User talk:Kabahaly

Welcome

Hello, Kabahaly, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Anup Mehra ^✈ 16:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Kabahaly, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kabahaly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm UY Scuti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Kogalymavia Flight 9268— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hermionedidallthework. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Barbara L, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 19:59, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Zyablikovo District. Thank you. Hermionedidallthework (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

St. Mary’s Church, Negombo

Please see if the c/e is adequate or let me know where else to chnage--Nvvchar. 13:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Olie

Hi I removed a strange template you left on this page. Please be careful when reviewing new articles. Thanks. Jane (talk) 13:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My intention wasn't to promote a product, but I had to enter links in the references. Please specifically indicate which sentences to be deleted. Antonyroman

Not really advertisement, just not a neutral point of view. This sentence "Today he is known for his unusually sharp depictions of various parts of Amsterdam that no longer exist." Kabahaly (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! I am not Antonyroman, so I didn't put that there (and the Jacob Olie page is not a product). The photographer made unusually sharp photographs, and the places he photographed no longer exist. Is there something wrong with how I worded it that you see multiple issues? I am not sure how else to put it. He was not known for his photography during his lifetime, but becamse known for the nostalgic value of his photos. Maybe if you state your issues it would be clearer to me, because I don't see anything wrong with that sentence. Jane (talk) 18:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

poor grammar?

You have twice tagged Star of Devon for poor grammar, but I can't see any problem at all can you enlighten me?Theroadislong (talk) 16:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added two commas, and possibly there could be two more (around 'Devon'). It did work as it was, but I'm a stickler for commas. Peridon (talk) 18:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

I can't see Oana Stoica Mujea as vandalism. Possibly promotional or not notable, as the title has been deleted on the Romanian Wikipedia twice (once each for those reasons so far as I can see), but not vandalism. It is in Romanian, not English, but we list articles in other languages at WP:PNT (unless we can see a clear problem that requires speedy deletion). You might see something there that I don't - if you have information about something that anyone else might not, or if there might be a language problem hiding something, please put a note on the talk page to explain this. It makes our lives easier... Peridon (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed at DRN

You are receiving this message because you are signed up as a volunteer at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. We have a number of pending requests which need a volunteer to address them. Unless you are an inexperienced volunteer who is currently just watching DRN to learn our processes, please take a case. If you do not see yourself taking cases in the foreseeable future, please remove yourself from the volunteer list so that we can have a better idea of the size of our pool of volunteers; if you do see yourself taking cases, please watchlist the DRN page and keep an eye out to see if there are cases which are ready for a volunteer. We have recently had to refuse a number of cases because they were listed for days with no volunteer willing to take them, despite there being almost 150 volunteers listed on the volunteer page. Regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN help needed and volunteer roll call

You are receiving this message because you have listed yourself on the list of volunteers at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Volunteering#List of the DRN volunteers.

First, assistance is needed at DRN. We have recently closed a number of cases without any services being provided for lack of a volunteer willing to take the case. There are at least three cases awaiting a volunteer at this moment. Please consider taking one.

Second, this is a volunteer roll call. If you remain interested in helping at DRN and are willing to actively do so by taking at least one case (and seeing it through) or helping with administrative matters at least once per calendar month, please add your name to this roll call list. Individuals currently on the principal volunteer list who do not add their name on the roll call list will be removed from the principal volunteer list after June 30, 2016 unless the DRN Coordinator chooses to retain their name for the best interest of DRN or the encyclopedia. Individuals whose names are removed after June 30, 2016, should feel free to re-add their names to the principal volunteer list, but are respectfully requested not to do so unless they are willing to take part at DRN at least one time per month as noted above. No one is going to be monitoring to see if you live up to that commitment, but we respectfully ask that you either live up to it or remove your name from the principal volunteer list.

Best regards, TransporterMan (talk · contribs) (Current DRN coordinator) This is an informational posting only and I am not watching this page; contact me on my user talk page if you wish to communicate with me about this. Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Political Compass (June 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tokyogirl79 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to show how this questionaire is notable enough for an entry. This can be done by showing where the topic has been written about in independent and reliable sources like newspapers or academic texts. Online sources can be used, but be careful as not all online sources are considered to be independent and reliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Political Compass and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The International 2016 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The International 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 19:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My page on Sarah Bellamy who travelled with the First Fleet to colonise Australia had not been finished — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halljo22 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Doggy style, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rhett and Link. Binksternet (talk) 05:20, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G2

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Userspace is exempt from G2 speedy deletes. Users are permitted to do tests in their own sandboxes. If it is your own test, you can use CSD-G7 to ask for delete, or if someone else tested in you userspace you can use CSD-U1. Also if someone independent declines your speedy delete nomination do not put it back on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Black supremacy

I sincerely hope you don't go around Wikipedia making stuff up like you did at Black supremacy. Try it again and you'll be reported at WP:AN/I. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 13:20, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ElectroYoga

Why would you remove ElectroYoga? It's a real word that is developing. If you don't like the links that were provided we could just remove them. I need to site examples of where the word was used to substantiate that it is a real word that is now being used. I am perfectly happy to leave out the examples of the word being used. However the word electroyoga is used to describe a public event. Magenta1984 (talk) 13:01, 20 July 2016 (UTC)magenta1984[reply]