User talk:Cmach7
Hello,
Please leave Messages right here if you need my answers to your questions. Cmach7 (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
2011 Archives:
2012 Archives:
2013 Archives:
Adopted!
I have accepted your adoption request. Your classroom for adoption has been set up at User:Brambleberry of RiverClan/Adoption/Cmach7. I suggest that you add it to your watchlist so that you know when I have responded to one of your queries. öBrambleberry_ meow _ watch me in action 15:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 23:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
öBrambleberry_ meow _ watch me in action 23:38, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
I have sent you an e-mail about an important matter. Please confirm, either here or by reply e-mail, that you have received it. Thank you. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Replied. Cmach7 (talk) 01:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1924 in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Man (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Re. Ocaasi's RfA
Hey, how's it going? =)
I just wanted to stop by and say that I'm sorry if my comments over at Ocaasi's RfA made you feel awkward or did anything to humiliate you. I just figured that, since you're new to the bureaucratic side of Wikipedia, it might help for me to give you some tips on how to participate in an RfA. I never meant for anything to snowball like they have.
I hope this doesn't deter you from making any further positive contributions to Wikipedia. You've done a lot of good work so far, and I hope I continue to see you around the place.
Take care. Kurtis (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I came here to leave a message about the same thing. With only just over 500 edits, I am reasonably sure that your experience does not extend yet to participating objectively in such bureaucratic places as RfA. Most of us start our Wiki careers by building content rather than looking at the adminy stuff behind the scenes. That said, if you are really interested in what our RfA candidates have to go through, you will almost certainly find this essay very interesting: WP:Advice for RfA candidates. Good luck, and if you ever need help with anything or some suggestions where you can work on improving article quality, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 20:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
Also. Actually, what you said wasn't inappropriate. It's OK to give a general feeling that someone's demonstrated qualities are not convincing. You should not have been questioned about that. It's OK to question a general agreement if you don't understand the reason for it. I've been a in a very small minority or even a minority of one from time to time, & I will be again whenever I think it worthwhile. Of course, when it is something that doesn't matter it does put oneself in a rather exposed position. Never feel you have to agree with the dominant position. DGG ( talk ) 02:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Activity warning
While in the past I was usually on every day for a few hours, my schedule has been ramped up. I probably won't be able to get on Mondays at all with few exceptions, and when I do get on I will probably be on for a shorter period of time.
While I will do my best to ensure that I get all your queries answered as soon as possible, I can make no guarantees of when "as soon as possible" will be anymore. By late May my schedule should be winding down again, and I will go back to my usual period of activity.
I apologize for any inconvenience. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 14:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
RfA: thank you for your support
Thank you for your support during my recent RfA, Cmach7. Your late-breaking support, even in the midst of a lot of sound and fury at the end, was heartening. Warm regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Cmach7 19:24, 19 February 2013 (UTC)