User talk:Jamiebijania
|
|||
 | This user is part of the Welcoming Committee. |
| SB | This user lets SuggestBot recommend articles to edit twice a month. |
To be clear
- FYI, you've been blocked twice so I'm not going to say this to you again but please note that the next block that you get for disrupting wikipedia will be upwards of 1 week and/or possibly more. FWIW, even RI students don't behave in this manner. Best and out. --Dave ♠♣♥♦™№1185©♪♫® 20:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Weirdo much? I didn't even do anything wrong. Anw, I'm not from RI lol. Don't believe everything you see on the net. Just saying. Jamiebijania (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Scoot
Why on your user page do you claim to have created Scoot Airlines when you didnt? --JetBlast (talk) 03:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Er, actually i did. Check the page history. 1 Cheers, Jamiebijania (talk) 03:15, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- My opolgies i was looking at Scoot --JetBlast (talk) 03:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- Haha, its okay. Have a great day Jamiebijania (talk) 03:28, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
- My opolgies i was looking at Scoot --JetBlast (talk) 03:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:05, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
The article Tony Colbert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:GNG.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 13:46, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The article Chris Jones (Chelsea coach) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:BIO, no 3rd party sources that discuss the subject
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
The article James Melbourne (Match Analyst) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- fails WP:BIO, no 3rd party sources that discuss the subject
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 01:09, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Neil Bath has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO, no independent coverage
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 06:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Paco Biosca has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO, no independent coverage
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 06:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Daniel Sousa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO, no independent coverage
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 06:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Christophe Lollichon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:BIO, no non-trivial independent coverage
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz679 06:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Paco Biosca for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paco Biosca is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paco Biosca until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz679 20:43, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
MOTDs (This space for rent)
You may have noticed over the past few days that the MOTD that you link to on your user page has simply displayed a red link. This is due to the fact that not enough people are reviewing pending MOTDs here. Please help us keep the MOTD template alive and simply go and review a few of the MOTDs in the list. That way we can have a real MOTD in the future rather than re-using (This space for rent). Any help would be appreciated! –pjoef (talk • contribs) 10:48, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Republic of China article
Since you mentioned about the Republic of China in your user page, I guess you are interested to share your insights at Talk:Republic of China#Requested Move (February 2012). Thanks for your attention. 61.18.170.36 (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of TOUCH Community Services
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on TOUCH Community Services requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. WWGB (talk) 11:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. When you recently edited Humanitarian Organization for Migration Economics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Founder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
July 2012
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. Additionally, please review our deletion policy regarding criteria for speedy deletion, {{Db-disambig}}, assuming good faith, and vandalism. The disambiguation page as placed for deletion met the criteria for speedy deletion, because it disambiguated only one article. The criteria applies when dab pages only differentiate between 'two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic). Once you added additional pages, the criteria no longer applied. Remember, any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is never vandalism. Best regards, Cindy(talk to me) 04:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- If this is a matter of my skin colour, i will not hesitate to file a police report against you. Thank you. Jamiebijania (talk) 09:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)