Jump to content

Environmental philosophy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Bthibs7 (talk | contribs) at 21:59, 7 November 2012 (Deep ecology movement). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Environmental philosophy is a branch of philosophy that is concerned with the natural environment and humans' place within it.[1] Environmental philosophy includes environmental ethics, environmental aesthetics, ecofeminism and environmental theology.[2] Some of the main areas of interest for environmental philosophers are:

  • Defining environment and nature
  • How to value the environment
  • Moral status of animals and plants
  • Endangered species
  • Environmentalism and Deep Ecology
  • Aesthetic value of nature
  • Restoration of nature
  • Consideration of future generations[1]

Contemporary Issues

  • Overfished oceans
  • Pesticides in ground and water
  • Ozone holes
  • Rising extinction rates
  • Deforestation
  • Pollutants in atmosphere (Such as Carbon-Dioxide)[3]

Modern History

Environmental Philosophy re-emerged as a major social movement in the 1970s. The movement was an attempt to connect with humanity's sense of alienation from nature in a continuing fashion throughout history. The movement created a divide between the body of writing that is fairly professional; objective, theoretical and academic in nature. This contrasts with a more spiritual and political concern. Environmental Philosophy encompasses each of these positions in the overall study and acknowledgement of the craft.[4]

Deep Ecology Movement

In 1984, George Sessions and Arne Naess articulated the principles of the new Deep Ecology Movement. These basic principles:

  • The well-being and flourishing of human and non human life have value
  • Richness and diversity of life forms contribute to the realization of these values and are also values in themselves.
  • Humans have no right to reduce this richness and diversity except to satisfy vital needs.
  • The flourishing of human life and cultures is compatible with a substantial decrease in the human population.
  • Present human interference with the nonhuman world is excessive, and the situation is rapidly worsening.
  • Policies must therefore be changed. These policies affect basic economic, technological, and ideological structures. The resulting state of affairs will be deeply different from the present.
  • The ideological change is mainly that of appreciating life quality (dwelling in situations of inherent value) rather than adhering to an increasingly higher standard of living. There will be a profound awareness of the difference between big and great.
  • Those who subscribe to the foregoing points have an obligation directly or indirectly to try to implement the necessary changes.

References

  1. ^ a b Belshaw, Christopher (2001). Environmental Philosophy. Chesham: Acumen. ISBN 1-902683-21-8.
  2. ^ "International Association of Environmental Philosophy". Retrieved 2008-07-30.
  3. ^ Weston, 1999. "An Invitation to Environmental Philosophy," Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
  4. ^ Weston, 1999. "An Invitation to Environmental Philosophy," Oxford University Press, New York, New York.

See also