
Talk – Sandbox – Blog |
Welcome to my talk page! I'll sometimes reply on your talk, but will frequently (increasingly often) reply here.
|
The Signpost: 19 September 2011
- From the editor: Changes to The Signpost
- News and notes: Ushahidi research tool announced, Citizendium five years on: success or failure?, and Wikimedia DC officially recognised
- Sister projects: On the Wikinews fork
- WikiProject report: Back to school
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom narrowly rejects application to open new case
- Technology report: MediaWiki 1.18 deployment begins, the alleged "injustice" of WMF engineering policy, and Wikimedians warned of imminent fix to magic word
- Popular pages: Article stats for the English Wikipedia in the last year
sockpuppet editing
There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari/ Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed. Yonmei (talk) 21:45, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Now there's a name I haven't seen in a while
Good to see you pop up on my watchlist. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:58, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) Giving things another go, for a bit. Hopefully I find something productive to do! – Luna Santin (talk) 03:02, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- As I'm sure you know, your mop is still over there in the corner, with your name still on it. Although I can empathize if you don't want it back right now. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Can't decide. Probably should, but I worry I'd be out of touch with community norms. I suppose things can't have changed that much. Lots of new faces, and some cool new templates and scripts, but mostly everything looks familiar. It's great to see so many people have kept at it, yourself included. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Nah, things haven't changed that much in a year; 99% of it is common sense, and that seems to be less common than it used to be. One more sane admin would be welcome. --Floquenbeam (talk) 12:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- Can't decide. Probably should, but I worry I'd be out of touch with community norms. I suppose things can't have changed that much. Lots of new faces, and some cool new templates and scripts, but mostly everything looks familiar. It's great to see so many people have kept at it, yourself included. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- As I'm sure you know, your mop is still over there in the corner, with your name still on it. Although I can empathize if you don't want it back right now. --Floquenbeam (talk) 03:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
Oh wow another old timer who came back, welcome back Secret account 02:29, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- It's good to know you haven't abandoned us to a chaotic demise :) /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 22:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 September 2011
- Recent research: Top female Wikipedians, reverted newbies, link spam, social influence on admin votes, Wikipedians' weekends, WikiSym previews
- News and notes: WMF strikes down enwiki consensus, academic journal partnerships, and eyebrows raised over minors editing porn-related content
- In the news: Sockpuppeting journalist recants, search dominance threatened, new novels replete with Wikipedia references
- WikiProject report: A project in overdrive: WikiProject Automobiles
- Featured content: The best of the week
Ray William Johnson
Would you like to revisit WP:RFPP? 117Avenue (talk) 05:17, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks for pointing that out. I'll have it fixed in a jiffy. – Luna Santin (talk) 05:18, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Yay!
Hey, it's good to see your name again! Welcome back! :) Acalamari 07:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- I agree, wonderful to see your name pop up with a current time stamp again :) --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 14:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, both of you. I really appreciate the warm welcome I've been getting, and it's good to be back "home". I did pick a strange time to join back up, though: I'm going on two trips in as many weeks... oh, well! Thanks, again. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Welcome back! Good to see you back editing again :) Trusilver 14:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, both of you. I really appreciate the warm welcome I've been getting, and it's good to be back "home". I did pick a strange time to join back up, though: I'm going on two trips in as many weeks... oh, well! Thanks, again. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Welcome back. WJBscribe (talk) 09:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of The End's Not Near, It's Here for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The End's Not Near, It's Here is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The O.C. episodes from season 4, volume 1 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 16:42, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 3 October 2011
- News and notes: Italian Wikipedia shuts down over new privacy law; Wikimedia Sverige produce short Wikipedia films, Sue Gardner calls for empathy
- In the news: QRpedia launches to acclaim, Jimbo talks social media, Wikipedia attracts fungi, terriers and Greeks bearing gifts
- WikiProject report: Kia ora WikiProject New Zealand
- Featured content: Reviewers praise new featured topic: National treasures of Japan
- Arbitration report: Last call for comments on CheckUser and Oversight teams
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The conservatism of Wikimedians
- News and notes: Largest ever donation to WMF, final findings of editor survey released, 'Terms of use' heavily revised
- In the news: Uproar over Italian shutdown, the varying reception of BLP mischief, and Wikipedia's doctor-evangelist
- WikiProject report: The World's Oldest People
- Featured content: The weird and the disgusting
Template:Blockid has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 14:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
HOLY CRAP!
Welcome Back! :) We sent out our best internet search parties trying to find you, but they only turned up some b-tards, a couple LOLcats, a video of some dude embarrassing himself, and three illegal music downloads. I had given you up for lost, a victim of the internet black hole guarded by the insidious Rebecca Black. Good to see you back online and back here at Wikipedia. :) Let me know if you need anything to help you get back in the swing of things. Take Care...Neutralhomer • Talk • 06:19, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Got busy offline, mostly. :) By the time I realized I was taking a long wikibreak, it had already been quite a while. Edited anonymously, here and there. Of all the things to draw me back in, I saw some article getting vandalized after it was linked from Reddit and thought it needed semi-protection. Thanks for the welcome home!
I should probably poke around user scripts, a bit. Maybe I'll just steal somebody'smonobookvector -- my old one just crashed the browser, the moment I logged in. :p – Luna Santin (talk) 15:48, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 October 2011
- News and notes: Arabic Wikipedia gets video intros, Smithsonian gifts images, and WikiProject Conservatism scrutinized
- In the news: Why Wikipedia survives while others haven't; Wikipedia as an emerging social model; Jimbo speaks out
- WikiProject report: History in your neighborhood: WikiProject NRHP
- Featured content: Brazil's boom-time dreams of naval power: The ed17 explains the background to a new featured topic
Hello, Luna Santin. You stated some time ago that you would unprotect Origin of the Albanians; the page remains protected. It isn't my wish to complain about this, and if there is some reason why the page must remain protected, that's fine; however, if that's the case, I'd like to know what the reason is. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 01:30, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Right! Thanks for the reminder -- I'm sorry to say that I forgot about it. I've unprotected the page at this time. – Luna Santin (talk) 04:22, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Subpages
Yes, if you could please protect them all, that would be great! :-D Thank you very much! CTJF83 20:14, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Done. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) CTJF83 11:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
Semi-protection or blocking
Much appreciate your quick attention, regardless of the outcome. How could you block an anon IP that engages in persistent reverts (I think that is the same one for Paul Martin and Parliamentary leader, for the latter the edit war stopped because 99.224.54.167 won that round)? MonkeyKingBar (talk) 21:05, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Looking at Parliamentary leader, I notice most of the reverts came from 142.205.241.254 (talk · contribs); trouble is, that seems to be a shared IP address with more or less tame edits since that edit war, so it's entirely possible that blocking them now would only inconvenience some other people without even affecting the user responsible for all of those reverts. As for the recent reverts at Paul Martin, it looks to me like that's a pretty normal content dispute -- as far as I can see, 99.224.54.167 (talk · contribs) has never edited at Parliamentary leader. The one incident is so old that there's no practical way to take action on it, and the other seems like a job for dispute resolution. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:12, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Waiting for a yes or no :x
I noticed you haven't replied yet, so I thought I'd remind you. Talk:Merle_(dog_coat)#Miscellaneous_Proposed_Edits ItsWolfeh (talk) 07:20, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Replied at Talk:Merle (dog coat). Thanks for the reminder. – Luna Santin (talk) 20:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Hi Luna Santin. You participated in Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 78#Template to request a discussion be closed, after which {{Request close}} and Category:Requests for Close were created. There is a discussion regarding non-admin closures of non-AfDs at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Non-AfD NACs. I have posed several questions there and am interested in your thoughts. Cunard (talk) 06:10, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
?
Its Just Rumours About Mickie James and Magnus its not Even for Real — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickiefan2005 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 October 2011
- From the editors: A call for contributors
- Opinion essay: There is a deadline
- Interview: Contracting for the Foundation
- WikiProject report: Great WikiProject Logos
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion; request for amendment on Climate Change case
- Technology report: WMF launches coding challenge, WMDE starts hiring for major new project
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thanks for all your help at CAT:EP - much appreciated! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Admin's Barnstar | |
Thank you for serving the Wikipedia community by doing tedious yet necessary tasks around the site. -- Luke (Talk) 11:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Special Barnstar | |
For your civil, tireless and outstanding efforts in mentorship, regardless of the final outcome... your efforts have not gone unnoticed and set an example for us all! ROBERTMFROMLI | TK/CN 19:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC) |
Hi Luna Santin
Hi, I would like to make responses to you, and to the comments made at ANI, however I feel it is important to have someone helpful to review my comments before I post them. I feel like I am being stalked by user:only on my talkpage, so I am not sure how to proceed, should I use email, or discuss what I would like to say with you, I have asked LadyOfShallot for assistance also. Penyulap talk 13:21, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Unblock-en-l
I've been trying to get a hold of you, but haven't been able to, and then I thought the dumb thing was I never posted here :P but if you could send me an email or stop by IRC sooner rather than later that would be great. Sorry if this is the first you've heard/known about this. -- DQ (t) (e) 23:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for getting to that, but could you stop by the list and give a ban to the one obviously disruptive email please? -- DQ (t) (e) 20:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2011
- Opinion essay: The monster under the rug
- Recent research: WikiSym; predicting editor survival; drug information found lacking; RfAs and trust; Wikipedia's search engine ranking justified
- News and notes: German Wikipedia continues image filter protest
- Discussion report: Proposal to return this section from hiatus is successful
- WikiProject report: 'In touch' with WikiProject Rugby union
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Abortion case stalls, request for clarification on Δ, discretionary sanctions streamlined
- Technology report: Wikipedia Zero announced; New Orleans successfully hacked
The Signpost: 7 November2011
- Special report: A post-mortem on the Indian Education Program pilot
- Discussion report: Special report on the ArbCom Elections steering RfC
- WikiProject report: Booting up with WikiProject Computer Science
- Featured content: Slow week for Featured content
- Arbitration report: Δ saga returns to arbitration, while the Abortion case stalls for another week
The Signpost: 14 November 2011
- News and notes: ArbCom nominations open, participation grants finalized, survey results on perceptions on Wikipedia released
- WikiProject report: Having a Conference with WikiProject India
- Arbitration report: Abortion and Betacommand 3 in evidence phase, three case requests outstanding
Dear Luna Santin, I am Alexgreene87. I wasn't sure what to do when editing the page so I am leaving this message with you. This is about John Morrison going to face Dolph Ziggler for the WWE United States Championship at Survivor Series 2011. It has been reported on WWE.COM.
16 November 2011, 17:59 (UTC)