Jump to content

User talk:Crisco 1492

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Zevion (talk | contribs) at 23:45, 11 August 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome to Wikipedia, the greatest encyclopedia on Earth! You seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! / You may wish to review the welcome page, tutorial, and stylebook, as well as the avoiding common mistakes and Wikipedia is not pages.

Here are some helpful links:

By the way, an important tip: To sign comments on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments.

Hope to see you around the Wiki! If you have any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact me on my talk page!

Who?¿? 08:40, 29 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New Year


I Hope You Have A Happy New Year Crisco 1492!!!! ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I hope that you have a wonderful New Year and will party all night long. If you don't celebrate New year at this time well then happy early or late New Year and I still advise that you have a good time tonight!!! ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FAC response

Hi. I'm the editor nominating Sons of Soul for FAC. I made some fixes in response to your comments, but also have questions/comments of my own about some of your points. Dan56 (talk) 13:12, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

VidMuze Page Deleted but needs to be modified.

Yes, if you can open the VidMuze page up again so I can make changes to it, I would really appreciate it.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgvideographer (talkcontribs) 15:10, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you very much for participating in my RfA. I appreciate that you took the time and effort to assess my contribution history, something that most people couldn't be bothered to do.

Oh, and just as a side note, I hope you didn't feel badgered or irritated by my response to your oppose. I had felt compelled to post a link to the "Sherlock" comment in my answer to Q3, for reasons of disclosure, which is where Mysterytrey originally picked it up from. I looked at it after the fact and actually felt kind of bad, sort of a "holy crap, I didn't mean for it to come across that way!" moment. I opted against posting on the talk page of whoever initially added that material to the article, in the off chance that they did not see the edit summary (and thus, no harm no foul). I don't mean to sound as if I'm above saying things that can be construed as being offensive, but I'm generally a pretty easy person to get along with. Hopefully your impression of me wasn't permanently soured, but if it was, I won't hold it against you. If ever you see me around, don't worry — I won't bite. ;)

Anyways, take care. =)

(P.S. you're doing a great job as an admin so far) Master&Expert (Talk) 23:32, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thanks M&E. A bit more experience (edit count wise) and content creation will go a long way at RFA the next time you decide to run. Not necessarily Featured Content, but a couple of GAs at the very least. Seeing an article through to GA or FA shows dedication and can be a factor in how people !vote. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK reply

You have a response waiting at Template:Did you know nominations/Parental brain. SilverserenC 07:43, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A question of image licensing

I found an image which should be in the Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War article. It can be viewed here The image is quite graphic so I will understand if you do not wish to look at it. It appears all over the web so I have no idea who owns it, would it be allowed under fairuse? Darkness Shines (talk) 16:44, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AfD/merge of Oscar Flight UFO/Missile Incident

Hi again Crisco, I've completed the AfD merge of Oscar Flight UFO/Missile Incident into Malmstrom Air Force Base, so I'm contacting you as requested to handle the deletion of that page, which has been identified as an unlikely search term. I'm not sure how the attribution will work, in accordance with Wikipedia's licensing terms, but perhaps you'll deem that my merge was enough of a paraphrase as to not need it. The relevant content is in the 341st Strategic Missile Wing section; giving it its own section felt too WP:UNDUE. I'll leave the article for deletion as a redirect in the meantime. Best, BDD (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Köllnischer Park DYK

Hi: Thanks for promoting this, but wouldn't the bear pic show up better? See nom page. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:53, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I went ahead and did so. TAP didn't look at the separate German Wikipedia article on the Berlin bear, which has a section on the Bärenzwinger and this pic, which suits his hook better. --Yngvadottir (talk) 12:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SFF as a RS?

To be honest, I think it's one of those sources that's sort of half reliable, half not. I've heard people say that it is, but then others say that it isn't. I've never really gotten a straight answer on it. 0.o I think that was one of those sources that I added but wasn't entirely sure about.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:27, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rajbir Dujaniya

Hi I created the above page.. which was nominated for speedy deletion by Zaldax (talk) on 02:34, 8 August 2012 (UTC) 16:59,

And before I could react ( i am not that frequent to wikipedia) you deleted on same day (8 August 2012 Crisco 1492 deleted page Talk:Rajbir Dujaniya )


I think it is a bit unfair that I or others were not given chance to clarify on the matter.. and if I remember correctly I have also given links to prove his notability as per guidelines in earlier deletion notice (a link to his song on itune and one other site which i dont remember now but had link on that page). So please look into the matter and undo it.. Thanks [[User:imdabs|Amit Амит अमित ਅਮਿਤ]] ([[User talk:imdabs|talk]]) (talk) 12:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Imdabs, I've looked over the article that was deleted and at the time it was deleted it didn't have a clear indication of importance. That being said, it's possible that you have further sources. Would you like me to recreate the article for you in your user space for you to work on? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination for parental brain

Hello, now that you have approved my DYK nomination for parental brain, what exactly is the next step? Do I have to wait for someone to promote it to one of the prep areas? Thank you very much for all your help with this article and your patience. Carina1205 (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message

Hi Crisco - you have a new message from me at the teahouse (I've used the blue colored "you have new messages" template once, unable to locate it now - I will find it again, just tired). My post there is deeper into the thread, not sure I need to notify you here. Take care. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions#Expansion_Tag Albeit27 (talk) 19:11, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sign up.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:14, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted pictures?

Hello,

I've been referred to you by another editor who said you are very good with image copyright.

If we look at this from Wikimedia Israel:

The spokesperson unit of the Israel Defense Forces began publishing its photographs online (on its Flickr account) under a free Creative Commons license. This move follows a long and protracted process of legislation promoted by WMIL in discussions in the Science and Technology Committee of the Knesset, the Israeli parliament. While legislation meant to free any work created by the Israeli government of copyright has not yet been accepted, the move by the IDF is certainly motivated by it. Hundreds of IDF Spokesperson images are now in use on Wikimedia projects. WMIL released a widely circulated press release condoning the move by the IDF spokesperson.

Now, a recent attack (2012 Egyptian-Israeli border attack) could use a photo of the attack, and such photos are provided on the IDF Spokesperson website. HOWEVER, these photos have NOT been uploaded to the IDF's Flickr account. I'm wondering whether I would still be allowed to upload these pictures from their official website, even though they're not on their official Flickr account.

Some other useful information - on many of the pictures (if not all, I just havent' seem them all) uploaded here on Wikipedia by the IDF, there is a notice by an administrator below that says the administrator reviewed it to make sure it was on the IDF's official Flickr account... I'm not sure though whether it would still be OK to have it on their official website, and perhaps they only checked to see if it was on their Flickr account to make sure it was legitimately the IDF.

So... Would I be allowed to publish pictures of the attack from the IDF official website that are NOT on the IDF's official Flickr account?

Thank you so much for your help. I really appreciate it. --Activism1234 02:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • The IDF images on Flickr that you linked to do not allow commercial reuse, which is necessary to be used on Wikipedia (we aren't commercial, but people who reuse our content sometimes are). However, I have good news for you. The IDF blog is licensed CC-BY-SA (Creative Commons Share-Alike Attribution), which is okay to use (click on "some rights reserved" at the bottom of the page; it links to this) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Side note: In case the license changes, I'd suggest archiving this version using http://www.webcitation.org  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:25, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! I appreciate it! --Activism1234 03:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nadar

Ok, I finished my comments on Nadar, sorry if I end up splitting hairs there by the end. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:13, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No photo?♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:30, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sigh

Ntv7 SatuSuro 09:03, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Crisco, The article's length has been increased. If you could please take a look and provide me feedback. This article was writtten for a school assignment and I would greatly appreciate if you could approve it for DYK.

Regards,

User: ProBonoPublicoA90.

New message

You have a new message at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion/Internet_pornography_statistics#Merge_or_delete --Tito Dutta 19:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FAC question

Thanks for your review and leaned support at 3 May Const article. I have another article that recently passed milhist A-class that I'd like to push towards a FA, Stanisław Koniecpolski. Do you think I should wait for when the 3 May is passed, or can I have two FACs at the same time? Time-wise, I should be able to handle both, it's more of a "are there enough reviewers" issue. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 20:15, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Per FAC: "An editor is allowed to be the sole nominator of only one article at a time; however, two nominations may be allowed if the editor is a co-nominator on at least one of them." So, in other words, guidelines say no. However, occasionally one of the delegates will give permission to run more than one at the same time. I suggest asking Ian Rose or Graham Colm  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Maladi

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

CPJ International Press Freedom Awards

Okay, I wrote a lengthier intro section for CPJ International Press Freedom Awards--I'm at about 3250 characters. Take a look and let me know what you think. I've looked at a few samples, but still don't have a great feel for how these usually read. So I'm happy to do whatever more revision is needed. Otherwise feel free to go ahead and co-nom at your leisure. (I'll keep participating, but you're far more used to the process/paperwork involved.)

Incidentally, I also wrote to CPJ directly to see if they have images of their awards banquet we can use as another illustration, or at least to give us a broader choice of individual winners. I like the ones you've already posted, though, so no need to wait for them before moving forward.

Thanks for this offer! Should be fun. Khazar2 (talk) 03:54, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I can do that--it's the sort of repetitive task I excel at. Just do one to give me an example format to follow (e.g., should each person be footnoted? Or each year?) I can handle the descriptors, too, though CPJ doesn't always name just one incident in giving the award. Khazar2 (talk) 04:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just added one in. No need to archive if you don't want to, but I find it easier to maintain. The only issue with having information on what they did in the table is that it will have to be individually cited (hence why I suggest not adding it yet) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:12, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Mannus Franken

Orlady (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orlady (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, several changes were made to this article during the DYK nomination. If you could please take a look at the article, provide me with feedback and approve for DYK status. I really appreciate your time and help.

ProBonoPublicoA90 (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.150.162.39 (talk) 17:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Visual Arts Center of Richmond

Hi! I understand that you were the administrator who deleted the page for the Visual Arts Center of Richmond, and I was hoping I could get a copy restored so that I might edit it and fix the problems with the page. I had worked on it for the better part of a day, went to bed, and when I woke up to work on the page some more, it was gone. I understand that there was a problem with a quote I had included not meeting the criteria for how to cite a source, and am happy to delete the quote. i also intended to work on making the piece read more "neutral" and had researched sources to cite a lot more of the information.

I spent a lot of time on this page (my first ever) and would appreciate the chance to improve the page rather than have it deleted without that opportunity.

Thanks!


moxfulder99 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.176.203.23 (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi Moxfulder, I'm sorry but I can't do that. The article was deleted for copyvio as it was too close to the source material (in places the exact same). Copyright law does not allow an exact copying and pasting of copyrighted material, and the VACoR has full copyright over their text. You're welcome to start from scratch, assuming you paraphrase the source better. For example, rather than use a quote from the source you could has something like "The Visual Arts Center of Richmond, located in the Fan District of Richmond, Virginia, is an arts center dedicated to improving community awareness of visual arts." and so on. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Wikileaks revelations from Indonesia page Hi Crisco, I just wondered why you had removed the addition of Wikileaks revelations to the Indonesia page entry 'foreign relations' section. Primary sources were provided. The cables have been a huge point in modern international politics, and I think worthy of inclusion. They provide an insight into what the US Government really think about the current administrations handling of one of the most pressing domestic issues facing Indonesia - that of the independence struggle in West Papua.