Jump to content

User talk:AmritasyaPutra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Raam2 (talk | contribs) at 08:31, 25 July 2014 (→Access to mylibrary British Council). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Archives (Index)

Nomination of Child marriage among Muslims in Kerala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Child marriage among Muslims in Kerala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Child marriage among Muslims in Kerala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edmondhills (talk) 08:48, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the records. Closed as keep. --Jyoti (talk) 13:56, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edit warring POV pushing in article Cheraman Juma Masjid

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Cheraman Juma Masjid shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring— even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Wasif (talk) 14:28, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wasif, discuss per WP:BRD, the references you provided have been shown to be utterly unreliable. --Jyoti (talk) 14:34, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jyoti Replied NPOV notice board. Wasif (talk) 14:43, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For the records. That is wrong discussion board, no new response there -- same stuff what was on article talk page repeated by same editor there. The reliability of concerned source has been discussed at WP:RSN. --Jyoti (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please visit the Wikipedia article on M.S. Golwalkar and look into its edit history. Something is going wrong.

Dear Jyoti, I humbly wish to draw your kind attention to the page on M.S. Golwalkar. Please see its edit history. Tell me if I am doing any mistake. I look forward for your kind guidance. Arghyan Opinions (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arghyan Opinions I have replied on the article talk page. Indopug's argument is valid in its place. I believe he is doing it in good faith, don't be discouraged. I will see if I may filter and re-word your contribution. Regards. --Jyoti (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Jyoti Thank you very very much. I have already restarted my research. I am planning to start an altogether new section in the article on M.S. Golwalkar, so that I may not have to revert any edit this time. I am working on the matter. Thanks once again. Arghyan Opinions (talk) 19:40, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, I may come to this article later, I am reading on Deendayal Upadhyaya presently. You may ping me for reliable references in your research. I have access to British Council Mumbai, and http://www.questia.com. --Jyoti (talk) 19:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ganapati Muni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the records. Fixed. --Jyoti (talk) 14:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2002 Gujarat riots

Please provide your inputs in the Nazi textbooks section, which has turned into an edit war. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddyuday (talk • contribs) 09:12, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reddyuday, I have responded there now. The article is in such a bad shape there is little that be done to it without first doing a major copy-edit. edit war like this one is very common on this page! Follow guidelines and work with reliable sources maybe you will be able to make improvements to it. Regards, --Jyoti (talk) 09:31, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

infection theory

please give me a little more time to work on this page. I suspected that my source wasn't specific enough to warrant a page, but I am hopeful that I will be able to find stronger citations in the future.

thank you for your work

ned hartley — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedhartley (talk • contribs) 13:56, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Elst at ELN

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion at Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard is taking place regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 15:07, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Vanamonde93,
  1. It is in Further Reading, not External links. This noticeboard is for External links.
  2. On your insistence only I opened a RfC two days back which is still open and you have participated there. Do you disagree?
  3. You have excluded mentioning Calypsomusic here, who also has participated in the RfC and does not support your views.
  4. Enough references has been provided to establish that the book is about the article topic. That the work falls under author's area of expertise. That the author is notable (albeit you claim without reference that his notability is for all the wrong reasons).
  5. Can we not keep discussion to one page instead of spreading it across multiple places? And wait for one dispute resolution method to get over? This is going to be my only response to this, I will continue to participate in the open RfC.
--Jyoti (talk) 15:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The proper procedure for an RfC is to wait for it to conclude, and then either insert the content or not, depending on the outcome. You inserted the content, and opened an RfC immediately after; therefore, it is utterly meaningless. It is the equivalent of banning a user and then opening an RfCU. I participated only so that external contributors do not think I am ignoring the discussion. You keep discussing notability, which shows a complete misunderstanding of policy; nobody is saying Elst is not notable, we are saying he is not reliable, which is entirely different. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:07, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have given reference to support my edit. You have not provided any reference to back your claims. You are merely insisting that your inference is the truth. --Jyoti (talk) 06:10, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your references show notability at best, and are useless, at worst. They do not demonstrate reliability. And you have still violated RfC procedure. Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:37, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, some more inference and insistence! No reference? --Jyoti (talk) 06:39, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Integral humanism (India), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Body and Sankara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed both. --Jyoti (talk) 09:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Integral Humanism

Thanks for your comment. I don't really have time to do a lot of editing now. I know that the concept is discussed at length in "Decolonizing the Hindu Mind" by K. Elst, and is probably the best source to use (being AFAIK the most detailed scholarly discussion on this topic). --Calypsomusic (talk) 11:43, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I have read the Integral Humanism book before, but at present I do not have access to either the original book nor the book by K. Elst. If I get it I will see what I can add from it. Regards. --Jyoti (talk) 11:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hi AmritasyaPutra. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! – Juliancolton | Talk 13:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Juliancolton I will keep that in mind. Regards. --Jyoti (talk) 13:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:208.68.222.25

Hello Jyoti.mickey. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:208.68.222.25, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Leave it be or simply blank it manually. Talk pages are rarely deleted. Thank you. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 06:23, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks FreeRangeFrog, I will blank it manually. --Jyoti (talk) 06:24, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to STiki!

Hello, Jyoti.mickey, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

  • The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
  • Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Changed my username.

Changed my username. Changed globally on all projects. All redirects done properly. --AmritasyaPutra✍ 09:54, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stiki

Hi there. I noticed that you started using WP:Stiki around a week back and made one edit with it. I wanted to know your opinion of the tool, including the interface as well as your experience with it. Thanks, happy editing. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 04:58, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rsrikanth05, Its okay tool, but requires a open connection to mysql and is amazingly slow for me. I switched back to Huggle and also realized I prefer plain recent change patrol instead of either tools! --AmritasyaPutra✍ 10:38, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Aah, the first edit always takes a while to load because Stiki has to connect to the backend. Once the first classification is done, it loads fast, do try it out. We're always looking to grow the Stiki family. :) --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Access to mylibrary British Council

Hi, I see that you have access to mylibrary British Council. Can you help me read books by Ian Stevenson online? Thanks in advance for the help.—Raam2 (talk) 16:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raam2, I have E-Books subscription as I do not reside in Mumbai. I searched and did not see any book by Ian Stevenson in my subscription. Will be glad to help in future. --AmritasyaPutra✍ 04:09, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thanks!-Raam2 (talk) 08:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AmritasyaPutra&oldid=618389449"