User talk:Riccarda04: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
CorenSearchBot (talk | contribs)
Notifying user of possible copyvio on Daniela Alves
Redvers (talk | contribs)
di-no source-notice
Line 1: Line 1:

'''Welcome!'''
'''Welcome!'''


Line 47: Line 46:


This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 21:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on [[User talk:Coren|the maintainer's talk page]]. [[User:CorenSearchBot|CorenSearchBot]] ([[User talk:CorenSearchBot|talk]]) 21:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

==File source problem with File:Daniela Bobadilla.jpg==
[[File:Copyright-problem.svg|64px|left]]
Thank you for uploading '''[[:File:Daniela Bobadilla.jpg]]'''. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the [[copyright]] status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [{{fullurl:Special:Log|type=upload&user=Riccarda04}} in your upload log]. '''Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged''' per Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F4|F4]]. If the image is [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] and [[Wikipedia:Non-free content|non-free]], '''the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)''' per [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] criterion [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F7|F7]]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the [[Wikipedia:Media copyright questions|Media copyright questions page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-no source-notice --> <small>[[User:Redvers/SN|⇦]]'''[[User talk:Redvers|REDVƎRS]]'''[[User:Redvers/SN|⇨]]</small> 14:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:51, 7 June 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Riccarda04, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Danielle, Daniela, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! noq (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Danielle, Daniela

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Danielle, Daniela. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Danielle. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Danielle - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. noq (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have used cut/paste to move the text from Daniela to Daniela Alves Lima. This is not the correct way to rename an article as it loses the edit history of the original. I have asked an administrator to review these and sort out the moves in the correct manner. noq (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Daniela. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I read about this situation at the administrators' noticeboard. I don't believe this is vandalism; it seems that you were attempting to create a "disambiguation" page for the name Daniela. That seems like a perfectly valid goal.
However, there are some issues with it. As noted above, material cannot be copied from one Wikipedia page to another in the way that you did, as this creates a copyright problem. Our contributors do not release their material into public domain, but retain the rights to attribution. There is more information on this at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. As advised above, a change of this sort should be accomplished through a page move, rather than copying and pasting the content into a new article. When you can't move the page yourself, there are processes to get it moved, as explained at that linked page.
There can also be issues if people objects to the change, as seems to be the case here. In that case, you should begin by discussing it at the talk page for Talk:Daniela. If consensus develops among those interested in the article (or if nobody objects), the page can be moved and the disambiguation page created, similar to the one existing at Danielle. If they do not agree, you can pursue dispute resolution to achieve some kind of consensus. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Daniela. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. HJ Mitchell | fancy a chat? 22:37, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daniela, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. As noted above, if you think the page should be moved, please discuss the issue at Talk:Daniela. However, do not blank the text currently at Daniela. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:38, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Daniela has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. allennames 21:29, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Daniela Alves, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Daniela. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Daniela Bobadilla.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Daniela Bobadilla.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. REDVƎRS 14:51, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]