User talk:Hasteur

Welcome to my talk page

I treat my talk page as a top level landing page for all discussion and as such archive stale discussions quickly. If a conversation started elsewhere, I will be watching it. If it starts here I will watch it here. Thanks.

Pizza Patrón

Thank you very much for photographing the Pizza Patrón HQ! Are you open to more photo requests? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

• Within Reason. I've done a bunch of photo requests this past couple of weeks (~20) so I'm probably going to be hands off for a couple of weeks as a 70 mile trip every weekend is not as fun. Hasteur (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
  • It's fine if I only list requests in the Dallas area, right? I have quite a few requests in the Dallas area. WhisperToMe (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Northern half of Dallas County I can do fairly quickly. South half (South of Downtown) takes longer. I also do some Collin County sites as I'm near the Dallas/Collin county border

Alright, so there are some requests. If you already have any of the following, please let me know. If you want to take your time or only do certain ones for now, that's fine too. If you want more than what I posted, please let me know, and I can post more.

Northern Dallas County:

Highland Park:

HP Town Hall: 4700 DREXEL DRIVE | HIGHLAND PARK, TEXAS 75205

Highland Park Department of Public Safety and the HP Library are next door - please photograph those too

File:Highland Park Municipal Building.JPG

File:Highland Park Department of Public Safety.JPG

Highland Park Middle School/McCulloch Intermediate: 355 Granada Drive, Dallas, TX 75205

File:Highland Park Middle School.JPG

Armstrong Elementary: 3600 Cornell, Dallas, TX

File:John S. Armstrong School.JPG

Bradfield Elementary: 4300 Southern, Dallas, TX

File:John S. Bradfield Elementary School.JPG

Vickery Meadow

Emmett J. Conrad High School - 7502 Fair Oaks Avenue Dallas, TX 75231

Tasby Middle School - 7001 Fair Oaks Avenue, Dallas, TX 75231

Jack Lowe, Sr. Elementary School - 7000 Holly Hill Drive Dallas, TX 75231

McShan Elementary School - 8307 Meadow Road, Dallas, TX 75231

Jill Stone Elementary School at Vickery Meadow - 6606 Ridgecrest Road, Dallas, TX 75231-7002

Fire Station #37 - 6742 Greenville Avenue

Preston Hollow

St. Mark's School (Texas) - 10600 Preston Road, Dallas, TX 75230

Ursuline Academy of Dallas - 4900 Walnut Hill Lane Dallas, Texas

Pershing Elementary School - 5715 Meaders Ln, Dallas, TX

Preston Hollow Elementary School - 6423 Walnut Hill Ln Dallas, TX 75230

Preston Hollow Presbyterian School - 9800 Preston Road, Dallas, TX

Preston Royal Library: 5626 Royal Lane

Preston Post Office: 8604 TURTLE CREEK BLVD DALLAS, TX 75225-9998

Netherland Park: 5600 Dittmer

Preston Hollow Park: 6600 Park Ln

Fire Station 41 - 5920 Royal Lane

University Park

UP City Hall/Police/Courts: 3800 University Blvd. University Park, TX 75205

Peek Service Center: 4420 Worcola Street Dallas, TX 75206 (lower priority)

Highland Park Library: 6517 Hillcrest Suite 110, 75205

Highland Park Independent School District administration - 7015 Westchester Drive, Dallas, TX

Highland Park High School - 4220 Emerson Dallas, Texas 75205

Hyer Elementary: 3920 Caruth, Dallas, TX

University Park Elementary: 3505 Amherst, Dallas, TX

UP Parks (other than Holmes Aquatic, those are the lowest priority):

When photographing a park, please get the sign announcing the name, like this: File:AgnesMoffitPark.JPG

Burleson Park - 3000 University @ Dublin2900 Daniel Avenue

Caruth Park - 7801 Hillcrest Ave @ Caruth

Curtis Park and Holmes Aquatic Center - 3501 Lovers Lane @ Dickens

Germany Park - 6401 Lomo Alto @ University

Smith Park - 4000 Greenbrier @ Pickwick

Williams Park - 3801 University @ Williams Pkwy

Central Dallas:

DISD HQ: 3700 Ross Avenue Dallas, TX 75204-5491

Requests for southern Dallas County:

Wilmer-Hutchins ISD admin building (it's across the street from a gas station, so I suppose you can park at the gas station and take the photo from there) - 3820 East Illinois Avenue, Dallas, TX - I fear it could be demolished or have its markings removed (last time I saw it, it was still marked as the WHISD admin building), so I would very much like to have it photographed

File:Wilmer-Hutchins ISD admin building.JPG Hasteur (talk) 08:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

DFW Airport area, in Tarrant County:

• American Airlines/AMR Corporation corporate headquarters: 4333 Amon Carter Boulevard Fort Worth, TX 76155
• DFW Airport Admin Building (you will not have to pay the toll to access it): 3200 East Airfield Drive (75261)
• Fort Worth ARTCC: 13800 FAA Road, Fort Worth, Texas, United States 76155

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 23:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Bad news, the WH ISD building (which I assume was on that little triangle of land between the gas station and the highway) is already demolished. Hasteur (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Just to make sure, was it located on this parcel? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

If it's the building that's listed as the Imperialist University of America, I got a shot of that. There were no WH-ISD logos on it. I was referring to the little triangle as the 2nd link you sent is what I though was the WHISD building. I'll upload what I have shortly Hasteur (talk) 22:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Okay. I look forward to seeing the image :) WhisperToMe (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

There is a triangle of land with nothing on it, but maybe that's not where the building was after all... WhisperToMe (talk) 22:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

The triangle that may have been empty was empty back in 2001: http://msrmaps.com/image.aspx?T=4&S=9&Z=14&X=7100&Y=36216&W=3&qs=%7cDallas%7cTX - It seems like the building itself is still standing WhisperToMe (talk) 22:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Please let me know when you post any photos taken over the weekend. I'll add them to articles WhisperToMe (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry it took so long to upload. Hardware failure prevented me from uploading quickly. Hasteur (talk) 08:14, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I just added it to the WHISD article WhisperToMe (talk) 13:52, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Highland Park Done. Hasteur (talk) 20:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much for getting these! WhisperToMe (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

DRN organisers

Hello. I am just letting you know that I've made a proposal to create a rotating DRN organiser-style role that would help with the day-to-day running of DRN. As you are a listed volunteer at DRN, I'd appreciate your thoughts on this, and the other open proposals at DRN. You can read more about it here. Thanks! Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 00:14, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Minor item

Hi there. Just a quick note on this infobox: It should say "This user has been dragged to the Administration Noticeboards N times," an experience which should only happen when drugged. Jokestress (talk) 05:53, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Decline

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Hello, I am the author of the Pirates of the Caribbean timeline article, and I am offended by what you said. Columbus is never mentioned in the movies. Anyway, you obviously didn't read the notes section where it says:

"Some dates are historicaly accurate, such as the death of Bartholomew "Black Bart" Roberts, and are important to the storyline in one of the movies or books, such as Blackbeard's birth in 1680 as he becomes the main antoganist in On Strangers Tides, or Juan Ponce de León's discovery of Florida, and the Fountain of Youth as Sparrow and Barbossa search for his ship also in On Strangers Tides."

Having seen that I realy encourage you to look back into my article. Cheers. JoshBlitz (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)JoshBlitz

• I completely agree with Hasteur's declining the submission. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 20:06, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

And obviously you missed the Reductio ad absurdum of mentioning Columbus and trying to point out that your timeline is so meticulously over detailed that it does not belong here. Hasteur (talk) 20:10, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

That is not true. The article tells the timeline of events showcased in the series and books. Now the Beatles have a timeline and it is the exact same thing. It says details such as when George Martin was born, John and Cynthia wedding, and when a record was released. My article is no different. So please relook into it now. Cheers. JoshBlitz (talk) 20:17, 15 April 2013 (UTC)JoshBlitz

• The Beatles are real in a way that your boat is not. Drmies (talk) 20:24, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

WP:OTHERSTUFF. The Beatles has a very obvious and definite timeline and membership in the band. In addition your "timeline" claims in the title to only follow the movies, yet you include the births of characters only mentioned (Hernando Cortez is not in any of the films but is mentioned in description) or characters that are not even talked about in the movies (Ben Franklin for example). I'm not going to give your article a pass at this time because it is not up to the standards and quality of a article (or list). Please take my (and Drmies) advise and walk away for a while. I observe that you've submitted a great many articles for creation with very few of them actually passing. Perhaps it's time to go back to square one and consider if perhaps your understanding of the best practices (Rules/Guidelines/MoS/etc.) is not in line with the community consensus. And if you try to make another end run play such as removing the declined AfC submissions and trying to get a different reviewer, I will be asking the AfC volunteer team as a whole what steps we should take to prevent further disruption from you. Hasteur (talk) 20:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes that was an accident, after I made the title I thought to myself, "Crap," and I tried to change the title but I couldn't find out how. Anyhoo, you again didn't read the notes section. Ben Franklin's birth was not mentioned, and Hernando Cortez is mentioned in the BOOK SERIES!! Yes, I know it says "...(Movie Series)" I mad a mistake, I tried to change it but I couldn't! Also, the Beatles DID NOT have a difinitive timeline. I am still working on a Beatles article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The History of The Beatles, witch is an article about their history, (also i'd love some feedback for it), and it includes people who were members, not just, Paul, John, George, and Ringo, but Tommy Moore, Ivan Vaughan, Bill Smith, Eric Griffiths, Colin Hanton, and Norman Chapman. People you probably have never heard of but, consequently have all been in the Beatles before... JoshBlitz (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2013 (UTC)JoshBlitz

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

ASBIS

Dear Hasteur, thank you for your reviewing the article about ASBISC Enterprises PLC. We have previously worked at it with Nimuaq and developed it with his kind assistance. Could you please, specify what did you mean by decline reasoning “the high prevelance of PR blurb”? Perhaps you can give your competent recommendations and more detailed instruction of how to improve the article to get approved then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ASBIS.cmg (talk • contribs) 12:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

There is a high concentration of 1st person sources (ASBIS itself, or press releases from ASBIS) that significantly disqualify the article (in my mind) as being appropriate for mainspace. In addition your user name coupled with the article you're trying to get submitted suggests a significant conflict of interest. I looked at your interaction with Nimuaq, and it was nothing more than basic information (just as I'm giving) and not significant assistance. Hasteur (talk) 12:39, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for_creation/Aradhna_Krishna

HI,

many thanks for your review about this page (Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aradhna Krishna). It was much appreciated!!!

I am trying to edit the page following your suggestions. Could you help me please in understanding what criteria to use to delete the references that you think are unnecessary? I have written a message to the live chat, but the people there suggested me to contact you directly.

Many thanks again, Alfa privativo (talk) 16:59, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Please read WP:OVERREF and try to pick the best ones for the clusters you have. Also the people who staffed the live chat were obviously mistaken as it's very obvious as to the meaning. Hasteur (talk) 17:01, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks Hasteur!!

Alfa privativo (talk) 17:06, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ben Corday

Your reasons for declining my submission are vague. While I will continue to work on improving this short article, I would much appreciate an elaboration on what you meant by "Narrative composition is confused. Chronology within a section is not consistent." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richiesullivan (talk • contribs) 21:07, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Read the block of description. It talks about his death, then about the flash that he sold. Consider breaking his biography out from his impact. Hasteur (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I thought that's what you were getting at, but wasn't sure. I will edit accordingly and resubmit.--Richiesullivan (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tropical Depression01W (2010)

Hi! I am the one creating this article and I waited for a long time for someone to review it and thankfully you are there when you reviewed it. I am asking in a friendly matter, I did not understand your comment there so will you tell me what is the problem of my article? Procyclone (talk) 02:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

1. WebCite makes the original source of the references impossible to determine. From my spot check, it appears all the sources was the Illonois Weather Listserv.
   1. If this is the case your article will give the "Article depends on a single source" problem which means you're going to be declined on that argument
2. There are many more important named tropical storms that don't have articles on Wikipedia, so a pre-determined pattern of naming for a single year's storm is unlikely to be significantly notable.
3. The fact that the storm's existance was a total of 3 days suggests that there wasn't any significant notability to the storm. That only 2 people died and there was under 500k in damages also suggests that there isn't a great claim of significance in this storm.

For these reasons I've declined the article. Hasteur (talk) 02:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

If I can edit it to replace sources, do you think it will be accepted? Procyclone (talk) 13:53, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The sources aren't going to help it. It still suffers from the "non-named tropical storms" problem and the "low impact" problem. Hasteur (talk) 14:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

So you mean it is not notable even if it has 3 deaths and $245,000 (I am not sure)?Procyclone (talk) 03:29, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

I'm saying that in my mind with only 3 deaths and such a minimal amount of monetary losses, it's not notable. Hasteur (talk) 12:33, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sherry Lynn

Hasteur, thank you for reviewing my article on Sherry Lynn. I did read the criteria for Musicians on Wiki and also researched other musicians that do have articles published. And I see no reason for Sherry Lynn who had a single chart on the Billboard Charts in 2012 and is about to release her 2nd studio CD not be included here. Here upcoming single which is slated for release in the next few weeks is a duet with Crystal Gayle. She has been published in multiple country music publications both here and abroad. Compared to a few other artists published here she definitely has the credentials to appear in Wikipedia. Sammi8170 (talk) 14:34, 17 April 2013 (UTC)Sammi8170 moved here from misplaced category page edit Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 14:36, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

The Billboard listing is not cited, therefore it can't count to the notability tracker. That she placed so low on the chart that it's questionable as if the charting is qualified. Please be aware that the Charting requirement is being considered for removal based on the fact that below the top ~30 it's not as easy to determine notability. Hasteur (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

If that requirement is removed then that would be in our favor? Since she does fit a majority of the rest of them. And as I said there are other artists who have published articles that do not fit all the criteria listed.Sammi8170 (talk) 00:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Sammi8170

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Woodpecker Wooliams

Hello Hasteur-

You've recently declined the Woodpecker Wooliams article due to multiple submissions following my recent rewriting of it; please would you advise me how to either delete or merge the articles as you've requested; the fact that there are several submissions comes from me struggling to submit the rewritten article / to navigate around the wikipedia pages.

Your help is much appreciated. DC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dv8create (talk • contribs) 21:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Take a look at the edit text of the entire page, and either delete or copy together the content. Read through the creation afterwords to make sure there's only 1 references block, 1 external links block, and 1 categories block. I speedy failed the submission because it's difficult to evaluate the article's relative density of references when looking at a double submission. Previously i would have chopped the older text, but I've been counseled that this is not always the best solution to this issue, and to let the submitter choose which version they want to keep. Hasteur (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Hasteur- Thank you for the advice. I think this is completed now- as far as I can tell there is just one version / one set of references... etc. I can't see how to resubmit for review though and I think that's where things went wrong before and duplicate entries were made... is there anything else i need to do now (can you see?) in order for it to be reconsidered? many thanks, DC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dv8create (talk • contribs) 21:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

An Barnstar for You!

	The AFC Backlog Buster Barnstar
	Congratulations, Hasteur! You're receiving a Brownie because you reviewed 26 articles during the recent AFC Backlog elimination drive! Thank you for you contributions to Wikipedia at-large and helping to keep the backlog down. We hope you continue reviewing submissions and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! Mdann52 (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Hasteur. You have new messages at Film at 11's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

We'll have the full story... at 11! 18:53, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Hasteur-

Thank you for the advice. I think this is completed now- as far as I can tell there is just one version / one set of references... etc. I can't see how to resubmit for review though and I think that's where things went wrong before and duplicate entries were made... is there anything else i need to do now (can you see?) in order for it to be reconsidered?

many thanks, DC — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dv8create (talk • contribs) 21:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Jose Antonio Vargas, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:PhilKnight (talk) 19:10, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Peter Proctor, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, User:PhilKnight (talk) 23:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Seeking for guidance

Hi Hasteur,

I submitted an article on 'Cullen Investments', which was reviewed by you and later got declined on 17 April 2013. Here's the link for your reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cullen_Investments

Previously the article was declined on 31 March 2013 due to insufficient references considering which the reference list was updated considerably.

This time the reason for rejection is 'promotional stuff'. I'll be grateful if you can help me with the edition and successful submission of the same article. Additionally it would good if you can point out few sentences in the article which sounds like promotional stuff.

Thanks Ingoddess2805