Talk:Michael Malloy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
{{WikiProject New York City}} <!-- NYC death -->
{{WikiProject New York City}} <!-- NYC death -->
{{WikiProject Popular culture}}
{{WikiProject Popular culture}}
{{WPIRELAND}}
}}
}}



Revision as of 14:31, 1 September 2013

Untitled

Well, I don't have a subscription so I can't read the whole article but the New Your Times archive[1] corroborates at least the core truth of the murder plot. As for the validity of such details as the various poisons, I'm sure the story has been embellished over time. And then there is the ridiculous addition at the end of an exhumed Malloy still being alive that is pure fantasy; even according to the listed source. Ridiculous.69.148.171.32 (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't believe many of these stories are true... although they still might be worth documenting as stories. What are the sources?

Christ, there's books, programs and plays based on it, I think we can presume it's true. Troubleshooter 21:59, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So now anything anyone says is true, so long as other people agree? You don't happen to be religious, do you?Vegetable4 22:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The original writer of this article almost certainly got his/her information from one of the People's Almanac books written by David Wallenchinsky and co. The latest one, I think, was The People's Almanac Presents: The 20th Century and Malloy's story is found in the chapter on death under "Famous Non-Survivors." At least, *I've* never seen it mentioned in any other book, etc.--Massofspikes 19:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is there a link to Rasputin? Other than the fact that he was, in theory, also very hard to kill off, they're entirely unrelated. What gives? 66.159.76.67 04:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because he was very hard to kill off, that is the whole reason, not many people could survive multiple murder attempts.Davie4264 20:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific discussion of this?

On reading the article, the whole story comes across sounding like an urban legend. Perhaps there could be a section on possible scientific causes of the phenomena he displayed, assuming of course that the story is true? That might lend the article a bit more credibility.FlamingSilmaril 13:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Credibility

Come on, this needs more sources for such surprising claims. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.102.197 (talk) 22:50, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]