Talk:Regimen Animarum: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m →‎top: add WikiProject (and cat) tags
→‎top: adding paid connected contributor templates for pages I've contributed to per community request
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Connected contributor (paid)
|User1=Rachel Helps (BYU)|U1-employer=BYU|U1-EH=yes|U1-otherlinks=COI declarations [[User:Rachel Helps (BYU)#Conflict of Interest statements|on userpage]]}}
{{DYK talk|13 June|2016|entry= ... that the '''''[[Regimen Animarum]]''''' ''(pictured)'' is a [[Latin]] [[codex]] created in 1343 that contains the Office of the Feast of [[Corpus Christi (feast)|Corpus Christi]]?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Regimen Animarum}}
{{DYK talk|13 June|2016|entry= ... that the '''''[[Regimen Animarum]]''''' ''(pictured)'' is a [[Latin]] [[codex]] created in 1343 that contains the Office of the Feast of [[Corpus Christi (feast)|Corpus Christi]]?|nompage=Template:Did you know nominations/Regimen Animarum}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=

Revision as of 17:49, 24 April 2024

Article poorly written and includes incorrect information

The majority of sentences begin with 'it', which is poor writing, and includes multiple citations from the same source. Also states that the codex was written in 1343 after the Hundred Years War, but the war hadn't yet begun in 1343! Needs somebody knowledgeable to fix this up, otherwise I suggest it be deleted.202.215.75.38 (talk) 03:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some very dubious claims from the article, a pity that this kind of nonsense gets put on the main page but the subject is notable so not ready for deletion. Further rewriting and removal of information may be necessary though (e.g. the line about the Reformation). Fram (talk) 07:17, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for fixing those errors! Neither I nor my student is very knowledgeable about medieval history, but we wanted to get the ball rolling for such a notable subject. If you have suggestions for other secondary sources about the Regimen Animarum I'm happy to add them. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 15:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]