Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kbq430 (talk | contribs) at 22:04, 5 May 2018 (Khangate). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 5, 2018.

Khangate

Possible BLP violation, not mention in either his article or yhe article on his premiership Doug Weller talk 20:00, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • "In January 2017, Canada's Ethics Commissioner, Mary Dawson, began an investigation into Trudeau for a vacation he and his family took to Aga Khan IV's private island in the Bahamas.[185][186] The Ethics Commissioner's report, released in December 2017, found that Trudeau had violated four provisions of the Conflict of Interest Act.[187]"

Template:Tpv5-n and others

Implausible redirects. Septrillion (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cross namespace

No reason for these cross-namespace redirects UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:05, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've speedily deleted (WP:CSD#G6) the football stubs one as the history shows that was unequivocally created in error in the wrong namespace and the redirect resulted from it being fixed. I'm still thinking about the other two, but they were not clearly created in error and so speedy deletion does not apply. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Holcomb C3-R

brand name, not mentioned in linked article. DGG ( talk ) 16:02, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danger opportunity

This phrase is ambiguous in nature and could describe forms of risk. To redirect it to an article about a foreign language translation could be seen as a WP:SURPRISE and also forces readers to go to a specific article when Wikipedia's search function could provide readers better assistance. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antimaterials

Undiscovered antimaterials, not notable. Might as well have these for every material documented on Wikipedia... –LaundryPizza03 (d) 08:58, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Created en masse by Nicole Sharp back in 2016 without any justifications except for Antiwater which was created back in March by another editor. Not used in any reliable sources or discussed in the article. They won't be missed. AngusWOOF (barksniff) 17:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all as exceptionally unlikely search terms. As has been stated above, it's just within reach to synthesize antiparticles, but the anti-elements listed here are far off. Richard0612 23:49, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I think we know where this is heading, but none of these were appropriately tagged, so in the interest of procedure, I'm relisting them. I've tagged them all.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Amory (utc) 12:51, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kevinism

Expression is not mentioned in the target article, this page should be deleted. WWGB (talk) 12:26, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CCAV

Fails WP:NPOV Shwangtianyuan Merry Christmas and Happy New Year 04:30, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AJ-100

Not mentioned in target. TheSandDoctor Talk 01:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete or mention. This refers to the "Architects' Journal list of 100 best UK practices", and seems to be regarded as a fairly prestigious thing so it would definitely be appropriate to mention it in the article. However the only places I can see a reference currently is at PDP London and Page\Park Architects, two architecture firms that have won the award, but neither is a suitable place to retarget to. Thryduulf (talk) 11:25, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]