Jump to content

Super Audio CD

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 174.111.81.238 (talk) at 18:32, 18 June 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Super Audio CD
Media typeOptical disc
EncodingDigital (DSD)
Capacityup to 7.95 GiB/GB
Read mechanism650 nm laser
Developed bySony & Philips
UsageAudio storage
Optical discs
General
Optical media types
Standards
See also

Super Audio CD (SACD) is a high-resolution, read-only optical disc for audio storage. Sony and Philips Electronics jointly developed the technology, and publicized it in 1999.[1] It is designated as the Scarlet Book standard. Sony and Philips previously collaborated to define the Compact Disc standard (as well as the S/PDIF digital audio cable specification). SACDs allow greater dynamic range and hold more playing time than CDs.

Technology

SACD is capable of encoding recorded audio in either stereophonic sound or surround sound. Although SACD audio streams are encoded in a pulse-density modulation (PDM) scheme called Direct Stream Digital (DSD), a manufacturer may also write a Pulse-code modulation (PCM) "layer" compatible with conventional Compact Disc players.

SACD is a disc of identical physical dimensions to a standard compact disc; the density of the disc is the same as a DVD and it encodes audio using a process known as Direct Stream Digital. The SACD sampling rate is 2.8224 MHz and the resolution is one bit. A stereo SACD recording can stream data at an uncompressed rate of 5.6 Mbit/s, four times the rate for Red Book CD stereo audio.[2] SACD recordings can have a wider frequency and dynamic range than conventional CDs.

CD SACD
Format 16 bit PCM 1 bit DSD
Sampling frequency 44.1 kHz 2.8224 MHz[2]
Dynamic range 96 dB 120 dB[2]
Frequency range 20 Hz – 22.05 kHz 20 Hz – 50 kHz[2]
Disc capacity 700 MB 7.95 GB
Stereo Yes Yes
Discrete surround Never implemented Yes

There are three types of SACDs:[2]

  • Hybrid: Hybrid SACDs are encoded with a 4.7 GB DSD layer (also known as the HD layer), as well as a PCM (Red Book) audio layer readable by most conventional Compact Disc players.[3]
  • Single-layer: A DVD-5 encoded with one 4.7 GB DSD layer. Single-layer SACDs are not backward-compatible with conventional CD players.
  • Dual-layer: A DVD-9 encoded with two DSD layers, totaling 8.5 GB, and no PCM layer. Dual-layer SACDs can store nearly twice as much data as a single-layer SACD. Like single-layer SACDs, dual-layer discs are not backward-compatible with conventional CD players.

Almost all commercially released SACDs have included both stereo (dual-channel) and surround sound (multi-channel) mixes. A multi-channel mix need not be surround, however; some of the Living Stereo reissues (such as the RCA reissue of the 1957 Chicago Symphony Orchestra recording of Mussorgsky's Pictures at an Exhibition[4]) use only the three front channels to reproduce the original three-track (3.0) stereo recordings. Nor is a surround mix obliged to use all six SACD channels (five full-range plus LFE). For example, the 2001 SACD release of Mike Oldfield's Tubular Bells remains in the quadraphonic 4.0 mix.[5]

The CD layer exists primarily for backward compatibility, but is not required. If the CD layer is omitted, the SACD need not be limited to an 80-minute playing time. For stereo material, the space that would have been taken by the multi-channel program can be used to extend playing time to four hours or more. BIS has taken advantage of this to put all of Bach's organ music on five SACD-only disks.[6]

Adoption

The Super Audio CD format was originally introduced in 1999.[1] Royal Philips Electronics and Crest Digital partnered in May 2002 to develop and install the first SACD hybrid disc production line in the USA, with a production capacity of 3 million discs per year.[7] But SACD did not achieve the same explosive growth that Compact Discs enjoyed in the 1980s,[8] and was not accepted by the mainstream market.[9][10][11] By 2008, some considered the Super Audio CD a complete failure.[12] However, the format continues to thrive in the audiophile community,[13][14] and new SACD recordings[15] and players[16][17] continue to be made.

Despite the global decline in Compact Disc sales, sales of Super Audio CDs and players increased in 2010.[18]

Content

By October 2009, record companies had published more than 6,000 SACD releases, slightly more than half of which were European classical music. Jazz and popular music albums, mainly remastered previous releases, were the next two most numerous genres represented.[19][20]

Artist releases

Main article: List of SACD artists

Many popular artists have released some or all of their back catalog on SACD. Pink Floyd's album The Dark Side of the Moon sold over 800,000 copies by June 2004 in its SACD Surround Sound edition.[21] The Who's rock opera Tommy, and Roxy Music's Avalon, were released on SACD to take advantage of the format's multi-channel capability. All three albums were remixed in 5.1 surround, and released as hybrid SACDs with a stereo mix on the standard CD layer.

Some popular artists have released new recordings on SACD. Sales figures for Sting's Sacred Love album reached number one on SACD sales charts in four European countries in June 2004.[21]

Between 2007-2008 Genesis re-released all their studio albums across three box sets. Each album in these sets contains the original album on SACD in both stereo and 5.1 mixes. The US & Canada versions do not use SACD but CD instead.

By August 2009 443 labels[22] had released one or more SACDs. Instead of depending on major label support, some orchestras and artists have released SACDs on their own. For instance, the Chicago Symphony Orchestra started the Chicago Resound label to provide full support for high-resolution SACD hybrid discs,[23] and the London Symphony Orchestra established their own 'LSO Live' label.[24]

Disc reading

How a hybrid Super Audio CD works

Objective lenses in conventional CD players have a longer working distance, or focal length, than lenses designed for SACD players. This means that when a hybrid SACD is placed into a conventional CD player, the laser beam passes the high-resolution layer and is reflected by the conventional layer at the standard 1.2 mm distance, and the high-density layer is out of focus. When the disc is placed into an SACD player, the laser is reflected by the high-resolution layer (at 600 µm distance) before it can reach the conventional layer. Conversely, if a conventional CD is placed into an SACD player, the laser will read the disc as a CD since there is no high-resolution layer.[2][25]

Playback hardware

Hybrid Super Audio CDs, which include both CD and Super Audio CD layers, can be played on CD players, or other equipment which can play CDs; non-hybrid SACDs cannot. The SACD layer can be played only on a player that supports the SACD format. Not all SACD players support multi-channel playback—some are simply stereo.

The Sony SCD-1 was a player which was introduced concurrently with the SACD format in 1999, at a price of approximately US$5,000.[26] It weighed over 26 kg (57 lb). The SCD-1, no longer produced, was introduced before multi-channel SACDs existed and played two channel SACDs and Red Book CDs only.

Many electronics manufacturers, including Onkyo,[27] Denon,[16] Marantz,[28] Pioneer[17] and Yamaha[29] offer SACD players. None, however, has offered a portable SACD player capable of playing the high-definition layer of an SACD. Most portable CD players will play the conventional CD layer of a Hybrid SACD.

Sony has made in-car Super Audio CD players.[30]

Several brands have introduced (mostly high-end) Blu-ray Disc players that can play SACD discs.[31]

SACD players are not permitted to offer an output carrying an unencrypted stream of Direct Stream Digital (DSD).[32] Players initially supported only analog output; later some proprietary digital interfaces such as Denon Link permitted encrypted transmission of DSD. There are now two standard digital connection methods capable of carrying DSD in encrypted form: i.Link and HDMI (version 1.2 or later, standardised in August 2005).

The older i.Link interface is generally found on older mid- to high-end equipment and some current top-of-the-line units from Japanese manufacturers. HDMI is more common, being the standard digital connection method for high-definition video with audio. Most new mid-level and higher 2007 model year and later A/V processors support the HDMI 1.2 specifications DSD over HDMI feature. Most boutique manufacturers still do not support DSD. Some HDMI 1.1 spec DVD players convert DSD to LPCM and then pass it to an HDMI 1.1 spec or later processor. Lower end processors usually convert the DSD to LPCM, higher end ones usually convert it to LPCM for bass management or DSP but can also process it natively at the expense of DSP and bass management. Some new DVD players from Oppo Digital, Pioneer, Onkyo, etc. now support HDMI 1.2 or 1.3 and will pass DSD over HDMI as well as LPCM. Be aware that some players, for instance, Onkyo DV-SP504, will not support DSD or LPCM over HDMI without resampling it to 48 kHz. SACD or DVD-A will be played through analog outputs instead. The older i.Link interface has been dropped from all but high-end A/V processors and DVD players.

Unofficial playback of SACD ISO on a PC is now possible through freeware audio player foobar2000 for Windows using an open source plug-in extension called SACDDecoder.[33]

PlayStation 3 and SACD playback

The first two generations of Sony's PlayStation 3 (PS3) game console were capable of reading SACD discs. Starting with the third generation (introduced October 2007), SACD playback was removed altogether.[34]

For models that are capable of reading SACD, three output options exist:

  • Using the AV output will give an analog stereo sound for SACD's that include a stereo track.
  • Using HDMI will give access to multi-channel high-resolution PCM audio (converted from DSD).
  • Using S/PDIF will give digital stereo sound (of either the stereo track, or a subset of the multi-channel mix)

PS3 was capable of converting surround DSD to lossy 1.5 Mbit/s DTS for playback over S/PDIF using the 2.00 system software. The subsequent revision removed the feature.[35] There is software available for creating a backup copy of a SACD using an older generation PlayStation 3.[36] The resulting ISO files may be played through foobar2000 or burned to SACD-R. Many existing stand-alone players capable of playing SACD will also play SACD-R.[37]

DSD

Technical background

Main article: Direct Stream Digital

SACD audio is stored in a format called Direct Stream Digital (DSD), which differs from the conventional Pulse-code modulation (PCM) used by the compact disc or conventional computer audio systems.

DSD is 1-bit, has a sampling rate of 2.8224 MHz, and makes use of noise shaping quantization techniques in order to push 1-bit quantization noise up to inaudible ultrasonic frequencies. This gives the format a greater dynamic range and wider frequency response than the CD. The SACD format is capable of delivering a dynamic range of 120 dB from 20 Hz to 20 kHz and an extended frequency response up to 100 kHz, although most currently available players list an upper limit of 70–90 kHz,[38] and practical limits reduce this to 50 kHz.[2] Because of the nature of sigma-delta converters, one cannot make a direct technical comparison between DSD and PCM. DSD's frequency response can be as high as 100 kHz, but frequencies that high compete with high levels of ultrasonic quantization noise.[39] With appropriate low-pass filtering, a frequency response of 50 kHz can be achieved along with a dynamic range of 120 dB.[2] This is about the same resolution as PCM audio with a bit depth of 20 bits and a sampling frequency of 96 kHz.[2] Thus, DSD looks inferior to a "standard" PCM 24bit/96 kHz even using slightly more bandwidth than PCM (2.8224 Mbit/s vs 2.304 Mbit/s).

Audible differences compared to PCM/CD

In the audiophile community, the sound from the SACD format is thought to be significantly better than older format Red Book CD recordings.[40] However, in September 2007 the Audio Engineering Society published the results of a year-long trial in which a range of subjects including professional recording engineers were asked to discern the difference between SACD and compact disc audio (44.1 kHz/16 bit) under double blind test conditions. Out of 554 trials, there were 276 correct answers, a 49.8% success rate corresponding almost exactly to the 50% that would have been expected by chance guessing alone.[41] The authors commented:

Now, it is very difficult to use negative results to prove the inaudibility of any given phenomenon or process. There is always the remote possibility that a different system or more finely attuned pair of ears would reveal a difference. But we have gathered enough data, using sufficiently varied and capable systems and listeners, to state that the burden of proof has now shifted. Further claims that careful 16/44.1 encoding audibly degrades high resolution signals must be supported by properly controlled double-blind tests.[42][43]

This conclusion is contentious among the audiophile community.[44] Some have questioned the basic methodology and the equipment used in the AES study.[45]

Double-blind listening tests in 2004 between DSD and 24-bit, 176.4 kHz PCM recordings reported that among test subjects no significant differences could be heard.[46] DSD advocates and equipment manufacturers continue to assert an improvement in sound quality above PCM 24-bit 176.4 kHz.[47] Despite both formats' extended frequency responses, it has been shown people cannot distinguish audio with information above 21 kHz from audio without such high-frequency content.[48]

DST

To reduce the space and bandwidth requirements of Direct Stream Digital (DSD), a lossless data compression method called Direct Stream Transfer (DST) is used. DST compression is compulsory for multi-channel regions and optional for stereo regions. This typically compresses by a factor of between two and three, allowing a disc to contain 80 minutes of both 2-channel and 5.1-channel sound.[49]

Direct Stream Transfer compression was also standardized as an amendment to MPEG-4 Audio standard (ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/Amd 6:2005 - Lossless coding of oversampled audio) in 2005.[50][51] It contains the DSD and DST definitions as described in the Super Audio CD Specification.[52] The MPEG-4 DST provides lossless coding of oversampled audio signals. Target applications of DST is archiving and storage of 1-bit oversampled audio signals and SA-CD.[53][54][55] A reference implementation of MPEG-4 DST was published as ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/Amd.10:2007 in 2007.[56][57]

Pit Signal Processing

SACD includes various copy protection measures of which the most prominent is Pit Signal Processing (PSP), a physical watermarking feature that contains a digital watermark modulated in the width of pits on the disc (data are stored in the pit length). The optical pickup must contain special circuitry to read the PSP watermark, which is then compared to information on the disc to make sure it is legitimate. Because the majority of DVD players and all DVD-ROM drives use an optical pickup that lacks this specialized watermark detection circuitry, although they can read the data on the SACD layer, they cannot decode the audio of a protected SACD disc.[58]

On hybrid SACD discs, PSP is only applied to the SACD layer, not to the CD layer.

Copy protection

SACD has several copy protection features at the physical level which as of 2012 appeared to make the digital content of SACD discs difficult to copy. The content may be copiable without SACD quality by resorting to the analog hole, or ripping the conventional 700MB layer on hybrid discs. Copy protection schemes include physical pit modulation and 80-bit encryption of the audio data, with a key encoded on a special area of the disk that is only readable by a licensed SACD device. The HD layer of an SACD disc cannot be played back on computer CD/DVD drives, and SACDs can only be manufactured at the disc replication facilities in Shizuoka, Japan and Salzburg, Austria.[59] But there is software available which allows ripping/copying a SACD using an early Sony PlayStation 3 Console.[36]

Some later SACD players have encrypted IEEE 1394 (also called FireWire or i.Link) or HDMI digital outputs carrying DSD data, and it may be possible to get the raw DSD data from these links. The protection mechanism used is Digital Transmission Content Protection (DTCP), which can be used in "Copy Once" or "Copy Never" modes.

There seems to be one solution for obtaining digital non-DRM output on SACD as well as DVD-A players. A company based in Switzerland offers a modified output board that taps into the digital datastream prior to D/A conversion as well as converting DSD to PCM that the S/PDIF port can transfer.[60]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b The Guardian, Thursday 2 August 2007 No taste for high-quality audio by Jack Schofield. "Such a format—Super Audio CD (SACD)—has been out there since September 1999. And now, it's dying." Retrieved on May 29, 2009.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i Extremetech.com, Leslie Shapiro, July 2, 2001. Surround Sound: The High-End: SACD and DVD-Audio. "A stereo SACD recording has a data rate of 5.6Mbps, which is four times the stereo CD data rate of 1.4Mbps." Retrieved on May 20, 2009.
  3. ^ PC Magazine Encyclopedia Definition of Hybrid SACD Retrieved June 16, 2009
  4. ^ ArkivMusic.com, Album Details: Mussorgsky: Pictures At An Exhibition, Etc / Reiner, Chicago "The three-channel remastering is equally successful" Retrieved June 3, 2009
  5. ^ Amazon.com Tubular Bells Hybrid SACD "a pristine condition four-channel master of this legendary recording" Retrieved June 3, 2009
  6. ^ BIS-SACD-1527/28 "20 hours+ of music on 5 SACDs for the price of 2! (Please note: These single layer stereo SACDs can only be played back on an SACD player)"
  7. ^ "Crest National and Philips Partner to Bring SACD Hybrid Disc Manufacturing to the USA". Newscenter.philips.com. 2002-05-30. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
  8. ^ Mark Fleischmann Are DVD-Audio and SACD DOA? April 2, 2004 "the CD tidal wave was so aggressive that it swept away everything in its path including the terms album and record. I keep waiting for a high-resolution audio to trigger a similar tsunami. But tiny islands of SACDs and DVD-Audio titles in my local Tower Records have not grown into mighty continents." [1] Retrieved on January 16, 2010.
  9. ^ C|Net News, March 26, 2009 Betamax to Blu-ray: Sony format winners, losers by Steve Guttenberg. [2] "SACD was praised by audiophiles, but fizzled in the market. Sony Records no longer releases new SACD titles" (This is not entirely true; while Sony Classical does not appear to be making new SACD releases, Sony Classical in Germany and Japan made SACDs as recently as June 5, 2009 Sony Classical Germany Sony Music Japan) Retrieved on May 29, 2009.
  10. ^ Stereofile eNewsletter, January 10, 2006. Io Saturnalia! by Wes Phillips. [3] Mentions "the failure of SACD and DVD-A to gain traction." Retrieved on May 28, 2009.
  11. ^ Audio Video Revolution, October 19, 2006. The Symbolism Of Losing Tower Records by Jerry Del Colliano. "The pure failure of SACD and DVD-Audio as high resolution formats was analogous burning down a small town." [4] Retrieved on May 28, 2009.
  12. ^ Washington Post, The Frustration of Format Wars, by Rob Pegoraro. February 28, 2008 "just the past decade, numerous other formats -- MiniDisc, DVD-Audio and Super Audio Compact Disc -- have gone the way of HD DVD discs" [5] Retrieved on January 16, 2010
  13. ^ SoundStage! Arcam FMJ CD37 CD/SACD Player by Roger Kanno, March 2009 "Although mainstream adoption of the SACD format never materialized, as Sony once predicted it would, it seems to have found a home in the audiophile marketplace" [6] Retrieved January 16, 2010
  14. ^ Steoeophile, Music in the Round #38 by Kalman Rubinson September 2009 "We all recognize that the Super Audio Compact Disc, despite being an almost ideal format for high-resolution audio, has not replaced the "Red Book" CD [...] A steady stream of new SACDs continues from the independent classical labels, including many releases by major orchestras and ensembles" [7] Retrieved January 16, 2010
  15. ^ Amazon's link to SACD recordings shows SACD recordings are still being released. Retrieved January 16, 2010.
  16. ^ a b Denon's web page shows a single SACD player, the DCD-SA1. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  17. ^ a b The PD-D6-J and PD-D9-J are two SACD players that Pioneer offers. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  18. ^ "New SACD releases up 7% in 2010". PS3SACD.com. December 26, 2010. Retrieved February 13, 2011.
  19. ^ High Fidelity Review. News. Retrieved on May 20, 2009.
  20. ^ SA-CD.net
  21. ^ a b High Fidelity Review. Universal Music Artists Hit SACD Gold and Silver in Europe. Retrieved on May 18, 2009.
  22. ^ SA-CD.net. FAQ
  23. ^ Chicago Resound label retrieved June 6, 2009
  24. ^ London Symphony Orchestra—Buy Recordings retrieved June 6, 2009
  25. ^ How A Hybrid Super Audio Compact Disc (SACD) Works "SACD players are equipped with optical pick-ups that emit a 650 nanometer wavelength laserlight that is reflected by the DSD layer. The optical pick-ups in all CD players, however, emit a 780 nanometer laserlight which is transparent to the DSD layer, so only the CD layer is read" Retrieved June 16, 2009
  26. ^ "The Sony SCD-1 SACD Player". @udiophilia. Retrieved 2006-05-18.
  27. ^ Onkyo's list of CD Players shows a single SACD player, the C-S5VL. Retrieved March 21, 2012
  28. ^ Marantz's list of Hi-Fi Components shows one SACD player and Marantz's "Reference series" list shows four SACD players. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  29. ^ Yamaha's web page shows the CD-S1000 and CD-S2000 SACD players. Retrieved June 3, 2009
  30. ^ "Sony Announces Three Super Audio CD Car Stereo Players". High Fidelity Review. Archived from the original on 2007-03-02. Retrieved 2007-01-18.
  31. ^ "Super Audio CD-compatible Blu-ray Disc players". Retrieved 2009-10-21.
  32. ^ practical-home-theater-guide.com SACD Playback Requirements and Content Protection "SACD compatible players are not permitted to send DSD digital content over an unencrypted digital audio link" Retrieved June 18, 2009
  33. ^ Maxim V. Anisiutkin. "Super Audio CD Decoder". SourceForge. Retrieved 18 March 2012.
  34. ^ "Why did Sony take SA-CD out of PS3 again?". PS3 SACD FAQ. Retrieved 2009-01-04.
  35. ^ "Firmware v2.01". PS3SACD.com. November 22, 2007. Retrieved August 11, 2010.
  36. ^ a b "SACD ripping software using a PS3". Google Project Hosting. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
  37. ^ "A list of SACD-R compatible players". Google Project Hosting. November 23, 2011. Retrieved March 18, 2012.
  38. ^ Reefman, Derk; Nuijten, Peter. "Why Direct Stream Digital is the best choice as a digital audio format." (PDF) Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 5396, May 2001.
  39. ^ Ambisonic.net. Richard Elen, August 2001. Battle of the Discs. Retrieved on May 20, 2009.
  40. ^ The Mariinsky Label FAQ, for example, claims that "The DSD process used for producing SACDs captures more of the nuances from a performance and reproduces them with a clarity and transparency not possible with CD." Retrieved August 14, 2010
  41. ^ Is SACD doomed? www.audioxpress.com
  42. ^ Meyer, E. Brad and Moran, David R. "Audibility of a CD-Standard A/DA/A Loop Inserted into High-Resolution Audio Playback". AES E-Library. 55 (9): 775–779.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  43. ^ Audibility of a CD-Standard A/DA/A Loop Inserted into High-Resolution Audio Playback. Audio Engineering Society, September 2007.
  44. ^ The Emperor's New Sampling Rate Mix Online, April 2008.
  45. ^ AES Journal, 2008.
  46. ^ Blech, Dominikp; Yang, Min-Chi. "DVD-Audio versus SACD: Perceptual Discrimination of Digital Audio Coding Formats." (PDF) Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper 6086, May 2004.
  47. ^ "The 1-Bit Advantage – Future Proof Recording" (PDF). Korg. Retrieved 2011-12-31.
  48. ^ Toshiyuki Nishiguchi, Kimio Hamasaki, Masakazu Iwaki, and Akio Ando, "Perceptual Discrimination between Musical Sounds with and without Very High Frequency Components" [8] Published by NHK Laboratories in 2004
  49. ^ practical-home-theater-guide.com Direct Stream Digital Technology Retrieved June 3, 2009
  50. ^ ISO/IEC (2006-03-14). "ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/Amd 6:2005 - Lossless coding of oversampled audio". ISO. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  51. ^ ISO/IEC (2007-08-06). "ISO/IEC 14496-4:2004/Amd 15:2007 - Lossless coding of oversampled audio". ISO. Retrieved 2009-10-09.
  52. ^ ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11/N6674 (2004-07), ISO/IEC 14496-3:2001/FPDAM6 (Lossless coding of oversampled audio). (DOC), retrieved 2009-10-09 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  53. ^ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 N7465 (2005-07). "Description Lossless coding of oversampled audio". chiariglione.org. Retrieved 2009-10-09. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11 N7465 (2005-07). "Description Lossless coding of oversampled audio". archive.org. Archived from the original on 2007-02-03. Retrieved 2009-12-28. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  55. ^ ISO/IEC (2009-09-01), ISO/IEC 14496-3:2009 - Information technology -- Coding of audio-visual objects -- Part 3: Audio (PDF), IEC, retrieved 2009-10-07
  56. ^ ISO/IEC (2007), ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/Amd.10:2007 - Information technology -- Coding of audio-visual objects -- Part 5: Reference software -- Amendment 10: SSC, DST, ALS and SLS reference software (ZIP), ISO, retrieved 2009-10-07
  57. ^ ISO/IEC (2007-03-01), ISO/IEC 14496-5:2001/Amd.10:2007 - SSC, DST, ALS and SLS reference software, ISO, retrieved 2009-10-09
  58. ^ "Details of DVD-Audio and SACD". DVDdemystified.com. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  59. ^ "Sony Starts Hybrid Super Audio CD Production Facilities in Europe". SA-CD.net. 2003-01-22. Retrieved 2007-07-12.
  60. ^ dvdupgrades.ch

Bibliography

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Audio_CD&oldid=498218601"