Jump to content

User talk:Okamialvis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guitarsoftheworld (talk | contribs) at 10:37, 31 March 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Okamialvis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:55, Sunday, November 1, 2015 (UTC)

Bank Tabungan Negara

Hi Okamialvis . The Bank Tabungan Negara page is still being edited. Kindly wait until it is finalized to make comments. Let's not add tags and comment all over the place just to increase our page count. Cheers! Zotezangu (talk) 16:31, November 22, 2015 (GMT)

Flowers For Mama

Hi there. I noticed that you nominated Flowers For Mama for speedy deletion under criterion A9. However, that criterion only applies to "a musical recording where none of the contributing recording artists has an article ... " (my emphasis). In this case, the artist Jean Stafford does have an article. She is a three-times Golden Guitar winner and she was inducted into the Australian Country Music Roll of Renown, so there is hardly a question of her notability. The article is obviously just a stub at this time, but that means we should improve it rather than delete it. Cleaning up the "junk" that constantly threatens to overwhelm Wikipedia is important and I encourage you to continue doing it, but please take a moment to check the subject, rather than the quality of the article, before tagging CSD.--Gronk Oz (talk) 16:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too-speedy speedy tagging

Thanks for patrolling new pages, a vital and under-appreciated task, but please don't tag newly created articles with WP:CSD#A1, WP:CSD#A3 or WP:CSD#A7 too soon after creation. While things like copyright violations and attack pages need to be tagged at once, new contributors often put in a word or two and then click "Save page" to see how it looks: it is discouraging and BITEy if a speedy-deletion template pops up at once. For incomplete articles like Rey stacks just now, you should make a note of the title and wait at least 10 - 15 minutes before tagging. I agree it did not look promising, but you only gave it two minutes. See {{uw-hasty}}. There is general advice about new page patrolling at WP:NPP, and about speedy tagging at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Okamialvis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:29, Tuesday, November 24, 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to California, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blackguard 20:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello Okamialvis. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3), or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Jahanzeb Khan. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks.Template:Z149. You've been cautioned about this before. An editor clearly deserves more than three minutes to write an article. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 17:38, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Multan Garrison Mess

Hi Okamialvis ,You previously tagged speedy deletion on Multan Garrison Mess. I have upgraded the article in my 2nd contribution. Can I remove the tag now? - Yasir72.multan Talk Contribs
09:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Okamialvis (talk) 09:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou - Yasir72.multan Talk Contribs
09:50, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit

Edits like this don't help the situation; even if the article ends up being deleted, that could still be considered vandalism. Please keep constructive comments to the talk page. 331dot (talk) 09:51, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Information icon Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. czar 04:10, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(diff) See the text of the article ("The main game has 32 levels[1] across eight worlds and five bonus worlds"). It is verifiable and sourced to a reliable source. The lede paragraph doesn't use sources because it is a summary of the sourced info below. czar 17:25, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to MV Grand Pelican— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:20, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm Krj373. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Vicktor Kotev has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 18:17, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thank you for your response but why is it still appearing on the search? Actually I just want to change the name of the article but see no option. Can you advise me.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clubcreative (talkcontribs) 08:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hello there are countless band on wikipedia who had much less notoriety than Sacrilege and their page has never been deleted, bands such as:(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartz_(metal_band), (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blitzkrieg_(heavy_metal_band)), (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warrior_(band) as they are currently on tour with sacrilege and all have their own wikipedia page and they are definitely less if not equal popular as sacrilege. can't see why you keep on deleting this page as sacrilege are a very popoular band, definitely much more than other band listed on wikipedia, see bands like (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonilla)