Jump to content

User talk:Ainz Ooal Gown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aksndls (talk | contribs) at 08:05, 25 June 2019 (→‎Draft Review: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Experienced Editor
Experienced Editor
It is approximately 1:27 AM in this user's locale. (Purge to update.)

Regarding your user warning

June 2019

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 22:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • @John from Idegon: - regarding your reversion in this diff, and the user warning you left above, Masumrezarock100 was acting to remedy the situation described here, whereby, through a messy edit conflict, I left multiple comments duplicated in the Teahouse, and subsequently cleaned up all duplicated comments here. This diff was then reverted by Masumrezarock100, who left the same user warning you just left on my talk page. After I explained the edit, and pointed out that this discussion now contained (and once again contains) duplicated comments, and asked that they strike their user warning. They did so, and self-reverted so that my cleaning up of the discussion would be restored, which you then reverted again. As such, I feel this user warning is unwarranted, and that the discussion once again needs tidying up. I will leave it to you to decide what you want to do regarding this matter, and apologise profusely for the messy edit conflict which resulted in this kerfuffle, where two user warnings, and three reversions, have (in my view erroneously) occurred. Thanks, and apologies to all parties, Stormy clouds (talk) 22:51, 19 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]
My suggestion would be to fix it again and leave an informative edit summary, not "my bad". I've been guilty of the same things both regarding the edit conflict and the uninformative edit summary. No biggie. John from Idegon (talk) 23:14, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It's my fault too for not leaving helpful summary. @John from Idegon: I request you to strike out above comments. Masum Reza📞 23:17, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Chart history of Dalida

Hello, regarding your edit on Chart history of Dalida that indicates how sources are nbadly arranged: what exactly is wrong? Help me fix it. I wrote all pages, that I used as source for charts, at the bottom of the page with title "Reference" that indicates how those are sources for the chart info. Majority of which are internet sites run by people that do extensive research as they own chart books, while there are several charts provided solely by me as I have few documents. I think it is better like that rather than placing a reference mark next to each country coloumn in the tab, as some countries chart are provided by several different charts. Actually, it is completely unnecessary to ad a ref to each coloumn when we can all sort it at bottom of page. What do you propose? Dalida Editor please ping or message me 20:38, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DalidaEditor: Hello, thanks for reaching out. We add citations (sources) in article using {{cite web}} and similar templates. While I've improved citation style, I also tagged the article with another maintenance tag as currently the article has zero inline citations. Please add more inline citations or footnotes. Masum Reza📞 00:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you do that? You literally deleted all explanations for each link that tell us which link is source to which country. It took me hours to nicely sort them. I don't understand what is the problem of joining all sources to the one section and nicely write to which country does each source lead? What you made has no logic and my previous state of article was way better....Dalida Editor please ping or message me 00:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DalidaEditor: External link's original titles are way better than customized title. I did it to improve citation style. I recommend you to add more inline citations. Also I removed some of the references as the appeared to be unreliable. Masum Reza📞 00:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Canadian supercentenarians. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reno, California listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reno, California. Since you had some involvement with the Reno, California redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reno, CA listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reno, CA. Since you had some involvement with the Reno, CA redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:37, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Las Vegas, UT listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Las Vegas, UT. Since you had some involvement with the Las Vegas, UT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reno, UT listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reno, UT. Since you had some involvement with the Reno, UT redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:05, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

G11 speedies

Hi Masumrezarock100 -- I'd ask you to go more steadily with your G11 tagging; I recognise that people's thresholds differ as to what is unacceptably promotional but some of your recent taggings seem definitely incorrect, eg Barraquito and 2008 European Masters Games. Please bear in mind that deletion is always a last resort for articles that are fundamentally unacceptable. Espresso Addict (talk) 03:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Espresso Addict: Thanks for informing me of my mistakes. I will try to be more careful in future. Masum Reza📞 03:20, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings

Hi, could you explain your warning here? How is this against policy? Praxidicae (talk) 14:59, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: See WP:UAA. I think he is a imposter. Masum Reza📞 15:01, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I would hardly consider Duncan Foster a notable person, especially considering there is no article. It seems the reviewing admin at UAA agrees. Praxidicae (talk) 15:03, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Praxidicae: Hmm. He certainly doesn't meet WP:NPEOPLE notability guidelines. Also Sam Sailor is not an admin. Masum Reza📞 15:09, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Teahouse

I’m sorry to say that but I’m not joining The Teahouse. Goodbye. BamZ412 (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BamZ412: I am sorry. I don't understand why you are informing me of this. Please clarify. Masum Reza📞 17:51, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 26, 2019)

Hello, Masumrezarock100.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Legislator

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Bookworm (insect) • Karla Faye Tucker


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #370

17:29, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tuna as food requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://beatcancer2010.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/fish-of-the-week-tuna/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 18:56, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Masumrezarock100

Made a reply to your comment on the MfD. Promethean (talk) 23:46, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:John Stott

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Stott. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me to create a page for first ever US Based digital color solution company

I want to create a page for the Florida based company 'zenColor', similar like 'Pantone', 'Adobe', 'X-Rite' based on Color communication, Color model, and ColorChecker. The special thing about this company, It's first ever company in this entire universe, providing Digital Color solutions using a proper Color space, especially for RGB color model, CMYK color model. As, I have no previous experience in creating any of the wikipedia page. Please help me to edit or, create or, approve this wiki entry! Vivekjain9024 (talk) 07:30, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Vivekjain9024: Hello thanks for asking my help. For starters please take a look at WP:COI and WP:COI, we don't recommend editors who are paid and have conflict of interests to edit articles, they are connected to. But you can ask others for help to create your company's article if the subject meets our notability guideline on organizations and companies and general notability guideline. Also the article must not be for promotional purposes. Masum Reza📞 07:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Masumrezarock100: Hello thanks for your on time reply. I would surely look at the pages which you are recommending. Thanks for your precious help. Vivekjain9024 (talk) 07:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Always happy to help. Masum Reza📞 07:55, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft Review

Hi @Masurrezarock100, this is in reference to talk we had regarding article 'GlobalLinker' which was rejected. Have made some edit to article giving proper references.

Can you please review the article and suggest possible changes so that it can be included to Wikipedia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:GlobalLinker

Thanks for advice you had through talk feature.