User talk:Curb Safe Charmer

AfC submissions Random submission

3+ months

2,518 pending submissions to update

Wikipedia ads	file info – #69

Thanks for the help, I'll look forward charting with you. (Wazirinbida (talk) 21:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC))

oddball footnote

This footnote refers back to User_talk:Curb_Safe_Charmer#Draft:Matt_Briglia

Revisions to my Aaron LaPedis Article

Hello!

I made a fair amount of corrections to the draft of the wikipedia article I was writing on Aaron LaPedis. It has been a few weeks, and I would appreciate it if you get a chance to look over them! Thank you

Kristie A.D.-Research and Diagnostic Systems, Inc. (R&D Systems)

Hi Curb Safe Charmer! I've tried to update my user information to better reflect my paid editor status for this piece. Basically we were hoping to add our flagship brand to this site. Our other brands are here. How, other than writing it ourselves and selecting better references to cite, could we get this brand onto Wikipedia?

Amit Ramani

Hello,

I have updated the content with a relevant source. Kindly review and let us know the same

Regards,

Draft page Expo 2021 Hatay

Hello,

When do you think is the best time to create this page?

Thanks, liberetaecus

Rejected submission lerocque

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lerocque

Hi Curb,

I am writing in reference to my draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lerocque. I have already provided citations as footnotes.So, i am unable to figure out what is the exact reason for rejection. Kindly help me with this as i want to correct my draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahul sharma (talk • contribs) 04:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Hi I have not changed any content on wiki. But I had received a message that I have changed content on two pages and have been reverted. Please note that I have not made any changes on any pages. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nupurgup (talk • contribs) 11:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Rejection of my page Pranav shastry

Hello, I actually run a YouTube channel and it has grown vastly in the past 6 years. I would request you to take a second look at the article you rejected Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pranav Shastry (talk • contribs) 20:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

@Pranav Shastry: I wish you luck with your channel. However that doesn't make you worthy of an article about you in an encyclopedia. See WP:NYOUTUBE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:16, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Rejected Tally Money page

Hi,

I work for Tally money and we are trying to create a Wikipedia page. How do we go about this without being rejected?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macklindamon (talk • contribs) 11:13, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

@Macklindamon: There's already good advice on your talk page, but in summary: (1) edit your user page to add a declaration of who you work for - my message to you on your talk page explains how; (2) re-write your draft without copying and pasting any content from existing websites (unless the content has been made available under a compatible licence), in order to avoid breaking copyright law; (3) bear in mind that using Wikipedia for promotional purposes is contrary to the terms of use, so your draft needs to be written neutrally and have references from reliable, independent sources to back up the statements you make in the article; (4) We don't have articles about every company. Read WP:NCORP to understand the criteria for inclusion of articles about companies. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello Curb Safe Charmer,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

• There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
• A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
• A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
• A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Rohit Mishra

You have redirected the article Rohit Mishra to Mahatma Gandhi Central University protests cause he is known for a single event. But still there are many people who are noted for one event and still on wikipedia. As you have reviewed the article earlier and article is in stub now. People are contributing to this article. So, you are requested to undo the redirect links as article is still in stub. Hope you will consider my point. Adityarajmba (talk) 03:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)

Concept Medical

I thing I have given enough content and reference links to publish my Draft article about Concept_Medical Skgacharya (talk) 13:12, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

[[Draft::YTS]] and YIFY

User:Donranase is using your rejection of this draft at Draft:YTS to justify edit warring content from there into YIFY. I assume you did not intend that they would do that. Can you please have an additional word with them? YTS is one of several copycat websites that have been imitating YIFY since that site's shutdown. We mention this in the legacy section, but we should not promote one over the others. - MrOllie (talk) 15:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

@MrOllie: Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I've now left a message for them at Talk:YIFY. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

KlasJet article

Hello, I am very disappointed to see 2 edits being rejected, but I can't understand why. There are no more sources about KlasJet's fleet, but their website. Also information found about them is scarce so there is no way of composing an article without use of informations provided on their site. I am in no way paid to do that, I just want major companies in Lithuania to have their Wiki pages. If it is about services segment I will remove it, as I wasn't sure whether I should add it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EdvinasA (talk • contribs) 21:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

@EdvinasA: If you are connected with the company, which you appear to be, then you have a conflict of interest and you must declare it. If no independent, reliable publications have written in depth about the company then it doesn't meet the inclusion criteria. If coverage is scarce then this suggests the subject is not notable, and you should choose another company to write about. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:41, 18 February 2020 (UTC)

Removed images

Dear Curb Safe Charmer, the images you pulled from "Corporate Digital Responsibility" are creative commons. The copyright notice you cited is at the bottom of the website of the pubblisher, but does not apply to this journa articles which is published under "creative commons" - see https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . See the notice and link on the article just under the title https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006 . I'd like to add both figures. How do I do this now? Best wishes, Jochen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizwirtz (talk • contribs) 00:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

@Bizwirtz: Thanks for the message. That's good news. I have left a message for the administrator who deleted the images so hopefully they'll be restored soon. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

 Done They've been restored already :) Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you (bizwirtz) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.132.222.122 (talk) 01:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

About reporting me

Hi, I saw that you were just reporting my "other" account. As you see, I was testing some features (see in User:The Lord of Math/lab/Draft review), and also the vandalism templates are supposed to be tried out by me. Please do understand: those are not vandalism. I mean, I may have done something wrong with the timestamp resetting, but please understand me. Thanks. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) (Report false positive) 14:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

The reason that my actions seem strange is solely because the person operating it is simply not a "new" user. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) (Report false positive) 14:08, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps it is wrong, and I should call it off. Anyway, please do understand that I am honestly testing something. I might have been wrong, but please AGF. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) (Report false positive) 14:10, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

@The Lord of Math: One of the drafts you'd modified, Draft:Trang T. Lê was in my watchlist and I saw a 0 byte modification and went to see what had changed. I saw a new editor who was not the author had changed the timestamp. I look at the new editor's contributions and see a bunch of the same activity. I start to revert the changes. I use Twinkle to leave them a warning. I see that new changes are still being made. I go to report there being current, persistent vandalism. Only after doing so I noticed in their contributions that they'd created a user page. It was at that point that I saw that this was a second account from an established editor, and your Teahouse message. If I had seen that at the start I would have left you a message on your talkpage first, but instead I saw the bizarre edits and thought I should nip it in the bud. I don't think I understand your experiment yet. It would have been good to publicise it on the AfC talk page first. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:20, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Yeah, I should have asked. But I just never thought that this was disruptive. And by the way, when you sent me the warning I hadn't seen it immediately, and only after I saw it did I see your warning (and CSD). Thanks a lot. BoxHT (talk) 14:24, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Article Help

Hi,

Sorry to see the article has been declined. I have read your feedback and thank you for your revisions, could I possibly get some advice with what is necessary for this post to be uploaded please?

Many Thanks,

Nathan — Preceding unsigned comment added by NathanBickerton (talk • contribs) 14:54, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

@NathanBickerton: Please could you respond to the conflict of interest message that I left on your talk page before editing the article further. It appears to me that you have an external connection to the subject of the article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

NathanBickerton (talk) 15:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, yes. I have responded.

Article reference revision

Hi Curb Safe Charmer, thanks for the message. I've revised the reference, please have a look. Hope it's ok now.

Regards, Vojdank (talk) 09:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Lerocque

Yes, i have added the citation in the footnotes and edited the document as well. So any other issues that needs to be addressed ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahul sharma (talk • contribs) 08:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Article Reference

Hello @Curb Safe Charmer.

You recently declined my article titled "Goose Fiord Formation." Your rationale for doing such was due to my lackluster citations. I recently added a few, but am novice at doing inline citations, as this was my first article. What would you want me to do to upgrade my article?

Sincerely, Ahoy9099 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahoy9099 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

The Nat West Hole in Ilkeston

Sir, you are mistaken - this is a very real attraction and is worthy of inclusion. Please reconsider your dismissal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavoGregorious (talk • contribs) 17:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Eva Magala

Hello , I see you proposed an article I am working on (Eva Magala)for deletion - I have just created it and in the process of populating it then this!! . This thing is less than a minute old — Preceding unsigned comment added by AKibombo (talk • contribs) 12:35, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

@AKibombo: Biographies must have sources, and the one you've written had none. I have simply moved it to Draft:Eva Magala. Please work on it there, and submit it for review when you think it is ready for inclusion in mainspace. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

And I mentioned that it was less than a minute old and was still being developed even as you swiftly identified it for deletion. I really wish you had considered this before that unfortunate action. I am simply saying that regardless of your reasons, this action and its timing were unnecessary in light of the fact that this was, I keep emphasizing, less than a minute old. AKibombo (talk) 12:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)AKibombo

@AKibombo: I have moved it back to mainspace. However, I recommend if you are working on a new article you consider doing so in your sandbox and only move it to mainspace once it meets the basic criteria for a new article such as sources. If you do create an article directly in mainspace you can tag it as {{In creation}}. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Invite to discussion

Hi there Curb Safe Charmer, fancy seeing a fellow Channel Islander on here! I notice you have made significant contributions to articles relating to YouTube and YouTubers, and following your recent reply on the Sidemen talk page, I wondered if I might ask if you'd be willing to have your say in a discussion going on about the inclusion of certain channels in the same page's infobox here. Many thanks —Formulaonewiki 16:19, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the input. Having a bit of a headache trying to keep the discussion coherent and on-topic, I hope there are some other contributions but I fear rational discussion is already breaking down. The replies so far come across rather emotional and, in places, juvenile, as can often be the case when contributing and improving articles about YouTubers, many of which are frequently edited by young users unwilling to learn about Wikipedia's rules. While I hope the discussion can be productive, I'm beginning to think just dropping it might save me wasted breath. —Formulaonewiki 20:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Question about your WP:UPOL warning of BobBeathard

I have removed BobBeathard from Category:Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues as I do not see this username as being a blatant violation of the username policy and they appear to be editing in good faith. "Beathard" is a real last name, as evidenced by Bobby Beathard, which I found based on a quick google search. Of course, that is not to say that the user is Bobby Beathard, but just as an illustration of the point. I am curious as to why you flagged this account for review? Am I missing something? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 03:27, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@TheSandDoctor: Hi. Agreed, there's no issue with their editing and certainly no blatant violation. I used Twinkle to add the tag to suggest that they review their decision to edit under their real name. As a new editor they may not have understood the implications of that. When selecting uw-username in Twinkle the following text appears in red: "{{uw-username}} should not be used for blatant username policy violations. Blatant violations should be reported directly to UAA (via Twinkle's ARV tab). {{uw-username}} should only be used in edge cases in order to engage in discussion with the user. (the latter being what I was intending). So I wasn't expecting the tool to also add them to a category monitored by admins. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:48, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Oh, I see. Yes, pages tagged with that are added to Category:Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues, which seems to predominantly contain things that should have been reported at UAA....even an article, JS script, and several user pages, as I discovered when trying to run some analysis on the category and clean up. I am currently reviewing the ones whose talk pages have been edited in 2020, and that is how I found this case. Admins tend to shy away from looking at the category, but it is an "official" administrative backlog category.

While I understand your intent in leaving BobBeathard the template, {{uw-username}} is probably not the best template to leave when just concerned about them using what appears to be their real name as that is not a policy violation or even close to one. That template is for edge cases of the username policy. Perhaps, moving forward, the better alternative in situations like this where there is no violation but a potential real name, would be to leave them a custom talk page note (or develop your own userspace template/page to substitute or email)? --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 13:28, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

@TheSandDoctor: Thanks for the feedback - will do. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:05, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome & thank you! --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 14:06, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

able to accept

Hi,

Thanks for tidying up the references on this article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Coronavirus:_The_Movie Are you able to accept to decline this article? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brslxyl (talk • contribs) 12:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC) @Curb_Safe_Charmer Hi sorry I did not hear from you, thanks