Jump to content

User talk:Zppix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Meters (talk | contribs) at 18:46, 11 December 2015 (→‎Vandalism warning? Really?: agree with IP. That was an unjustified use of the revert button, an unjustified warning, and an excessively harsh warning. Edit restored and warning struck). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Zppix! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 19:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Please comment on Talk:Muhammad

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Muhammad. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ed Sheeran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ed Sheeran. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research

This was a mistake on your part [1]. Cheers. Materialscientist (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I saw a whole lot removed and I didn't see that it read like an ad... sorry man. We all make mistakes --Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 San Bernardino shooting. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cycling in different countries and cities

You were a bit hasty is reverting Template:Cycling in different countries and cities. All htose flags were unneeded clutter, template of that type don't have flags, and you removed some important links. 203.109.162.133 (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ivo Andrić

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ivo Andrić. Legobot (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Dochub Logo.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mlpearc (open channel) 20:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi appreciate your message. I don't agree. This information may b relevant in other areas of deepak chop rad page. However it does not belong in the intro. It appears you are biased as this is a rudimentary change and an honest change. The information does not belong in the introduction. Simple as that. If you have any real reason you want this page to be compromised please let me know. If you have no personal investment in denigrating this man-then please explain to me why you insist on having biased information that does not demonstrate both sides of an argument. What's more this is not an argument of a page. When other great philosophers are introduce none of this rubbish is written!- why about this man? I will continue to edit as many others who see that this page has become somewhat of a joke! Lauren55 (talk) 20:37, 10 December 2015 (UTC) @Lauren55: what are you talking about?[reply]

why are you threatening me?

Why are you threatening me? What was wrong with my edits? i think the article is too detailed as there are other articles to give day by day detail. Is this how you welcome new editors? Maybe I wont bother registering after all — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.190.6.192 (talk) 22:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

86.190.6.192, i'm not. your removing content that was factual... But if you choose to not register because of me then so be it. Also please always sign your posts that are towards a talk page using ~~~~ Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 22:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page watcher) It's usual to give a level 1 warning first rather than go straight to level 3. WP:AGF? PamD 23:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

rollback/pending changes reviewer user rights

Hello Zppix. Your account has been granted the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.

Rollback user right
Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
Pending changes reviewer user right
The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Katietalk 22:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zppix, just dropping you a line to let you know I removed the PROD on Modern Physics course at Nazarbayev university as another editor has tagged it with a valid CSD tag. Cheers! -- samtar whisper 14:48, 11 December 2015 (UTC) Hey Samtar thanks Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 14:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning? Really?

Re: List of Star Wars: The Clone Wars episodes. Couple things: first of all, the links to disruptive editing and vandalism you provided explicitly say disruptive editing is NOT vandalism. Second, I deleted an entire section that is completely unnecessary to the page. Not only is the section completely irrelevant to the main subject of the page, it's horrendously done. Anyone with eyes can see that section needs to go. Vandalism is defined as a deliberate attempt to damage Wikipedia. I was deliberately attempting to improve Wikipedia by removing that travesty. 173.18.64.137 (talk) 15:00, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree that your reversion here was not warranted. The IP should not have removed it without leaving an edit summary, but the removal of material was justified as it was an unsourced and poorly written collection of trivia about light saber battles that does not belong in the article List of Star Wars: The Clone Wars episodes, which is simply a list of episodes. The IP's removal of the material was not vandalism and thus your reversion without an edit summary was not correct. I have undone your reversion, and I suggest that you be more careful of your use of the revert button.
Furthermore, your jumping straight to a level 3 vandalism warning when he or she has no previous warnings (and no previous edits) is also unjustified. I have struck your warning on the IP's page. Meters (talk) 18:44, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]