User talk:PageImp
September 2019
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Tulu Nadu. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 18:37, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Edit reason
Dear sir/ma'am , it was only out of sheer necessity & genuine intention that the information on the news channel's page was edited. A detailed description of my edits is found in the article's talk section which you may read and since the page has only 4 talk topics currently active, by expanding on the earlier talk conversations you will find that exactly similar such earlier edits in the first paragraph have been removed by several other contributors on earlier occasions.
Regards :) HarshithaHappyGoLucky (talk) 22:14, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
New message from DBigXray
Message added 10:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DBigXrayᗙ 10:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Kini moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kini, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 06:48, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Notice of noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding a page deletion (I didn't open this thread, but I see you haven't been notified, so I'm notifying you). The thread is "Suggestions for Sadhu Shetty?".The discussion is about the topic Sadhu Shetty. Thank you.– Levivich 21:07, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tulu people, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Stop removing sourced content, just because something has separate article doesn't mean you need to remove summary of that article topic written in other related articles Panda619 (talk) 23:21, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
About hiding some information
Dear Wikipedian, Why you want to hide this information which is imported from the reference url : "The name is from Konkani še?n?y ‘accountant’, ‘clerk’, from Sanskrit senapati ‘commander of an army’ (from sena ‘army’ + pati ‘lord’). "[1] Dr.SunBD (talk) 18:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Draft:Kini concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kini, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Nagavanshi
The bunt community of tulunad belong to nagavamshi clan . The members of the community worship Naga God. Ajay Shetty tulunad (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Please cite a reliable source claiming the same. It will be added to the article. Cheers! PageImp (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kini
Hello, PageImp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kini".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 14:23, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bunt (community); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Hi, you are not new here but you are reverting me at Bunt (community) to repeatedly insert a book that is a mirror of Wikipedia. You are also claiming in your edit summary that we should trust the community's claim to be kshatriya but, of course, it is well known that Indian castes often glorify their position and, of course, they are not independent as required by WP:V. Sitush (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 Sitush (talk) 18:12, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
Warning
After being told that you were using a Wikipedia mirror as a reference, and were about to violate the 3RR restriction, you instead removed the entire well-sourced "Varna Classification" section. That's disruptive. You have been alerted to the discretionary sanctions for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan. You are likely to be topic banned at least from caste-related pages if such disruption continues. Bishonen | tålk 19:31, 17 July 2020 (UTC).
Sorry for the disruptive edits. But let’s just be clear. Was the Bunt community “officially” categorised? How can one publication claim for its status? The Varna system was not prevalent in South India and the Bunt caste was not part of the chaturvarna system. The classification mentioned in the publication seemed more like an opinion. Claims like Upper Shudra/Clean Shudra/Kshatriya etc should not be added as it would confuse readers. I apologise for the mirror links. But such claims should not be made until it is official. PageImp (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
- No, you were happy to add kshatriya as the varna and then threw your toys out of the pram when you realised that you could not have that. Suddenly, you think varna should not be mentioned at all! Strikes me that is someone who is here to promote a caste glorifying agenda. - Sitush (talk) 00:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Agenda? Haha. It seems like you are running your own propaganda here and as seen in the talk page “targeting the Bunt community” page. When you have been already accused of adding false statements, don’t you have some shame left?
I added Kshatriya as sources and many websites mention so. But will now research on one and put it across here and this time it won’t be mirror link. Just because you have certain rights, don’t think your above anyone. PageImp (talk) 03:45, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
Personal attack warning
Sitush and you have both accused each other of tendentious editing, I know. However, this edit summary is worse than that. Edit summaries are more difficult to change than normal text (only admins can change them), and also more prominent than normal text, appearing in page histories at a glance, so please be careful about attacking people in them. Especially since you have no basis for attacking Sitush. You haven't even written anywhere what you think he's writing "propaganda" for, let alone given any evidence. Why would anybody be writing negative propaganda, as in "targeting the Bunt community"? It doesn't make any sense to me. PS, please indent your posts in discussions, using colons, to make the dialogue easier to follow. Bishonen | tålk 14:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC).
- PageImp, I have left a note at Talk:Bunt (community) about that last edit to the article where you cited The People of India. I strongly suggest you discuss things there before trying to add or remove any varna claim. - Sitush (talk) 15:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:26, 18 July 2020 (UTC)Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been topic banned indefinitely from all pages and discussions connected with India.
You have been sanctioned for persistent disruptive editing and responding to information with attacks and insinuations.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Bishonen | tålk 16:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
PageImp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been blocked for my edits on the “Bunt (community)” page wherein I had simply stated facts and NOT my point of view. I was falsely accused by an editor called Sitush for pushing my POV. However, if you look at the talk page of the said article there has been instances of Sitush trying to push his own propaganda, constantly denigrating the community page and making false accusations on editors. If the citation is not cherry picked by Sitush, he will simply revert the edits and continue to make accusations simply because he has certain rights/privileges bestowed upon him. I merely stated facts as I place readers first on Wikipedia and will continue to abide by it in future as well. But this type of bullying, ganging up of editors and blocking is not acceptable at all. I have made numerous verified edits on Wikipedia and immensely contributed to the commons page as well. But now I feel worthless because of editors like Sitush, who will simply suppress and block edits. [[User:PageImp|PageImp]] ([[User talk:PageImp#top|talk]]) 20:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked for my edits on the “Bunt (community)” page wherein I had simply stated facts and NOT my point of view. I was falsely accused by an editor called Sitush for pushing my POV. However, if you look at the talk page of the said article there has been instances of Sitush trying to push his own propaganda, constantly denigrating the community page and making false accusations on editors. If the citation is not cherry picked by Sitush, he will simply revert the edits and continue to make accusations simply because he has certain rights/privileges bestowed upon him. I merely stated facts as I place readers first on Wikipedia and will continue to abide by it in future as well. But this type of bullying, ganging up of editors and blocking is not acceptable at all. I have made numerous verified edits on Wikipedia and immensely contributed to the commons page as well. But now I feel worthless because of editors like Sitush, who will simply suppress and block edits. [[User:PageImp|PageImp]] ([[User talk:PageImp#top|talk]]) 20:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been blocked for my edits on the “Bunt (community)” page wherein I had simply stated facts and NOT my point of view. I was falsely accused by an editor called Sitush for pushing my POV. However, if you look at the talk page of the said article there has been instances of Sitush trying to push his own propaganda, constantly denigrating the community page and making false accusations on editors. If the citation is not cherry picked by Sitush, he will simply revert the edits and continue to make accusations simply because he has certain rights/privileges bestowed upon him. I merely stated facts as I place readers first on Wikipedia and will continue to abide by it in future as well. But this type of bullying, ganging up of editors and blocking is not acceptable at all. I have made numerous verified edits on Wikipedia and immensely contributed to the commons page as well. But now I feel worthless because of editors like Sitush, who will simply suppress and block edits. [[User:PageImp|PageImp]] ([[User talk:PageImp#top|talk]]) 20:34, 18 July 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- ^ "Shenoy Name Meaning", Dictionary of American Family Names, Oxford University Press, 2013