User talk:Eagleash
 | Eagleash is suffering from physical health issues. This may affect his ability to work on Wikipedia. Consequently, he may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience is greatly appreciated. |
Will be editing on a slightly reduced basis for the foreseeable future. Eagleash (talk) 06:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
| 1, 2, 3 |
To respond
Sir, as per your request I have posted my request on Talk page of Shamsheer Vayalil but two hours passed and no one responded to it. Sir, please make the desire edit. Thanks.(223.230.146.67 (talk) 15:02, 16 June 2019 (UTC))
New page reviewer granted
Hello Eagleash. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.
- URGENT: Please consider helping get the huge backlog down to a manageable number of pages as soon as possible.
- Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
- Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
- Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:59, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
AfC
Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Articles for creation! We are a group of editors who work together on the Articles for creation and Files for upload pages.
A few tips that you might find helpful:
- Please take time to fully read the reviewers' instructions before reviewing submissions.
- The reviewers' talk page is the best place to ask for help or advice. You might like to watchlist this page, and you are encouraged to take part in any discussion that comes up.
- Article submissions that need reviewing can be found in Category:Pending AfC submissions and there is also a useful list which is maintained by a bot.
- You might wish to add {{AFC status}} or {{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions. There is also a project userbox. If you haven't done so already, please consider adding your name to the list of participants.
- Several of our members monitor Wikipedia's help IRC channel, and you are welcome to join in to ask Wikipedia-related questions.
- The IRC channel #wikipedia-en-afc connect is used occasionally for internal discussion regarding the Articles for Creation process, and also serves as a recent changes feed, displaying all edits made in the Articles for Creation namespace.
- The help desk is the place where new editors can ask questions about their submissions. You are welcome to help in answering their questions.
Once again, welcome to the project.
Added this myself as it was not added when I joined the proj. and the links should be useful. Eagleash (talk) 13:18, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Request on 22:02:36, 8 January 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by The Baniano
- The Baniano (talk · contribs)
Hi
This is about the draft article 'Stanisław Kruciński'.
The reason for putting him on Wiki is not his career as a competitor. He had one, though, but without big wins in competitions.
The reason is that he is a renowned Polish fencing master. Stanisław Kruciński has been the head coach of the Polish Fencing Association during the golden age of that sport in Poland (late sixties - early seventies). He has contributed a great deal to those successes and for that he deserves an article on Wikipedia.
Moreover, he has been active internationally as a trainer (in Mexico, Austria and Venezuela) and should have a wikipedia article in English, the internaional language of today.
Please reconsider
The Baniano The Baniano (talk) 22:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
- @The Baniano: Hello, thank you for leaving a message, with your concerns. There really isn't enough in the page, as it stands at the moment, to justify its inclusion in the encyclopedia. Noted that he has been head coach of the national federation, but there is little content / context in this respect. There doesn't seem to be a sport-specific guideline in this instance and we are therefore relying on WP:GNG to decide upon acceptance. As head coach, what did he achieve? Did he lead the team at the Olympics for example or the European Games or World Championships or other major events? If so, what results were achieved, was he a particularly good or even a particularly poor coach? whatever the case, more coverage of him is needed in reliable independent third-party sources to help to establish notability and support the additional points you include in your post above. If more coverage can be found and referenced content added the page can be re-submitted but I would not re-review myself but leave it to another WP:AFC participant to consider. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 17:52, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Hi
I made some research and found another source. I added more information to the article and resubmitted.
As a fencer, he won twice the silver medal in team saber. During his term as head coach, it was the golden age of Polish fencing.
1968 Olympics in Mexico men: -gold in saber for Jerzy Pawłowski -bronze in team foil -bronze in team epée
1969 World championships Havana men: -gold in epée for Bohdan Andrzejewski -silver in team foil -silver in team saber
1970 World championships Ankara men: -silver in team epée -bronze in foil for Marek Dąbrowski -bronze in saber
1971 World championships Vienna men: -silver in saber for Jerzy Pawłowski -silver in foil for Marek Dąbrowski women: -bronze in team foil
1972 Olympics in Munich -gold in foil for Witold Woyda -gold in team foil
All can be checked on Wikipedia If that's not an exceptionally good head coach, then who is one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Baniano (talk • contribs) 20:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- @The Baniano: Thank you for your message. I have noted the additions to the page and made some minor adjustments. However, I think you would need to work some of the information in your post above, into the article. There is still not enough (in my opinion) to demonstrate notability satisfactorily. Adding the titles won by him or others under his tutelage or management will help. However, please note that Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference (see WP:UGC). When you feel the page is ready for mainspace, click the resubmit button in the pink notice. As mentioned above, I will leave it for another AfC participant to review. Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (
~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 23:33, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
I'm not convinced he is part of the first team squad. He's listed in the U23 section on the club website, so I think we should wait until he appears in the squad before putting him back on the squad template. Spike 'em (talk) 16:47, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Spike 'em: It seems to be a hangover from last season, when he was in the squad after appearing against Burnley. It was copied out with this edit so all I did was remove the mark-up. If you want to copy it out again (pro-tem) or even remove it altogether it's OK. He may go back out on loan fairly quickly or get a permanent move in the window. He's had a good run in the U23s so could also be close to a first team chance. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: Copied out again...for the time being. Eagleash (talk) 23:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
North Clifton copyright
As you can see the text came from Harby, Nottinghamshire (diff) and was from 1853 so its likely that it would be in public domain anyway. The text was added to the Harby article in 2008 and has been prominent in the article and noted its source so its likely it would have noticed in the over 10 years of its existence there. Crouch, Swale (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: The text actually came from here, which was flagged up at review by the copy-vio detector. No connection is made by this to other Wiki articles. After a quick check, the page was accepted. The note was to alert other reviewers that the article was already under consideration. Eagleash (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: PS (For future reference) if you have not already done so, see WP:CWW for information on copying within Wikipedia. Eagleash (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank's yes there wasn't a diff (since either the destination or source page has to be edited first) but I could have used a permanent link. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:20, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Atari Computing
Thanks for reviewing, although I have to disagree with your judgement. Atari Computing was the last printed UK Atari magazine. Compared to the Kelstar, which has a Wikipedia entry but no independent sources or well known authors. How is it possible to add more sources about a magazine that's been discontinued for 19 years? As is, while I do respect your decision, it'll probably be my first (and last) new article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MJaap (talk • contribs) 20:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
I have to agree, it was the last magazine to cater to the st-line of computers, and had worldwide distribution. It may not seem significant to you as a motorcycle nut, but to atarians it certainly is. The ISSN number should be more than enough proof the magazine existed, and as the last magazine, published for 5 years, it is certainly significant in the history of Atari. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.10.206.27 (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
This is absurd. The magazine is of no significance in the world of magazines, but this is a piece of atari history, refuting the article because some anal interpretation of a sub category guideline is just... bizarr. It should be judged based on the role it had in atari history.11:27, 2 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.136.40.91 (talk)
- @MJaap: Thank you for leaving me a message with your concerns. The bar at WP:NMAGAZINE is a relatively high one; rightly so, as many magazines do not merit an encyclopedic article. As the magazine guideline has not been met, satisfying notability via the general notability guidelines would be the only way the page could be accepted. There is little, if anything in the page to demonstrate this could be possible. It would require significant in depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. All that is available here is an announcement of the publication and an interview with the head of the publishing house. Neither of these are independent. Unfortunately, not every topic can be covered in a Wikipedia article and although, as you mention, a page exists for Kelstar, it does not meet Wikipedia's standards and could well be deleted if it cannot be improved. WP:OSE is also a factor here. If you are able to find, and add, multiple good sources, you are free to re-submit the article; I shall not review it further but leave it to another AfC particpant to comment. Just to re-emphasise, Wikipedia should only contain articles which are properly notable. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 22:08, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: The two IPs adding comments, both geolocate to the same general area and have made only one edit (to the article concerned) outside of this thread. Eagleash (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Just to let you know, this draft is stale and eligible for G13 deletion. -- Dolotta (talk) 18:09, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
- Note: Minor edit made to postpone G13. It is possible he will be released at the end of this season; depending on any transfer activity, may subsequently become notable. Could be deleted then or incubated in a sandbox possibly. Eagleash (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.17
Hello Eagleash,
- News
- The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.
- Discussions of interest
- Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
- {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
- A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
- There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
- Reminders
- NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
- NPP Tools Report
- Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
- copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
- The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
Draft: Bluetech (March 28)
Thank you for your guidance on this article creation. I have added references to both mainstream media sources as well as several references to coverage by publications devoted to electronic music sub-culture per the Notability requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hopefully this isnt taken (talk • contribs) 28 March 2019 02:53 (UTC)
- @Hopefully this isnt taken: Hello and thank you for leaving me a message. I note that some 'sources' have been added to the page. However, it looks as though the majority of them are basically links to interviews with the subject and not really what is needed to support an article. What is required, is facts about the subject and any available sources used to support those statements: the fact that he has been interviwed by 'X' or 'Y' magazine etc. is not notable. In fact it does not help with creating an article very much (if at all). Wikipedia does not rely on, or have very much interest in, what somebody has to say about themselves, but on what has been written about the subject in independent reliable secondary sources. This is just one of the ways in Which Wiki tries to ensure neutrality. If the article can be expanded and the sourcing improved, you are free to submit it again (in fact you can submit it again at any time... but beware of doing so tendentiously. If and when, it is re-submitted, I shall not review it further but leave for input from another AfC participant. See also WP:BLP.
- On another note please don't change the date and time of talk page messages. This forms part of the page history and is important for several reasons. Thank you. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 12:26, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
K
Thanx Bayanda Elona ("Flaxy BayG") Gola (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
I created a page "Indictment and Arrest of Julian Assange" and within minutes of my posting you'd read, made minor edits and reviewed! I was impressed at how quickly that happened since it usually takes a dozen hours for my newly created pages to be reviewed. Thanks for being so ready.
ObongiFrank (talk) 21:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- @ObongiFrank: Thanks; no problem. Eagleash (talk) 11:10, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Jon Toral
Hi. Jon Toral was only in the youth teams of Barcelona. The category refers to FC Barcelona footballers (note that even B and C are different). We are doing something wrong if we intend to include non-professional young players in these categories. Regards. --Zigurat (talk) 08:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Youth players are included in the club category where no separate subcat exists, which is the case with the majority of clubs. For an example see Hakeeb Adelakun. This element of categorisation has been discussed at WT:FOOTY in the past. The player should have been placed in the appropriate subcat at the first edit, not just the cat removed and then further disruption to the page (and talk pages) before the subcat was belatedly added several edits later. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
History
Thank you for your reply. Life today is not mean but also "not to easy".
145.129.136.48 (talk) 15:59, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
NPR Newsletter No.18
Hello Eagleash,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
- Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
- Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
- Reliable Sources for NPP
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
- Backlog drive coming soon
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
- News
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
- Discussions of interest
- A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
- There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
- What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Need assistance for a draft
Hi, I am new to wikipedia. I would like you to help me on this article User:Jennifer Jaynes/sandbox/Joey Attawia . I have disclosed COI as per wikipedia rules. Thanks ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.57.27.212 (talk • contribs) 23 May 2019 04:37 (UTC)
- Hello, There is a draft draft in existence (here) as well as the subsequently created sandbox here. The draft has been submitted via WP:AFC and what should happen now is that a reviewer will consider the draft and accept or decline it, providing feedback on where improvements are required in the latter case. The sandbox draft seems to be a duplicate of the AFC submission and should probably be deleted as it is superfluous. You can do this by placing
{{Db-G7}}at the top of the page which will request speedy deletion.
- The draft may not pass Wikipedia's quite stringent notability guidelines. Although there are multiple references verifying content, not many of them give WP:SIGCOV of him from mainstream reliable sources. I have some doubts about notability and although I am an AFC participant, having worked on the page to some degree, I will not consider it but leave for another reviewer for their input.
- Please log-in to your account when editing and sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 09:52, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Alexandra Phillips MEP and Alexandra Phillips MEP
Hello. I noticed you'd edited a page on a newly elected UK MEP who could be confused with one with an identical name. I think some of the disambiguation issues have been resolved, but there is a question of titling one or both pages. I'd like to invite you to comment at Talk:Alexandra L. Phillips#Title_of_article_-_proposed_move. --Cedderstk 21:36, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
Avni Hasani
The edits aren't constructive, but also don't constitute vandalism - so bear in mind 3RR. I'd just leave it, the article is likely going to get deleted anyway. GiantSnowman 07:26, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Clear competency/COI issue. GiantSnowman 11:58, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Hey! I see that you declined the above draft. I did so as well, but after a conversation at my talk page, it became apparent that the painter probably meets WP:ARTIST #4d (National Gallery of Canada and Art Gallery of Ontario). --MrClog (talk) 15:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @MrClog: OK, let me know if you intend to accept it and I'll revert my own edit which will in effect re-submit it. (I've accepted enough drafts where an earlier reviewer has missed a guideline point by now, I would have thought!) Eagleash (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Eagleash, sure, if you revert your edit, I'll have a look at it to see if it matches all the requirements besides notability. --MrClog (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @MrClog: I've resubmitted it on behalf of the creator. I should look at it soonish... might get declined again. Eagleash (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Eagleash, sure, if you revert your edit, I'll have a look at it to see if it matches all the requirements besides notability. --MrClog (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
New message from Path slopu
Message added 16:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
PATH SLOPU 16:32, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
I realized my mistake and I apologize for that. You taught me the true meaning of wikipedia. For this I'm thankful to you. You are just a fabulous editor. From now onwards you will see no request related to Shamsheer Vayalil's article. I quit now. May God bless you!
Thanks.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.230.166.106 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 14 June 2019 18:00 (UTC)