Jump to content

User talk:50.29.199.144

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by EvilLair (talk | contribs) at 20:22, 22 October 2016 (It is true however that you're allowed to remove discussions/comments from your own page per WP policy.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Hadouken! has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Hadouken! was changed by 50.29.199.144 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960089 on 2015-12-14T15:45:40+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Karate Kid (2010 film). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Karate Kid (2010 film) was changed by 50.29.199.144 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.940533 on 2015-12-14T18:46:30+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I personally don't think it's any vandalism at all. It's just giving a private message that the plot summary should be where it requires. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 18:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Thanks for your edits to the DragonForce article.

Some cookies to welcome you!
Hello, 50.29.199.144, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

50.29.199.144, good luck, and have fun. – Caballero/Historiador (talk) 14:29, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jalen Ramsey, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 20:20, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK now. A reference has been added for the article. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 20:29, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I've blocked you for 31 hours for disruptive editing. See WP:GAB for how to appeal this block.

Regardless of your motives, I have just spent some time cleaning up after you. I've deleted talk pages and rolled back your edits to talk and user pages. You are not an administrator. You cannot issue block notices or even quasi block notices to other user. You also should not be tagging users as socks or confirmed socks or whatever. If you promise to stop doing anything like this again, I will unblock you.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

50.29.199.144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Forgive me Bbb23. It was my fault. I should not even pose as an administrator or mini-op any sort of user on the site. I promise deep in my heart, that I would never want to do this ever again. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 22:49, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Fine. I'll take you at your word, but any repeat of this behavior will result in a much longer block. I've unblocked you. Bbb23 (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Emmanuel Ogbah. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:45, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What are you? Human or bot? You got quite some security sightreading I must assume. The source has already been added to the article so it's fine now. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 12:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:56, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Calvin Pryor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --allthefoxes (Talk) 01:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"announced to enter"

For example: "After his junior season, Phillips announced to enter the 2015 NFL Draft." grammatically doesn't make sense. Can you please not continue this?--Yankees10 01:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Calvin Pryor. If you are to write ANY information on Wikipedia, it must be sourced, especially for living people. Please cite where your information was received from! --allthefoxes (Talk) 01:53, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Aye karumba! Give me a fucking break already! What are you? Human or robot? Some say edits without sourcing material are OK but can't you let them be credible for JUST once? Uh mean, whatever! You're just playing shenanigans already! 50.29.199.144 (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I am a human, maybe. Some call me a robot. Either way, the main issue is that your statistics are not sourced. Anything you add to a biography of a living person should be sourced. Where are you getting these statistics from?
Maybe if you check this website out, you might get the stats from the players. And there's your answer there. Hope it helps. :-D -- 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:00, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Great! Now, you need to cite that in the article! --allthefoxes (Talk) 02:02, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bingo! Successfully cited. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! --allthefoxes (Talk) 02:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.29.199.144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Forgive me again Bbb123. I'm on the wrong road once again. I shouldn't have done it again, but I actually have. I'll admit this for once. I've been touring so many list of sock puppet and banned user pages trying to put up the proper notices, but only admins or other users with specific rights can do that. I guess I wasn't up to the task after all. I should've only focused on the real articles, but now that I know that no one can really edit userpages, I think I'll stop doing the wrong thing like this for good. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 14:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Did not learn from the last block apparently. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:04, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Virtually none of your recent changes are sourced. Please be sure to add references ASAP, because if you submit more unsourced content, you will be blocked again for disruptive editing. You also need to double-check your submissions for grammar and spelling errors like here and here. I also can't help but notice that the reference you added here has a title that is not consistent with the article's title, and the content "15 games with 25 tackles and 2.5 sacks" is not supported by article prose. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Information icon Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Star Wars: The Force Awakens, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scr★pIronIV 21:53, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Félix Doubront, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Scr★pIronIV 21:55, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Félix Doubront. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Scr★pIronIV 12:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

NFL player position changes and WP:OR

Hello, anonymous editor. You've probably noticed that I have undone several of your edits relating to NFL player positions, and I want to explain to you why I have made these changes and the importance of Wikipedia's policy on original research. Many of your edits have appeared to me to violate this policy. NFL player positions are taken from their NFL profile, or their team's official roster. To give an example, you recently changed Zach Kerr's position to defensive tackle, when his NFL profile page lists defensive end as his position. The Colts roster lists Kerr as a nose tackle, so either NT or DE would be acceptable, because reliable sourcing exists. Defensive tackle is unsourced as his position, and is not acceptable without sourcing. Furthermore, your edit summary ("Currently enlisted as DT. Besides, his weight is too bulky to tango as DE.") is both incorrect and appears to violate WP:OR. He is not listed as a defensive tackle on NFL or the Colts roster, and stating that "his weight is too bulky to tango as DE" is original research without reliable sourcing. As a minor add-on, please take note that positions are not proper nouns, and should not have each word capitalized in the infobox ("Defensive end", not "Defensive End"). You can and will be blocked from editing, as you have been twice in the past, if you continue to add original research to pages, so please stop. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 19:37, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In other truths and cases, teams have their own style of defense. Some sources other than NFL have different positions enlisted, which equals no original research. Some teams use 3-4 schemes while others use 4-3 schemes. Some players, according to NFL, have their own types of positions, but the thing to watch out for is their weight. For example, if a player is over 300 pounds, it can play DE in 3-4 schemes, but in other cases, it can play that same position in 4-3 schemes. The lone DT (a.k.a. NT) usually or commonly outweighs every other lineman in a 3-4 type scheme, so you have to be more precise on focusing on a player's weight before their position is legit enough after viewing the source. More ever, outside linebackers are commonly a little heavier than inside/middle linebackers. If the NFL source about a player's position (or any other source) is incorrect about a player's position, then that's no original research, so the best strategy to do is to focus more on a player's weight, then list their position. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 20:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It's clear that you have a good understanding of the NFL's defensive schemes, but I feel like you're missing the point I'm trying to make with regards to editing Wikipedia. "If the NFL source about a player's position (or any other source) is incorrect about a player's position... the best strategy to do is to focus more on a player's weight, then list their position" - this part of your response is especially concerning to me. Wikipedia editors don't get to decide what a player's position is, or whether or not NFL is incorrect. We also don't get to change a position based on a player's weight and/or personal knowledge of NFL defensive schemes. That's original research - inserting or changing information on a page based on your own personal knowledge or opinion. The other sources for player positions are irrelevant when compared to NFL.com, as NFL.com is the official source. A player's listed position on their Wikipedia page should always match the position listed on NFL or on that player's team's official roster (often they are the same). Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 00:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm Sanket Edits Wiki. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lance McCullers Jr., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. **SEW** (talk) 10:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jordan Gay— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:41, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this website for more information on football player profiles. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism directly after being released from a block will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing again for a longer period of time. Rostermon.com is not a reliable source! Please stop adding unsourced changes or you will be blocked! A User (contribs) 23:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stats

With Brandon Marshall (linebacker) and Darian Stewart, to just name two. Numbers less than 10 are to be written out was one, two, three, etc., it's proper English grammar. Numbers 10 and higher are to be written, 10, 11, 12, etc. Also, please refrain from removing sourced entries. Removing is considered disruptive and can get you blocked. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 17:37, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't just copy and paste from bios, that's a WP:COPYVIO and will get you blocked. (talk page stalker) CrashUnderride 17:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm KGirlTrucker81. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 17:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reply

I won't nitpick just because of one small mistake, so I'm not mad at you or anything. :D EvilLair (✉ | c) 02:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. I saw your contributions. You have been accomplished not only on the XY&Z anime, but other Japanese anime as well. Gravity will fall and intensify as times goes by, so Bewear. Make sure you live up to your expectations and focus on your own doing rather than attack strangers or newbies from now on. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 02:37, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You did actually send me it over your email, so I wasn't attacking, I'm just sharing some experience I have with Wikipedia pages. I have 2 years of experience here, so I know a lot of the basic rules on Wikipedia (such as talk pages, sources, Japanese romanization style, etc., since I can translate Japanese, but I'm not always 100% sure since I'm not a native speaker of Japanese). Also, I don't know if this was you so we can put that case behind us, there's always username coincidences and VideoGamePhenom is somewhat of a shared name (not a common name though, but somewhat shared). EvilLair (✉ | c) 03:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have revoked the comment regarding where anyone lives, but nonetheless, you have quite some experience on Wikipedia, and you can translate as well. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 12:04, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk:YouTube copyright strike without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To tell you the truth, there has been a dilemma on YouTube, indeed. One user is vandalizing another user on that site by making false copyright claims, and there is no such thing as a flawed bot system. I'm only giving you a head's up about this. There's nothing else to fear. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No, the copyright complaint system is what's flawed as anyone can send a copyright claim and it'll go through even if they don't own the video. The humans reviewing the video on YouTube's end will process the claim anyway; that's what's flawed. We don't use talk pages to complain about intersite YouTube drama and edit war by constantly reverting a single edit over and over again. / The copyright issue is resolved for anyone seeing this, I sent retractions for the IP user's videos to be restored on his channel on YouTube. EvilLair (✉ | c) 18:36, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NeilN talk to me 13:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

50.29.199.144 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This IP address isn't the same as Edday1051 was using. You have the wrong one. Please re-check the sock puppet investigations. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 14:08, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but I don't believe that; the behavioural evidence is pretty convincing. Huon (talk) 15:21, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't know how I should say this, but it's just completely different when other users use a different IP address, and it renders others innocent when the IP underlying the user is used only once. Alas, I have no choice. I guess I'll have to accept this suspension until it expires. 50.29.199.144 (talk) 20:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:50.29.199.144&oldid=745706494"