User talk:Scope creep

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chetan Sandesara (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chetan Sandesara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chetan Sandesara, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Scope creep! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:12, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judy Blank (May 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judy Blank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judy Blank, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:16, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm North8000. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Çiçek Islands, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:11, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @North8000: What is the reason exactly? They seem fairly decent, they do exist and are fair size. scope_creep^Talk 22:15, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: Thanks for the ping. I think I made a mistake. I previously intended to have it as unreviewed, and then yesterday after the sources were added, I intended to change it to "reviewed". Maybe I made a mistake and did the opposite. I'll fix. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: I just checked. It is (already) marked as reviewed. Maybe the bot misfired when it sent this message. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 19:37, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Luxmoore (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please provide additional independent sources (i.e. not interviews and not written by Royal Aeronautical Society) about his aerospace professional career. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Independent sources. Thanks!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Luxmoore and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Luxmoore, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tsuki Adventure (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the included references seem to be in secondary reliable sources. Either listings/fan pages or blogs and "guides" (nothing from WP:VG/RS too).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tsuki Adventure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tsuki Adventure, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:40, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Karr O'Connor has been accepted

Joseph Karr O'Connor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Allenjambalaya (talk) 13:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lawrence Cahoone (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We need a source to verify he is the president of that society

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lawrence Cahoone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lawrence Cahoone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dvaitadvaita

Hi, this is regarding the copyright issue with Dvaitadvaita that you have raised. Actually I only created separate pages from existing Wikipedia page. So was there a copyright violation in the previous Wikipedia page Kumāra Sampradaya from which I copied the text? Would be glad to discuss this in the Kumāra Sampradaya talk page. Maybe we need to find out who authored the previous article. Thank you for raising the issue. (User talk:Madhav kiran sodum) —Preceding undated comment added 15:24, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Madhav kiran sodum: How are you keeping? I would restore it back to copyright tag that is on it. It still has a 96% copyvio score on Earwig:[1]. It doesn't matter where it has been copied from, it is still copyright text. I have reported it to the copyvio noticeboard at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2020 May 19 and User:Diannaa. They will deal with it. scope_creep^Talk 15:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zoom H6 Handy Recorder

Greetings. No discussion page was created for this AfD. Page Curation seems to be especially buggy lately in this regard--I'd recommend sticking to Twinkle for AfD nominations. Thanks. --Finngall ^talk 17:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deejay Crim (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youtube are not basically considered reliable sources, article needs a lot of work as its been REFBOMBED.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Deejay Crim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Deejay Crim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 21:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed

Hello, Scope creep

Thank you for creating Zawiya of Sidi Abd el-Aziz.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Google book reference exist.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 00:05, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Médéric Boquien (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add independent reliable sources (i.e. not written by Boquien or his employer) - see WP:Independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Médéric Boquien and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Médéric Boquien, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:57, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Koren (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add independent sources - see WP:Independent sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gary Koren and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gary Koren, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 02:59, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomba di Menotti Garibaldi (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tomba di Menotti Garibaldi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tomba di Menotti Garibaldi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:18, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020 at Women in Red

Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:

New: Pride / United Nations / Geofocus on reducing gender imbalance
Continuing initiatives: #1day1woman / Sports!
Help us plan future events: Virtual Ideas Cafe

Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

re: Rote Kapelle

In case you missed it on RDH: see Red Orchestra (espionage). 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 (talk) 20:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588:, What is RDH and how does it relate to the Red Orchestra? scope_creep^Talk 20:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RDH, the humanities refdesk where you asked for translation of a passage regarding the Rote Kapelle. 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588:. I think I must be word blind sometimes. Yip ,I got that back. I put it in the article. Excellent translation it was as well. scope_creep^Talk 23:23, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I see you've done a lot of work on the Red Orchestra article--nice! I wonder about the translation "Red Chapel" in the first sentence though, especially since Jmar67 translated "Kapelle" as "band". I don't speak much German but see under Kapellmeister that the word also translates to choir or orchestra. I wonder if you think another WP:RDL query is warranted. 2601:648:8202:96B0:3567:50D5:8BFF:4588 (talk) 03:36, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have probably transcribed it wrong. The red orchestra was defined by the Gestapo as a choir, 'radio operators as pianists and their controllers as conductors. I've found various references to that fact, but couldn't locate the core person who defined it, or who said it, or when So in that respect, defining it as a band, is somewhat accurate. I would be happy if I could get a more accurate quote. There is several quotes on the the articles, that I would be more than happy if they were absolutely accurate idiomatic translations, with respect the person who stated it. That would be ideal actually. I think posting them all up there, would be ideal. I don't know if there is any more to go in. In respect to the article, it looks that way. A lot of structure has went in but a mountain of final details are still unknown. I found out recently the Perrault book I was relying on for historical analysis isn't particularly accurate, and takes old view. I'm still using it in parts. There is a newish French publication that seems to better. Lots still to do. scope_creep^Talk 09:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh that's interesting about the choir/pianists/etc. Way outside of my area though. I'm mostly a bit uncomfortable with the translation of "Kapelle" as "chapel" in a couple places in the article. Could you take a look at those and maybe change them, or alternatively perhaps ask a German speaker to give a verdict? 2601:648:8202:96B0:E9DB:C6D7:59AE:B46A (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How come? I think that naming stuff was done before I arrived and it is well sourced. I think it is accurate. Is there a specific reason why you don't think it should be chapel?. There is several good source reference for that term.scope_creep^Talk 21:44, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'll post up the reference desk and see what they say. scope_creep^Talk 21:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted it as a word. Can you tell me where you think it needs changed, in a particular instance? Since you have brought it up, I plan to post all the quotes to the Reference desk, one after another, starting tomorrow. scope_creep^Talk 22:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I posted it up to the Reference Desk. Can you please point out what you think needs to changed. I'm happy to take a look at it. The article still has a lot of work to do on it, so I'll here for next year or so. scope_creep^Talk 22:17, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your new RD thread, which looks good. If it were me I'd just remove the translations to "red chapel" and leave it at red orchestra. But, I'll defer to Jmar67. 2601:648:8202:96B0:A598:FF3D:8240:4E2B (talk) 01:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yip, I plan to do it. I'm massively happy it has been caught. I'm also happy that somebody else is looking at the article. If you see anything else that is bothersome, inaccurate, or a bad translation, drop me a message right away, and I'll address it. scope_creep^Talk 07:19, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Maritime Venice has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Maritime Venice. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 19:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rouleauville has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rouleauville. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 19:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bromley Little Theatre (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability - Note IMDB is not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bromley Little Theatre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bromley Little Theatre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maritime Venice has been accepted

Maritime Venice, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rouleauville (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The "History" and "The district today" sections do not have any inline citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rouleauville and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rouleauville, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yitu Technology (May 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yitu Technology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yitu Technology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:01, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Incidents#FloridaArmy_and_AfC_woes. Sulfurboy (talk) 04:54, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Katsiabanis has been accepted

Harry Katsiabanis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:22, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shou-Chuan Lee has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shou-Chuan Lee. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 20:56, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Yury Ponomaryov has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Yury Ponomaryov. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 22:23, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yury Ponomaryov has been accepted

Yury Ponomaryov, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ymblanter (talk) 05:53, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the draft (for full disclosure, the author asked me to have a look at my talk page), and I do not see much issues. Whereas the main body of sources are in Russian, and some indeed only have passing mentions, there are enough of them for the guy to pass GNG.--Ymblanter (talk) 05:56, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Garth Castle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aberfeldy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

Speedy deletion of Hello Wood article

Dear scope_creep^Talk, I'm writing you because you nominated speedy deletion of an article created by me (Hello Wood). I ask you to cancel your speedy deletion. I see you flagged it as "promotional" but I rather see it as an encyclopedic content about an internationally acclaimed and awarded design studio. Both I and Hello Wood have Hungarian roots, but I tried to write the article without any bias. If any of my words, sentences seem promotional please advise me how to correct them or feel free to correct them yourself. I don't see why this article has to be removed.

Thanks, Littletkforyou

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]