English Opening
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moves | 1.c4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO | A10–A39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Origin | Staunton vs. Saint-Amant, 1843 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named after | Howard Staunton, English player and World Champion (unofficial) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parent | Flank opening |
The English Opening is a chess opening that begins with the move:
- 1. c4
A flank opening, it is the fourth most popular[1][2] and, according to various databases, anywhere from one of the two most successful[1] to the fourth most successful[3] of White's twenty possible first moves. White begins the fight for the centre by staking a claim to the d5-square from the wing, in hypermodern style. Although many lines of the English have a distinct character, the opening is often used as a transpositional device in much the same way as 1.Nf3 – to avoid such highly regarded responses to 1.d4 as the Nimzo-Indian and Grünfeld Defences — and is considered reliable and flexible.[4]
The English derives its name from the English (unofficial) world champion Howard Staunton, who played it during his 1843 match with Saint-Amant and at London 1851, the first international tournament.[5] It did not inspire Staunton's contemporaries and caught on only in the twentieth century.[5] It is now recognised as a solid opening that may be used to reach both classical and hypermodern positions. Mikhail Botvinnik, Tigran Petrosian, Anatoly Karpov, Garry Kasparov, and Magnus Carlsen employed it during their world championship matches. Bobby Fischer created a stir when he switched to it from his customary 1.e4 late in his career, employing it against Lev Polugaevsky and Oscar Panno at the Palma de Mallorca Interzonal in 1970, and in his world championship match against Boris Spassky.
Taxonomy
Opening theoreticians who write on the English Opening divide it into three broad categories, generally determined by Black's choice of defensive setup.
Symmetrical Defence: 1...c5
The Symmetrical Defence (classified A30–39 in ECO) is 1...c5, and is so named because both of the c-pawns are advanced two squares, maintaining symmetry. Note that Black can reach the Symmetrical Defence through many move orders by deferring ...c5, and often does. For example, 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 (or 2.Nf3) c5 is a Symmetrical Defence even though Black played ...Nf6 before ...c5.
Either player may make an early break in the centre with the d-pawn.
- Similar to the Open Sicilian, an early d2–d4 for White can arise on the third move in the Symmetrical Defence with 2.Nf3, where Black has chosen one of 2...Nc6, 2...e6, 2...d6, or 2...g6. After 3.d4, the game usually continues with 3...cxd4 4.Nxd4. The games can give a large variety of positional and tactical ideas, and can transposes into variants of the Open Sicilian involving the Maróczy Bind, such as the Accelerated Dragon, Taimanov, Kan, or Kalashnikov Variations, if White plays e4 in a later move. If Black manages to play d5 before White plays e4, then the game could transpose into variants of the Queen's Gambit Declined.
- When Black plays 2...Nf6, these lines are often called the Anti-Benoni, since these positions is often reached after the transposition 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 c5 3.Nf3, where White avoided the Benoni Defense that would arise after 3.d5. After 3...cxd4 4.Nxd4, Black could follow up with 4...e5 forcing White's knight to go to the queenside and avoiding the transpositions to the Sicilian or the QGD. However, White could avoid the line by first playing 3. Nc3 and then play 4. d4, if black doesn't play 3...d5 (see below). Same as above, the position could transposes into a Queen's Gambit Declined or an Open Sicilian involving the Maróczy Bind.
- With 2.e6, the position transposes into a Panov-Botvinnik Attack after 3.d4 cxd4 4.exd4 d5. Alternatively, the position could transpose into a Tarrasch Defense in the Queen's Gambit Declined.
- A typical line of play where Black plays an early d5 is 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Nf3 d5, when White usually trades off in the centre 4.cxd5 Nxd5. White can either challenge the centre with 5.d4 or 5.e4 or allow Black a space advantage in the centre with 5.g3. In the latter case, Black can play 5...Nc6 6.Bg2 Nc7 followed by 7...e5, reaching a reversed Maróczy Bind position called the Rubinstein System.
There are several types of positions that can arise from the Symmetrical Defence. Among the ideas are:[6]
- The Hedgehog system[7] involves a solid but flexible defence in which Black develops by b6, e6, Bb7, and Be7, before controlling the fifth rank with moves such as a6 and d6. The game typically involves extended maneuvering, but both players need to be on the lookout for favourable pawn advances and pawn breaks.
- The double fianchetto defence involves Black developing both bishops by fianchetto to g7 and b7. The line is fairly solid and difficult to defeat at the grandmaster level. Some lines are considered highly drawish, for instance if White's bishops are also fianchettoed to g2 and b2 there may be many simplifications leading to a simplified and equal position.
Reversed Sicilian: 1...e5
The Reversed Sicilian (classified A20–29 in ECO) is another broad category of defence, introduced by the response 1...e5. Note again, that Black can delay playing ...e5, for example 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 e5 whereupon even though ...e5 has been delayed, once it is played the defence is classified as a Reversed Sicilian.
After 1...e5, White has Black's position in the Sicilian but with an extra tempo. This is often called the Reversed Sicilian,[8] though others call it the King's English.[9] Bruce Leverett, writing the English chapter in MCO-14, stated, "It is natural to treat the English as a Sicilian reversed, but the results are often surprising—main lines in the Sicilian Defence correspond to obscure side variations in the English, and vice versa."
Other lines
The third broad category consists of the non-...e5 and non-...c5 responses, classified A10–19 in ECO. Most often these defences consist of ...Nf6, ...e6, and ...d5 or ...Bb4 systemic responses by Black, or a Slav-like system consisting of ...c6 and ...d5, a direct King's Indian Defence setup with ...Nf6, ...g6, ...Bg7, ...0-0, after which ...c5 and ...e5 are eschewed, or 1...f5, which usually transposes to a Dutch Defence once White plays d4. All irregular responses such as 1...b6 and 1...g5 are also lumped into this third broad category.
Common responses include:[1]
- 1...Nf6
The most common response to 1.c4, often played to arrive at an Indian Defence. However, more than half the time, Black subsequently elects to transpose into either a Symmetrical Defence with ...c5, or a Reversed Sicilian with ...e5. - 1...e6
Can lead to a Queen's Gambit Declined after 2.Nc3 d5 3.d4, but White often prefers 2.Nf3, which may lead to a variety of openings. - 1...f5
Leads to a Dutch Defence when White follows up with d4. Other choices for White are 2.Nc3, 2.Nf3, and 2.g3, where Black usually plays ...Nf6. - 1...g6
May lead to a Modern Defense or after Nf6 and d6 or d5 to the King's Indian Defence or the Grünfeld Defence, respectively, or stay within English lines. Often dubbed the Great Snake variation. - 1...c6
Can lead to a Slav Defense after 2.d4 d5, but White will often prefer a Caro–Kann Defence with 2.e4 d5, or a Réti Opening after 2.Nf3 d5 3.b3. - 1...b6
The English Defence. This setup involves the fianchetto of the queenside bishop and 2...e6. Often Black will defer the move ....Nf6, choosing to attack the centre with ...f5 and/or ...Qh4. The English grandmasters Tony Miles and Jonathan Speelman have successfully used this opening. - 1...d5
The Anglo-Scandinavian Defense.[10] Thought of as inferior to the Scandinavian defense due to exchanging the c pawn for a center pawn, in addition to the Scandinavian already having a somewhat suspect reputation. - 1...g5
An eccentric response known as Myers' Defense after Hugh Myers' advocacy of it in print and actual play.[11][12][13] It is intended as an improved Grob's Attack; after 2.d4, Black will put pressure on the d4-square with moves such as ...Bg7, ...c5, and ...Qb6.[12][14] According to Nunn's Chess Openings, White obtains a small advantage after 2.d4 Bg7 (offering a Grob-like gambit: 3.Bxg5 c5) 3.Nc3 h6 4.e4.[15] Myers recommended 3...c5 (instead of 3...h6); in response, Joel Benjamin advocates 4.dxc5![12] - 1...b5
Called the Jaenisch Gambit after Carl Jaenisch.[16] Black obtains no compensation for the sacrificed pawn,[17] though the 365Chess Opening Explorer does show it as a potentially high-percentage move for Black. FIDE Master Artem Kopyl has used it successfully.[18]
Transposition potential
If White plays an early d4, the game will usually transpose into either the Queen's Gambit or an Indian Defence. For example, after 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.d4 d5 the game has transposed into the Grünfeld Defence, usually reached by the move order 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5.
White can, however, also play 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 g6 3.e4, making it impossible for Black to reach a Grünfeld, instead more or less forcing him into lines of the King's Indian Defence with 3...d6. Black also cannot force a Grünfeld with 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 d5, since White can deviate with 3.cxd5 Nxd5 4.g3, a line played several times by Mikhail Botvinnik in 1958, in his final match for the world championship with Vasily Smyslov.
Instead of playing an early d4, White can also play Nf3 and fianchetto the king's bishop (g3 and Bg2), transposing into a Réti Opening.
Also, after 1.c4 c6, White can transpose into the Polish Opening, Outflank Variation, by playing 2.b4!?, which can be used as a surprise weapon if Black does not know very much about the Polish Opening.[19]
The many different transpositional possibilities available to White make the English a slippery opening for Black to defend against, and make it necessary for him to consider carefully what move order to employ. For instance, if Black would like to play a Queen's Gambit Declined (QGD), the most accurate move order to do so is 1...e6 2.d4 d5. (Of course, White can again play the Réti instead with 2.Nf3 d5 3.b3.) If Black plays instead 1...Nf6 2.Nc3 e6, White can avoid the QGD by playing 3.e4, the Flohr–Mikenas Attack.
ECO
The Encyclopaedia of Chess Openings has classified the English Opening under the codes A10 through A39:
- A10 1.c4
- A11 1.c4 c6
- A12 1.c4 c6 2.Nf3 d5 3.b3
- A13 1.c4 e6
- A14 1.c4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.g3 Nf6 4.Bg2 Be7 5.0-0
- A15 1.c4 Nf6
- A16 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3
- A17 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6
- A18 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6 3.e4 (Mikenas–Carls Variation)
- A19 1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 e6 3.e4 c5
- A20 1.c4 e5
- A21 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3
- A22 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6
- A23 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.g3 c6 (Bremen System, Keres Variation)
- A24 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.g3 g6 (Bremen System with ...g6)
- A25 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6
- A26 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.d3 d6
- A27 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 (Three Knights System)
- A28 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 Nf6
- A29 1.c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.g3 (Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto)
- A30 1.c4 c5 (Symmetrical Variation)
- A31 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 (Symmetrical, Benoni Formation)
- A32 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 e6
- A33 1.c4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 e6 5.Nc3 Nc6
- A34 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3
- A35 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6
- A36 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3
- A37 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3
- A38 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 Nf6
- A39 1.c4 c5 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 g6 4.Bg2 Bg7 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.0-0 0-0 7.d4
Depiction in cinema
The English Opening is used by Professor Moriarty in the film Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows as he and Holmes discuss their competing plans over a game of chess. Both Holmes and Moriarty eventually play the final moves blindfolded by citing out the last moves in descriptive notation (rather than algebraic, as the former was contemporary in the late 19th century), ending in Holmes checkmating Moriarty, just as Watson foils Moriarty's plans.
1.c4 is also used in Pawn Sacrifice by Bobby Fischer in the climactic game six of the 1972 World Chess Championship versus Boris Spassky.
See also
References
- ^ a b c Meyer-Kahlen, Stefan. "Shredder opening database statistics". Retrieved 2008-01-19.
- ^ "Chess Opening Explorer". Chessgames.com. Retrieved 2008-01-19.
- ^ Chess Openings Database statistics at the Wayback Machine (archived 2010-07-26)
- ^ Chess Life. Vol. 59 (1–7 ed.). United States Chess Federation. 2004. p. 303.
- ^ a b de Firmian, Nick (2008). Modern Chess Openings: MCO-15. New York: David McKay Co. p. 675. ISBN 978-0-8129-3682-7.
- ^ Cummings, David (October 1, 2001). Symmetrical English. Everyman Chess. ISBN 978-1-85744-292-2.
- ^ de Firmian, Nick (1999). Modern Chess Openings: MCO-14. New York: David McKay Co. pp. 661–65. ISBN 0-8129-3084-3.
- ^ Weeks, Mark. "Chess Opening Tutorial : English – 1...e5". About, Inc. Archived from the original on December 3, 2007. Retrieved 2008-01-19.
- ^ Kasparov, Gary; Keene, Raymond (1982). Batsford Chess Openings. B.T.Batsford Ltd. ISBN 0-7134-2114-2.
- ^ https://www.chess.com/openings/A10-English-Opening-Anglo-Scandinavian-Defense
- ^ ChessBase.com, Hugh Myers (1930–2008), opening theoretician (2008-12-25). Retrieved on 2008-12-25.
- ^ a b c Stefan Bücker, The Impoliteness of Ice Age Openings. Retrieved on 2005-12-27.
- ^ Rick Kennedy, Review of A Chess Explorer. Retrieved on 2008-12-27.
- ^ Watson remarks, "Note ... how White (by his shockingly committal first move) has forfeited his chance for [c3], the key move in several of the most effective defences to Grob's Attack". John L. Watson, English: Franco, Slav and Flank Defences, Batsford, 1981, p. 103. ISBN 0-7134-2690-X. Watson considers 1...g5 "playable". Id.
- ^ John Nunn, Graham Burgess, John Emms, and Joe Gallagher, Nunn's Chess Openings, Everyman Publishers, 1999, p. 19 n. 1. ISBN 1-85744-221-0.
- ^ "A10: English, Jaenisch gambit - 1. c4 b5 - Chess Opening explorer". www.365chess.com. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
- ^ Schiller, Eric (1998). "English Opening • Halbut Gambit". Unorthodox Chess Openings. Cardoza Publishing. pp. 135–36. ISBN 0-940685-73-6.
- ^ Igor Egorenkov vs. Artem Kopyl https://www.365chess.com/game.php?gid=3513730
- ^ Silman, Jeremy (2004). "The Dynamic English". Retrieved 2008-01-19.
Further reading
- Kallai, Gabor; Ribli, Zoltán (1993). Winning With the English. Henry Holt. ISBN 978-0-8050-2642-9.
- Kosten, Tony (1999). The Dynamic English. Gambit Publications. ISBN 978-1-901983-14-2.
- Hansen, Carsten (2001). The Symmetrical English. Gambit. ISBN 978-1-901983-40-1.
- Pritchett, Craig (2008). Play the English. Everyman Chess. ISBN 978-1-85744-545-9.