This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
List of native Philippine chicken breeds is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
this pdf file link [1] is utilizing some parts including some of the pictured breeds of the article obviously copypasted from the Philippine Native Chicken article from Wikipedia website. It is an act of plagiarism on part of the owner of the PDF file posted in this site http://entrp2.site88.net The purpose is to reference the different breeds written in the Wikipedia article, therefore the Philippine Native Chicken article in Wikipedia did not expressly violate copyright claim. Wikipedia article written in 2011.
i, the author of this article verified that the writer/author of the PDF file in question is therefore guilty of plagiarism. Fowl vet (talk) 00:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with you that the author of that document, created on 27 March 2014, appears to have copied much of the content from our page here; I'll tag this page accordingly. However, it also seems that almost all of this article was itself copied without attribution in February 2011 from our page on the Rhode Island Red, as this Duplication detector report confirms. Copying within Wikipedia is perfectly acceptable, but attribution must be given – please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. I'll deal with that too. But that also means that little of the content in this article has anything to do with this chicken breed, and that it thus needs to be radically rewritten from independent reliable sources. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:25, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Plagiarism
- due to the plagiarism that was committed by a researcher from the site http://entrp2.site88.net/, i as the orginal author of the Philippine Native Chicken article, decided to rewrite the article restoring the Philippine local definitions and variations of the Philippine native chicken. The old article describes the local descriptions and definitions of the breed but the admin of wikipedia dismissed that my article has been copied from another article which is wrong..i'm a resident of the Philippines and have spoken to elders regarding the variations of the Philippine Native Chicken and included some researches from local gov't articles have enriched my journey studying this beautiful, hardy fowl of my country..--Fowl vet 17:43, 18 August 2014 User:Fowl vet
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.backyardchickens.com/t/829034/hi-i-am-a-new-member-of-byc/10. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original orplagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The author there referenced my article by copying from my article to the backyardchickens forum website for discussion reasons. Therefore my article was copied again for reference and was not properly acknowledged. As i said before my Wikipedia article was written in 2011. Again, my article is not the problem, it is the persons utilizing, referencing my article who committed such. Therefore, I as the original author, will rewrite this article to properly provide description to readers worldwide about this lovely fowl. --Fowl vet