Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Reaper Eternal (talk | contribs) at 18:44, 19 October 2012 (→‎User:Czar: done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


Most of my edits on Wikipedia relate to the removal of vandalism, and I have been a Wikipedian for over a year. I was formerly a rollbacker, but lost it due to liberal use. 1966batfan (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done sorry, but you kind of had the right revoked then barely edited until a weeks burst of recent activity. please give it another few weeks. Pedro :  Chat  20:17, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am having a very slow computer, which takes more than 2 minutes to reload (to be precise, the basic texts etc. loads within a dozen seconds, but the extensions like Twinkle, edit tool bar, ProveIt and popups loads later after some minutes.). I tried to use popups but that, when used by some one with slow computer like mine, may produce unintended results like this and this. Just a couple of months before, I built up a watchtower [1], but having a slow computer, it has not been used up to its full potential. If given this right then I can easily defend obvious vandalism from recent changes. (FYI: Valchemishnu, Vanischenu at some institutions and Vanischenu from public computers are my alternate accounts. Of course, they have contributed almost nothing, just provided the links for transparency as I do not have a userpage yet to list them.···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 06:42, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Pedro :  Chat  20:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much!···Vanischenu (alt) 04:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I request rollback because I revert a lot of vandalism. –– Anonymouse321 (talkcontribs) 21:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Yunshui  10:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you – I replied at my talk page but almost forgot to reply here. –– Anonymouse321 (talkcontribs) 04:27, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I revert a fair mount of vandalism and would like additional tools to help in that effort. I also plan to use STiki – MrX 01:22, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Pedro :  Chat  20:15, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank youMrX 20:54, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A number of my edits involve reverting vandalism. I tend to do this using Twinkle or the "Rollback (vandal)" link on article diffs. I am making this request on the advice of an administrator who recently contacted me via email, suggesting I request rollback privileges as a path to a possible future RfA. Tckma (talk) 22:10, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Yunshui  09:17, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Tckma (talk) 15:04, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Originally I made a request just a little over a month ago, but back then I didn't have quite enough edits. However, since discovering Twinkle, I've spent a lot of time reverting vandalism, and to make it quicker, would like to use rollback. Widr (talk) 06:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, although IMHO the Twinkle rollback feature (which allows you to add an edit summary) is more useful anyway. Yunshui  09:21, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Twinkle is hell. (By the time I refresh RC and validate my findings, someone with real tools has invariably beat me to it.) I'd prefer to use my time more effectively. I believe I've shown good judgment and a steady hand, and would like to use AWB and STiki before hitting 1k edits. czar · · 08:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done This doesn't allow you to use AWB, however. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Please grant me rollback rights for reverting vandalism. S.M.Samee (talk) 18:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You need to get some more experience. With only 87 edits, I cannot really judge how you would act with the tool. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]