Jump to content

User talk:Rushbugled13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rushbugled13 (talk | contribs) at 07:26, 19 December 2012 (Mark Grieb: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Rejection: Blueair

I've added 3 more sources, please let me know if you need any more.


Rejection: Predestination Records

You commented:

  • Comment: The YouTube, MySpace, Last.Fm, and Bandcamp sources, just because of the nature of those websites, are not reliable sources. Also, the record label's webpage is not from an independent pov, and therefore is not necessarily reliable. The notability requirements for record labels in Wikipedia are not crystal clear, but it appears very few of the artists under the record label are notable, and therefore I would argue that that makes the record label not notable. The current reliable sources don't demonstrate the notability of the label itself or its signed artists. For how to demonstrate notability, see Wikipedia talk:Notability (music) for more information.Rushbugled13 (talk) 20:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]



My response:

Firstly, regarding notability of musical artists and labels, it is definitely a gray area on Wikipedia, I accept that.

The facts of the matter here, however, are that this record label exists, as a legal entity, and this record label has released several albums, EPs and compilation CDs, some of which received critical acclaim from "reliable" publications such as Rocksound Magazine, The Skinny Magazine and Powerplay Magazine. And when we say release, I do not mean online downloads, we are talking fully pressed records with sleeve and all, distributed around the UK via labels such as Cargo Records UK.

Even if only one of the artists on the label was arguably "notable" enough for wiki, that is irrelevant to the point here. The point is the existence of the label itself is legally notable and atleast one of it's artists are considered artistically notable. In terms of the official site not coming from an "independent pov", the reference in question makes that point also irrelevant as the reference in question is simply company structure and establishment, not a "point of view".

And lastly, if websites like last.fm, myspace, bandcamp, youtube are not classified as reliable sources for music related articles, then what are? Besides the fact that the official website, TheList, TheSkinny, Rocksound etc are all reliable sources, whatever way you cut it, in the context they have been used.

Kind regards,

Pearlykick (talk) 15:30, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of ArKna: Sed de Poder

Hi Rushbugled13, you recently rejected the article I posted on Arkna, a Chilean Card Game, and I was wondering why. The game is well known enough in Chile to meet the requirements I believe, and making this article was in part to enrich an existing article on IguanaBee, a Chilean mobile games company, where it mentions its games but has no link to an article on Arkna, so I figured I would simply add one.

This is the link to the page of IguanaBee.

This is the link to the article I tried to submit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/ArKna:_Sed_de_Poder

Thank you.

Rejected Article

Hi, you just rejected an article I wrote on Chuuwee, a Hip Hop artist. The article is located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Chuuwee

However, the article does meet the criteria for notability located here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:MUSIC

In particular, stipulation number 5 for musicians and ensembles: "Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are notable)."

As it notes in the article, Chuuwee is currently signed to Amalgam Digital, an independent label which has also signed artists such as Max B, Joe Budden, Lil B, Saigon, and others. All of these artists have their own pages on Wikipedia, respectively. He has released 4 albums (mixtapes in Hip Hop terminology) through the label.

So can we get the article up now?

Hello Rushbugled 13,

I am trying to figure out specifically why my entry does not meet the qualifications for publication. Could you kindly provide specific examples why my work cannot be considered or perhaps what entry you are finding questionable? There is a Wikipedia page on propaganda that already exists. Please be aware there is a Wikipedia entry titled "Civilization Jihad" that is posted on Wikipedia. I am highlighting one case where propaganda is indeed attempting to persuade the masses to take action on behalf of the so-called Cuban 5. I have used citations throughout my project and used examples that are indeed instances of propaganda. You will note that I did not proclaim my support or disdain for the Cuban 5, I am merely trying to show the readership that many of the approaches used in support of the Cuban 5 meet the accepted definition of propaganda, which result is to persuade the masses to take action on a cause. I have used official sources from the Cuban government and various organizations that are pro-Cuban 5 along with research involving active measures and propaganda. I also incorporated the findings of the US Circuit Court to provide a juxtaposition to the claims of the Cuban 5 and those who support them.

Thank you, very much- Propculture

MEHNAZ HOOSEIN

Hello Rushbugled13,

Thank you for your feedback regarding my Wikipedia submission. I have submitted three times and have been declined and would really appreciate specifics on what I'm doing wrong or needs to be referenced.

Can you please help?

Thank you!

Mehnaz Hoosein — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mehnaz Hoosein (talkcontribs) 02:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

grannies on a boat fighting zombies

is the amazon page listing the book and reviews not a 'verifiable' source? what else would be necessary?

Caught Doing Science

Quick and Thorough
Thanks for the feedback and your totally right! Wiki is not a place for scientific articles. Unfortunately for us both, my professor made this page the term assignment due tonight for a 400-level developmental biology class. So please refrain from editing it for the next couple days (so silly, right?). Cheers and wiki-on. Genrocheleau (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DIFC Courts: Rejected and now edited

Good afternoon,

Re DIFC Courts, would you be able to review it for me please? i have added some resources as suggested. it has been more than one week since the rejection.

thank you

Alan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alan Devereux (talkcontribs) 10:51, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the approval — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.99.227.64 (talk) 19:21, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of Stub on Capitalist Manifesto

Rushbugled13, thanks for your review of the stub I submitted, but it is unclear to me why it was rejected for not having verifiable sources. The New York Times bestseller lists and Time magazine are generally recognized as both reputable and verifiable, appearing to meet the citation guidelines and, in any event, the article is merely a stub. A little more specificity would help a great deal. Thanks.Justicesoldier (talk) 11:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to see what I could do to improve my articles: I work at 140db Managment, the label that looks after Dan Austin, Neil Comber and Joe Hirst and have been told to create wikipages for them with their biogs and production credits. I don't really know what else to put in as I'm rather new to the company so I don't know much about the lads I can add, aside from the biogs and credits we keep. What do you think would be useful to add to these pages? I know I've copied and pasted, so would it just be best for me to re-word the biogs?


Thanks, Elle — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElinorAlicia (talkcontribs) 11:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Rejection of Articles for creation/Microsoft Office password recovery

Hello!

Thank you for checking my article.

However, its submission was declined, as you noted that Wikipedia is not a place for internet guides. I read WP:NOT, and I am not sure that my article falls into internet guide category since it features description of password recovery attacks that are offered by a multitude of password-cracking programs, not some particular website. I believe that this information can be useful to anybody who needs recovering a forgotten password, and reading this article will save much time because there will be no need to check numerous vendors' sites trying to figure out what product one needs. Please advise if any encyclopedic information must be added to it, so is would be published and people could make use of it.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChupaCabraChups (talkcontribs) 12:10, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article of Imam Mohamad

Hi, I just noticed that the article for Imam Imam Mohamad was rejected. However there are about 50 references listed. Although some of them may seem to come from "biased" sources, there are many references that are clearly considered third party sources that are independent from the subject himself. If the issue is just the way in which the article was written, that can be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marwa609 (talkcontribs) 12:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kenneth M. Lewis

Hi wiki-friend... You talk about notability, golden rules ect. Dagbladet.no is a Norwegian national newspaper with music coverage (Articles require significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject) and how a Billboard link cannot be reliable? And what about Rockipedia.no, which is the official Norwegian music industry register? Don´t really understand... Anyway, this guy Kenneth M. Lewis has had many roles in the Norwegian music industry through the years, i.a. he has worked with all these Spellemann nominated artists (Norwegian Grammy Awards):

2008/10 Ida Maria – Best New Act (won) and Female Artist (as A&R, Excecutive Producer) 2007 Lomsk – Amerikabrev – Best Folk-Rock (as Producer and co-writer) 2004 Span – Mass Distraction – Best Rock and New Act (as A&R and producer) 2003 Karin Park - Best New Act and Female Artist (as A&R and producer) 2000 M2M – Song of The Year and Best Pop Group (as A&R and producer) 1998/99 Babel Fish – Song of The Year, Best Pop Group and Music Video (won) (as A&R and producer) 1997 Bjørn Eidsvåg – På svai – Spellemann of The Year (won) and Folk-rock (as Engineer-mixer) 1987/89 Visvas – Best Children´s album (as Engineer-mixer) 1986 Can Can – European Rainbow – Best Rock (as Engineer-mixer) 1986 Sissel Kyrkjebø – Sissel – Spellemann of The Year (won) (as Engineer-mixer) 1985 Jonas Fjeld Band – Neck´n Neck – Best Rock (won) and Spellemann of The Year (as Engineer-mixer)

Can you please help me? Do you think it would be easier if I first write the article about him on the Norwegian Wikipedia and then, once it has been accepted there I can resubmitt it here? Thanks. Oslocat (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of ROI Coroporation page

Hello, You have recently rejected a page for ROI Corporation, a page which I believe you should reconsider. This company has existed in Canada for 40 years, and is the first company to recognize the specific need of dental professionals to have a specialized version of real estate. If you read the entire article, than you realize that this page is more of a history of a company, with a biographical explanation of it's current employees (all well known, well respected individuals in the dental profession). I see very little of this article that is presented with a bias, as it is almost entirely factual, historical information on the business. If you feel strongly that the article "reads more like an advertisement," perhaps it would be of value to explain what it is specifically that you have read that way. Furthermore, this page comes highly requested by dental professionals, which is evident when "ROI Corporation" is typed into Google, and "ROI Corporation Wiki" is the second suggested search. I would also like to point out that Wikipedia currently has Plenty of Real Estate companies with Wikipedia pages (ZipRealty, Trulia, Zillow, Royal LePage, Century 21), so it must stand that creating a Wikipedia page for a real estate company, supplying its history and motivations is not considered advertising. Perhaps you do not live in Canada, or perhaps you do not have an understanding of the Dental Profession in Canada, but Company, although perhaps unknown to many Canadian citizens, is of tremendous importance to the specific dental community, made of tens of thousands of dentists nationwide, who have or will have all had some interaction with this company at some point in their career. Perhaps the reason this reads as an advertisement is simply that you are not included in the target audience for such a page, as you are not a dental professional in Canada. Lastly, the reason most of this information on this page comes from the Companies own website, is that it is mostly a historical page, and the history has come straight from Roy Brown, the companies founder and my grandfather, which is displayed on the company website. All other articles pertaining to this corporation are in peer-reviewed dental profession journals, and are not easily accessed sources on the internet. This being Wikipedia, there is always the potential for anyone who is interested to submit edited revisions on our information for your approval, but the information provided need not come from several sources, as it is almost explicitly historically based, and not based in opinion or bias. Please reconsider and be specific should you choose to deny our request again,

Thank you, Mikeboyle1260 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeboyle1260 (talkcontribs) 19:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciation

Thank you for reviewing Kappa Andromedae b and subsequently creating it. I understand there is a high backlog on the Pending AfC Submissions page, and I very much appreciate the attention given to this article. Once again, thank you. Greengreengreenred (talk) 07:58, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Riches...

So, exactly what do you need from me to prove that the very minimal page I've written is kosher? And while we're at it, what is there in the very minimal entry that's worthy of being banned from Wikipedia?

I can't wait to hear this. And please, don't just send me some pre-written BS, engage with me. I could do with a laugh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnthonyRiches (talkcontribs) 21:52, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kenneth M. Lewis

Hi, thanks for your help and suggestions!

I have attached new references, and, in case you need to understand the content, I send you hereby the translations for the articles published on the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet (ref 2 and 3):

Article ref. 2 Dagbaldet.no

Great Sales in USA Lørenskog duo Marion and Marit got a cannon start to their American pop-adventure.

The duo's single "Do not Say You Love Me" is pre-sold for an astonishing 400,000 copies. Meanwhile, M2M, Lørenskog girls Marit Larsen (16) and Marion Raven (15), have praised the industry bible Billboard and have beeb helped by Abba-guru Benny Andersson.

- They've got an incredible start. A pre-sales of 400,000 single discs are insane even for an established artist over here, says Jim Welsh at Atlantic Records in New York.

Atlantic record Marit and Marion signed a contract with Warner Bros.-owned Atlantic last summer. Since then they have been working overtime, with such Backstreet Boys-producer Max Martin and the Spice Girls-songwriter Matt Rowe. The first single "Do not Say You Love Me," which Larsen and Raven wrote with producer Jimmy Bralower, landed in American record stores yesterday. At the same time it goes like a rocket up U.S. radio lists. 73 leading popstasjoner picked up the track in the first week.

- The Atlantic's 50-year history has no onset artist gone on so many radio stations in its first week, said the Welsh typical American platebransjevis.

"Do not Say You Love Me" fronts also the soundtrack for the new animated youth film "Pokeman". The soundtrack also includes songs from established stars like Christina Aguilera, B * witched, Aaron Carter, Britney Spears, Baby Spice Emma Bunton, but it is M2Ms song that is picked as the first single.

Benny on accordion This week presents the leading music industry magazine Billboard M2M as a "European teenage dream." Meanwhile, the girls' debut single reviewer praised by the magazine. Billboard reviewer thinks the girls have a more mature sound compared to their young age, and the single is getting kudos for its catchy chorus, youthful vocals and his humorous production. The conclusion from Billboard is "one of the fall's first big hits."

Girls' debut album "Shades of Purple" is released 25th January in USA. Two of the songs are produced by the Norwegian producers who discovered the pair Marit and Marion in 1995, Kenneth M. Lewis and Kai Robøle. On one of these two, "Pretty Boy", plays Abbas Benny Anderssson accordion.

Yep, he persuaded producer Max Martin to be with, grinning a delighted Jim Welsh Atlantic Records. _____________________________

Article ref. 3 Dagbaldet.no

The record deal is in the bag, and the songs are ready. Only band missing. - We will replace these dolls with two tough girls of flesh and blood - guaranteeing a hectic period of great launch in the U.S., says Kai Robøle and Kenneth Lewis at Waterfall Studio.

In the picture GIRLS WANTED:-We want smart, brave girls who can sing aged 17 to 23 years. We promise you a record deal and international platelansering, says Kai Robøle and Kenneth Lewis to Waterfall Studio.

This is a story from backward countries, because here everything happens in the reverse feeling: First came the record contract, then the tracks were written - but the band is missing.

- Yes, it's true. And we are in a hurry. Therefore, we encourage young girls to get in touch with us, says Robøle and Lewis.

It started when a major label in the U.S. contacted Waterfall Studio Grünerløkka in Oslo wanting them to create a kind Abba band.

Robøle and Lewis have written suitable tunes. Two boys have already been picked out, but the girls are missing.

- We need help from the newspaper and the public to find two girls. It is not with big tits and blonde hair. You have to be tough, having bones in her nose and could sing - and to dance and play.

Not sugar sweet The style of music is not Sweetened and glossy. The band record company want to play pop, but with traditional rock instrumentation.

- More Hanson and Abba than Aqua, says Robøle.

- USA missing band concept that we have more of in Europe. The record company wants the kind of two girls & two boys-band - with Norwegian or Scandinavian artists. We have been promised huge international record marked space, with the U.S. first, says Lewis.

Waterfall may initially not guarantee wealth, but the advance backing of the recording, for both producer and artist are in millons.

- The record will be launched next spring, so we are in a hurry. We itchy hands after getting started and hoping for quick contact. Our dream girls are like No Doubt and Garbage singers.

Hard toil Many people dream of becoming artists and pop stars. Most fail, perhaps after many years of toil and sweat - and bad advice.

- Here you come to the set table. It is a tough and tiring period before the band, and no one will have time for either work or school.

The recordings will take place in Oslo and New York. When the record is clear, it is hard promotion.

Lewis and Robøle are the talentscouts who made sure to give Babel Fish, M2M (Marit and Marion) and Midnight Sons million contracts in the U.S.

Oslocat (talk) 12:16, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

White Dress

Please, just fix the article I sent for review: White Dress. Thanks Eleventhblock (talk) 19:54, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

rejected article about Mc Sai

Hi just a few questions about my article which got rejected. Mc Sai is a friend of mine, and everything i wrote was literally what he dictated to me and also info i got from a few other sites ( which i cited). I'm not sure on how else to make my article more reliable, if you do not mind can you point out anything i can do, please? I understand that it is part of your rules to reject a article where there is insufficient sources, so would you like him to personnaly contact you, or maybe i can do something else? And also i am not able to upload a picture of him, why is that?

Thankyou Ahranee

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mahagujarat Movement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saurashtra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge translation moved into public space

Hi Rush, thanks for taking care of my article! I was expecting it to take another week or so. Am I doing something wrong, or will it take a little while for the article to show up in the Wikipedia search engine? When I search for it, it returns 'no such article' and invites me to start one. At least, that's as of 1:45 pm CST on November 26th. Thanks again. PublicanHealth (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rfc hoaxes

Very nice job spotting these. How are you able to identify them so quickly--what are you screening for? DGG ( talk ) 03:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of Leptopecten latiauratus

Hello, Thank you for your thoughtful review of my first entry on Wikipedia. I've found some additional sources and updated my entry with more details. There is very little published on this particular species so I've needed to take some information from studies done of the entire scallop family or of a different species. I've made this known in each case with phrases like "As a member of the Pectinidae family... At this point I've exhausted myself trying to research this. Please confirm if this is acceptable or a you offered please provide some specific advice on where to turn.

Also, once my page is accepted do you know how I can connect it to the higher level site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pectinidae

Thank you, Scott Comment Added Originally at 06:44, 27 November 2012 (UTC) Ssakolsnow (talk) 12:56, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

rejection of article "Leon DSouza"

hello,I have submitted the source in references regarding my article and for this article the source is perfect. have another look on my article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Leon_D%27Souza — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meesatyajit (talkcontribs) 08:29, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guidance welcomed. All new to me. The article is about the West Lothian Archaeological Trust. I cannot see how it is unbalanced As far as I know, we are the only Archaeological Trust (or any other group!) specialising in broad spectrum kite aerial photography from the UV to thermal infra-red. I have added publications John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr John Wells (talkcontribs) 01:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Blanchardb. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Smbat Margaryan, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Blanchardb

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/West_Lothian_Archaeological_Trust

Is this OK? Hopefully references 7,8 and 9 help, especially inclusion in the DART work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr John Wells (talkcontribs) 02:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your help. It is much appreciated. John West Lothian Archaeological Trust — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr John Wells (talkcontribs) 02:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taavi

Hi Rushmugled13, just wondering wat i can do for references if no real references are out there. i am his manager/marketing manager so i have all the details of his shows and career. how can i make it so that these things are respectable sources? Thank you for your help Yarrow30 (talk) 03:02, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cronin Economics

I'm confused where did I attack, threaten, or disparage? Can you please highlight so I can delete if I did.

Kevin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcron24 (talkcontribs) 03:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD template

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Cronin Economics. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it. Snotbot  t • c »  04:48, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I tagged the article for speedy deletion using Twinkle, Twinkle must have deleted the AfD tag as a result. Rushbugled13 (talk) 04:56, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


the way to do this to to give an opinion, speedy delete at the AfD, and if you are right , some admin will close it soon accordingly; or, if you are very sure of yourself as for an obvious copyvio, close the AfD, saying speedy delete. If you use the script, it will put the speedy tag on the article; if you do it manually, remove the AfD tag and put on a speedy tag, using the template {{db-xfd|votepage=link to closed deletion discussion}} , When you become an admin, the script will also do the deletion. In this particular case, the G10 did probably not apply, or at least the very experienced admin Seraphimblade, (who has been an admin a few months longer than I) thought so when he declined the deletion and left it listed at AfD. You may want to give an opinion there. DGG ( talk ) 06:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I declined your speedy. This is a legitimate split,; the only problem was that the creator forgot to remove the unnecessary duplicative text , but this list is just what it ought to be. the guidelines that apply are WP:LIST and WP:Summary style. Please don't go just by the lede of an article page in trying to judge if something duplicates. (Whether of not it is appropriate to split the list is another matter, but that's for the talk p. of the main article; I wouldn't have done it myself, because it isn't so excessively long, but if someone wants to do the work, I'd let them, since it really doesn't matter much. DGG ( talk ) 06:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rushbugled13 -- This AfC on the author Chris Stedman has over the last few weeks been tonally- and NPOV- improved (as you recommended on Nov 8 2012); both a Nov 24, 2012, Huffington Post news article about the subject, and an Oct 26, 2012, PBS Television Documentary interviewing the subject, have been added (as Refs 7-8), now making at least four secondary notability sources, as well as demonstrating importance of the subject sufficient for a wikipedia article); and two old, dead links (taken from a non-User's AfC submission on this subject some years ago) were ID'd by another User/Editor and updated-resurrected. This AfC now looks ready to me to move to article space thanks to your guidance and that of the other User-Editors; but because my own experience as a User-Editor hasn't previously extended to biographies of "living persons," and because you're the major reviewing editor who left significant comments for article improvement, would you be willing to give this 3rd version of the AfC a final look-see, and if you feel it passes muster, consider moving it to article space? (If you like, I can add in relevant categories once it's posted -- I already researched those in a prior draft version). Thx much, Fhburton (talk) 07:39, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kenneth M. Lewis

Hi again, regarding my article I see that on reference 5 the name Lewis is not correct (Lewsi)...I tried to update it myself, but I cannot see the links when I click on edit....is this normal? how do I update my reference list? Thanks again Oslocat (talk) 09:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've declined your A7 speedy on this as it's a place. Apart from web content, A7 only applies to people or groups of people or named animals. But not schools or educational establishments. An over simplified way of looking at it is that if it's accessed on the web or has legs, it's open to A7. (But not schools or downloaded software.) OK, there are a few named fish, worms and whales, but you get the idea. So General Motors has legs, but a Cadillac Eldorado doesn't. Peridon (talk) 11:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With regard to something up page from here, Twinkle doesn't like double tagging. If adding a new speedy to an existing one, either do it the hard way (including notifying), or detag and retag including both criteria as a multiple (there's a little tick box near the top of the Twinkle window for multiple criteria). For AfD, I've just done a test edit on an AfD candidate, and Twinkle quite happily accepted the speedy without removing the AfD template. Peridon (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I just wrote this wikipedia reference about myself Cory Johnsen, How do I make sure it does not get deleted?Coryjcps (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

keith frid is a model citizen. i put it there so people that search his name can see what he accomplished and learn from him. it would be great if you can remove the deletion notice, and maybe help me out with the page. again, this is not harmful whatsoever so pls roll with me, not against me thanks -cain613 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cain613 (talkcontribs) 21:21, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rushbugled13, I created the Sun Airway band page because I saw them touring with M83 in Spetember, 2012. I discovered they did not have a page on wikipedia so others could find out more about them. Not sure if it's wikipedia worthy either. Let me know your thoughts. Jamesharveygrantham (talk) 22:07, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


I wasn't even finished writing yet, why was my article deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharrison2012 (talkcontribs) 22:28, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not understanding why my article was deleted when I wasn't even finished with it yet? I haven't even submitted either so how were you able to see what I've written so far?

Article for creation - Seven Ballerinas

Dear Rushbugled13, I have tried to comply with all conditions outlined by Wikipedia. Assuming good faith by all parties, could I have a timely decision on my submission please. Thanks! I'm considering writing an anthology of Australian Indie Rock, some of which I thought to put into Wikipedia. This article was to be the first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tuffley (talkcontribs) 23:20, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

can i ask what kind of reference u need .... all i can think that i can provide u with articles from local newspaper in Arabic stating her hosting or presenting a program ..... is this will be good ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaljafan (talkcontribs) 23:34, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


i add them hope fully i am out of the deletion process ....... thanks for your fast replys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaljafan (talkcontribs) 23:52, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/West_Lothian_Archaeological_Trust Updated Dr John Wells (talk) 00:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Submission declined for creating article for Golm Metabolome Database

Hi, thank you for taking the time. It was my first submission and the content got lost. I added the content again re-submitted the article. However, ther are severeal notice section and I'm not shure whether or not I should remove them. Could you please advice me how to proceed the submission of the article? Thank you very much for your time and effort. Jan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahu54321 (talkcontribs) 01:59, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Declined

I am assuming good faith, but I cannot believe that you declined my article for Fay Wolf http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Fay_Wolf

For your information all of the information I had in there was accurate. I also cited my reliable sources correctly. If you don't believe me, go look for yourself. You might actually see that you're wrong and you shouldn't pick on others just because you didn't make that article.

Everything is right. You're just jealous that you couldn't come up with such a great article. But I beat you to it. And, if you won't approve my article, than I will take it to a higher source for them to approve and to get you demoted of your current article reviewing responsibilities.

Once again, I am assuming good faith. I am also not personally attacking you. I am proving to you that you're wrong and are not responsible enough to review articles for the public.

Thank you, -Mallen22 (talk) 02:10, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Epigenetics of the sexual differentiation of the brain rejection

Hi Rushbugled13,

You recently rejected my article on the Epigenetics of the sexual differentiation of the brain. I'm a little confused about why it was rejected. I'd like some clarification so that I can improve the article. Was the article rejected because it was too scientifically complex? Was it too close in subject to one of the articles that it referenced? You previously said to summarize it and include it under another article, but I think the subject can stand alone if edited to suit what you want.

Matsdreyer (talk) 02:20, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment regarding: Articles for creation/Charbroiler

Comment: There appears to be something wrong with the article in terms of being over-detailed, but I can't put my finger on what is specifically wrong. I will wait and see what other reviewers have to say.Rushbugled13 (talk) 03:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Regarding the suggestion that this article is 'over-detailed', I am an engineer to conducts regular training on this and other manufactured cooking equipment to a wide range of audiences. This is intended to be a comprehensive summary of the topic for purposes of training and education for those in industry.

I have audited dozens of technical wikis as guidance, and you may refer to the 'Griddle' wiki which was also authored by me, for clarity on content, structure and purpose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyungbluth (talkcontribs) 03:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

article on Andrea Natale

Hi there

as you can see, i added references for the article

please, could you tell me how to make his last name Capital , i mean "Natale" as opposed to 'natale"

Thanks, please let me know any comments you may have

Francio

Francionyc (talk) 04:38, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article for Creation: The Cerebrospinal Venous System

Dear Rushbugled, please review the article, it has been updated and the references regarding notability have been explicitly cited. Thank you. CSVS1 (talk)CSVS1 —Preceding undated comment added 20:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1030 submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our help desk.

Do you have what it takes?
  1. Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
  2. Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
  3. Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
  4. Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. Plus, reviewing is easy when you use our new semi-automated reviewing script!
Thanks in advance, Nathan2055talk - contribs

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation at 22:21, 29 November 2012 (UTC). If you do not wish to receive anymore messages from this WikiProject, please remove your username from this page.

Mystic Life

I attempted to add an article on the author Mystic Life but was told he was not notable. I added several external sources that aren't self-referential and resubmitted the article. I follow him on Twitter (http://twitter.com/UnificationCom) where he is extremely well known in the polyamory community, which is why I was surprised to not find him listed on Wikipedia. I'm curious if it would help if I removed his pages http://unification.com and http://spiritualpolyamory.com from the submitted page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mystic_Life Opdr (talk) 03:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KidWX

KidWX is a review based website for parents. www.kidwx.com provides an information portal for parents to post reviews of professionals who provide services for children. Founded by two mothers, Jamie Finch and Linda Nimmo, KidWX has unfiltered reviews and no advertising. Unique in its business plan this website provides instant information for parents whose needs change due to relocation or stage of life. KidWX closely aligns itself with multiple non-profit organizations all who benefit children with an emphasis on special needs.

Speedy Deletion declined

I have declined your speedy deletion requestion on Arshad Warsi Movies. Claiming to be the production company behind four nationally released movies is a sufficient claim of importance to meet WP:CSD#A7. It's possible that the company doesn't meet WP:CORP; if you can't find any sources after searching, you could nominate the article for deletion via AfD. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:54, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ref'ed Vs. Unref'ed

Hi Rushbugled13, Hoping you are well. I came across and unref'ed tag you had left on the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struttin%27_Our_Stuff, however there was 1 sneaky ref' at the end of the article, but the author never put in a =Ref= section title so it was easily missed. I have removed your unref'ed tag and added the =Ref= secion. Hope you don't mind. I am writing this as courticy to a fine editor. Let me know if there are any issues with what I have done. Kindest regards to you, (MrNiceGuy1113 (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Request for Deletion

Please delete this page - <link>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jet_(Web_Browser)</link> on JetBrowser [1] I do not wish to edit/improve or add more content to this page, due to its low notability and availability of references. Plus there are so many such similar web browsers like TorchBrowser. [2]

Thank You! Compfreak7 (talk) 10:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


dear:Rushbulged13 why did you decline my page ``Ryan Shoushan if you complain I will decline all your pages — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.83.168 (talk) 22:00, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of article on Embedded Instrumentation

My submission on Embedded Instrumentation was declined because the reviewer said that an article on this subject already existed. He cited an article on Embedded Systems, which is something quite different. Embedded Systems are computer systems that are part of a larger system of electronic and mechanical subsystems, and quite often is never seen or used directly by users. For example, the electronic system that operates a robot in a factory is embedded in the robot and is considered an embedded system. It is part of the larger factory automation system that runs the factory. Embedded Instrumentation is something quite different. Instruments or test functionality is embedded (placed inside of) semiconductors so that engineers and designers can test the chips where the instruments have been embedded. In addition, these 'embedded instruments' can also be used to test circuit boards and systems. This testing is a critical portion of the production process for electronic equipment because without testing the quality of the electronic systems produced would be quite low. The manufacturer would not know whether the system he produced actually worked the way it should. So Embedded Instruments are totally distinct from Embedded Systems despite the fact that they share the word 'embedded' in their names. Please explain what I must do next. Thank you. WSoxFan (talk) 22:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)WSoxFan[reply]

Your proposal for deletion is the result a weak start. I simply had posted a bare bones frame — loaded with one or two interesting albeit non-essential stories (omitted at the urging of Bgwhite serving as my lucid wingman) — with the aim of finding a center and building it to a level 6 (out of 10) within a week. The initial start may have failed to adequately convince you; but rest assured, A.C. was notable — as an authority on Southwestern U.S. history, as an influential book critic for what had been one of the nation's major newspapers, and as an author of nearly two dozen books, all carrying high acclaim in reputable Texas literary circles ... and a few national.

Being on the East Coast myself, I am keenly aware that some consider "Texas" and "literary" as an oxymoron. Fifteen minutes of research (archives of NYTs, Dallas Morning News, Texas Monthly, Time, and the like) will prove otherwise. He was a bookish authority with rank.

A.C., himself, was notable for having sway as The Decider of who was notable in the Texas literary scene. To quote SMU professor Terry Marshall (aka Mr. "SMU" and founder of its nationally recognized creative writing program), "Green was in charge of the definition of Texas literature." — Eurodog (talk) 17:27, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fratellos Oshkosh, Wisconsin

Fratellos has been a great family restaurant in the Oshkosh area for over 20 years, the Supple's have given so much to the community with their business. I would really like it if that information could remain up.

Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.233.75.81 (talk) 23:33, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request for new editor

I'd like my recent article submission to be reviewed by another editor as I believe I have properly formatted this article. My current editor may have a bias against the author due to the controversial nature of his writing. I could list many examples of less influential authors who are listed on Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opdr (talkcontribs) 00:27, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This is an official warning for your repeated vandalism. Please refrain from doing so in the future or you will face official punishment.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.1.153 (talk) 06:59, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page stalker here. What he did to your talk page is not considered vandalism. All he did was give you a level 1 warning about an nonconstructive edit. Please calm down, a single warning is not meaning to offend, just to make you aware that you've done something wrong. Cheers! --A Wild Abigail Appears! Capture me. Moves. 07:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Free Wikipedia with sound knowlegde

Wikipedia should be free. Someone who called kimself kagefumimaru intends to shrinck the thought we might have. it is because he has not done anything yet, He is a bad claimer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.104.9.62 (talk) 11:44, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teatro Caupolicán

Hi Rushbugled13, thanks for looking over my revision to the article Teatro Caupolicán. Including yours, two other wikipedia editors also rejected it for seeming like an add. I changed the language again, and added more sources, again. I would like to say that Pablo Neruda was an important figure and this article gives a setting and scene to where/how he influenced people in public speaking. Also the Unidad Popular is an extremely important political moment in Chilean history, as it was the party through which Allende rose to the presidency and which later resulted in the Coup d'Etat of 1973. I'm not trying to write an ad, I just think its culturally important. Do you think I should erase the list of all the rock bands that have played there to make it meet the wikipedia standards? Laurasreagan (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Psionics

The whole article on psionics is really bad, I admit my editing in the word "Bollocks" repeatedly is probably not the best way to edit Wikipedia, but deletion of "Psionics as a practice" (no one has ever been proved to "practice psionics") should be deleted, as should the statement that psionics appears in much in fiction as much as magic. The inference is psionics is a legitimate area of study, which it really isn't.

Article Stephane Bancel

Following should be removed from Stephane Bancle

"Stephane Bancel is named as an inventor on over 630 patent filings in the field of messenger RNA technology. Despite the fact that he has no training in this field, his achievements have led to claims covering a broad range of novel compositions and formulations as well as manufacturing and clinical methods in the fields of human and animal therapeutics, cosmetics, diagnostics and cell processing.

Stéphane Bancel was elected a 2009 Young Global Leader by the World Economic Forum. He was elected best CEO for investor relations in France in 2009 and was ranked #1 CEO in the Biotech sector according to his friends at the 2011 Thomson Reuters EXTEL Study. "

These are exaggerated claims with absolutely no documents and references. I did USPTO.GOV search and could not find 630 patents assigned to Stephane Bancel. Scientific searches for Stephane Bancel returns absolutely no results to support his claim of contribution for RNA. Most probably this exaggerated profile was written by him, his relative or a friend. Wikipedia should not publish unverified falsified claims, A person with 630 patents on his resume is always a well known scientist. I work in the RNA and Genomics field as a VP President at ZS Gentics, Inc. I literally laughed after reading this profile. I have never heard this name for RNA research, not even dreams or as rumors.

Disneycember

In the "List of Nostalgia Critic episodes", I removed the Disneycember table because there's already a whole article on the Disneycember episodes and I thought having another table on the NC episodes list would be taking up too much room. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.217.211.199 (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agenda 21

Agenda 21 - China - Social Aspects ... These programs offer a systematic introduction to China's Agenda 21 and the concept ... By the end of 1996, 666 cities and 17,770 towns had drawn ... www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/china/social.htm - 42k

Hi Rushbugled,

Following on from your rejection of the article on Courtney Murphy I stripped everything back to the 3 main points. These are all backed up by reliable sources which are not directly affiliated with the subject;

The points of him being from Australian Idol in 2004 and releasing his debut album in 2010 is all referenced from the Australian Idol wiki page (and all the information on that was taken from the now defunct Australian Idol website)

The point of his television appearances is referenced from the Internet Movie Database.

I don't understand why the article is still rejected as these are reliable sources and I've stripped the article back to the bare minimum of important information on the subject.

Thanks.

MyNameIsBeanie (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cerebrospinal Venous System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Suboccipital (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Influenster

Hi, I recently created an article for the social media platform called Influenster. I added 3 citations from reputable technology publications. Not sure why this was rejected. This is a high traffic site with hundreds of thousands of members from across North America. If you do a simple Google search, you will see this is a tech platform with high social impact and big membership base. I would urge you to look into this again. Let me know if you need additional resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.27.213.71 (talk) 15:44, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Is this a bit more acceptable? I am very much feeling my way here and asked for advice from people in the field http://arch.ced.berkeley.edu/kap/discuss/index.php?p=/discussion/4251/wikipedia-help I have also suggested on this forum that wiki needs more CC kite aerial photographs (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Aerial_photographs_from_kites), especially as applied to archaeology.

Dr John Wells (talk) 20:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr John Wells (talkcontribs) 20:05, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Winter storms of 2009-2010

I moved the infobox about the winter storms of 2009-2010 to global storm activity of early 2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.204.183.62 (talk) 01:27, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

kagefumimaru

In the Wikipedia page in Japanese about the Goldberg Variations, now there are about one third of information comparing the English page. It is because that kagefumimaru has shrinked the content of it based on his likeness. I don't know he is a specialist or not. But only I can imagine is that he dislikes other's thoghts. My page "Music of Intellect" about the Goldberg Variations had been in the external reference about ten years without any complaints. But he deleted it. He did nothing contributable for music lovers. He wants to put a trace of himself her in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.165.131.168 (talk) 03:20, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect revert

Hello,

You reverted an edit of mine (see my talk page). You said I gave no reason for blanking the section, but in fact I said, "Removed section, see talk page", and I have a lengthy rationale on the talk page. Please undo your revert; the section in question is pretty clearly non-notable at best and nonsense at worst. 24.22.240.81 (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why did the page get declined?

It's a known actor what more reliable source can I give for an actor other than IMDb.

He's a screen actor so it's not that hard to identify him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanessat123 (talkcontribs) 08:01, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Question

So is IMDb not enough? Like I said he's on the big screen so it's not like you can't pick up a movie and watch him!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanessat123 (talkcontribs) 08:09, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply] 

CLASH Scavenger Hunts

Hey friend! I just updated the CLASH Scavenger Hunts article that was rejected on November 20th. I added two news sources and actually linked them into the article. Let me know if you think anything else needs to be done, it appears to be okay by new page guidelines and all!

Thanks again for all you do! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaykaypea (talkcontribs) 22:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What should I do about this article? I think this article is good and has important tips. But This is taken from an essay and needs some more development.The references also are not good.So what should I do?--pratyya (talk) 07:03, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Warning Tags

Hey,

You restored a warning tag I deleted for the IP address I currently use. However, the warning tag was a false alarm, trigged by an edit I made of the Sandbox that included a draft for a Facebook message I was sending. I spoke to the person who warned me, and they told me I could delete it. You can locate the exchange here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Webclient101/Archive_1#My_trigger_of_the_.22edit_filter Thus, I'm going to delete the warning again. Hopefully there are no hard feelings here!

Sincerely,

Chuck 68.50.224.118 (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Authenticity of the Holocaust from the Iranian Perspective

Dear Rushbugled13,

Do you even lift? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.90.3 (talk) 20:27, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of edit to; "Oakley - Fife"

I dispute this, as Oakley is, rather than a village, indeed a shitehole. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.253.210 (talk) 23:31, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is Slavery a positive good

Do you have a copy of Battletoads? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.213.148.132 (talk) 23:38, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Morality of Interracial Relationships

How do magnets work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.213.148.132 (talk) 01:32, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

About article deletion - I Believe in This Life

I moved it to a user page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hooky-i-vanisher/I_Believe_In_Life — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hooky-i-vanisher (talkcontribs) 07:02, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unauthorized Changes to Komarno Hassidic Dynasty

I think you have extraordinary Chutzpah to determine what content is appropriate for the Komarno Hassidic Dynasty Wikipedia page. Where do you get the egregious audacity to make just such a ridiculous statement that the changes you made were because it didn't appear constructive. Constructive to what, to whom? All Wikipedia articles are subject to proprietary rights in terms of priority regarding genealogical lineage and in the case of this subject matter direct lineage to the subject matter takes precedence as final arbiter to articles such as Komarno Hasidic Dynasty. Whatever your interests in maligning descendants of the Komarno Dynasty you have no ability to displace direct Son-to-Son descendants from Reb Isaakel Komarno that represent the interests of the Hassidic Komarno Dynasty and whatever your conspiracies are, they will fail via Wikipedia and the courts, for falsification of information, libel. Your identity can easily be traced through special Wikipedia tools despite your status as anonymous and will pursue thewillful mischaracterization as you have repeatedly done until justice is served. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Authorizedkomarnoauthor (talkcontribs) 04:03, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Change!

The change made by me to the article DAV Public School Thane was absolutely true! The school is that historic and unmaintained ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aayish (talkcontribs) 04:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accusations of "Disruptive Editing"...

Some people feel that Rushbugled13 makes unfair and unfounded accusations that other contributers are engaging in "disruptive editing". This kind of juvenille name calling only serves to limit the creative process of those that serve the mission of wikipedia. Real Aaron Lustig fans don't ignore his controversial roles, they celebrate them. "Hitler's Ass" was a challenging film yes, but if we strike the record of actors who go out on a limb to change the perception of those in the mainstream we are doing a grave disservice to his career. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.145.232 (talk) 04:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Rushbugled13, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of article

Hello Rushbugled13,

My article titled Introverted Leaders was rejected on 20th November. Your comment was - Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought.

May I know how you would want the article to be less original? Do I need to add more references or should I cite from scholarly research to write the entire article? Can no thought be purely mine? After all, "my thoughts" came from reading various websites and books on Introverted leaders.

Thank you.

Medharoy (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2012 (UTC)Medha Roy[reply]

Boat reversion

Resolved

I also participate in anti-vandalism work on Wikipedia using Huggle. I'm not familiar with Wikipedia:STiki, but this reversion (diff) is a stretch of a reasonable definition of good faith, don't you think? –Newportm (talkcontribs) 03:36, 12 December 2012 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Rushbugled13. You have new messages at Newportm's talk page.
Message added 20:06, 12 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Surprising edit summary

Good faith?? 79.123.74.157 (talk) 08:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone makes an edit which (a) messes up the formatting of a section heading by removing an =, (b) gratuitously adds the word "water" by itself, not even in a sentence. And that edit must have been made in good faith, because it does not fit into any of the categories in a list that someone has made of the commonest types of vandalism? That really seems to me to be an odd interpretation of the expression "good faith". I would have thought that "good faith" referred to the intention behind the edit. How it could be an "accidental edit" I am not sure. It might be mistaken for a "test edit" if one only looks at the edit itself, but a test which produces nonsense ceases to be a mere test and becomes vandalism when the editor decides to walk away and leave it in place rather than revert it. Since in this case the edit had been left for well over five hours before you reverted it, I think we can safely conclude that the editor had no intention of reverting. I had thought, in fact, that your edit was an example of automatic and unthinking use of Stiki. Many people using such tools as Stiki and Huggle make the mistake of thinking that doing so removes the need to think about edits, and just automatically click on one of the default options that such tools give them, frequently producing inappropriate results. The message above was intended to be a gentle pointer to the fact that you might have done that, in the hope you would think about it. However, from what you say it was not a case of such automatic use of Stiki, but a definite decision that the edit should be treated as good faith. However, I still find the idea that something is not vandalism if it is not on a list headed "Vandalism on Wikipedia usually falls into one or more of these categories" an odd one. I am also by no means convinced that it doesn't fall within the types enumerated in that list, under the heading "Silly vandalism". 79.123.74.157 (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another one and more and more. Are you sure that you have really made a considered decision in each of these cases? I counted 63 Stiki edits in one hour. I never use Stiki, but I do use Huggle, and I never achieve a rate of anywhere near an edit a minute over a prolonged period, and I very much doubt whether anyone can really be giving sufficient thought to each edit at that rate. If the only result of haste is inappropriately edit summarising as "good faith" when there is vandalism, perhaps it is not a significant problem. However, hasty use of automatic vandalism tools is very likely to lead to more serious errors, such as reverting perfectly good edits as vandalism. I do suggest that you think about this. 79.123.74.157 (talk) 20:36, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pavan Kaul

Hello..Could you please re review this page which has been edited according to your suggestions? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Pavan_Kaul#Pavan_Kaul

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.170.65.15 (talk) 11:16, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile Monitoring

Hi Chris, you have declined the publishing of the article Mobile Monitoring. Can you help with fixing it or be more precise what is missing, so it can be made live? Why is Mobile Monitoring ok for the Germen Wicki and not for the English one?

Jschweizer - SWITZERLAND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jschweizer (talkcontribs) 08:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kate Dimbleby, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Ian Thomas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection of Sean Burch contribution

Hi, Thanks for reviewing the Sean Burch contribution page. Can you please be more detailed with specifics on what I need to do to get this accepted? I've looked at other submissions and contributions, and my writing seems to fit in with everything applicable as well as sourcing the info. Please help. Thanks. Alexia Stuart (talk) 20:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC) Alexia Stuart[reply]

Anton Kuivanen vandalism

Hi, I noticed that you reverted vandalism on article about Anton Kuivanen. The article has been maliciously edited multiple times in a short period of time. Previous activity: [1]. There seems two users whose nicks are "Pertti11111" and "Jorma74" who are vandalizing the article. I'm not certain if I can give them a warning or if it would help at all but can you warn or sanction them (ban) for intentionally vandalizing the article? 130.234.207.176 (talk) 10:29, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rejection: UFC 155: Dos Santos vs. Velasquez II

Hi,

I saw recently that you rejected the creation of the article for UFC 155. I added some data to the article (including an image) and I'd like for you to take another look at it and re-consider your decision.

Although I did not create the article, I believe it is reasonable and apparent enough to see that the article is NOT a test as you suggested. Aside from the facts that the topic and content of the article are specific to a real-life upcoming major sports event and that it is filled with real sources for the content discussed, there is nothing in the article that suggests it was created as a test article or that a reader would consider it to be a test article upon first view.

Furthermore, I believe that the article meets the notability guidelines for sports events listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_%28events%29. Specifically, there is both a great depth of discussion regarding the background and importance of the event, and there is a diversity of listed sources. The outcome of the event will impact the championship of a weight class within the largest mixed martial arts organization in the world, which meets the "lasting effects" guideline. All of the event participants even have their own Wikipedia articles, with the main event of the fight card featuring the current and former champions facing each other in a rematch.

The event is upcoming on December 29th, and I (and I'm sure other MMA fans) would appreciate it if you reconsidered your decision before then.

Thanks,

Accountingkid (talk) 08:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered 00:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.

Grupo Rush

I created this page by mistake, when I was trying to get an example. Can you delete it? Thank you so much, and apollogizes, Im going to create a new one.

--Misty2011 (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to the page of Reina Hein

I corrected the line on the page of Reina Hein that stated "Raina plays the role of Catwoman for the Gotham Sirens and appeared in their Lady Gaga's video, "Bad Romance." Fellow ANTM contestant, Jessica Serfaty, appears alongside Hein in the video as the role of Poison Ivy (comics).[12]"

After looking up the video, I found that the correct name for the video was BaT Romance. [1] [2] [3] To be clearer, maybe it could be stated "...and appeared on their rendition of Lady Gaga's "Bad Romance" entitled 'Bat Romance.'"

I received notice that this correction was changed.

Bethanybgd (talk) 01:12, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Grieb

You also unfairly removed my site for mark Grieb.